SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Top US General Makes Unannounced Trip to Iraq
Gen. Martin Dempsey to assess US-led strikes against ISIS as military presence grows
Nov 15, 2014
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, landed in Iraq on Saturday to discuss ongoing US-led strikes in the region, only two days after he told the U.S. House Armed Services Committee that he was considering deploying combat troops in areas under attack by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
The trip, which was unannounced, was Dempsey's first visit to Iraq since the U.S. began its offensive against ISIS. Shortly before landing in Baghdad, the general told Reuters that he "want[ed] to get a sense from our side about how our contribution is going."
"I want to hear from those actually doing the lifting that they've the resources they need and the proper guidance to use those resources," Dempsey added.
The general's spokesman, Air Force Col. Ed Thomas, said the "primary purpose of his visit is to get a firsthand look at the situation in Iraq, receive briefings, and get better sense of how the campaign is progressing."
Dempsey's visit comes a week after President Barack Obama authorized sending up to 1,500 more forces to Iraq, bringing the total amount of troops in Iraq to 3,000, who are due to start training and advising Iraqi and Kurdish forces.
Obama has promised that U.S. involvement in the region will be limited to advising and training, without "troops on the ground," but critics note that the military has already started combat in Iraq.
"If there are US troops on the front lines in al-Anbar, where ISIL has been expanding its reach in recent months, then unfortunately there are likely to be US casualties," Juan Cole said last week. "These are boots on the ground, even if there are not combat platoons going into battle by themselves."
Associated Press notes:
The Iraqi military and security forces, trained by the U.S. at the cost of billions of dollars, melted away in the face of ISIS' stunning offensive this summer, when they captured most of northern and western Iraq, including the country's second-largest city, Mosul.
Dempsey told the committee on Thursday that any effort to win back Mosul and other areas, including those along the border of Syria, would require more complex operations--and perhaps on-the-ground involvement of American troops.
"I'm not predicting at this point that I would recommend that those forces in Mosul and along the border would need to be accompanied by U.S. forces, but we're certainly considering it," he said.
State television news agencies reported on Saturday that Iraqi troops had recaptured a strategic oil refinery town in what they said was the army's biggest victory against ISIS yet. But unrest continued elsewhere on Saturday, as two car bombs exploded minutes apart near a checkpoint north of Baghdad that was staffed by army soldiers and security forces, authorities said.
AP writes: "The attack killed nine people and wounded 32, according to police and hospital officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief journalists."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, landed in Iraq on Saturday to discuss ongoing US-led strikes in the region, only two days after he told the U.S. House Armed Services Committee that he was considering deploying combat troops in areas under attack by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
The trip, which was unannounced, was Dempsey's first visit to Iraq since the U.S. began its offensive against ISIS. Shortly before landing in Baghdad, the general told Reuters that he "want[ed] to get a sense from our side about how our contribution is going."
"I want to hear from those actually doing the lifting that they've the resources they need and the proper guidance to use those resources," Dempsey added.
The general's spokesman, Air Force Col. Ed Thomas, said the "primary purpose of his visit is to get a firsthand look at the situation in Iraq, receive briefings, and get better sense of how the campaign is progressing."
Dempsey's visit comes a week after President Barack Obama authorized sending up to 1,500 more forces to Iraq, bringing the total amount of troops in Iraq to 3,000, who are due to start training and advising Iraqi and Kurdish forces.
Obama has promised that U.S. involvement in the region will be limited to advising and training, without "troops on the ground," but critics note that the military has already started combat in Iraq.
"If there are US troops on the front lines in al-Anbar, where ISIL has been expanding its reach in recent months, then unfortunately there are likely to be US casualties," Juan Cole said last week. "These are boots on the ground, even if there are not combat platoons going into battle by themselves."
Associated Press notes:
The Iraqi military and security forces, trained by the U.S. at the cost of billions of dollars, melted away in the face of ISIS' stunning offensive this summer, when they captured most of northern and western Iraq, including the country's second-largest city, Mosul.
Dempsey told the committee on Thursday that any effort to win back Mosul and other areas, including those along the border of Syria, would require more complex operations--and perhaps on-the-ground involvement of American troops.
"I'm not predicting at this point that I would recommend that those forces in Mosul and along the border would need to be accompanied by U.S. forces, but we're certainly considering it," he said.
State television news agencies reported on Saturday that Iraqi troops had recaptured a strategic oil refinery town in what they said was the army's biggest victory against ISIS yet. But unrest continued elsewhere on Saturday, as two car bombs exploded minutes apart near a checkpoint north of Baghdad that was staffed by army soldiers and security forces, authorities said.
AP writes: "The attack killed nine people and wounded 32, according to police and hospital officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief journalists."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, landed in Iraq on Saturday to discuss ongoing US-led strikes in the region, only two days after he told the U.S. House Armed Services Committee that he was considering deploying combat troops in areas under attack by the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
The trip, which was unannounced, was Dempsey's first visit to Iraq since the U.S. began its offensive against ISIS. Shortly before landing in Baghdad, the general told Reuters that he "want[ed] to get a sense from our side about how our contribution is going."
"I want to hear from those actually doing the lifting that they've the resources they need and the proper guidance to use those resources," Dempsey added.
The general's spokesman, Air Force Col. Ed Thomas, said the "primary purpose of his visit is to get a firsthand look at the situation in Iraq, receive briefings, and get better sense of how the campaign is progressing."
Dempsey's visit comes a week after President Barack Obama authorized sending up to 1,500 more forces to Iraq, bringing the total amount of troops in Iraq to 3,000, who are due to start training and advising Iraqi and Kurdish forces.
Obama has promised that U.S. involvement in the region will be limited to advising and training, without "troops on the ground," but critics note that the military has already started combat in Iraq.
"If there are US troops on the front lines in al-Anbar, where ISIL has been expanding its reach in recent months, then unfortunately there are likely to be US casualties," Juan Cole said last week. "These are boots on the ground, even if there are not combat platoons going into battle by themselves."
Associated Press notes:
The Iraqi military and security forces, trained by the U.S. at the cost of billions of dollars, melted away in the face of ISIS' stunning offensive this summer, when they captured most of northern and western Iraq, including the country's second-largest city, Mosul.
Dempsey told the committee on Thursday that any effort to win back Mosul and other areas, including those along the border of Syria, would require more complex operations--and perhaps on-the-ground involvement of American troops.
"I'm not predicting at this point that I would recommend that those forces in Mosul and along the border would need to be accompanied by U.S. forces, but we're certainly considering it," he said.
State television news agencies reported on Saturday that Iraqi troops had recaptured a strategic oil refinery town in what they said was the army's biggest victory against ISIS yet. But unrest continued elsewhere on Saturday, as two car bombs exploded minutes apart near a checkpoint north of Baghdad that was staffed by army soldiers and security forces, authorities said.
AP writes: "The attack killed nine people and wounded 32, according to police and hospital officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to brief journalists."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.