

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Critics of fracking in the United Kingdom assailed the British government on Monday for their heavy-handed censorship of an internal government report on the impacts of the shale oil and gas drilling technique.
The draft government report, titled Shale Gas Rural Economy Impacts, published by the Department of Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (or Defra), has information redacted 62 times in just 13 pages.
The censored sections include eight from the executive summary, four from the chapter on economic impacts, four from the section on social impacts, and 17 from the analysis of the impact on local services. Though the report still contains information regarding the negative impact on house prices in fracked areas, there is almost no visible mention of the environmental impacts of fracking or fracking waste.
Following the release of the censored report, Green Party Member of Parliament (MP) Caroline Lucas told BBC's Radio 4 Today that the "number of redactions would be almost comical if it weren't so concerning."
"I think the only conclusion you can draw by looking at this report is that the government has something to hide and I think we need to know what it is," Lucas said.
"The issue is, the government is trying to railroad through fracking in the face of huge public opposition," she continued.
"The issue is, the government is trying to railroad through fracking in the face of huge public opposition."
--Caroline Lucas, Green Party MP
Roughly 1,000 protesters are expected to set up camp at a drilling operation run by UK fracking giant Cuadrilla outside Blackpool in north west England this week following the success of protests last summer which shut down Cuadrilla's drilling operations in Balcombe.
And in June, widespread outcry and protests followed the announcement by Prime Minister David Cameron that the government was advancing a controversial fracking law which permits drilling for shale gas under people's homes without permission.
The censored report was released in response to a request under the Environmental Information Regulations, which grant similar access to government information as the Freedom of Information Act or FOIA. In a letter accompanying the report, dated July 28, a Defra spokesperson--whose name was also crossed out in the letter--writes that the information is withheld because it "relates to the formation of government policy," and that full disclosure of the "potential impacts and scenarios around the development of the shale gas industry [...] could close down discussion."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Critics of fracking in the United Kingdom assailed the British government on Monday for their heavy-handed censorship of an internal government report on the impacts of the shale oil and gas drilling technique.
The draft government report, titled Shale Gas Rural Economy Impacts, published by the Department of Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (or Defra), has information redacted 62 times in just 13 pages.
The censored sections include eight from the executive summary, four from the chapter on economic impacts, four from the section on social impacts, and 17 from the analysis of the impact on local services. Though the report still contains information regarding the negative impact on house prices in fracked areas, there is almost no visible mention of the environmental impacts of fracking or fracking waste.
Following the release of the censored report, Green Party Member of Parliament (MP) Caroline Lucas told BBC's Radio 4 Today that the "number of redactions would be almost comical if it weren't so concerning."
"I think the only conclusion you can draw by looking at this report is that the government has something to hide and I think we need to know what it is," Lucas said.
"The issue is, the government is trying to railroad through fracking in the face of huge public opposition," she continued.
"The issue is, the government is trying to railroad through fracking in the face of huge public opposition."
--Caroline Lucas, Green Party MP
Roughly 1,000 protesters are expected to set up camp at a drilling operation run by UK fracking giant Cuadrilla outside Blackpool in north west England this week following the success of protests last summer which shut down Cuadrilla's drilling operations in Balcombe.
And in June, widespread outcry and protests followed the announcement by Prime Minister David Cameron that the government was advancing a controversial fracking law which permits drilling for shale gas under people's homes without permission.
The censored report was released in response to a request under the Environmental Information Regulations, which grant similar access to government information as the Freedom of Information Act or FOIA. In a letter accompanying the report, dated July 28, a Defra spokesperson--whose name was also crossed out in the letter--writes that the information is withheld because it "relates to the formation of government policy," and that full disclosure of the "potential impacts and scenarios around the development of the shale gas industry [...] could close down discussion."
Critics of fracking in the United Kingdom assailed the British government on Monday for their heavy-handed censorship of an internal government report on the impacts of the shale oil and gas drilling technique.
The draft government report, titled Shale Gas Rural Economy Impacts, published by the Department of Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (or Defra), has information redacted 62 times in just 13 pages.
The censored sections include eight from the executive summary, four from the chapter on economic impacts, four from the section on social impacts, and 17 from the analysis of the impact on local services. Though the report still contains information regarding the negative impact on house prices in fracked areas, there is almost no visible mention of the environmental impacts of fracking or fracking waste.
Following the release of the censored report, Green Party Member of Parliament (MP) Caroline Lucas told BBC's Radio 4 Today that the "number of redactions would be almost comical if it weren't so concerning."
"I think the only conclusion you can draw by looking at this report is that the government has something to hide and I think we need to know what it is," Lucas said.
"The issue is, the government is trying to railroad through fracking in the face of huge public opposition," she continued.
"The issue is, the government is trying to railroad through fracking in the face of huge public opposition."
--Caroline Lucas, Green Party MP
Roughly 1,000 protesters are expected to set up camp at a drilling operation run by UK fracking giant Cuadrilla outside Blackpool in north west England this week following the success of protests last summer which shut down Cuadrilla's drilling operations in Balcombe.
And in June, widespread outcry and protests followed the announcement by Prime Minister David Cameron that the government was advancing a controversial fracking law which permits drilling for shale gas under people's homes without permission.
The censored report was released in response to a request under the Environmental Information Regulations, which grant similar access to government information as the Freedom of Information Act or FOIA. In a letter accompanying the report, dated July 28, a Defra spokesperson--whose name was also crossed out in the letter--writes that the information is withheld because it "relates to the formation of government policy," and that full disclosure of the "potential impacts and scenarios around the development of the shale gas industry [...] could close down discussion."