

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
TAMPA, Florida - The two U.S. presidential candidates have both expressed support for the death penalty, but abolitionist activists are hoping that pragmatism and a swing to the Democrats in the state elections in November will inevitably edge the country along the road to total abolition whoever wins the presidency.
John McCain and Barack Obama have told voters they want the death penalty for convicted child murderers and rapists. They have also called for the death penalty for Osama bin Laden, the alleged mastermind of the Sep. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the U.S.
'Barack Obama's position is clear. By any means, bin Laden has committed heinous crimes that deserve the death penalty,' Moira Mack, of the Obama presidential campaign staff, told IPS.
McCain has also said that he wanted the death penalty for bin Laden, if tried and found guilty in a court of law.
Anti-death penalty activists note McCain's more outspoken support of the punishment goes back many years. McCain has frequently called for more executions at a federal level.
The last federal execution was in 2003, bringing to three the number since the late 1960s.
Most crimes in the U.S. are prosecuted at a state rather than federal level. But there are now 51 people on the federal death row in Terre Haute, Indiana.
Rights activists have called for a moratorium on federal executions, citing racism. A Justice Department study in 2000 found that in 80 percent of cases where prosecutors sought the death penalty, the defendant was a member of an ethnic minority.
But although McCain's support of the death penalty at federal level was a 'long-standing policy', he would not impose federal standards on the death penalty states, Taylor Griffin, McCain's spokesman, told IPS.
'Each state must decide whether they want it. Ultimately, this is an administrative issue, rather than an issue for the campaign,' Griffin said.
In January 2000, McCain called for the death penalty to be generally used more frequently. Six years before, he voted in favour of a successful motion that prevented death row inmates anywhere from using sentencing statistics to argue that they had been racially discriminated against. African Americans make up 12 percent of the U.S. population, but 43 percent of the 3,200 on death row.
Richard Dieter, executive director of the rights group Death Penalty Information Centre, said he did not believe that the opinions of the two candidates on the death penalty would play a role in the presidential elections.
'Americans vote on larger issues -- the economy, foreign policy, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq,' he said.
However, he added, 'I think the public is moving significantly away from the death penalty, and that is going to happen no matter who is elected president.'
Obama was likely to be more sympathetic to those pressing for abolition, he suggested.
'Obama sees that there are problems with the death penalty. When he was a local politician in Illinois, he saw that there were problems with such things as police interrogations and tried to address these problems,' Dieter said.
Diana Rust-Tierney, executive director of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (NCADP), told IPS that whoever won the presidency would take a pragmatic stand on the death penalty.
'We do not put policy-makers in boxes or categories, especially presidential candidates. We think there is too great a risk of error if you do that. People's perceptions of the death penalty change over time,' she said. 'The question is not whether or not we are going to continue dragging along this non-working policy, but whether we are going to re-evaluate this.'
People all over the U.S. were starting 'to concentrate on answering the question: 'Is this in our best interest?''
'I am optimistic that we are going to continue to see changes in America regarding death penalty policies,' she said, adding that these would be carried through at a state level.
Dieter agreed that the future of the death penalty would be decided by politicians in each of the remaining 36 states out of 50 which allow the practice.
'State legislatures have more direct effect on the death penalty than the president of the U.S.,' he said.
He agreed that a large liberal Democratic Party win in the state legislatures in November might eventually result in abolition bills.
'That is a possibility. Then we would start to see some real changes,' Dieter said. 'But since it often takes months or even years for such legislation to pass, it would still be a long time before we would see such states abolishing the death penalty.'
According to the DPIC, there were 42 executions in the U.S. in 2007, all of them in southern states. Twenty-six of these executions were in Texas.
Since the lifting of a seven-month unofficial moratorium in April while the Supreme Court ruled on challenges to lethal injections, there have been 20 executions.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
TAMPA, Florida - The two U.S. presidential candidates have both expressed support for the death penalty, but abolitionist activists are hoping that pragmatism and a swing to the Democrats in the state elections in November will inevitably edge the country along the road to total abolition whoever wins the presidency.
John McCain and Barack Obama have told voters they want the death penalty for convicted child murderers and rapists. They have also called for the death penalty for Osama bin Laden, the alleged mastermind of the Sep. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the U.S.
'Barack Obama's position is clear. By any means, bin Laden has committed heinous crimes that deserve the death penalty,' Moira Mack, of the Obama presidential campaign staff, told IPS.
McCain has also said that he wanted the death penalty for bin Laden, if tried and found guilty in a court of law.
Anti-death penalty activists note McCain's more outspoken support of the punishment goes back many years. McCain has frequently called for more executions at a federal level.
The last federal execution was in 2003, bringing to three the number since the late 1960s.
Most crimes in the U.S. are prosecuted at a state rather than federal level. But there are now 51 people on the federal death row in Terre Haute, Indiana.
Rights activists have called for a moratorium on federal executions, citing racism. A Justice Department study in 2000 found that in 80 percent of cases where prosecutors sought the death penalty, the defendant was a member of an ethnic minority.
But although McCain's support of the death penalty at federal level was a 'long-standing policy', he would not impose federal standards on the death penalty states, Taylor Griffin, McCain's spokesman, told IPS.
'Each state must decide whether they want it. Ultimately, this is an administrative issue, rather than an issue for the campaign,' Griffin said.
In January 2000, McCain called for the death penalty to be generally used more frequently. Six years before, he voted in favour of a successful motion that prevented death row inmates anywhere from using sentencing statistics to argue that they had been racially discriminated against. African Americans make up 12 percent of the U.S. population, but 43 percent of the 3,200 on death row.
Richard Dieter, executive director of the rights group Death Penalty Information Centre, said he did not believe that the opinions of the two candidates on the death penalty would play a role in the presidential elections.
'Americans vote on larger issues -- the economy, foreign policy, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq,' he said.
However, he added, 'I think the public is moving significantly away from the death penalty, and that is going to happen no matter who is elected president.'
Obama was likely to be more sympathetic to those pressing for abolition, he suggested.
'Obama sees that there are problems with the death penalty. When he was a local politician in Illinois, he saw that there were problems with such things as police interrogations and tried to address these problems,' Dieter said.
Diana Rust-Tierney, executive director of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (NCADP), told IPS that whoever won the presidency would take a pragmatic stand on the death penalty.
'We do not put policy-makers in boxes or categories, especially presidential candidates. We think there is too great a risk of error if you do that. People's perceptions of the death penalty change over time,' she said. 'The question is not whether or not we are going to continue dragging along this non-working policy, but whether we are going to re-evaluate this.'
People all over the U.S. were starting 'to concentrate on answering the question: 'Is this in our best interest?''
'I am optimistic that we are going to continue to see changes in America regarding death penalty policies,' she said, adding that these would be carried through at a state level.
Dieter agreed that the future of the death penalty would be decided by politicians in each of the remaining 36 states out of 50 which allow the practice.
'State legislatures have more direct effect on the death penalty than the president of the U.S.,' he said.
He agreed that a large liberal Democratic Party win in the state legislatures in November might eventually result in abolition bills.
'That is a possibility. Then we would start to see some real changes,' Dieter said. 'But since it often takes months or even years for such legislation to pass, it would still be a long time before we would see such states abolishing the death penalty.'
According to the DPIC, there were 42 executions in the U.S. in 2007, all of them in southern states. Twenty-six of these executions were in Texas.
Since the lifting of a seven-month unofficial moratorium in April while the Supreme Court ruled on challenges to lethal injections, there have been 20 executions.
TAMPA, Florida - The two U.S. presidential candidates have both expressed support for the death penalty, but abolitionist activists are hoping that pragmatism and a swing to the Democrats in the state elections in November will inevitably edge the country along the road to total abolition whoever wins the presidency.
John McCain and Barack Obama have told voters they want the death penalty for convicted child murderers and rapists. They have also called for the death penalty for Osama bin Laden, the alleged mastermind of the Sep. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the U.S.
'Barack Obama's position is clear. By any means, bin Laden has committed heinous crimes that deserve the death penalty,' Moira Mack, of the Obama presidential campaign staff, told IPS.
McCain has also said that he wanted the death penalty for bin Laden, if tried and found guilty in a court of law.
Anti-death penalty activists note McCain's more outspoken support of the punishment goes back many years. McCain has frequently called for more executions at a federal level.
The last federal execution was in 2003, bringing to three the number since the late 1960s.
Most crimes in the U.S. are prosecuted at a state rather than federal level. But there are now 51 people on the federal death row in Terre Haute, Indiana.
Rights activists have called for a moratorium on federal executions, citing racism. A Justice Department study in 2000 found that in 80 percent of cases where prosecutors sought the death penalty, the defendant was a member of an ethnic minority.
But although McCain's support of the death penalty at federal level was a 'long-standing policy', he would not impose federal standards on the death penalty states, Taylor Griffin, McCain's spokesman, told IPS.
'Each state must decide whether they want it. Ultimately, this is an administrative issue, rather than an issue for the campaign,' Griffin said.
In January 2000, McCain called for the death penalty to be generally used more frequently. Six years before, he voted in favour of a successful motion that prevented death row inmates anywhere from using sentencing statistics to argue that they had been racially discriminated against. African Americans make up 12 percent of the U.S. population, but 43 percent of the 3,200 on death row.
Richard Dieter, executive director of the rights group Death Penalty Information Centre, said he did not believe that the opinions of the two candidates on the death penalty would play a role in the presidential elections.
'Americans vote on larger issues -- the economy, foreign policy, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq,' he said.
However, he added, 'I think the public is moving significantly away from the death penalty, and that is going to happen no matter who is elected president.'
Obama was likely to be more sympathetic to those pressing for abolition, he suggested.
'Obama sees that there are problems with the death penalty. When he was a local politician in Illinois, he saw that there were problems with such things as police interrogations and tried to address these problems,' Dieter said.
Diana Rust-Tierney, executive director of the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (NCADP), told IPS that whoever won the presidency would take a pragmatic stand on the death penalty.
'We do not put policy-makers in boxes or categories, especially presidential candidates. We think there is too great a risk of error if you do that. People's perceptions of the death penalty change over time,' she said. 'The question is not whether or not we are going to continue dragging along this non-working policy, but whether we are going to re-evaluate this.'
People all over the U.S. were starting 'to concentrate on answering the question: 'Is this in our best interest?''
'I am optimistic that we are going to continue to see changes in America regarding death penalty policies,' she said, adding that these would be carried through at a state level.
Dieter agreed that the future of the death penalty would be decided by politicians in each of the remaining 36 states out of 50 which allow the practice.
'State legislatures have more direct effect on the death penalty than the president of the U.S.,' he said.
He agreed that a large liberal Democratic Party win in the state legislatures in November might eventually result in abolition bills.
'That is a possibility. Then we would start to see some real changes,' Dieter said. 'But since it often takes months or even years for such legislation to pass, it would still be a long time before we would see such states abolishing the death penalty.'
According to the DPIC, there were 42 executions in the U.S. in 2007, all of them in southern states. Twenty-six of these executions were in Texas.
Since the lifting of a seven-month unofficial moratorium in April while the Supreme Court ruled on challenges to lethal injections, there have been 20 executions.