A mobile billboard calling for higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy depicts an image of billionaire businessman Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, near the U.S. Capitol on May 17, 2021. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Mark Pocan's 100% for Taxing the Billionaire Class
Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, who is worth $181.3 billion, has been paying 0.98%.
When a business publication posted an article several years ago called "Weird Things Top Billionaires Have in Common" -- eg., less likely to wear glasses, more likely to be bald -- Rep. Mark Pocan responded on social media with an addition to the list: "Another weird thing billionaires have in common? Not paying their taxes."
The progressive Democratic representative from the town of Vermont makes a good point.
Elon Musk, the ultra-billionaire and amateur rocketeer who is so rich ($273.6 billion) that he's angling to buy Twitter on a $43-billion lark, has enjoyed a tax rate of 3.27%, according to a 2021 ProPublica report.
Amazon's Jeff Bezos, who is worth $181.3 billion, has been paying 0.98%.
For Americans who just want their fair share on April 15, that's a jarring reminder that our tax system is set up to make the very wealthy very much wealthier -- while the rest of us shoulder the burden for keeping the federal government afloat. Pocan's got an idea for making things fairer. For years, the congressman has responded to reports of growing economic inequality in America with a three-word mantra: "Tax the rich!"
Now, Pocan's got a president on his side.
President Joe Biden has proposed a billionaire minimum income tax, which the White House argues will eliminate "the inefficient sheltering of income for decades or generations," a White House fact sheet explains. "In 2021 alone, America's more than 700 billionaires saw their wealth increase by $1 trillion, yet in a typical year, billionaires like these would pay just 8% of their total realized and unrealized income in taxes. A firefighter or teacher can pay double that tax rate."
The proposal seeks to address that reality by requiring households with assets valued in excess of $100 million to provide the Internal Revenue Service with annual accountings of how those fortunes increased. Billionaires and uber-millionaires who paid less than 20% on their gains would have to write a check to the IRS to get their rate of payment up to 20%.
That's not a "wealth tax" in the sense that Pocan and Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have championed. But arguing about semantics misses the point. The tax targets the very rich with a very necessary income tax adjustment.
Former Wisconsin legislative aide Amy Hanauer, who now leads the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, sums up the argument for the new tax, saying:
"Creating a billionaire minimum income tax would ensure for the first time that the very wealthiest people in this country, those who have gained the most from our economic system, would finally begin to pay tax on their full income, just as regular working people do on their earnings. It would affect only the richest .01% of households and it would raise hundreds of billions of dollars for the essential priorities that face all of us as a nation. It will help us address the soaring inequality we see in this country and make the tax code fairer, more adequate, and more sustainable. This plan offers a transformational and long-overdue change."
Pocan puts things more succinctly: "Just took a DNA test, turns out I'm 100% in favor of taxing the rich."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
When a business publication posted an article several years ago called "Weird Things Top Billionaires Have in Common" -- eg., less likely to wear glasses, more likely to be bald -- Rep. Mark Pocan responded on social media with an addition to the list: "Another weird thing billionaires have in common? Not paying their taxes."
The progressive Democratic representative from the town of Vermont makes a good point.
Elon Musk, the ultra-billionaire and amateur rocketeer who is so rich ($273.6 billion) that he's angling to buy Twitter on a $43-billion lark, has enjoyed a tax rate of 3.27%, according to a 2021 ProPublica report.
Amazon's Jeff Bezos, who is worth $181.3 billion, has been paying 0.98%.
For Americans who just want their fair share on April 15, that's a jarring reminder that our tax system is set up to make the very wealthy very much wealthier -- while the rest of us shoulder the burden for keeping the federal government afloat. Pocan's got an idea for making things fairer. For years, the congressman has responded to reports of growing economic inequality in America with a three-word mantra: "Tax the rich!"
Now, Pocan's got a president on his side.
President Joe Biden has proposed a billionaire minimum income tax, which the White House argues will eliminate "the inefficient sheltering of income for decades or generations," a White House fact sheet explains. "In 2021 alone, America's more than 700 billionaires saw their wealth increase by $1 trillion, yet in a typical year, billionaires like these would pay just 8% of their total realized and unrealized income in taxes. A firefighter or teacher can pay double that tax rate."
The proposal seeks to address that reality by requiring households with assets valued in excess of $100 million to provide the Internal Revenue Service with annual accountings of how those fortunes increased. Billionaires and uber-millionaires who paid less than 20% on their gains would have to write a check to the IRS to get their rate of payment up to 20%.
That's not a "wealth tax" in the sense that Pocan and Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have championed. But arguing about semantics misses the point. The tax targets the very rich with a very necessary income tax adjustment.
Former Wisconsin legislative aide Amy Hanauer, who now leads the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, sums up the argument for the new tax, saying:
"Creating a billionaire minimum income tax would ensure for the first time that the very wealthiest people in this country, those who have gained the most from our economic system, would finally begin to pay tax on their full income, just as regular working people do on their earnings. It would affect only the richest .01% of households and it would raise hundreds of billions of dollars for the essential priorities that face all of us as a nation. It will help us address the soaring inequality we see in this country and make the tax code fairer, more adequate, and more sustainable. This plan offers a transformational and long-overdue change."
Pocan puts things more succinctly: "Just took a DNA test, turns out I'm 100% in favor of taxing the rich."
When a business publication posted an article several years ago called "Weird Things Top Billionaires Have in Common" -- eg., less likely to wear glasses, more likely to be bald -- Rep. Mark Pocan responded on social media with an addition to the list: "Another weird thing billionaires have in common? Not paying their taxes."
The progressive Democratic representative from the town of Vermont makes a good point.
Elon Musk, the ultra-billionaire and amateur rocketeer who is so rich ($273.6 billion) that he's angling to buy Twitter on a $43-billion lark, has enjoyed a tax rate of 3.27%, according to a 2021 ProPublica report.
Amazon's Jeff Bezos, who is worth $181.3 billion, has been paying 0.98%.
For Americans who just want their fair share on April 15, that's a jarring reminder that our tax system is set up to make the very wealthy very much wealthier -- while the rest of us shoulder the burden for keeping the federal government afloat. Pocan's got an idea for making things fairer. For years, the congressman has responded to reports of growing economic inequality in America with a three-word mantra: "Tax the rich!"
Now, Pocan's got a president on his side.
President Joe Biden has proposed a billionaire minimum income tax, which the White House argues will eliminate "the inefficient sheltering of income for decades or generations," a White House fact sheet explains. "In 2021 alone, America's more than 700 billionaires saw their wealth increase by $1 trillion, yet in a typical year, billionaires like these would pay just 8% of their total realized and unrealized income in taxes. A firefighter or teacher can pay double that tax rate."
The proposal seeks to address that reality by requiring households with assets valued in excess of $100 million to provide the Internal Revenue Service with annual accountings of how those fortunes increased. Billionaires and uber-millionaires who paid less than 20% on their gains would have to write a check to the IRS to get their rate of payment up to 20%.
That's not a "wealth tax" in the sense that Pocan and Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have championed. But arguing about semantics misses the point. The tax targets the very rich with a very necessary income tax adjustment.
Former Wisconsin legislative aide Amy Hanauer, who now leads the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, sums up the argument for the new tax, saying:
"Creating a billionaire minimum income tax would ensure for the first time that the very wealthiest people in this country, those who have gained the most from our economic system, would finally begin to pay tax on their full income, just as regular working people do on their earnings. It would affect only the richest .01% of households and it would raise hundreds of billions of dollars for the essential priorities that face all of us as a nation. It will help us address the soaring inequality we see in this country and make the tax code fairer, more adequate, and more sustainable. This plan offers a transformational and long-overdue change."
Pocan puts things more succinctly: "Just took a DNA test, turns out I'm 100% in favor of taxing the rich."