A mobile billboard calling for higher taxes on the ultra-wealthy depicts an image of billionaire businessman Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon, near the U.S. Capitol on May 17, 2021. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
https://captimes.com/opinion/john-nichols/opinion-mark-pocan-s-100-for-taxing-t…
Apr 17, 2022
When a business publication posted an article several years ago called "Weird Things Top Billionaires Have in Common" -- eg., less likely to wear glasses, more likely to be bald -- Rep. Mark Pocan responded on social media with an addition to the list: "Another weird thing billionaires have in common? Not paying their taxes."
The progressive Democratic representative from the town of Vermont makes a good point.
Elon Musk, the ultra-billionaire and amateur rocketeer who is so rich ($273.6 billion) that he's angling to buy Twitter on a $43-billion lark, has enjoyed a tax rate of 3.27%, according to a 2021 ProPublica report.
Amazon's Jeff Bezos, who is worth $181.3 billion, has been paying 0.98%.
For Americans who just want their fair share on April 15, that's a jarring reminder that our tax system is set up to make the very wealthy very much wealthier -- while the rest of us shoulder the burden for keeping the federal government afloat. Pocan's got an idea for making things fairer. For years, the congressman has responded to reports of growing economic inequality in America with a three-word mantra: "Tax the rich!"
Now, Pocan's got a president on his side.
President Joe Biden has proposed a billionaire minimum income tax, which the White House argues will eliminate "the inefficient sheltering of income for decades or generations," a White House fact sheet explains. "In 2021 alone, America's more than 700 billionaires saw their wealth increase by $1 trillion, yet in a typical year, billionaires like these would pay just 8% of their total realized and unrealized income in taxes. A firefighter or teacher can pay double that tax rate."
The proposal seeks to address that reality by requiring households with assets valued in excess of $100 million to provide the Internal Revenue Service with annual accountings of how those fortunes increased. Billionaires and uber-millionaires who paid less than 20% on their gains would have to write a check to the IRS to get their rate of payment up to 20%.
That's not a "wealth tax" in the sense that Pocan and Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have championed. But arguing about semantics misses the point. The tax targets the very rich with a very necessary income tax adjustment.
Former Wisconsin legislative aide Amy Hanauer, who now leads the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, sums up the argument for the new tax, saying:
"Creating a billionaire minimum income tax would ensure for the first time that the very wealthiest people in this country, those who have gained the most from our economic system, would finally begin to pay tax on their full income, just as regular working people do on their earnings. It would affect only the richest .01% of households and it would raise hundreds of billions of dollars for the essential priorities that face all of us as a nation. It will help us address the soaring inequality we see in this country and make the tax code fairer, more adequate, and more sustainable. This plan offers a transformational and long-overdue change."
Pocan puts things more succinctly: "Just took a DNA test, turns out I'm 100% in favor of taxing the rich."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 The Capital Times
John Nichols
John Nichols is Washington correspondent for The Nation and associate editor of The Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin. His books co-authored with Robert W. McChesney are: "Dollarocracy: How the Money and Media Election Complex is Destroying America" (2014), "The Death and Life of American Journalism: The Media Revolution that Will Begin the World Again" (2011), and "Tragedy & Farce: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy" (2006). Nichols' other books include: "The "S" Word: A Short History of an American Tradition...Socialism" (2015), "Dick: The Man Who is President (2004) and "The Genius of Impeachment: The Founders' Cure for Royalism" (2006).
When a business publication posted an article several years ago called "Weird Things Top Billionaires Have in Common" -- eg., less likely to wear glasses, more likely to be bald -- Rep. Mark Pocan responded on social media with an addition to the list: "Another weird thing billionaires have in common? Not paying their taxes."
The progressive Democratic representative from the town of Vermont makes a good point.
Elon Musk, the ultra-billionaire and amateur rocketeer who is so rich ($273.6 billion) that he's angling to buy Twitter on a $43-billion lark, has enjoyed a tax rate of 3.27%, according to a 2021 ProPublica report.
Amazon's Jeff Bezos, who is worth $181.3 billion, has been paying 0.98%.
For Americans who just want their fair share on April 15, that's a jarring reminder that our tax system is set up to make the very wealthy very much wealthier -- while the rest of us shoulder the burden for keeping the federal government afloat. Pocan's got an idea for making things fairer. For years, the congressman has responded to reports of growing economic inequality in America with a three-word mantra: "Tax the rich!"
Now, Pocan's got a president on his side.
President Joe Biden has proposed a billionaire minimum income tax, which the White House argues will eliminate "the inefficient sheltering of income for decades or generations," a White House fact sheet explains. "In 2021 alone, America's more than 700 billionaires saw their wealth increase by $1 trillion, yet in a typical year, billionaires like these would pay just 8% of their total realized and unrealized income in taxes. A firefighter or teacher can pay double that tax rate."
The proposal seeks to address that reality by requiring households with assets valued in excess of $100 million to provide the Internal Revenue Service with annual accountings of how those fortunes increased. Billionaires and uber-millionaires who paid less than 20% on their gains would have to write a check to the IRS to get their rate of payment up to 20%.
That's not a "wealth tax" in the sense that Pocan and Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have championed. But arguing about semantics misses the point. The tax targets the very rich with a very necessary income tax adjustment.
Former Wisconsin legislative aide Amy Hanauer, who now leads the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, sums up the argument for the new tax, saying:
"Creating a billionaire minimum income tax would ensure for the first time that the very wealthiest people in this country, those who have gained the most from our economic system, would finally begin to pay tax on their full income, just as regular working people do on their earnings. It would affect only the richest .01% of households and it would raise hundreds of billions of dollars for the essential priorities that face all of us as a nation. It will help us address the soaring inequality we see in this country and make the tax code fairer, more adequate, and more sustainable. This plan offers a transformational and long-overdue change."
Pocan puts things more succinctly: "Just took a DNA test, turns out I'm 100% in favor of taxing the rich."
John Nichols
John Nichols is Washington correspondent for The Nation and associate editor of The Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin. His books co-authored with Robert W. McChesney are: "Dollarocracy: How the Money and Media Election Complex is Destroying America" (2014), "The Death and Life of American Journalism: The Media Revolution that Will Begin the World Again" (2011), and "Tragedy & Farce: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy" (2006). Nichols' other books include: "The "S" Word: A Short History of an American Tradition...Socialism" (2015), "Dick: The Man Who is President (2004) and "The Genius of Impeachment: The Founders' Cure for Royalism" (2006).
When a business publication posted an article several years ago called "Weird Things Top Billionaires Have in Common" -- eg., less likely to wear glasses, more likely to be bald -- Rep. Mark Pocan responded on social media with an addition to the list: "Another weird thing billionaires have in common? Not paying their taxes."
The progressive Democratic representative from the town of Vermont makes a good point.
Elon Musk, the ultra-billionaire and amateur rocketeer who is so rich ($273.6 billion) that he's angling to buy Twitter on a $43-billion lark, has enjoyed a tax rate of 3.27%, according to a 2021 ProPublica report.
Amazon's Jeff Bezos, who is worth $181.3 billion, has been paying 0.98%.
For Americans who just want their fair share on April 15, that's a jarring reminder that our tax system is set up to make the very wealthy very much wealthier -- while the rest of us shoulder the burden for keeping the federal government afloat. Pocan's got an idea for making things fairer. For years, the congressman has responded to reports of growing economic inequality in America with a three-word mantra: "Tax the rich!"
Now, Pocan's got a president on his side.
President Joe Biden has proposed a billionaire minimum income tax, which the White House argues will eliminate "the inefficient sheltering of income for decades or generations," a White House fact sheet explains. "In 2021 alone, America's more than 700 billionaires saw their wealth increase by $1 trillion, yet in a typical year, billionaires like these would pay just 8% of their total realized and unrealized income in taxes. A firefighter or teacher can pay double that tax rate."
The proposal seeks to address that reality by requiring households with assets valued in excess of $100 million to provide the Internal Revenue Service with annual accountings of how those fortunes increased. Billionaires and uber-millionaires who paid less than 20% on their gains would have to write a check to the IRS to get their rate of payment up to 20%.
That's not a "wealth tax" in the sense that Pocan and Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders have championed. But arguing about semantics misses the point. The tax targets the very rich with a very necessary income tax adjustment.
Former Wisconsin legislative aide Amy Hanauer, who now leads the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, sums up the argument for the new tax, saying:
"Creating a billionaire minimum income tax would ensure for the first time that the very wealthiest people in this country, those who have gained the most from our economic system, would finally begin to pay tax on their full income, just as regular working people do on their earnings. It would affect only the richest .01% of households and it would raise hundreds of billions of dollars for the essential priorities that face all of us as a nation. It will help us address the soaring inequality we see in this country and make the tax code fairer, more adequate, and more sustainable. This plan offers a transformational and long-overdue change."
Pocan puts things more succinctly: "Just took a DNA test, turns out I'm 100% in favor of taxing the rich."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.