

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Protesters hold signs expressing their opinion during a protest against Russia's military invasion of Ukraine at the Liberty square in Taipei. (Photo: Walid Berrazeg/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Ever since Russia began preparing for its brutal invasion of Ukraine, right-wing commentators in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere have been making wild and unfounded statements about Chinese support for Russia's action, possible coordination between Beijing and Moscow, and Chinese plans for a corresponding invasion of Taiwan. But while China certainly needs to be more forthright in condemning the Russian invasion, there is no compelling evidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin divulged his plans for a full-scale invasion when he met with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympics in Beijing on February 4 and none whatsoever that the two countries are coordinating their actions, let alone that Taiwan is the next target of such aggression.
Had the Chinese known of Putin's plans, they no doubt would have taken steps to protect their diplomatic staff in Ukraine and the thousands of Chinese citizens working and studying there. But when the Biden administration cited intelligence of the impending invasion, removed its own diplomatic personnel and called on all Americans to leave, China claimed this was all propaganda, and did nothing of the same. As a result, no planes were sent to rescue Chinese citizens and presumably many remain trapped in Kyiv as it comes under attack by Russian forces. On March 2, the Chinese Foreign Ministry reported the first Chinese casualty of the war, the death of a citizen shot while trying to flee the fighting.
Foreknowledge of Putin's plans would also have given Chinese authorities an opportunity to carefully hone their message in response to the invasion. But the official Chinese response has been incoherent, first suggesting that Russian operations were limited in nature and then suggesting that a negotiated settlement was within reach. On February 25, just a few weeks after Putin and Xi said their friendship had "no limits" at that Olympic ceremony, China abstained from a UN Security Council vote condemning the Russian invasion, a move interpreted by Western observers as an attempt to distance itself from Moscow. And while continuing to insist that NATO's eastward expansion was the original cause of the crisis, Chinese lending institutions have joined their Western counterparts in blocking funds to Russian companies.
What is most likely is that Chinese leaders suspected a limited Russian operation intended to expand its perimeter in the Donbas region of Eastern Ukraine, something that would provoke relatively minor outrage in the West and could be described as a legitimate security measure, not a violation of Ukraine's sovereignty. Beijing views sovereignty as a central pillar of its foreign policy, and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the Munich Security Conference on February 19 that China believes that "the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all countries should be respected and safeguarded. This is a basic norm of international relations that embodies the purposes of the UN Charter. It is also the consistent, principled position of China. And that applies equally to Ukraine." Once it became clear that Russia had no intention of respecting Ukraine's sovereignty, China has been at a loss for how to describe the situation and deal with it diplomatically. For Chinese leaders, this has become a huge embarrassment for which they were wholly unprepared. The notion that they are coordinating their response with Moscow is preposterous.
And then there are the far-fetched notions that "Taiwan is next": that China intends to invade Taiwan while the West is preoccupied with Russia and Ukraine. Among those propagating this wholly unsubstantiated notion is former President Donald Trump. China will invade sooner rather than later, he told Fox Business on March 2. "Of course they're going to do it--this is their time," he said.
While it is certainly true that China's military, the People's Liberation Army (PLA), has in recent years conducted elaborate military exercises in areas near Taiwan that suggest planning for an invasion of Taiwan should China's leaders order such a move, there is absolutely no evidence that the PLA is currently girding for such a move. The Committee for a Sane U.S.-China Policy maintains a log of Chinese air and naval maneuvers in the vicinity of Taiwan and posts it on its website. This data indicates that the tempo of Chinese maneuvers near Taiwan has declined since the start of 2022.
Any move by the PLA to gear up for an invasion of Taiwan would involve a major mobilization of air, ground, and sea forces and would be visible to both military and commercial satellite sensors, just as the Russian military buildup around Ukraine was widely reported in the Western media. There have been zero such reports. There simply is no evidence for the assertion that "Taiwan is next."
Nor is it very likely that China would undertake an invasion of Taiwan later, when the crisis in Ukraine is somehow resolved or is "frozen" in some fashion. Chinese leaders are well aware that an invasion of Taiwan would be far more difficult than Russia's invasion of Ukraine, given the hundreds of miles of water separating the Taiwan from the mainland and an understanding that if Chinese forces somehow managed an amphibious assault on Taiwan, they would likely encounter an even more intense resistance than Russian forces are facing in Ukraine--prompting international outrage, crushing sanctions, and a greater likelihood of U.S. intervention.
China has a lot of explaining and apologizing to do for its failure to condemn the Russian invasion from the very beginning and not taking more forceful action to isolate the Putin regime. But it cannot be accused of being complicit in the Russian invasion or of seeking to exploit the current moment to invade Taiwan.
Gerson and Klare serve as co-chairs of the Committee for a Sane U.S.-China Policy.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Ever since Russia began preparing for its brutal invasion of Ukraine, right-wing commentators in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere have been making wild and unfounded statements about Chinese support for Russia's action, possible coordination between Beijing and Moscow, and Chinese plans for a corresponding invasion of Taiwan. But while China certainly needs to be more forthright in condemning the Russian invasion, there is no compelling evidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin divulged his plans for a full-scale invasion when he met with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympics in Beijing on February 4 and none whatsoever that the two countries are coordinating their actions, let alone that Taiwan is the next target of such aggression.
Had the Chinese known of Putin's plans, they no doubt would have taken steps to protect their diplomatic staff in Ukraine and the thousands of Chinese citizens working and studying there. But when the Biden administration cited intelligence of the impending invasion, removed its own diplomatic personnel and called on all Americans to leave, China claimed this was all propaganda, and did nothing of the same. As a result, no planes were sent to rescue Chinese citizens and presumably many remain trapped in Kyiv as it comes under attack by Russian forces. On March 2, the Chinese Foreign Ministry reported the first Chinese casualty of the war, the death of a citizen shot while trying to flee the fighting.
Foreknowledge of Putin's plans would also have given Chinese authorities an opportunity to carefully hone their message in response to the invasion. But the official Chinese response has been incoherent, first suggesting that Russian operations were limited in nature and then suggesting that a negotiated settlement was within reach. On February 25, just a few weeks after Putin and Xi said their friendship had "no limits" at that Olympic ceremony, China abstained from a UN Security Council vote condemning the Russian invasion, a move interpreted by Western observers as an attempt to distance itself from Moscow. And while continuing to insist that NATO's eastward expansion was the original cause of the crisis, Chinese lending institutions have joined their Western counterparts in blocking funds to Russian companies.
What is most likely is that Chinese leaders suspected a limited Russian operation intended to expand its perimeter in the Donbas region of Eastern Ukraine, something that would provoke relatively minor outrage in the West and could be described as a legitimate security measure, not a violation of Ukraine's sovereignty. Beijing views sovereignty as a central pillar of its foreign policy, and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the Munich Security Conference on February 19 that China believes that "the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all countries should be respected and safeguarded. This is a basic norm of international relations that embodies the purposes of the UN Charter. It is also the consistent, principled position of China. And that applies equally to Ukraine." Once it became clear that Russia had no intention of respecting Ukraine's sovereignty, China has been at a loss for how to describe the situation and deal with it diplomatically. For Chinese leaders, this has become a huge embarrassment for which they were wholly unprepared. The notion that they are coordinating their response with Moscow is preposterous.
And then there are the far-fetched notions that "Taiwan is next": that China intends to invade Taiwan while the West is preoccupied with Russia and Ukraine. Among those propagating this wholly unsubstantiated notion is former President Donald Trump. China will invade sooner rather than later, he told Fox Business on March 2. "Of course they're going to do it--this is their time," he said.
While it is certainly true that China's military, the People's Liberation Army (PLA), has in recent years conducted elaborate military exercises in areas near Taiwan that suggest planning for an invasion of Taiwan should China's leaders order such a move, there is absolutely no evidence that the PLA is currently girding for such a move. The Committee for a Sane U.S.-China Policy maintains a log of Chinese air and naval maneuvers in the vicinity of Taiwan and posts it on its website. This data indicates that the tempo of Chinese maneuvers near Taiwan has declined since the start of 2022.
Any move by the PLA to gear up for an invasion of Taiwan would involve a major mobilization of air, ground, and sea forces and would be visible to both military and commercial satellite sensors, just as the Russian military buildup around Ukraine was widely reported in the Western media. There have been zero such reports. There simply is no evidence for the assertion that "Taiwan is next."
Nor is it very likely that China would undertake an invasion of Taiwan later, when the crisis in Ukraine is somehow resolved or is "frozen" in some fashion. Chinese leaders are well aware that an invasion of Taiwan would be far more difficult than Russia's invasion of Ukraine, given the hundreds of miles of water separating the Taiwan from the mainland and an understanding that if Chinese forces somehow managed an amphibious assault on Taiwan, they would likely encounter an even more intense resistance than Russian forces are facing in Ukraine--prompting international outrage, crushing sanctions, and a greater likelihood of U.S. intervention.
China has a lot of explaining and apologizing to do for its failure to condemn the Russian invasion from the very beginning and not taking more forceful action to isolate the Putin regime. But it cannot be accused of being complicit in the Russian invasion or of seeking to exploit the current moment to invade Taiwan.
Gerson and Klare serve as co-chairs of the Committee for a Sane U.S.-China Policy.
Ever since Russia began preparing for its brutal invasion of Ukraine, right-wing commentators in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere have been making wild and unfounded statements about Chinese support for Russia's action, possible coordination between Beijing and Moscow, and Chinese plans for a corresponding invasion of Taiwan. But while China certainly needs to be more forthright in condemning the Russian invasion, there is no compelling evidence that Russian President Vladimir Putin divulged his plans for a full-scale invasion when he met with Chinese President Xi Jinping at the opening ceremony of the Winter Olympics in Beijing on February 4 and none whatsoever that the two countries are coordinating their actions, let alone that Taiwan is the next target of such aggression.
Had the Chinese known of Putin's plans, they no doubt would have taken steps to protect their diplomatic staff in Ukraine and the thousands of Chinese citizens working and studying there. But when the Biden administration cited intelligence of the impending invasion, removed its own diplomatic personnel and called on all Americans to leave, China claimed this was all propaganda, and did nothing of the same. As a result, no planes were sent to rescue Chinese citizens and presumably many remain trapped in Kyiv as it comes under attack by Russian forces. On March 2, the Chinese Foreign Ministry reported the first Chinese casualty of the war, the death of a citizen shot while trying to flee the fighting.
Foreknowledge of Putin's plans would also have given Chinese authorities an opportunity to carefully hone their message in response to the invasion. But the official Chinese response has been incoherent, first suggesting that Russian operations were limited in nature and then suggesting that a negotiated settlement was within reach. On February 25, just a few weeks after Putin and Xi said their friendship had "no limits" at that Olympic ceremony, China abstained from a UN Security Council vote condemning the Russian invasion, a move interpreted by Western observers as an attempt to distance itself from Moscow. And while continuing to insist that NATO's eastward expansion was the original cause of the crisis, Chinese lending institutions have joined their Western counterparts in blocking funds to Russian companies.
What is most likely is that Chinese leaders suspected a limited Russian operation intended to expand its perimeter in the Donbas region of Eastern Ukraine, something that would provoke relatively minor outrage in the West and could be described as a legitimate security measure, not a violation of Ukraine's sovereignty. Beijing views sovereignty as a central pillar of its foreign policy, and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the Munich Security Conference on February 19 that China believes that "the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all countries should be respected and safeguarded. This is a basic norm of international relations that embodies the purposes of the UN Charter. It is also the consistent, principled position of China. And that applies equally to Ukraine." Once it became clear that Russia had no intention of respecting Ukraine's sovereignty, China has been at a loss for how to describe the situation and deal with it diplomatically. For Chinese leaders, this has become a huge embarrassment for which they were wholly unprepared. The notion that they are coordinating their response with Moscow is preposterous.
And then there are the far-fetched notions that "Taiwan is next": that China intends to invade Taiwan while the West is preoccupied with Russia and Ukraine. Among those propagating this wholly unsubstantiated notion is former President Donald Trump. China will invade sooner rather than later, he told Fox Business on March 2. "Of course they're going to do it--this is their time," he said.
While it is certainly true that China's military, the People's Liberation Army (PLA), has in recent years conducted elaborate military exercises in areas near Taiwan that suggest planning for an invasion of Taiwan should China's leaders order such a move, there is absolutely no evidence that the PLA is currently girding for such a move. The Committee for a Sane U.S.-China Policy maintains a log of Chinese air and naval maneuvers in the vicinity of Taiwan and posts it on its website. This data indicates that the tempo of Chinese maneuvers near Taiwan has declined since the start of 2022.
Any move by the PLA to gear up for an invasion of Taiwan would involve a major mobilization of air, ground, and sea forces and would be visible to both military and commercial satellite sensors, just as the Russian military buildup around Ukraine was widely reported in the Western media. There have been zero such reports. There simply is no evidence for the assertion that "Taiwan is next."
Nor is it very likely that China would undertake an invasion of Taiwan later, when the crisis in Ukraine is somehow resolved or is "frozen" in some fashion. Chinese leaders are well aware that an invasion of Taiwan would be far more difficult than Russia's invasion of Ukraine, given the hundreds of miles of water separating the Taiwan from the mainland and an understanding that if Chinese forces somehow managed an amphibious assault on Taiwan, they would likely encounter an even more intense resistance than Russian forces are facing in Ukraine--prompting international outrage, crushing sanctions, and a greater likelihood of U.S. intervention.
China has a lot of explaining and apologizing to do for its failure to condemn the Russian invasion from the very beginning and not taking more forceful action to isolate the Putin regime. But it cannot be accused of being complicit in the Russian invasion or of seeking to exploit the current moment to invade Taiwan.
Gerson and Klare serve as co-chairs of the Committee for a Sane U.S.-China Policy.