Demonstrators protest against gerrymandering at a rally at the Supreme Court during the gerrymandering cases Lamone v. Benisek and Rucho v. Common Cause. (Photo: Evelyn Hockstein/For The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Why Gerrymandering Could Get Way Worse
For the first time in 50 years, Republican legislators are free to effectively minimize the power of racial minorities.
Republicans are gerrymandering themselves into entrenched minority power, unless we stop them now.
What's really different about this redistricting cycle is that Republicans have become much more proficient at figuring out exactly how to design gerrymandered districts to minimize Democratic voters and maximize Republican voters.
Watch:
For the first time in 50 years, Republican legislators are free to effectively minimize the power of racial minorities. Now bear in mind, in 2019 the Supreme Court made it very clear that if there is racially motivated gerrymandering, that is illegal under the Constitution under the 14th Amendment. But that left open partisan gerrymandering. And the fact of the matter is that most people of color are Democratic voters.
It doesn't matter whether you actually show or prove racial intent; that's what the Republicans are doing.
If there was ever a demonstration of the power of gerrymandering to actually suppress the votes of people of color, you don't have to look beyond Texas. In Texas, you've got about 40% of the electorate that's white and about 40% of the electorate that's Hispanic. But if you look at actually the congressional districts, fewer than one-fifth are majority Hispanic because of gerrymandering. Hello?
What we have here is a system--we might call it entrenchment. If you look at Wisconsin or North Carolina or Georgia or any of these key swing states, these states are all becoming more and more Democratic, capital "D." But Republicans are radically gerrymandering so they can stay in power. As they gain more and more power and grab it from majorities, disproportionately people who are Black or Hispanic, they're able to, not only take over a legislature, they can take over the electoral machinery.
And in the next election, they can simply declare that the will of the majority is not going to be observed, or that most of the votes are not going to be counted, or some other way of rigging--and this is rigging--an election that further entrenches their status.
Look, we have to have national minimum voting standards, but in order to be passed, they need to be passed by 60 votes in the Senate because of the Senate filibuster, which means that the only way they're going to get passed is if the filibuster has a carve out.
I mean the choice ahead is very very clear: it's either the filibuster or it's our democracy. It comes down to that.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Republicans are gerrymandering themselves into entrenched minority power, unless we stop them now.
What's really different about this redistricting cycle is that Republicans have become much more proficient at figuring out exactly how to design gerrymandered districts to minimize Democratic voters and maximize Republican voters.
Watch:
For the first time in 50 years, Republican legislators are free to effectively minimize the power of racial minorities. Now bear in mind, in 2019 the Supreme Court made it very clear that if there is racially motivated gerrymandering, that is illegal under the Constitution under the 14th Amendment. But that left open partisan gerrymandering. And the fact of the matter is that most people of color are Democratic voters.
It doesn't matter whether you actually show or prove racial intent; that's what the Republicans are doing.
If there was ever a demonstration of the power of gerrymandering to actually suppress the votes of people of color, you don't have to look beyond Texas. In Texas, you've got about 40% of the electorate that's white and about 40% of the electorate that's Hispanic. But if you look at actually the congressional districts, fewer than one-fifth are majority Hispanic because of gerrymandering. Hello?
What we have here is a system--we might call it entrenchment. If you look at Wisconsin or North Carolina or Georgia or any of these key swing states, these states are all becoming more and more Democratic, capital "D." But Republicans are radically gerrymandering so they can stay in power. As they gain more and more power and grab it from majorities, disproportionately people who are Black or Hispanic, they're able to, not only take over a legislature, they can take over the electoral machinery.
And in the next election, they can simply declare that the will of the majority is not going to be observed, or that most of the votes are not going to be counted, or some other way of rigging--and this is rigging--an election that further entrenches their status.
Look, we have to have national minimum voting standards, but in order to be passed, they need to be passed by 60 votes in the Senate because of the Senate filibuster, which means that the only way they're going to get passed is if the filibuster has a carve out.
I mean the choice ahead is very very clear: it's either the filibuster or it's our democracy. It comes down to that.
Republicans are gerrymandering themselves into entrenched minority power, unless we stop them now.
What's really different about this redistricting cycle is that Republicans have become much more proficient at figuring out exactly how to design gerrymandered districts to minimize Democratic voters and maximize Republican voters.
Watch:
For the first time in 50 years, Republican legislators are free to effectively minimize the power of racial minorities. Now bear in mind, in 2019 the Supreme Court made it very clear that if there is racially motivated gerrymandering, that is illegal under the Constitution under the 14th Amendment. But that left open partisan gerrymandering. And the fact of the matter is that most people of color are Democratic voters.
It doesn't matter whether you actually show or prove racial intent; that's what the Republicans are doing.
If there was ever a demonstration of the power of gerrymandering to actually suppress the votes of people of color, you don't have to look beyond Texas. In Texas, you've got about 40% of the electorate that's white and about 40% of the electorate that's Hispanic. But if you look at actually the congressional districts, fewer than one-fifth are majority Hispanic because of gerrymandering. Hello?
What we have here is a system--we might call it entrenchment. If you look at Wisconsin or North Carolina or Georgia or any of these key swing states, these states are all becoming more and more Democratic, capital "D." But Republicans are radically gerrymandering so they can stay in power. As they gain more and more power and grab it from majorities, disproportionately people who are Black or Hispanic, they're able to, not only take over a legislature, they can take over the electoral machinery.
And in the next election, they can simply declare that the will of the majority is not going to be observed, or that most of the votes are not going to be counted, or some other way of rigging--and this is rigging--an election that further entrenches their status.
Look, we have to have national minimum voting standards, but in order to be passed, they need to be passed by 60 votes in the Senate because of the Senate filibuster, which means that the only way they're going to get passed is if the filibuster has a carve out.
I mean the choice ahead is very very clear: it's either the filibuster or it's our democracy. It comes down to that.