U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) speaks during a press conference with members of the Poor People's Campaign outside the U.S. Capitol August 25, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Democrats' Inept Messaging: It's Not a $3.5 Trillion Bill But $350 Billion a Year
Democrats are misrepresenting the size of their own reconciliation package to their own detriment.
Why are the Democrats so inept at framing their messages in a way that appeals to people instead of scaring them off? They're busy declaring that they want to pass $3.5 trillion in new federal spending for important and goals like child care, paid family leave, fighting climate change, increased Medicare benefits, lower prescription drug prices, and child tax credits, mostly paid for by higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations. Most of these individual programs are popular with voters, as is taxing the rich.
Because of obscure Senate rules, they keep promoting their $3.5 trillion plan, a number that scares even some of their supporters and hands Republicans talk points.
But the $3.5 Trillion number sounds astronomical, is scary to many voters, and gives Republicans and conservative Democrats like Joe Manchin and Krysten Sinema a huge opening to attack the level of spending which the country allegedly can't afford without disastrous consequences. To tell the truth, a number that large even scares me, a progressive Democrat, who believes the fear of deficits is overblown.
What's astounding, however, is that the Democrats are misrepresenting the size of their own reconciliation package to their own detriment. Democrats are promoting it as a $3.5 trillion bill--which is endlessly repeated by the media--which makes it sound like Democrats want to spend $3.5 trillion in one year. SCARY BUT FALSE!!! The Democratic bill is simply a blueprint for programs to be funded over 10 years. The actual cost of the bill is an average of $350 billion a year--it's a big number, but less than half of what the U.S. spends a year on the military budget.
So why isn't this the Democrat's message: We want to provide child care, universal Pre-K, paid family leave, lower drug prices, clean energy, and child tax credits to make your lives easier; it will cost about $350 billion a year which is less than half of the military budget; we'll pay for most of it by taxing the wealthy and corporations?
Whatever you do, Democrats, stop promoting it as a $3.5 trillion bill and start promoting it as a $350 billion a year bill.
Let's not get too into the weeds, but the only reason the $3.5 trillion number even comes up is due to the filibuster and other obscure Congressional rules. The only way the Democrats can pass their new programs without 10 Republican votes is through so-called "budget reconciliation" which only requires a simple majority of 51 votes instead of a super-majority of 60 votes in the Senate so long as the legislation is limited to taxes and spending.
But reconciliation rules requiring the Congressional Budget Office to project out changes to budget deficits over ten years necessitates multiplying the average annual number times approximately ten, which turns an average of $350 billion a year into $3.5 trillion over ten years. The military budget for the next ten years is projected to be close to $10 trillion, but no one talks about the "ten trillion dollar military budget."
However, Congressional Democrats just can't get their messaging right. Because of obscure Senate rules, they keep promoting their $3.5 trillion plan, a number that scares even some of their supporters and hands Republicans talk points. And the simple-minded media endlessly repeats the $3.5 trillion number.
It's time instead for Democrats to talk about a $350 billion a year plan that will help raise the standard of living and improve the security of most Americans. Wake up Democrats, before it's too late.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Why are the Democrats so inept at framing their messages in a way that appeals to people instead of scaring them off? They're busy declaring that they want to pass $3.5 trillion in new federal spending for important and goals like child care, paid family leave, fighting climate change, increased Medicare benefits, lower prescription drug prices, and child tax credits, mostly paid for by higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations. Most of these individual programs are popular with voters, as is taxing the rich.
Because of obscure Senate rules, they keep promoting their $3.5 trillion plan, a number that scares even some of their supporters and hands Republicans talk points.
But the $3.5 Trillion number sounds astronomical, is scary to many voters, and gives Republicans and conservative Democrats like Joe Manchin and Krysten Sinema a huge opening to attack the level of spending which the country allegedly can't afford without disastrous consequences. To tell the truth, a number that large even scares me, a progressive Democrat, who believes the fear of deficits is overblown.
What's astounding, however, is that the Democrats are misrepresenting the size of their own reconciliation package to their own detriment. Democrats are promoting it as a $3.5 trillion bill--which is endlessly repeated by the media--which makes it sound like Democrats want to spend $3.5 trillion in one year. SCARY BUT FALSE!!! The Democratic bill is simply a blueprint for programs to be funded over 10 years. The actual cost of the bill is an average of $350 billion a year--it's a big number, but less than half of what the U.S. spends a year on the military budget.
So why isn't this the Democrat's message: We want to provide child care, universal Pre-K, paid family leave, lower drug prices, clean energy, and child tax credits to make your lives easier; it will cost about $350 billion a year which is less than half of the military budget; we'll pay for most of it by taxing the wealthy and corporations?
Whatever you do, Democrats, stop promoting it as a $3.5 trillion bill and start promoting it as a $350 billion a year bill.
Let's not get too into the weeds, but the only reason the $3.5 trillion number even comes up is due to the filibuster and other obscure Congressional rules. The only way the Democrats can pass their new programs without 10 Republican votes is through so-called "budget reconciliation" which only requires a simple majority of 51 votes instead of a super-majority of 60 votes in the Senate so long as the legislation is limited to taxes and spending.
But reconciliation rules requiring the Congressional Budget Office to project out changes to budget deficits over ten years necessitates multiplying the average annual number times approximately ten, which turns an average of $350 billion a year into $3.5 trillion over ten years. The military budget for the next ten years is projected to be close to $10 trillion, but no one talks about the "ten trillion dollar military budget."
However, Congressional Democrats just can't get their messaging right. Because of obscure Senate rules, they keep promoting their $3.5 trillion plan, a number that scares even some of their supporters and hands Republicans talk points. And the simple-minded media endlessly repeats the $3.5 trillion number.
It's time instead for Democrats to talk about a $350 billion a year plan that will help raise the standard of living and improve the security of most Americans. Wake up Democrats, before it's too late.
Why are the Democrats so inept at framing their messages in a way that appeals to people instead of scaring them off? They're busy declaring that they want to pass $3.5 trillion in new federal spending for important and goals like child care, paid family leave, fighting climate change, increased Medicare benefits, lower prescription drug prices, and child tax credits, mostly paid for by higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations. Most of these individual programs are popular with voters, as is taxing the rich.
Because of obscure Senate rules, they keep promoting their $3.5 trillion plan, a number that scares even some of their supporters and hands Republicans talk points.
But the $3.5 Trillion number sounds astronomical, is scary to many voters, and gives Republicans and conservative Democrats like Joe Manchin and Krysten Sinema a huge opening to attack the level of spending which the country allegedly can't afford without disastrous consequences. To tell the truth, a number that large even scares me, a progressive Democrat, who believes the fear of deficits is overblown.
What's astounding, however, is that the Democrats are misrepresenting the size of their own reconciliation package to their own detriment. Democrats are promoting it as a $3.5 trillion bill--which is endlessly repeated by the media--which makes it sound like Democrats want to spend $3.5 trillion in one year. SCARY BUT FALSE!!! The Democratic bill is simply a blueprint for programs to be funded over 10 years. The actual cost of the bill is an average of $350 billion a year--it's a big number, but less than half of what the U.S. spends a year on the military budget.
So why isn't this the Democrat's message: We want to provide child care, universal Pre-K, paid family leave, lower drug prices, clean energy, and child tax credits to make your lives easier; it will cost about $350 billion a year which is less than half of the military budget; we'll pay for most of it by taxing the wealthy and corporations?
Whatever you do, Democrats, stop promoting it as a $3.5 trillion bill and start promoting it as a $350 billion a year bill.
Let's not get too into the weeds, but the only reason the $3.5 trillion number even comes up is due to the filibuster and other obscure Congressional rules. The only way the Democrats can pass their new programs without 10 Republican votes is through so-called "budget reconciliation" which only requires a simple majority of 51 votes instead of a super-majority of 60 votes in the Senate so long as the legislation is limited to taxes and spending.
But reconciliation rules requiring the Congressional Budget Office to project out changes to budget deficits over ten years necessitates multiplying the average annual number times approximately ten, which turns an average of $350 billion a year into $3.5 trillion over ten years. The military budget for the next ten years is projected to be close to $10 trillion, but no one talks about the "ten trillion dollar military budget."
However, Congressional Democrats just can't get their messaging right. Because of obscure Senate rules, they keep promoting their $3.5 trillion plan, a number that scares even some of their supporters and hands Republicans talk points. And the simple-minded media endlessly repeats the $3.5 trillion number.
It's time instead for Democrats to talk about a $350 billion a year plan that will help raise the standard of living and improve the security of most Americans. Wake up Democrats, before it's too late.