Activists rally on Jan. 19, 2021 in New York City to demand that U.S. President Joe Biden take immediate executive action to "Build Back Fossil Free." (Photo: Lev Radin / Pacific Press / LightRocket via Getty Images)
Apr 20, 2021
Although the strategic phase out of fossil fuels is the logical place to start curbing emissions, 25 years of climate negotiations have failed to mobilize a global effort to limit global fossil fuel production. In a few days, President Biden is hosting a Leaders Summit on Climate where he plans to urge global leaders to ratchet up their climate ambition. But all eyes are on the US and Canada, who are on track to consume two-thirds of the remaining global carbon budget. Canada anticipates producing more oil and gas in 2050 than in 2019.
President Biden and Prime Minister Trudeau must acknowledge and act on a glaring climate policy blind spot that fosters continued oil and gas expansion.
The US is the largest historical contributor to climate change, while Canada has ranked among the top 10 global carbon emitters for over a century. Yet instead of reining in oil and gas production, the US has by far the largest expansion plans for oil and gas in the world: it is on course to produce a staggering 2.3 billion barrels per year (Mbbl/y)--more in 2030 compared to 2019--and over 260 billion cubic meters per year (bcm/y). Canada has the second-largest gas expansion planned for 2030 (78 bcm) and the seventh-largest oil expansion (350Mbbl to 2030)
By refusing to look upstream to fossil fuel extraction and production, international negotiations have mistakenly fixated on mitigating emissions at the site of combustion and consumption. Strikingly, the 31-page Paris Agreement makes no mention of fossil fuels. Undeniably, demand-side measures such as energy efficiency standards and carbon pricing are important. Yet supply-side climate policies--i.e. policies that limit the exploration, extraction or transportation of fossil fuels--have been largely ignored, despite being central to achieving 1.5C climate goals.
President Biden has shown some encouraging signs. Within days of taking office, he revoked the Keystone XL pipeline permit, froze new oil and gas leasing on federal lands and offshore waters, and committed to a review of existing fossil fuel leases. However, the Biden administration recently announced it would allow oil to continue to flow through the Dakota Access Pipeline, despite promises to listen to Tribes and take environmental and climate justice seriously. Less encouragingly, Prime Minister Trudeau has been silent on the issue of curbing fossil fuels, bowing to the pressure of fossil fuel lobbyists--who in 2020 alone, met with Canadian politicians over 1,200 times, an average of 4.5 times per working day. So what must change?
The US and Canada can assert existing federal authority to begin an equitable, managed phase-out of fossil fuel production, one that could provide a blueprint for other fossil fuel producing nations. While both countries are federal states, each government has substantial levers to begin this work.
For the US, passing the End Polluter Welfare Act would eliminate all federal subsidies and financial support for fossil fuel production. Reinstating the crude oil export ban, prohibiting exports of coal and liquified gas, banning fracking on federal lands, and rejecting federal permits for any fossil fuel infrastructure--including the Dakota Access, Line 3, and Mountain Valley Pipelines--would send a powerful signal to global leaders.
Canada can up its climate ambition by removing federal subsidies and public financing for fossil fuel production and infrastructure, prohibiting the leasing of federal lands and waters for fossil fuel activity, and importantly, cancelling the Trans Mountain expansion pipeline.
Biden and Trudeau could also convene National Just Transition Commissions to prioritize a coordinated managed fossil fuel phase out that ensures no fossil fuel workers and communities are left behind. Early retirement plans; redundancy packages, priority job placement, and dedicated funding streams should form central components to any just transition.
The Climate Summit could serve as a platform to begin discussions on "the first-ever global negotiation of the cooperative managed decline of fossil fuel production"--an idea proposed by Vice President Harris in her 2020 presidential run. While it is unrealistic to expect buy-in from fossil fuel-rich nations, a smaller "coalition of the willing" could take the lead on tackling the managed decline of fossil fuels. This could operate akin to the Powering Past Coal Alliance--a group of governments and businesses committed to ending coal burning for power. While several countries are already limiting new permits for fossil fuel infrastructure, including Ireland, New Zealand, France, Denmark, Belize, and Costa Rica, the Climate Summit provides a historic opportunity to begin discussions on curbing fossil fuel production on a global scale.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Noel Healy
Noel Healy is an Associate Professor in the Geography and Sustainability Department at Salem State University. He is a contributing author for the IPCC 6th Assessment Report. Twitter @DrNoelHealy
Angela Carter
Angela Carter is an Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Waterloo. Her recent book, Fossilized, traces how Canada's largest oil-producing provinces undermined environmental policies while boosting extreme oil extraction. Carter's new research focuses on the global rise of "keep it in the ground" legislation.
Truzaar Dordi
Truzaar Dordi, recognized as a "Top 30 Under 30 Sustainability Leader" by Corporate Knights, is a Ph.D. Candidate in the School of Environment, Enterprise, and Development at the University of Waterloo. He researches financial stability and low-carbon transitions. Dordi has published on stranded assets, divestment, and energy policy, recently in the Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment and Climatic Change.
Although the strategic phase out of fossil fuels is the logical place to start curbing emissions, 25 years of climate negotiations have failed to mobilize a global effort to limit global fossil fuel production. In a few days, President Biden is hosting a Leaders Summit on Climate where he plans to urge global leaders to ratchet up their climate ambition. But all eyes are on the US and Canada, who are on track to consume two-thirds of the remaining global carbon budget. Canada anticipates producing more oil and gas in 2050 than in 2019.
President Biden and Prime Minister Trudeau must acknowledge and act on a glaring climate policy blind spot that fosters continued oil and gas expansion.
The US is the largest historical contributor to climate change, while Canada has ranked among the top 10 global carbon emitters for over a century. Yet instead of reining in oil and gas production, the US has by far the largest expansion plans for oil and gas in the world: it is on course to produce a staggering 2.3 billion barrels per year (Mbbl/y)--more in 2030 compared to 2019--and over 260 billion cubic meters per year (bcm/y). Canada has the second-largest gas expansion planned for 2030 (78 bcm) and the seventh-largest oil expansion (350Mbbl to 2030)
By refusing to look upstream to fossil fuel extraction and production, international negotiations have mistakenly fixated on mitigating emissions at the site of combustion and consumption. Strikingly, the 31-page Paris Agreement makes no mention of fossil fuels. Undeniably, demand-side measures such as energy efficiency standards and carbon pricing are important. Yet supply-side climate policies--i.e. policies that limit the exploration, extraction or transportation of fossil fuels--have been largely ignored, despite being central to achieving 1.5C climate goals.
President Biden has shown some encouraging signs. Within days of taking office, he revoked the Keystone XL pipeline permit, froze new oil and gas leasing on federal lands and offshore waters, and committed to a review of existing fossil fuel leases. However, the Biden administration recently announced it would allow oil to continue to flow through the Dakota Access Pipeline, despite promises to listen to Tribes and take environmental and climate justice seriously. Less encouragingly, Prime Minister Trudeau has been silent on the issue of curbing fossil fuels, bowing to the pressure of fossil fuel lobbyists--who in 2020 alone, met with Canadian politicians over 1,200 times, an average of 4.5 times per working day. So what must change?
The US and Canada can assert existing federal authority to begin an equitable, managed phase-out of fossil fuel production, one that could provide a blueprint for other fossil fuel producing nations. While both countries are federal states, each government has substantial levers to begin this work.
For the US, passing the End Polluter Welfare Act would eliminate all federal subsidies and financial support for fossil fuel production. Reinstating the crude oil export ban, prohibiting exports of coal and liquified gas, banning fracking on federal lands, and rejecting federal permits for any fossil fuel infrastructure--including the Dakota Access, Line 3, and Mountain Valley Pipelines--would send a powerful signal to global leaders.
Canada can up its climate ambition by removing federal subsidies and public financing for fossil fuel production and infrastructure, prohibiting the leasing of federal lands and waters for fossil fuel activity, and importantly, cancelling the Trans Mountain expansion pipeline.
Biden and Trudeau could also convene National Just Transition Commissions to prioritize a coordinated managed fossil fuel phase out that ensures no fossil fuel workers and communities are left behind. Early retirement plans; redundancy packages, priority job placement, and dedicated funding streams should form central components to any just transition.
The Climate Summit could serve as a platform to begin discussions on "the first-ever global negotiation of the cooperative managed decline of fossil fuel production"--an idea proposed by Vice President Harris in her 2020 presidential run. While it is unrealistic to expect buy-in from fossil fuel-rich nations, a smaller "coalition of the willing" could take the lead on tackling the managed decline of fossil fuels. This could operate akin to the Powering Past Coal Alliance--a group of governments and businesses committed to ending coal burning for power. While several countries are already limiting new permits for fossil fuel infrastructure, including Ireland, New Zealand, France, Denmark, Belize, and Costa Rica, the Climate Summit provides a historic opportunity to begin discussions on curbing fossil fuel production on a global scale.
Noel Healy
Noel Healy is an Associate Professor in the Geography and Sustainability Department at Salem State University. He is a contributing author for the IPCC 6th Assessment Report. Twitter @DrNoelHealy
Angela Carter
Angela Carter is an Associate Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Waterloo. Her recent book, Fossilized, traces how Canada's largest oil-producing provinces undermined environmental policies while boosting extreme oil extraction. Carter's new research focuses on the global rise of "keep it in the ground" legislation.
Truzaar Dordi
Truzaar Dordi, recognized as a "Top 30 Under 30 Sustainability Leader" by Corporate Knights, is a Ph.D. Candidate in the School of Environment, Enterprise, and Development at the University of Waterloo. He researches financial stability and low-carbon transitions. Dordi has published on stranded assets, divestment, and energy policy, recently in the Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment and Climatic Change.
Although the strategic phase out of fossil fuels is the logical place to start curbing emissions, 25 years of climate negotiations have failed to mobilize a global effort to limit global fossil fuel production. In a few days, President Biden is hosting a Leaders Summit on Climate where he plans to urge global leaders to ratchet up their climate ambition. But all eyes are on the US and Canada, who are on track to consume two-thirds of the remaining global carbon budget. Canada anticipates producing more oil and gas in 2050 than in 2019.
President Biden and Prime Minister Trudeau must acknowledge and act on a glaring climate policy blind spot that fosters continued oil and gas expansion.
The US is the largest historical contributor to climate change, while Canada has ranked among the top 10 global carbon emitters for over a century. Yet instead of reining in oil and gas production, the US has by far the largest expansion plans for oil and gas in the world: it is on course to produce a staggering 2.3 billion barrels per year (Mbbl/y)--more in 2030 compared to 2019--and over 260 billion cubic meters per year (bcm/y). Canada has the second-largest gas expansion planned for 2030 (78 bcm) and the seventh-largest oil expansion (350Mbbl to 2030)
By refusing to look upstream to fossil fuel extraction and production, international negotiations have mistakenly fixated on mitigating emissions at the site of combustion and consumption. Strikingly, the 31-page Paris Agreement makes no mention of fossil fuels. Undeniably, demand-side measures such as energy efficiency standards and carbon pricing are important. Yet supply-side climate policies--i.e. policies that limit the exploration, extraction or transportation of fossil fuels--have been largely ignored, despite being central to achieving 1.5C climate goals.
President Biden has shown some encouraging signs. Within days of taking office, he revoked the Keystone XL pipeline permit, froze new oil and gas leasing on federal lands and offshore waters, and committed to a review of existing fossil fuel leases. However, the Biden administration recently announced it would allow oil to continue to flow through the Dakota Access Pipeline, despite promises to listen to Tribes and take environmental and climate justice seriously. Less encouragingly, Prime Minister Trudeau has been silent on the issue of curbing fossil fuels, bowing to the pressure of fossil fuel lobbyists--who in 2020 alone, met with Canadian politicians over 1,200 times, an average of 4.5 times per working day. So what must change?
The US and Canada can assert existing federal authority to begin an equitable, managed phase-out of fossil fuel production, one that could provide a blueprint for other fossil fuel producing nations. While both countries are federal states, each government has substantial levers to begin this work.
For the US, passing the End Polluter Welfare Act would eliminate all federal subsidies and financial support for fossil fuel production. Reinstating the crude oil export ban, prohibiting exports of coal and liquified gas, banning fracking on federal lands, and rejecting federal permits for any fossil fuel infrastructure--including the Dakota Access, Line 3, and Mountain Valley Pipelines--would send a powerful signal to global leaders.
Canada can up its climate ambition by removing federal subsidies and public financing for fossil fuel production and infrastructure, prohibiting the leasing of federal lands and waters for fossil fuel activity, and importantly, cancelling the Trans Mountain expansion pipeline.
Biden and Trudeau could also convene National Just Transition Commissions to prioritize a coordinated managed fossil fuel phase out that ensures no fossil fuel workers and communities are left behind. Early retirement plans; redundancy packages, priority job placement, and dedicated funding streams should form central components to any just transition.
The Climate Summit could serve as a platform to begin discussions on "the first-ever global negotiation of the cooperative managed decline of fossil fuel production"--an idea proposed by Vice President Harris in her 2020 presidential run. While it is unrealistic to expect buy-in from fossil fuel-rich nations, a smaller "coalition of the willing" could take the lead on tackling the managed decline of fossil fuels. This could operate akin to the Powering Past Coal Alliance--a group of governments and businesses committed to ending coal burning for power. While several countries are already limiting new permits for fossil fuel infrastructure, including Ireland, New Zealand, France, Denmark, Belize, and Costa Rica, the Climate Summit provides a historic opportunity to begin discussions on curbing fossil fuel production on a global scale.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.