

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Bob Dylan performs as part of a double bill with Neil Young at Hyde Park on July 12, 2019 in London, England. (Photo by Dave J Hogan/Getty Images for ABA)
I've never been a Bob Dylan fan, and the Nobel Prize winner's sale of his archive to Universal Music changed nothing about that. In fact, sing as he might about how The Times They are a-Changing, Dylan's deal, worth an estimated $300 million to him, changed nothing about anything.
But it could have been different.
Dylan, pre-sale, had assets worth an estimated $200 million. Post-sale, he'll have half-a billion. If he lives to 100, he'll have to spend $25 million a year for the rest of his life to spend it down. More, if he invests.
Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity.
Come the holidays, Dylan may write some checks to charity. That's nice. People who have money and give some away can help those in immediate need. But they're not changing the times.
The times, and the tax code, mean that those with capital assets are taxed more leniently than those who live off wages. Dylan will pay a maximum of 20 percent on the gains from the sale of his music. The wage-earner doing well will max out at 37%. The tax code rewards charitable donations, but every deduction claimed shrinks what's available to pay for public services like schools and hospitals and libraries--all things that just might help those without wealth get a leg up.
Charity doesn't change the times. Redistributing assets does. As Marjorie Kelly of the Democracy Collaborative says, "Every economy is defined by who owns and controls assets."
What else could Dylan have done? Since 1966, the commercial rights to the song "We Shall Overcome" have been held by a fund at the Highlander movement training school in Tennessee. Highlander has played a role in every times-changing movement from Rosa Parks to Stacy Abrams.
Anyone can sing the song, but the song's commercial use is overseen by a community board, and whatever you think about private copyrights, the royalties have funded decades of grants to Black artists/activists selected democratically.
"It's not complicated to replicate what we've done," says Ashlee Woodard Henderson of Highlander.
But it is game-changing. Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity. Now, how about even one song?
I nominate The Times They Are a-Changing. What assets are you shifting this season?
You can watch the Laura Flanders Show and see our recent coverage of food justice at lauraflanders.org. And we're in fundraising mode. If you feel like shifting some assets our way, you can at www.lauraflanders.org/donate.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
I've never been a Bob Dylan fan, and the Nobel Prize winner's sale of his archive to Universal Music changed nothing about that. In fact, sing as he might about how The Times They are a-Changing, Dylan's deal, worth an estimated $300 million to him, changed nothing about anything.
But it could have been different.
Dylan, pre-sale, had assets worth an estimated $200 million. Post-sale, he'll have half-a billion. If he lives to 100, he'll have to spend $25 million a year for the rest of his life to spend it down. More, if he invests.
Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity.
Come the holidays, Dylan may write some checks to charity. That's nice. People who have money and give some away can help those in immediate need. But they're not changing the times.
The times, and the tax code, mean that those with capital assets are taxed more leniently than those who live off wages. Dylan will pay a maximum of 20 percent on the gains from the sale of his music. The wage-earner doing well will max out at 37%. The tax code rewards charitable donations, but every deduction claimed shrinks what's available to pay for public services like schools and hospitals and libraries--all things that just might help those without wealth get a leg up.
Charity doesn't change the times. Redistributing assets does. As Marjorie Kelly of the Democracy Collaborative says, "Every economy is defined by who owns and controls assets."
What else could Dylan have done? Since 1966, the commercial rights to the song "We Shall Overcome" have been held by a fund at the Highlander movement training school in Tennessee. Highlander has played a role in every times-changing movement from Rosa Parks to Stacy Abrams.
Anyone can sing the song, but the song's commercial use is overseen by a community board, and whatever you think about private copyrights, the royalties have funded decades of grants to Black artists/activists selected democratically.
"It's not complicated to replicate what we've done," says Ashlee Woodard Henderson of Highlander.
But it is game-changing. Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity. Now, how about even one song?
I nominate The Times They Are a-Changing. What assets are you shifting this season?
You can watch the Laura Flanders Show and see our recent coverage of food justice at lauraflanders.org. And we're in fundraising mode. If you feel like shifting some assets our way, you can at www.lauraflanders.org/donate.
I've never been a Bob Dylan fan, and the Nobel Prize winner's sale of his archive to Universal Music changed nothing about that. In fact, sing as he might about how The Times They are a-Changing, Dylan's deal, worth an estimated $300 million to him, changed nothing about anything.
But it could have been different.
Dylan, pre-sale, had assets worth an estimated $200 million. Post-sale, he'll have half-a billion. If he lives to 100, he'll have to spend $25 million a year for the rest of his life to spend it down. More, if he invests.
Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity.
Come the holidays, Dylan may write some checks to charity. That's nice. People who have money and give some away can help those in immediate need. But they're not changing the times.
The times, and the tax code, mean that those with capital assets are taxed more leniently than those who live off wages. Dylan will pay a maximum of 20 percent on the gains from the sale of his music. The wage-earner doing well will max out at 37%. The tax code rewards charitable donations, but every deduction claimed shrinks what's available to pay for public services like schools and hospitals and libraries--all things that just might help those without wealth get a leg up.
Charity doesn't change the times. Redistributing assets does. As Marjorie Kelly of the Democracy Collaborative says, "Every economy is defined by who owns and controls assets."
What else could Dylan have done? Since 1966, the commercial rights to the song "We Shall Overcome" have been held by a fund at the Highlander movement training school in Tennessee. Highlander has played a role in every times-changing movement from Rosa Parks to Stacy Abrams.
Anyone can sing the song, but the song's commercial use is overseen by a community board, and whatever you think about private copyrights, the royalties have funded decades of grants to Black artists/activists selected democratically.
"It's not complicated to replicate what we've done," says Ashlee Woodard Henderson of Highlander.
But it is game-changing. Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity. Now, how about even one song?
I nominate The Times They Are a-Changing. What assets are you shifting this season?
You can watch the Laura Flanders Show and see our recent coverage of food justice at lauraflanders.org. And we're in fundraising mode. If you feel like shifting some assets our way, you can at www.lauraflanders.org/donate.