Bob Dylan performs as part of a double bill with Neil Young at Hyde Park on July 12, 2019 in London, England. (Photo by Dave J Hogan/Getty Images for ABA)
The Times They Ain't a-Changing
Charity doesn’t change the times. Redistributing assets does.
I've never been a Bob Dylan fan, and the Nobel Prize winner's sale of his archive to Universal Music changed nothing about that. In fact, sing as he might about how The Times They are a-Changing, Dylan's deal, worth an estimated $300 million to him, changed nothing about anything.
But it could have been different.
Dylan, pre-sale, had assets worth an estimated $200 million. Post-sale, he'll have half-a billion. If he lives to 100, he'll have to spend $25 million a year for the rest of his life to spend it down. More, if he invests.
Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity.
Come the holidays, Dylan may write some checks to charity. That's nice. People who have money and give some away can help those in immediate need. But they're not changing the times.
The times, and the tax code, mean that those with capital assets are taxed more leniently than those who live off wages. Dylan will pay a maximum of 20 percent on the gains from the sale of his music. The wage-earner doing well will max out at 37%. The tax code rewards charitable donations, but every deduction claimed shrinks what's available to pay for public services like schools and hospitals and libraries--all things that just might help those without wealth get a leg up.
Charity doesn't change the times. Redistributing assets does. As Marjorie Kelly of the Democracy Collaborative says, "Every economy is defined by who owns and controls assets."
What else could Dylan have done? Since 1966, the commercial rights to the song "We Shall Overcome" have been held by a fund at the Highlander movement training school in Tennessee. Highlander has played a role in every times-changing movement from Rosa Parks to Stacy Abrams.
Anyone can sing the song, but the song's commercial use is overseen by a community board, and whatever you think about private copyrights, the royalties have funded decades of grants to Black artists/activists selected democratically.
"It's not complicated to replicate what we've done," says Ashlee Woodard Henderson of Highlander.
But it is game-changing. Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity. Now, how about even one song?
I nominate The Times They Are a-Changing. What assets are you shifting this season?
You can watch the Laura Flanders Show and see our recent coverage of food justice at lauraflanders.org. And we're in fundraising mode. If you feel like shifting some assets our way, you can at www.lauraflanders.org/donate.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
I've never been a Bob Dylan fan, and the Nobel Prize winner's sale of his archive to Universal Music changed nothing about that. In fact, sing as he might about how The Times They are a-Changing, Dylan's deal, worth an estimated $300 million to him, changed nothing about anything.
But it could have been different.
Dylan, pre-sale, had assets worth an estimated $200 million. Post-sale, he'll have half-a billion. If he lives to 100, he'll have to spend $25 million a year for the rest of his life to spend it down. More, if he invests.
Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity.
Come the holidays, Dylan may write some checks to charity. That's nice. People who have money and give some away can help those in immediate need. But they're not changing the times.
The times, and the tax code, mean that those with capital assets are taxed more leniently than those who live off wages. Dylan will pay a maximum of 20 percent on the gains from the sale of his music. The wage-earner doing well will max out at 37%. The tax code rewards charitable donations, but every deduction claimed shrinks what's available to pay for public services like schools and hospitals and libraries--all things that just might help those without wealth get a leg up.
Charity doesn't change the times. Redistributing assets does. As Marjorie Kelly of the Democracy Collaborative says, "Every economy is defined by who owns and controls assets."
What else could Dylan have done? Since 1966, the commercial rights to the song "We Shall Overcome" have been held by a fund at the Highlander movement training school in Tennessee. Highlander has played a role in every times-changing movement from Rosa Parks to Stacy Abrams.
Anyone can sing the song, but the song's commercial use is overseen by a community board, and whatever you think about private copyrights, the royalties have funded decades of grants to Black artists/activists selected democratically.
"It's not complicated to replicate what we've done," says Ashlee Woodard Henderson of Highlander.
But it is game-changing. Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity. Now, how about even one song?
I nominate The Times They Are a-Changing. What assets are you shifting this season?
You can watch the Laura Flanders Show and see our recent coverage of food justice at lauraflanders.org. And we're in fundraising mode. If you feel like shifting some assets our way, you can at www.lauraflanders.org/donate.
I've never been a Bob Dylan fan, and the Nobel Prize winner's sale of his archive to Universal Music changed nothing about that. In fact, sing as he might about how The Times They are a-Changing, Dylan's deal, worth an estimated $300 million to him, changed nothing about anything.
But it could have been different.
Dylan, pre-sale, had assets worth an estimated $200 million. Post-sale, he'll have half-a billion. If he lives to 100, he'll have to spend $25 million a year for the rest of his life to spend it down. More, if he invests.
Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity.
Come the holidays, Dylan may write some checks to charity. That's nice. People who have money and give some away can help those in immediate need. But they're not changing the times.
The times, and the tax code, mean that those with capital assets are taxed more leniently than those who live off wages. Dylan will pay a maximum of 20 percent on the gains from the sale of his music. The wage-earner doing well will max out at 37%. The tax code rewards charitable donations, but every deduction claimed shrinks what's available to pay for public services like schools and hospitals and libraries--all things that just might help those without wealth get a leg up.
Charity doesn't change the times. Redistributing assets does. As Marjorie Kelly of the Democracy Collaborative says, "Every economy is defined by who owns and controls assets."
What else could Dylan have done? Since 1966, the commercial rights to the song "We Shall Overcome" have been held by a fund at the Highlander movement training school in Tennessee. Highlander has played a role in every times-changing movement from Rosa Parks to Stacy Abrams.
Anyone can sing the song, but the song's commercial use is overseen by a community board, and whatever you think about private copyrights, the royalties have funded decades of grants to Black artists/activists selected democratically.
"It's not complicated to replicate what we've done," says Ashlee Woodard Henderson of Highlander.
But it is game-changing. Donated to a movement organization, Dylan's publishing rights could have fueled change-makers in perpetuity. Now, how about even one song?
I nominate The Times They Are a-Changing. What assets are you shifting this season?
You can watch the Laura Flanders Show and see our recent coverage of food justice at lauraflanders.org. And we're in fundraising mode. If you feel like shifting some assets our way, you can at www.lauraflanders.org/donate.