Thousands of water protectors and allies spent weeks at the Oceti Sakowin camp in North Dakota in 2016 to protest the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. (Photo: Reuters)
Environmental Justice Wins, Pipelines Lose
Three pipelines were stopped in a twenty-four-hour period after years of opposition led by Indigenous and Black environmental justice groups.
On July 6, a federal judge ordered the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) be shut down and emptied by August 5 until a more extensive environmental review can be carried out by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The order marks a major victory for the Standing Rock Sioux and their allies, who have been organizing for years to oppose the pipeline's construction.
In Virginia, the predominantly Black community of Union Hill, which was settled by formerly enslaved people after the Civil War, led the opposition to the pipeline.
The 1,172-mile-long underground pipeline carries oil from northwest North Dakota through South Dakota and Iowa to an oil terminal in Illinois. In South Dakota, it crosses the Missouri River, the Mississippi River and part of Lake Oahe. The Standing Rock Sioux are concerned that the pipeline will contaminate these water sources.
"Today is a historic day for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the many people who have supported us in the fight against the pipeline," said Mike Faith, Chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.
Since 2016, the tribe has been fighting a high-profile struggle against the DAPL. "It took four long years, but today justice has been served at Standing Rock," said Jan Hasselman, an attorney with Earthjustice who represents the Tribe. "We are undergoing a rapid economic and cultural shift nationally, where the economics of the frontline communities is pushing to the forefront of national consciousness," Hasselman told The Progressive.
On March 25, Judge James E. Boasberg of the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers "had violated the National Environmental Policy Act when it granted an easement [ . . . ] to construct and operate a segment of that crude-oil pipeline running beneath the lake [Oahe]." The court ordered the Corps to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
In response to the ruling, Energy Transfer, the company that built and now operates DAPL, said, "We intend to immediately file a motion to stay this decision and if not granted, to pursue a stay and expedited appeal with the Court of Appeals." Energy Transfer filed that motion on Monday and, according to Hasselman, it was denied by a judge on Tuesday morning. The D.C. Circuit will now decide if it will issue a stay, while Energy Transfer asks for an appeal. On Monday, Energy Transfer's shares fell by up to 14 percent.
The Environmental Impact Statement could take up to thirteen months to prepare, according to the judge's ruling, a timeframe that could see a new administration and new policies in place.
Climate scientist Michael E. Mann told The Progressive, "These are important 'supply side' successes in the climate battle and they demonstrate that activism and continued pressure and awareness-raising DO make a difference. But we need some 'demand side' successes, too. That means legislation with incentives for renewables and a price on carbon. House Democrats have now put forward such a bill, but the only way it becomes law is if the Democrats win back both the Presidency and Senate (and keep the House) in the 2020 election. Elections have consequences!"
The order falls on the heels of Dominion Energy and Duke Energy's July 5 announcement that they have canceled the 600-mile-long Atlantic Coast Pipeline that would have stretched from Virginia to North Carolina and carried fracked natural gas. This pipeline, like DAPL, faced years of legal delays, which ran up their costs. Bill McKibben of 350.org called the rulings "two massive victories in two days."
Tribes including the Lumbee, Coharie, Haliwa-Saponi, and Meherrin Tribes had organized for years to shut down the Atlantic Coastal Pipeline. Large Native American populations live along the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline route. Ryan Emanuel, a member of the Lumbee Tribe and Associate Professor, Center for Geospatial Analysis and Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, told The Progressive: "Individual Native Americans were heavily involved in grassroots organizing and building partnerships with other communities and organizations. People from many different Tribes were involved in these efforts, especially Tribes in North Carolina and Virginia whose traditional territories lay along the route."
In Virginia, the predominantly Black community of Union Hill, which was settled by formerly enslaved people after the Civil War, led the opposition to the pipeline. The Southern Environmental Law Center, which represents an alliance of organizations opposed to the pipeline, called this "a victory for all communities and natural areas in the path of the pipeline--countless farms, rugged national forests, thousands of rivers and streams, and historic African American and Native American communities."
Also on July 6, the Supreme Court dealt a blow to Keystone XL by rejecting a bid to revive a key permit. The court agreed to allow the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to reinstate use of its streamlined permitting for oil and gas pipelines across the country, with the exception of Keystone XL.
The Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe has opposed the Keystone pipeline since it was first proposed in 2008.
Collectively, these three court rulings over a twenty-four-hour period are a big win for tribes and environmental groups. The rulings also highlight economic and environmental costs associated with pipelines, exacerbated by the protests, rendering pipelines less and less viable.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Tina Gerhardt is an environmental journalist who covers international climate change negotiations, domestic and state energy policy and sea level rise. Her writing has been published in Common Dreams, Grist, The Nation, The Progressive, Sierra Magazine, and Washington Monthly. Her latest book is Sea Change: An Atlas of Islands in a Rising Ocean (University of California Press, 2023).
On July 6, a federal judge ordered the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) be shut down and emptied by August 5 until a more extensive environmental review can be carried out by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The order marks a major victory for the Standing Rock Sioux and their allies, who have been organizing for years to oppose the pipeline's construction.
In Virginia, the predominantly Black community of Union Hill, which was settled by formerly enslaved people after the Civil War, led the opposition to the pipeline.
The 1,172-mile-long underground pipeline carries oil from northwest North Dakota through South Dakota and Iowa to an oil terminal in Illinois. In South Dakota, it crosses the Missouri River, the Mississippi River and part of Lake Oahe. The Standing Rock Sioux are concerned that the pipeline will contaminate these water sources.
"Today is a historic day for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the many people who have supported us in the fight against the pipeline," said Mike Faith, Chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.
Since 2016, the tribe has been fighting a high-profile struggle against the DAPL. "It took four long years, but today justice has been served at Standing Rock," said Jan Hasselman, an attorney with Earthjustice who represents the Tribe. "We are undergoing a rapid economic and cultural shift nationally, where the economics of the frontline communities is pushing to the forefront of national consciousness," Hasselman told The Progressive.
On March 25, Judge James E. Boasberg of the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers "had violated the National Environmental Policy Act when it granted an easement [ . . . ] to construct and operate a segment of that crude-oil pipeline running beneath the lake [Oahe]." The court ordered the Corps to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
In response to the ruling, Energy Transfer, the company that built and now operates DAPL, said, "We intend to immediately file a motion to stay this decision and if not granted, to pursue a stay and expedited appeal with the Court of Appeals." Energy Transfer filed that motion on Monday and, according to Hasselman, it was denied by a judge on Tuesday morning. The D.C. Circuit will now decide if it will issue a stay, while Energy Transfer asks for an appeal. On Monday, Energy Transfer's shares fell by up to 14 percent.
The Environmental Impact Statement could take up to thirteen months to prepare, according to the judge's ruling, a timeframe that could see a new administration and new policies in place.
Climate scientist Michael E. Mann told The Progressive, "These are important 'supply side' successes in the climate battle and they demonstrate that activism and continued pressure and awareness-raising DO make a difference. But we need some 'demand side' successes, too. That means legislation with incentives for renewables and a price on carbon. House Democrats have now put forward such a bill, but the only way it becomes law is if the Democrats win back both the Presidency and Senate (and keep the House) in the 2020 election. Elections have consequences!"
The order falls on the heels of Dominion Energy and Duke Energy's July 5 announcement that they have canceled the 600-mile-long Atlantic Coast Pipeline that would have stretched from Virginia to North Carolina and carried fracked natural gas. This pipeline, like DAPL, faced years of legal delays, which ran up their costs. Bill McKibben of 350.org called the rulings "two massive victories in two days."
Tribes including the Lumbee, Coharie, Haliwa-Saponi, and Meherrin Tribes had organized for years to shut down the Atlantic Coastal Pipeline. Large Native American populations live along the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline route. Ryan Emanuel, a member of the Lumbee Tribe and Associate Professor, Center for Geospatial Analysis and Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, told The Progressive: "Individual Native Americans were heavily involved in grassroots organizing and building partnerships with other communities and organizations. People from many different Tribes were involved in these efforts, especially Tribes in North Carolina and Virginia whose traditional territories lay along the route."
In Virginia, the predominantly Black community of Union Hill, which was settled by formerly enslaved people after the Civil War, led the opposition to the pipeline. The Southern Environmental Law Center, which represents an alliance of organizations opposed to the pipeline, called this "a victory for all communities and natural areas in the path of the pipeline--countless farms, rugged national forests, thousands of rivers and streams, and historic African American and Native American communities."
Also on July 6, the Supreme Court dealt a blow to Keystone XL by rejecting a bid to revive a key permit. The court agreed to allow the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to reinstate use of its streamlined permitting for oil and gas pipelines across the country, with the exception of Keystone XL.
The Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe has opposed the Keystone pipeline since it was first proposed in 2008.
Collectively, these three court rulings over a twenty-four-hour period are a big win for tribes and environmental groups. The rulings also highlight economic and environmental costs associated with pipelines, exacerbated by the protests, rendering pipelines less and less viable.
Tina Gerhardt is an environmental journalist who covers international climate change negotiations, domestic and state energy policy and sea level rise. Her writing has been published in Common Dreams, Grist, The Nation, The Progressive, Sierra Magazine, and Washington Monthly. Her latest book is Sea Change: An Atlas of Islands in a Rising Ocean (University of California Press, 2023).
On July 6, a federal judge ordered the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) be shut down and emptied by August 5 until a more extensive environmental review can be carried out by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The order marks a major victory for the Standing Rock Sioux and their allies, who have been organizing for years to oppose the pipeline's construction.
In Virginia, the predominantly Black community of Union Hill, which was settled by formerly enslaved people after the Civil War, led the opposition to the pipeline.
The 1,172-mile-long underground pipeline carries oil from northwest North Dakota through South Dakota and Iowa to an oil terminal in Illinois. In South Dakota, it crosses the Missouri River, the Mississippi River and part of Lake Oahe. The Standing Rock Sioux are concerned that the pipeline will contaminate these water sources.
"Today is a historic day for the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the many people who have supported us in the fight against the pipeline," said Mike Faith, Chairman of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.
Since 2016, the tribe has been fighting a high-profile struggle against the DAPL. "It took four long years, but today justice has been served at Standing Rock," said Jan Hasselman, an attorney with Earthjustice who represents the Tribe. "We are undergoing a rapid economic and cultural shift nationally, where the economics of the frontline communities is pushing to the forefront of national consciousness," Hasselman told The Progressive.
On March 25, Judge James E. Boasberg of the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia ruled that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers "had violated the National Environmental Policy Act when it granted an easement [ . . . ] to construct and operate a segment of that crude-oil pipeline running beneath the lake [Oahe]." The court ordered the Corps to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
In response to the ruling, Energy Transfer, the company that built and now operates DAPL, said, "We intend to immediately file a motion to stay this decision and if not granted, to pursue a stay and expedited appeal with the Court of Appeals." Energy Transfer filed that motion on Monday and, according to Hasselman, it was denied by a judge on Tuesday morning. The D.C. Circuit will now decide if it will issue a stay, while Energy Transfer asks for an appeal. On Monday, Energy Transfer's shares fell by up to 14 percent.
The Environmental Impact Statement could take up to thirteen months to prepare, according to the judge's ruling, a timeframe that could see a new administration and new policies in place.
Climate scientist Michael E. Mann told The Progressive, "These are important 'supply side' successes in the climate battle and they demonstrate that activism and continued pressure and awareness-raising DO make a difference. But we need some 'demand side' successes, too. That means legislation with incentives for renewables and a price on carbon. House Democrats have now put forward such a bill, but the only way it becomes law is if the Democrats win back both the Presidency and Senate (and keep the House) in the 2020 election. Elections have consequences!"
The order falls on the heels of Dominion Energy and Duke Energy's July 5 announcement that they have canceled the 600-mile-long Atlantic Coast Pipeline that would have stretched from Virginia to North Carolina and carried fracked natural gas. This pipeline, like DAPL, faced years of legal delays, which ran up their costs. Bill McKibben of 350.org called the rulings "two massive victories in two days."
Tribes including the Lumbee, Coharie, Haliwa-Saponi, and Meherrin Tribes had organized for years to shut down the Atlantic Coastal Pipeline. Large Native American populations live along the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline route. Ryan Emanuel, a member of the Lumbee Tribe and Associate Professor, Center for Geospatial Analysis and Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, told The Progressive: "Individual Native Americans were heavily involved in grassroots organizing and building partnerships with other communities and organizations. People from many different Tribes were involved in these efforts, especially Tribes in North Carolina and Virginia whose traditional territories lay along the route."
In Virginia, the predominantly Black community of Union Hill, which was settled by formerly enslaved people after the Civil War, led the opposition to the pipeline. The Southern Environmental Law Center, which represents an alliance of organizations opposed to the pipeline, called this "a victory for all communities and natural areas in the path of the pipeline--countless farms, rugged national forests, thousands of rivers and streams, and historic African American and Native American communities."
Also on July 6, the Supreme Court dealt a blow to Keystone XL by rejecting a bid to revive a key permit. The court agreed to allow the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to reinstate use of its streamlined permitting for oil and gas pipelines across the country, with the exception of Keystone XL.
The Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe has opposed the Keystone pipeline since it was first proposed in 2008.
Collectively, these three court rulings over a twenty-four-hour period are a big win for tribes and environmental groups. The rulings also highlight economic and environmental costs associated with pipelines, exacerbated by the protests, rendering pipelines less and less viable.