A Senate acquittal will be a triumph for Trump, and a disgrace for the United States, and for the world. (Photo: AFP/Timothy A. Clary)
Dec 21, 2019
Poor Donald Trump. They don't let you rest easy. When the political trial--and its consequences--looms ominously over his head, the powerful evangelistic magazine Christianity Today published an editorial in which it violently attacks the American president and asks for his removal from power. His answer: "I will not read it again!" Trump said furiously.
Mark Galli, the editor of the magazine, wrote: "The facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president's political opponents." These are certainly very hard words from a group that until now had strongly supported the American president.
These facts occur when the political trial against President Trump has just been approved by the House of Representatives of the US Congress and has to be submitted to the Senate for approval. Contrary to what happens with parliamentary democracies, where it is enough for parliament to lose confidence in the Prime Minister to provoke a new parliamentary election, impeachment is the weapon that presidential democracies have to remove a president from power.
This is the third time in the history of the United States that a president is subjected to political trial. The first was President Andrew Johnson, the second was Bill Clinton and the last of the presidents is Donald Trump. Donald Trump is accused of denying military aid to Ukraine unless his president agrees to seek evidence against whom Donald Trump perceives as his main political enemy: Joe Biden, the former Vice President of the United States.
Bill Clinton was accused of committing a sexual infidelity with Monica Lewinsky, a young woman who worked on an interim basis in the United States Congress. This trial was followed avidly throughout the world and, although Clinton was not finally removed from office, he can never eliminate the stain that incident had on his political career. Interestingly, Monica Lewisnky, who is currently 46 years old, was able to overcome this unfortunate incident and is currently a fashion designer and a women's rights activist.
The course of the process against Trump is in the hands of Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader of Congress, who is probably the most powerful woman in the United States. She is the one who has to reach an agreement with the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, especially with regard to the testimony of witnesses that Democrats consider key in this process.
Until reaching an agreement on that point, Nancy Pelosi refuses to send the request for impeachment to the US Senate, much to the fury of the Republicans who consider this as a dishonest maneuver of the Democrats as it lengthens the process and runs the risk that New evidence may appear against President Trump.
Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi, who, despite her small stature is a formidable political figure, does not hide her contempt for both leaders. "Those who wrote our Constitution," she said recently, "imagined a scenario where the President of our country was a rogue person. However, they never imagined that both the President and the Senate leader were equally rogue."
In these circumstances, it is possible that the political trial is still delayed for an indeterminate time. And that, when carried out, President Trump, who enjoys an overwhelming majority in the Senate, is finally acquitted of the charges against him and remains in power. It will be a triumph for Trump, and a disgrace for the United States, and for the world.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just hours away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Cesar Chelala
Dr. Cesar Chelala is an international public health consultant, co-winner of an Overseas Press Club of America award and two national journalism awards from Argentina.
Poor Donald Trump. They don't let you rest easy. When the political trial--and its consequences--looms ominously over his head, the powerful evangelistic magazine Christianity Today published an editorial in which it violently attacks the American president and asks for his removal from power. His answer: "I will not read it again!" Trump said furiously.
Mark Galli, the editor of the magazine, wrote: "The facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president's political opponents." These are certainly very hard words from a group that until now had strongly supported the American president.
These facts occur when the political trial against President Trump has just been approved by the House of Representatives of the US Congress and has to be submitted to the Senate for approval. Contrary to what happens with parliamentary democracies, where it is enough for parliament to lose confidence in the Prime Minister to provoke a new parliamentary election, impeachment is the weapon that presidential democracies have to remove a president from power.
This is the third time in the history of the United States that a president is subjected to political trial. The first was President Andrew Johnson, the second was Bill Clinton and the last of the presidents is Donald Trump. Donald Trump is accused of denying military aid to Ukraine unless his president agrees to seek evidence against whom Donald Trump perceives as his main political enemy: Joe Biden, the former Vice President of the United States.
Bill Clinton was accused of committing a sexual infidelity with Monica Lewinsky, a young woman who worked on an interim basis in the United States Congress. This trial was followed avidly throughout the world and, although Clinton was not finally removed from office, he can never eliminate the stain that incident had on his political career. Interestingly, Monica Lewisnky, who is currently 46 years old, was able to overcome this unfortunate incident and is currently a fashion designer and a women's rights activist.
The course of the process against Trump is in the hands of Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader of Congress, who is probably the most powerful woman in the United States. She is the one who has to reach an agreement with the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, especially with regard to the testimony of witnesses that Democrats consider key in this process.
Until reaching an agreement on that point, Nancy Pelosi refuses to send the request for impeachment to the US Senate, much to the fury of the Republicans who consider this as a dishonest maneuver of the Democrats as it lengthens the process and runs the risk that New evidence may appear against President Trump.
Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi, who, despite her small stature is a formidable political figure, does not hide her contempt for both leaders. "Those who wrote our Constitution," she said recently, "imagined a scenario where the President of our country was a rogue person. However, they never imagined that both the President and the Senate leader were equally rogue."
In these circumstances, it is possible that the political trial is still delayed for an indeterminate time. And that, when carried out, President Trump, who enjoys an overwhelming majority in the Senate, is finally acquitted of the charges against him and remains in power. It will be a triumph for Trump, and a disgrace for the United States, and for the world.
Cesar Chelala
Dr. Cesar Chelala is an international public health consultant, co-winner of an Overseas Press Club of America award and two national journalism awards from Argentina.
Poor Donald Trump. They don't let you rest easy. When the political trial--and its consequences--looms ominously over his head, the powerful evangelistic magazine Christianity Today published an editorial in which it violently attacks the American president and asks for his removal from power. His answer: "I will not read it again!" Trump said furiously.
Mark Galli, the editor of the magazine, wrote: "The facts in this instance are unambiguous: The president of the United States attempted to use his political power to coerce a foreign leader to harass and discredit one of the president's political opponents." These are certainly very hard words from a group that until now had strongly supported the American president.
These facts occur when the political trial against President Trump has just been approved by the House of Representatives of the US Congress and has to be submitted to the Senate for approval. Contrary to what happens with parliamentary democracies, where it is enough for parliament to lose confidence in the Prime Minister to provoke a new parliamentary election, impeachment is the weapon that presidential democracies have to remove a president from power.
This is the third time in the history of the United States that a president is subjected to political trial. The first was President Andrew Johnson, the second was Bill Clinton and the last of the presidents is Donald Trump. Donald Trump is accused of denying military aid to Ukraine unless his president agrees to seek evidence against whom Donald Trump perceives as his main political enemy: Joe Biden, the former Vice President of the United States.
Bill Clinton was accused of committing a sexual infidelity with Monica Lewinsky, a young woman who worked on an interim basis in the United States Congress. This trial was followed avidly throughout the world and, although Clinton was not finally removed from office, he can never eliminate the stain that incident had on his political career. Interestingly, Monica Lewisnky, who is currently 46 years old, was able to overcome this unfortunate incident and is currently a fashion designer and a women's rights activist.
The course of the process against Trump is in the hands of Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader of Congress, who is probably the most powerful woman in the United States. She is the one who has to reach an agreement with the Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, especially with regard to the testimony of witnesses that Democrats consider key in this process.
Until reaching an agreement on that point, Nancy Pelosi refuses to send the request for impeachment to the US Senate, much to the fury of the Republicans who consider this as a dishonest maneuver of the Democrats as it lengthens the process and runs the risk that New evidence may appear against President Trump.
Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi, who, despite her small stature is a formidable political figure, does not hide her contempt for both leaders. "Those who wrote our Constitution," she said recently, "imagined a scenario where the President of our country was a rogue person. However, they never imagined that both the President and the Senate leader were equally rogue."
In these circumstances, it is possible that the political trial is still delayed for an indeterminate time. And that, when carried out, President Trump, who enjoys an overwhelming majority in the Senate, is finally acquitted of the charges against him and remains in power. It will be a triumph for Trump, and a disgrace for the United States, and for the world.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
LATEST NEWS
'Endangering Every American's Health': 9 Former CDC Chiefs Sound Alarm on RFK Jr.
Their "astonishing, powerful op-ed," said one professor, "drives home what we are losing and what's already been lost."
Sep 01, 2025
Nearly every living former director or acting director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from the past half-century took to the pages of The New York Times on Monday to jointly argue that Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. "is endangering every American's health."
"Collectively, we spent more than 100 years working at the CDC, the world's preeminent public health agency. We served under multiple Republican and Democratic administrations," Drs. William Foege, William Roper, David Satcher, Jeffrey Koplan, Richard Besser, Tom Frieden, Anne Schuchat, Rochelle Walensky, and Mandy Cohen highlighted.
What RFK Jr. "has done to the CDC and to our nation's public health system over the past several months—culminating in his decision to fire Dr. Susan Monarez as CDC director days ago—is unlike anything we have ever seen at the agency, and unlike anything our country has ever experienced," the nine former agency leaders wrote.
Known for spreading misinformation about vaccines and a series of scandals, Kennedy was a controversial figure long before President Donald Trump chose him to lead HHS—a decision that Senate Republicans affirmed in February. However, in the wake of Monarez's ouster, fresh calls for him to resign or be fired have mounted.
This is powerful. Nine former CDC leaders just came together to defend SCIENCE.Maybe it’s time we LISTEN TO THEM—not the loud voices spreading MISINFORMATION.Science saves lives. Lies cost themwww.nytimes.com/2025/09/01/o...
[image or embed]
— Krutika Kuppalli, MD FIDSA (@krutikakuppalli.bsky.social) September 1, 2025 at 10:35 AM
As the ex-directors detailed:
Secretary Kennedy has fired thousands of federal health workers and severely weakened programs designed to protect Americans from cancer, heart attacks, strokes, lead poisoning, injury, violence, and more. Amid the largest measles outbreak in the United States in a generation, he's focused on unproven "treatments" while downplaying vaccines. He canceled investments in promising medical research that will leave us ill-prepared for future health emergencies. He replaced experts on federal health advisory committees with unqualified individuals who share his dangerous and unscientific views. He announced the end of US support for global vaccination programs that protect millions of children and keep Americans safe, citing flawed research and making inaccurate statements. And he championed federal legislation that will cause millions of people with health insurance through Medicaid to lose their coverage. Firing Dr. Monarez—which led to the resignations of top CDC officials—adds considerable fuel to this raging fire.
Monarez was nominated by Trump, and was confirmed by Senate Republicans in late July. As the op-ed authors noted, she was forced out by RFK Jr. just weeks later, after she reportedly refused "to rubber-stamp his dangerous and unfounded vaccine recommendations or heed his demand to fire senior CDC staff members."
"These are not typical requests from a health secretary to a CDC director," they wrote. "Not even close. None of us would have agreed to the secretary's demands, and we applaud Dr. Monarez for standing up for the agency and the health of our communities."
After Monarez's exit, Trump tapped Jim O'Neill, an RFK Jr. aide and biotech investor, as the CDC's interim director. Critics including Robert Steinbrook, director of Public Citizen's health research group, warn that "unlike Susan Monarez, O'Neill is likely to rubber-stamp dangerous vaccine recommendations from HHS Secretary Kennedy's handpicked appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and obey orders to fire CDC public health experts with scientific integrity."
The agency's former directors didn't address O'Neill, but they wrote: "To those on the CDC staff who continue to perform their jobs heroically in the face of the excruciating circumstances, we offer our sincere thanks and appreciation. Their ongoing dedication is a model for all of us. But it's clear that the agency is hurting badly."
"We have a message for the rest of the nation as well: This is a time to rally to protect the health of every American," they continued. The experts called on Congress to "exercise its oversight authority over HHS," and state and local governments to "fill funding gaps where they can." They also urged philanthropy, the private sector, medical groups, and physicians to boost investments, "continue to stand up for science and truth," and support patients "with sound guidance and empathy."
Doctors, researchers, journalists, and others called their "must-read" piece "extraordinary" and "important."
"Just an astonishing, powerful op-ed that drives home what we are losing and what's already been lost," said University of Michigan Law School professor Leah Litman. "We are so incredibly fortunate to live with the advances [of] modern medicine and health science. Destroying and stymying it is just unforgivable."
'Brazenly Anti-Worker': Labor Day Reports Highlight Trump Attacks on Unions
"This is a government that is by, and for, the CEOs and billionaires," said AFL-CIO president Liz Shuler.
Sep 01, 2025
Although US President Donald Trump's administration likes to boast that he puts "American workers first," several news reports published on Monday document the president's attacks on the rights of working people and labor unions.
As longtime labor reporter Steven Greenhouse explained in The Guardian, Trump throughout his second term has "taken dozens of actions that hurt workers, often by cutting their pay or making their jobs more dangerous."
Among other things, Greenhouse cited Trump's decision to halt a regulation intended to protect coal miners from lung disease, as well as his decision to strip a million federal workers of their collective bargaining rights.
Liz Shuler, president of the AFL-CIO, told Greenhouse that Trump's actions amount to a "big betrayal" of his promises to look out for US workers during the 2024 presidential campaign.
"His attacks on unions are coming fast and furious," she said. "He talks a good game of being for working people, but he's doing the absolute opposite. This is a government that is by, and for, the CEOs and billionaires."
Heidi Shierholz, president of the Economic Policy Institute, similarly told Greenhouse that Trump has been "absolutely, brazenly anti-worker," and she cited him ripping away an increase in the minimum wage for federal contractors that had been enacted by former President Joe Biden as a prime example.
"The minimum wage is incredibly popular," she said. "He just took away the minimum wage from hundreds of thousands of workers. That blew my mind."
NPR published its own Labor Day report that zeroed in on how the president is "decimating" federal employee unions by issuing March and August executive orders stripping them of the power to collectively bargain for better working conditions.
So far, nine federal agencies have canceled their union contracts as a result of the orders, which are based on a provision in federal law that gives the president the power to terminate collective bargaining at agencies that are primarily involved with national security.
The Trump administration has embraced a maximalist interpretation of this power and has demanded the end of collective bargaining at departments that aren't primarily known as national security agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Weather Service.
However, Trump's attacks on organized labor haven't completely intimidated government workers from joining unions. As the Los Angeles Times reported, the Trump administration's cuts to the National Park Service earlier this year inspired hundreds of workers at the California-based Yosemite, Sequoia, and Kings Canyon national parks to unionize.
Although labor organizers had been trying unsuccessfully for years to get park workers to sign on, that changed when the Trump administration took a hatchet to parks' budgets and enacted mass layoffs.
"More than 97% of employees at Yosemite and Sequoia and Kings Canyon national parks who cast ballots voted to unionize, with results certified last week," wrote the Los Angeles Times. "More than 600 staffers—including interpretive park rangers, biologists, firefighters, and fee collectors—are now represented by the National Federation of Federal Employees."
Even so, many workers who succeed in forming unions may no longer get their grievances heard given the state of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
As documented by Timothy Noah in The New Republic, the NLRB is now "hanging by a thread" in the wake of a court ruling that declared the board's structure to be unconstitutional because it barred the president from being able to fire NLRB administrative judges at will.
"The ruling doesn't shut down the NLRB entirely because it applies only to cases in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, where the 5th Circuit has jurisdiction," Noah explained. "But Jennifer Abruzzo, who was President Joe Biden's NLRB general counsel, told me that the decision will 'open the floodgates for employers to forum-shop and seek to get injunctions' in those three states."
Noah noted that this lawsuit was brought in part by SpaceX owner and one-time Trump ally Elon Musk, and he accused the Trump NLRB of waging a "half-hearted" fight against Musk's attack on workers' rights.
Thanks to Trump and Musk's actions, Noah concluded, American oligarchs "can toast the NLRB's imminent destruction."
Trump Voter ID Threat Condemned as 'Unconstitutional'
"The Constitution gives this authority to the states and Congress, not you!" said the head of Democracy Defenders Fund, threatening a lawsuit.
Sep 01, 2025
US President Donald Trump continued his "authoritarian takeover of our election system" over the weekend, threatening an executive order requiring every voter to present identification, which experts swiftly denounced as clearly "unconstitutional."
"Voter I.D. Must Be Part of Every Single Vote. NO EXCEPTIONS!" Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform late Saturday. "I Will Be Doing An Executive Order To That End!!! Also, No Mail-In Voting, Except For Those That Are Very Ill, And The Far Away Military. USE PAPER BALLOTS ONLY!!!"
Less than two weeks ago, Trump declared on the platform that "I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES." He claimed, without evidence, that voting by mail leads to "MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD," and promised to take executive action ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Those posts came as battles over his March executive order (EO), "Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections," are playing out in federal court. The measure was largely blocked by multiple district judges, but the president is appealing.
Trump's voter ID post provoked a new threat of legal action to stop his unconstitutional attacks on the nation's election system.
"Go ahead, make my day Mr. Trump," said Norm Eisen, who co-founded Democracy Defenders Fund and served as White House special counsel for ethics and government reform during the Obama administration.
"We at Democracy Defenders Fund immediately sued you and got an injunction on your first voting EO," he noted. "We will do the same here if you try it again. The Constitution gives this authority to the states and Congress, not you!"
In addition to pointing out that Trump is "an absentee voter himself," Democracy Docket explained Sunday that "the US Constitution gives the states the primary authority to regulate elections, while empowering Congress to 'at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations.' The Framers never considered authorizing the president to oversee elections."
According to the National Conference of State Legislatures: "Thirty-six states have laws requesting or requiring voters to show some form of identification at the polls. The remaining 14 states and Washington, DC use other methods to verify the identity of voters."
Those laws already prevent Americans from participating in elections, according to the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law.
"Overly burdensome photo ID requirements block millions of eligible American citizens from voting," the center's voter ID webpage says. "As many as 11% of eligible voters do not have the kind of ID that is required by states with strict ID requirements, and that percentage is even higher among seniors, minorities, people with disabilities, low-income voters, and students."
Most Popular
Together, we can defend the truth when it’s under siege.
Your support powers the fearless, independent reporting that democracy depends on.