Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

If you’ve been waiting for the right time to support our work—that time is now.

Our mission is simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

But without the support of our readers, this model does not work and we simply won’t survive. It’s that simple.
We must meet our Mid-Year Campaign goal but we need you now.

Please, support independent journalism today.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

From left, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calf., Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., conduct a news conference on the testimony of former special counsel Robert Mueller on his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election on Wednesday, July 24, 2019. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

From left, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calf., Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., conduct a news conference on the testimony of former special counsel Robert Mueller on his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election on Wednesday, July 24, 2019. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

Why Are House Democrats Afraid to Wield Their Subpoena Power?

Make no mistake: Democratic cowardice toward oversight has real, "kitchen-table" consequences for voters.

Jeff HauserMax Moran

Does the Democratic leadership even want to wield power?

It’s hard to tell. Nine months into their House majority, Democratic committee chairs don’t seem to realize they have any powers at all besides the occasional sarcastic clap.

To be clear, Democratic House leaders possess a major power that Republicans can do nothing to block, obstruct, or impede: the power to issue and enforce subpoenas. Through subpoenas, committee chairs could force the Trump administration’s malfeasance into the spotlight. Through subpoenas, Democrats could uncover facts and compel testimony about corporate misconduct important to voters. Through subpoenas, Democratic leaders could answer Trump’s strongman routine with a backbone of their own.

Trump clearly recognizes the danger that subpoenas pose. He braced for a long fight in April by ordering subordinates to never comply with Democratic subpoena activity, thus openly declaring his contempt for the law. Democrats have met that escalation… by doing nothing.

"Democrats act like there's nothing more they can do to rein in the Trump administration or improve the lives of their constituents, when they've barely tapped the powers available to them. They can do a tremendous amount without having to so much as email Mitch McConnell's office. But they haven't."

Take a handful of examples from last week. On Tuesday, former Trump campaign manager Corey Lewandowski repeatedly refused to answer questions from the House Judiciary Committee. He displayed open loathing toward the very idea of congressional inquiry. To answer this challenge to Congress’ authority, chairman Jerrold Nadler… did nothing.

Acting Intelligence Chief Joseph Maguire refused to testify to the House Intelligence Committee, in a clear violation of whistleblower laws, despite repeated requests from the Democrats. In response, Chairman Adam Schiff has… not yet filed a lawsuit.

On Thursday, the House Education and Labor Committee fulminated to an empty chair because the contractor in charge of the broken Public Service Loan Forgiveness program—which has cultivated corrupt ties with Betsy DeVos’ Education Department—simply declined an invitation to testify. In response, Chairman Bobby Scott seems to plan on… doing nothing.

In each of these cases, subpoenas and enforcement would solve the problems that seem to leave House leaders stumped. The administration won’t hand over whistleblower information? Subpoena it. Is your subpoena being ignored? Fire off a lawsuit to enforce it. Can’t get a straight answer from Trump’s old campaign manager? Hold him in contempt. Can’t get a student loan contractor to talk about its ties to DeVos? Tell the CEO, “We’ll see you in court.”

Make no mistake: Democratic cowardice toward oversight has real, “kitchen-table” consequences for voters. That student loan contractor, the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (PHEAA), does everything it can to keep hundreds of thousands of young debtors from making the qualifying payments they need to achieve loan forgiveness. PHEAA aggressively pushes borrowers into forbearance, fails to correct copious errors, and actually penalizes borrowers for paying too much.

This system’s mismanagement conveniently, implausibly seems to always keep young people in debt. It’s exactly the kind of shadiness that subpoenas could help to clarify. It’s about as “kitchen-table” as politics can get: the millennial chained down by student loan debt is a damning cliché in modern life.

Yet Scott hasn’t forced the company’s leadership to the table, nor compelled information from the Education Department, which granted these contracts. This is an Education Department, mind you, that let top staffer Kathleen Smith immunize PHEAA from state-level oversight right before taking a job at the company. Faced with one stumble of resistance, Scott defaults to doing nothing.

Democratic leaders have done a lot of nothing in the last nine months. It seems to have taken the imminent emergence of a primary challenger to scare Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal into actually suing for Trump’s tax returns. Remember when requesting Trump’s tax returns was supposed to be the easiest oversight target of all? They likely won’t be here before the 2020 elections.

At least that lawsuit eventually happened. As far as we’ve gathered, Democrats are only pursuing two cases in retaliation to Trump’s obstruction of their subpoena powers. There’s the case about his tax returns, and the case about White House Counsel Donald McGahn’s testimony. There are two cases where Trump’s lawyers intervened against congressional subpoenas of third parties, but Democrats weren’t subpoenaing the administration in the first place in either case. And that’s it. One would think, considering the courts’ prominence in Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s messaging about Trump, that her caucus would take more action against his defiance of their oversight authority.

Democrats act like there’s nothing more they can do to rein in the Trump administration or improve the lives of their constituents, when they’ve barely tapped the powers available to them. They can do a tremendous amount without having to so much as email Mitch McConnell’s office. But they haven’t.

If Pelosi and the party elders want to know why the young progressive base is so angry with them, they should ask themselves: “Why are we so scared of holding a gavel?”

 

This article was produced in partnership by the Center for Economic and Policy Research and Economy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Jeff Hauser

Jeff Hauser is the founder and director of the Revolving Door Project, which scrutinizes executive branch appointees to ensure they use their office to serve the broad public interest.

Max Moran

Max Moran

Max Moran is a research assistant at the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.

 

80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·


Progressives Rebuke Dem Leadership as Clyburn Dismisses Death of Roe as 'Anticlimactic'

"The gap between the Democratic leadership, and younger progressives on the question of 'How Bad Is It?' is just enormous."

Julia Conley ·


In 10 Key US Senate Races, Here's How Top Candidates Responded to Roe Ruling

While Republicans unanimously welcomed the Supreme Court's rollback of half a century of reproductive rights, one Democrat said "it's just wrong that my granddaughter will have fewer freedoms than my grandmother did."

Brett Wilkins ·


Sanders Says End Filibuster to Combat 'Outrageous' Supreme Court Assault on Abortion Rights

"If Republicans can end the filibuster to install right-wing judges to overturn Roe v. Wade, Democrats can and must end the filibuster, codify Roe v. Wade, and make abortion legal and safe," said the Vermont senator.

Jake Johnson ·


Patients in Trigger-Ban States Immediately Denied Abortion Care in Post-Roe US

Some people scheduled to receive abortions were turned away within minutes of the right-wing Supreme Court's decision to strike down Roe v. Wade.

Kenny Stancil ·

Common Dreams Logo