The Democratic Party is foolish not to dedicate a presidential debate to this issue. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
DNC Chair Tom Perez Tries to Justify Failure to Prioritize Climate Crisis
The Democratic Party leadership’s failure to take global heating seriously is out of step with Democratic voters who now consider climate change to be a top-tier issue
Last week, during his national tour, Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez stopped in Albuquerque to speak at a Democratic Party gathering. But he hastily left without taking questions. Luckily, I was able to approach Perez before his talk and handed him the RootsAction.org petition urging a presidential debate focused on climate change; more than 4,500 people had signed it the day before.
Perez cut me off before I could ask a question, but he did assert that there would be a "robust discussion of climate" during the debate season. Perez was referring to his reformulated response to the call for a climate-change debate - now saying that he is urging TV networks to have their panelists focus serious questioning on the topic.
Perez is passing responsibility for addressing climate change to the same corporate media which largely failed to ask any such questions in 2015 and 2016. This is no more logical than Perez' prior justification for denying a debate on the biggest existential threat in the history of humankind - that the DNC would then have to allow every other candidate's issue-specific debate ideas.
Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
The Democratic Party leadership's failure to take global heating seriously is out of step with Democratic voters who now consider climate change to be a top-tier issue. The world's top scientists tell us there are only 11 years to take preventative action to get fossil fuels out of national economies, and this estimate is likely an understatement. But Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused to establish a House committee on the Green New Deal, dismissing it as "the Green Dream or whatever they call it". Instead, she and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer formed an advisory committee with no mandate to come up with a plan, no subpoena power to bring fossil fuel executives to account for their contribution to the climate catastrophe, and no rule prohibiting members of the committee from receiving fossil fuel industry money.
In the Senate, pro-coal Senator Joe Manchin is the ranking Democrat on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. In August, 2018, the DNC reversed its brief ban on accepting fossil fuel donations.
It is little wonder that at the Albuquerque Democratic Party event, there were over 100 people, but virtually no one under the age of 40. Young voters believe that the government should do more about climate change, even if it slows down economic growth. Yet, fossil fuel donations to Democratic leadership still play an outsized role in the agenda of the party.
Now is the time for our nation's leaders to encourage public discussion of the options for averting climate disaster. The Democratic Party is foolish not to dedicate a presidential debate to this issue.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Last week, during his national tour, Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez stopped in Albuquerque to speak at a Democratic Party gathering. But he hastily left without taking questions. Luckily, I was able to approach Perez before his talk and handed him the RootsAction.org petition urging a presidential debate focused on climate change; more than 4,500 people had signed it the day before.
Perez cut me off before I could ask a question, but he did assert that there would be a "robust discussion of climate" during the debate season. Perez was referring to his reformulated response to the call for a climate-change debate - now saying that he is urging TV networks to have their panelists focus serious questioning on the topic.
Perez is passing responsibility for addressing climate change to the same corporate media which largely failed to ask any such questions in 2015 and 2016. This is no more logical than Perez' prior justification for denying a debate on the biggest existential threat in the history of humankind - that the DNC would then have to allow every other candidate's issue-specific debate ideas.
Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
The Democratic Party leadership's failure to take global heating seriously is out of step with Democratic voters who now consider climate change to be a top-tier issue. The world's top scientists tell us there are only 11 years to take preventative action to get fossil fuels out of national economies, and this estimate is likely an understatement. But Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused to establish a House committee on the Green New Deal, dismissing it as "the Green Dream or whatever they call it". Instead, she and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer formed an advisory committee with no mandate to come up with a plan, no subpoena power to bring fossil fuel executives to account for their contribution to the climate catastrophe, and no rule prohibiting members of the committee from receiving fossil fuel industry money.
In the Senate, pro-coal Senator Joe Manchin is the ranking Democrat on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. In August, 2018, the DNC reversed its brief ban on accepting fossil fuel donations.
It is little wonder that at the Albuquerque Democratic Party event, there were over 100 people, but virtually no one under the age of 40. Young voters believe that the government should do more about climate change, even if it slows down economic growth. Yet, fossil fuel donations to Democratic leadership still play an outsized role in the agenda of the party.
Now is the time for our nation's leaders to encourage public discussion of the options for averting climate disaster. The Democratic Party is foolish not to dedicate a presidential debate to this issue.
Last week, during his national tour, Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez stopped in Albuquerque to speak at a Democratic Party gathering. But he hastily left without taking questions. Luckily, I was able to approach Perez before his talk and handed him the RootsAction.org petition urging a presidential debate focused on climate change; more than 4,500 people had signed it the day before.
Perez cut me off before I could ask a question, but he did assert that there would be a "robust discussion of climate" during the debate season. Perez was referring to his reformulated response to the call for a climate-change debate - now saying that he is urging TV networks to have their panelists focus serious questioning on the topic.
Perez is passing responsibility for addressing climate change to the same corporate media which largely failed to ask any such questions in 2015 and 2016. This is no more logical than Perez' prior justification for denying a debate on the biggest existential threat in the history of humankind - that the DNC would then have to allow every other candidate's issue-specific debate ideas.
Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
The Democratic Party leadership's failure to take global heating seriously is out of step with Democratic voters who now consider climate change to be a top-tier issue. The world's top scientists tell us there are only 11 years to take preventative action to get fossil fuels out of national economies, and this estimate is likely an understatement. But Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused to establish a House committee on the Green New Deal, dismissing it as "the Green Dream or whatever they call it". Instead, she and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer formed an advisory committee with no mandate to come up with a plan, no subpoena power to bring fossil fuel executives to account for their contribution to the climate catastrophe, and no rule prohibiting members of the committee from receiving fossil fuel industry money.
In the Senate, pro-coal Senator Joe Manchin is the ranking Democrat on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. In August, 2018, the DNC reversed its brief ban on accepting fossil fuel donations.
It is little wonder that at the Albuquerque Democratic Party event, there were over 100 people, but virtually no one under the age of 40. Young voters believe that the government should do more about climate change, even if it slows down economic growth. Yet, fossil fuel donations to Democratic leadership still play an outsized role in the agenda of the party.
Now is the time for our nation's leaders to encourage public discussion of the options for averting climate disaster. The Democratic Party is foolish not to dedicate a presidential debate to this issue.