The Democratic Party is foolish not to dedicate a presidential debate to this issue. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
Jun 18, 2019
Last week, during his national tour, Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez stopped in Albuquerque to speak at a Democratic Party gathering. But he hastily left without taking questions. Luckily, I was able to approach Perez before his talk and handed him the RootsAction.org petition urging a presidential debate focused on climate change; more than 4,500 people had signed it the day before.
Perez cut me off before I could ask a question, but he did assert that there would be a "robust discussion of climate" during the debate season. Perez was referring to his reformulated response to the call for a climate-change debate - now saying that he is urging TV networks to have their panelists focus serious questioning on the topic.
Perez is passing responsibility for addressing climate change to the same corporate media which largely failed to ask any such questions in 2015 and 2016. This is no more logical than Perez' prior justification for denying a debate on the biggest existential threat in the history of humankind - that the DNC would then have to allow every other candidate's issue-specific debate ideas.
Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
The Democratic Party leadership's failure to take global heating seriously is out of step with Democratic voters who now consider climate change to be a top-tier issue. The world's top scientists tell us there are only 11 years to take preventative action to get fossil fuels out of national economies, and this estimate is likely an understatement. But Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused to establish a House committee on the Green New Deal, dismissing it as "the Green Dream or whatever they call it". Instead, she and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer formed an advisory committee with no mandate to come up with a plan, no subpoena power to bring fossil fuel executives to account for their contribution to the climate catastrophe, and no rule prohibiting members of the committee from receiving fossil fuel industry money.
In the Senate, pro-coal Senator Joe Manchin is the ranking Democrat on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. In August, 2018, the DNC reversed its brief ban on accepting fossil fuel donations.
It is little wonder that at the Albuquerque Democratic Party event, there were over 100 people, but virtually no one under the age of 40. Young voters believe that the government should do more about climate change, even if it slows down economic growth. Yet, fossil fuel donations to Democratic leadership still play an outsized role in the agenda of the party.
Now is the time for our nation's leaders to encourage public discussion of the options for averting climate disaster. The Democratic Party is foolish not to dedicate a presidential debate to this issue.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Pia Gallegos
Pia Gallegos is the Chair of the Adelante Progressive Caucus of the Democratic Party of New Mexico.
Last week, during his national tour, Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez stopped in Albuquerque to speak at a Democratic Party gathering. But he hastily left without taking questions. Luckily, I was able to approach Perez before his talk and handed him the RootsAction.org petition urging a presidential debate focused on climate change; more than 4,500 people had signed it the day before.
Perez cut me off before I could ask a question, but he did assert that there would be a "robust discussion of climate" during the debate season. Perez was referring to his reformulated response to the call for a climate-change debate - now saying that he is urging TV networks to have their panelists focus serious questioning on the topic.
Perez is passing responsibility for addressing climate change to the same corporate media which largely failed to ask any such questions in 2015 and 2016. This is no more logical than Perez' prior justification for denying a debate on the biggest existential threat in the history of humankind - that the DNC would then have to allow every other candidate's issue-specific debate ideas.
Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
The Democratic Party leadership's failure to take global heating seriously is out of step with Democratic voters who now consider climate change to be a top-tier issue. The world's top scientists tell us there are only 11 years to take preventative action to get fossil fuels out of national economies, and this estimate is likely an understatement. But Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused to establish a House committee on the Green New Deal, dismissing it as "the Green Dream or whatever they call it". Instead, she and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer formed an advisory committee with no mandate to come up with a plan, no subpoena power to bring fossil fuel executives to account for their contribution to the climate catastrophe, and no rule prohibiting members of the committee from receiving fossil fuel industry money.
In the Senate, pro-coal Senator Joe Manchin is the ranking Democrat on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. In August, 2018, the DNC reversed its brief ban on accepting fossil fuel donations.
It is little wonder that at the Albuquerque Democratic Party event, there were over 100 people, but virtually no one under the age of 40. Young voters believe that the government should do more about climate change, even if it slows down economic growth. Yet, fossil fuel donations to Democratic leadership still play an outsized role in the agenda of the party.
Now is the time for our nation's leaders to encourage public discussion of the options for averting climate disaster. The Democratic Party is foolish not to dedicate a presidential debate to this issue.
Pia Gallegos
Pia Gallegos is the Chair of the Adelante Progressive Caucus of the Democratic Party of New Mexico.
Last week, during his national tour, Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez stopped in Albuquerque to speak at a Democratic Party gathering. But he hastily left without taking questions. Luckily, I was able to approach Perez before his talk and handed him the RootsAction.org petition urging a presidential debate focused on climate change; more than 4,500 people had signed it the day before.
Perez cut me off before I could ask a question, but he did assert that there would be a "robust discussion of climate" during the debate season. Perez was referring to his reformulated response to the call for a climate-change debate - now saying that he is urging TV networks to have their panelists focus serious questioning on the topic.
Perez is passing responsibility for addressing climate change to the same corporate media which largely failed to ask any such questions in 2015 and 2016. This is no more logical than Perez' prior justification for denying a debate on the biggest existential threat in the history of humankind - that the DNC would then have to allow every other candidate's issue-specific debate ideas.
Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
The Democratic Party leadership's failure to take global heating seriously is out of step with Democratic voters who now consider climate change to be a top-tier issue. The world's top scientists tell us there are only 11 years to take preventative action to get fossil fuels out of national economies, and this estimate is likely an understatement. But Democratic leaders are acting like they don't understand the urgency of the problem or that they don't care.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi refused to establish a House committee on the Green New Deal, dismissing it as "the Green Dream or whatever they call it". Instead, she and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer formed an advisory committee with no mandate to come up with a plan, no subpoena power to bring fossil fuel executives to account for their contribution to the climate catastrophe, and no rule prohibiting members of the committee from receiving fossil fuel industry money.
In the Senate, pro-coal Senator Joe Manchin is the ranking Democrat on the Energy and Natural Resources Committee. In August, 2018, the DNC reversed its brief ban on accepting fossil fuel donations.
It is little wonder that at the Albuquerque Democratic Party event, there were over 100 people, but virtually no one under the age of 40. Young voters believe that the government should do more about climate change, even if it slows down economic growth. Yet, fossil fuel donations to Democratic leadership still play an outsized role in the agenda of the party.
Now is the time for our nation's leaders to encourage public discussion of the options for averting climate disaster. The Democratic Party is foolish not to dedicate a presidential debate to this issue.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.