Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Nurses and doctors rallying for Medicare for All in Chicago over the weekend outside the annual gathering of the American Medical Association which currently opposes the plan to make healthcare coverage in the United States available to all. (Photo: National Nurses United/flickr/cc)

Medicare for All Is Coming... Because Even the "Insured" Are Not Safe in This For-Profit System

So-called "experts" tell us that Americans love this system and it would be too costly or too complicated to change it. But even those with private insurance or employee-provided coverage know this simply is not true.

Bonnie Castillo

As the House Ways and Means Committee prepares to hold an influential hearing Wednesday on HR 1384, the Medicare for All bill authored by Reps. Pramila Jayapal and Debbie Dingell, with 112 House co-sponsors, news reports every day remind us of why the bill is so necessary.

Just ask Caitlin and Corey Gaffer of Minneapolis who, with their first child on the way, unexpectedly learned that their health insurance had been cancelled for “non-payment” for a series of bureaucratic snafus even though they had paid their premium.

The problem was eventually resolved, but not before they were slammed with an unexpected additional $30,000 in medical bills and had “racked up lots of stress” while Caitlin was navigating a complicated pregnancy, as Kaiser Health News reported.

The Affordable Care Act, many believed, prevented insurance companies from kicking people off their insurance. But still, KHN noted, “tens of thousands of Americans each year—exact counts aren’t available—are dropped by their insurers over payment issues, sometimes with little or no prior warning from their insurers.”

Then there’s Andrew Heymann, the Hackensack, NJ accountant who suffered a deeply gashed ankle while helping a neighbor move a large glass table. He went to the emergency room where they quickly stitched him up.

He has “insurance,” and was at a hospital that was “in network,” as the PBS News Hour noted, but the surgeon on hand was not “in network.” The result? A $6,000 bill, of which his “insurance” would only cover $860.

“We've received literally thousands of stories from consumers all over the country that are having this problem,” a Consumer Reports representative told PBS. In a survey last year, 30 percent of Americans with “insurance” said they’ve been hit with surprise medical bills, according to Consumer Reports.

For every report like these two that are published—and the one-third of GoFundMe campaigns that are launched due to unpayable medical bills—are the daily less reported experience that people have with their “insurance” even when dutifully paying their premiums, their co-pays, and still having to meet their ever-increasing deductibles.

The doctor or doctors you regularly see, the doctor’s office you regularly visit, the nearest hospital you rely on, are “in network”—until they are not. Your insurance company may every year change the medical group or hospital and other providers it has a contract with, and you have to start over and search for doctors and other providers. Or the only specialist you need is not “covered” and you have to go miles away to find one who is.

Or you go to the doctor and are prescribed medication, or told you need a diagnostic test, or referral to a specialist. But there’s a catch. First you have to wait until it is “authorized” by your insurance company. And then you might spend hours on the phone negotiating with your insurance company, and the billing office at your medical group, your doctor’s office, or your hospital getting that approval.

This is the system we have today. The bureaucracy and hassle people endure even if you are among the “insured,” even if you have really good employer-paid “insurance,” all while your out-of-pocket costs for that really good insurance goes up and up every year.

But somehow the policy wonks, the experts quoted in the press, and too many politicians of both parties, tell us that Americans love this system and it would be too costly or too complicated to change it.

That it is just not political feasible or expedient to have a system that will actually guarantee you can get health care, not access to “insurance,” when you need it, where you need it.  Without having the worry of sudden cancellations of your “insurance,” surprise medical bills, or spending hours trying to get the actual coverage you pay for, or having to exhaust your savings or skip other basics if you get really sick.

Why? Because the existing system reinforces a health care industry structured to generate profits, not to actually take care of people. Leaving commercial insurers in charge of our health will continue to fail patients, exactly why Medicare for All is the only solution that will guarantee health care as a human right in the U.S. as in so many other wealthy nations.

Millions of people are demanding change, and tens of thousands are engaged in mass action building an undeniable movement to press policy makers to make that change happen. That’s why there is a hearing Wednesday on Medicare for All. And we’re still just getting started.


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Bonnie Castillo

Bonnie Castillo

Bonnie Castillo, RN is the executive director of National Nurses United. Follow her on Twitter: @NNUBonnie

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

ACLU Demands 'Truly Systemic Overhaul' of US Civilian Harm Policies

"While a serious Defense Department focus on civilian harm is long overdue and welcome, it's unclear that this directive will be enough," says director of the legal group's National Security Project.

Jessica Corbett ·


'This Is Not Over': Alaska Supreme Court Rejects Youth Climate Case

"With the state continuing to undermine their health, safety, and futures," said the plaintiffs' lead counsel, "we will evaluate our next steps and will continue to fight for climate justice."

Jessica Corbett ·


Analysis Finds 'Staggering' Rise in Voter Suppression After GOP Restrictions in Georgia

"This is why we are fighting this new law in court," said one voting rights advocate.

Brett Wilkins ·


'Egregious': Pennsylvania Court Strikes Down Mail-In Voting Law

The ruling was stayed pending an appeal to the state's Supreme Court and as one voting advocate put it: "The fight's not over yet, folks."

Julia Conley ·


Big Win for Open Internet as Court Upholds California Net Neutrality Law

One legal advocate called the Ninth Circuit's opinion "a great decision and a major victory for internet users in California and nationwide."

Kenny Stancil ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo