Solar energy installation provides good, union jobs for electrical workers. (Photo: Clean Energy Economy for the Region, CC BY 2.0.)
Feb 26, 2019
The simple yellow protest signs were stenciled "Green Jobs for All." Speaker after speaker stepped into the middle of the office floor, marked with a U.S. House of Representatives seal. Representative-Elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, fresh off her election win, gave the protesters high fives.
That was the scene in November when the youth climate justice organization Sunrise Movement held a sit-in at the office of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, who was soon to be the Speaker of the House.
Most Americans had never heard of the "Green New Deal" at the time.
Now, it's on the mainstream radar. The New York Times and the Washington Post ran multiple stories when Ocasio-Cortez introduced a resolution on February 7 to reduce carbon emissions through a massive good jobs program. The resolution has 67 House co-sponsors, while the Senate version has 12.
Just like the original New Deal in the '30s, her version of a Green New Deal would include a federal guarantee of living-wage employment--that is, anyone who wanted a job could get one at a salary that could support a family, with an emphasis on union jobs and protecting the right to organize.
The plan would also include public investments in clean energy infrastructure. But "there are millions of good, high-wage jobs that will be available through the Green New Deal, and they're not just jobs that are in the manufacture of clean energy," said security officer Judith Howell, a Service Employees 32BJ shop steward. For instance, she said, it will take work to clean up the environment where it's already been damaged.
Howell has been an environmental activist since hearing Ray Charles sing "America the Beautiful" on Earth Day. Last year she helped push through a carbon tax in her hometown of Washington, D.C.
Activists like her are responding to the acute necessity to deal with climate change before the earth is drastically damaged.
It's not too soon. Scientists now estimate that humanity has 12 years to cut carbon pollution by 45 percent to avert dramatic increases in droughts, flooding, heat, and poverty. Among the costs will be exposure to deadly heat illnesses for 350 million more people around the world by 2050 and $500 billion lost annually to the U.S. economy by 2100.
IT HASN'T BEEN EASY
Not everyone is on board, though. In fact, significant forces in the labor movement are actively opposed to a Green New Deal.
"It is difficult to take this unrealistic manifesto seriously, but the economic and social devastation it would cause if it moves forward is serious and real," said Terry O'Sullivan, president of the Laborers union, in a statement about the Green New Deal resolution.
The Laborers are worried that members will lose their jobs in fossil fuel industries, which they say are paid much more than current jobs in the renewable energy sector.
The American labor movement has a long history of mistrusting environmental groups as job-killers. Frequently the Building Trades are at odds with environmental groups over projects like the Keystone XL and Dakota Access oil pipelines.
Most often, the AFL-CIO backs the Building Trades, though some unions, like National Nurses United, Steelworkers, and Service Employees, have forged ties with environmental groups.
"A small group of unions with close ties to the fossil fuel industry appear to be setting the definition of what the millions and millions of union members in America want and need," said historian Jeremy Brecher, a staff member at the Labor Network for Sustainability.
It's not hard to see that a huge gap exists between current labor-environment collaboration and what it will take to win a massive, federally mandated good jobs program to combat climate change.
JOBS, JOBS, JOBS
One union that finds itself in a unique position is the Electrical Workers (IBEW), which benefits from solar energy construction but has traditionally allied with the other Building Trades and still supports coal and nuclear energy production, anathema to environmentalists.
The IBEW has offered career training for electricians in the solar energy industry in New York, Los Angeles, Alameda County in California, and Washington state.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Saurav Sarkar
Saurav Sarkar is a freelance writer based in the New York area who frequently covers Starbucks Workers United. He can be reached at sauravsarkar.com or on Twitter @sauravthewriter.
alexandria ocasio-cortezgreen new dealinequalitykeystone xllivable wagenational nurses unitedworkers
The simple yellow protest signs were stenciled "Green Jobs for All." Speaker after speaker stepped into the middle of the office floor, marked with a U.S. House of Representatives seal. Representative-Elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, fresh off her election win, gave the protesters high fives.
That was the scene in November when the youth climate justice organization Sunrise Movement held a sit-in at the office of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, who was soon to be the Speaker of the House.
Most Americans had never heard of the "Green New Deal" at the time.
Now, it's on the mainstream radar. The New York Times and the Washington Post ran multiple stories when Ocasio-Cortez introduced a resolution on February 7 to reduce carbon emissions through a massive good jobs program. The resolution has 67 House co-sponsors, while the Senate version has 12.
Just like the original New Deal in the '30s, her version of a Green New Deal would include a federal guarantee of living-wage employment--that is, anyone who wanted a job could get one at a salary that could support a family, with an emphasis on union jobs and protecting the right to organize.
The plan would also include public investments in clean energy infrastructure. But "there are millions of good, high-wage jobs that will be available through the Green New Deal, and they're not just jobs that are in the manufacture of clean energy," said security officer Judith Howell, a Service Employees 32BJ shop steward. For instance, she said, it will take work to clean up the environment where it's already been damaged.
Howell has been an environmental activist since hearing Ray Charles sing "America the Beautiful" on Earth Day. Last year she helped push through a carbon tax in her hometown of Washington, D.C.
Activists like her are responding to the acute necessity to deal with climate change before the earth is drastically damaged.
It's not too soon. Scientists now estimate that humanity has 12 years to cut carbon pollution by 45 percent to avert dramatic increases in droughts, flooding, heat, and poverty. Among the costs will be exposure to deadly heat illnesses for 350 million more people around the world by 2050 and $500 billion lost annually to the U.S. economy by 2100.
IT HASN'T BEEN EASY
Not everyone is on board, though. In fact, significant forces in the labor movement are actively opposed to a Green New Deal.
"It is difficult to take this unrealistic manifesto seriously, but the economic and social devastation it would cause if it moves forward is serious and real," said Terry O'Sullivan, president of the Laborers union, in a statement about the Green New Deal resolution.
The Laborers are worried that members will lose their jobs in fossil fuel industries, which they say are paid much more than current jobs in the renewable energy sector.
The American labor movement has a long history of mistrusting environmental groups as job-killers. Frequently the Building Trades are at odds with environmental groups over projects like the Keystone XL and Dakota Access oil pipelines.
Most often, the AFL-CIO backs the Building Trades, though some unions, like National Nurses United, Steelworkers, and Service Employees, have forged ties with environmental groups.
"A small group of unions with close ties to the fossil fuel industry appear to be setting the definition of what the millions and millions of union members in America want and need," said historian Jeremy Brecher, a staff member at the Labor Network for Sustainability.
It's not hard to see that a huge gap exists between current labor-environment collaboration and what it will take to win a massive, federally mandated good jobs program to combat climate change.
JOBS, JOBS, JOBS
One union that finds itself in a unique position is the Electrical Workers (IBEW), which benefits from solar energy construction but has traditionally allied with the other Building Trades and still supports coal and nuclear energy production, anathema to environmentalists.
The IBEW has offered career training for electricians in the solar energy industry in New York, Los Angeles, Alameda County in California, and Washington state.
Saurav Sarkar
Saurav Sarkar is a freelance writer based in the New York area who frequently covers Starbucks Workers United. He can be reached at sauravsarkar.com or on Twitter @sauravthewriter.
The simple yellow protest signs were stenciled "Green Jobs for All." Speaker after speaker stepped into the middle of the office floor, marked with a U.S. House of Representatives seal. Representative-Elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, fresh off her election win, gave the protesters high fives.
That was the scene in November when the youth climate justice organization Sunrise Movement held a sit-in at the office of Rep. Nancy Pelosi, who was soon to be the Speaker of the House.
Most Americans had never heard of the "Green New Deal" at the time.
Now, it's on the mainstream radar. The New York Times and the Washington Post ran multiple stories when Ocasio-Cortez introduced a resolution on February 7 to reduce carbon emissions through a massive good jobs program. The resolution has 67 House co-sponsors, while the Senate version has 12.
Just like the original New Deal in the '30s, her version of a Green New Deal would include a federal guarantee of living-wage employment--that is, anyone who wanted a job could get one at a salary that could support a family, with an emphasis on union jobs and protecting the right to organize.
The plan would also include public investments in clean energy infrastructure. But "there are millions of good, high-wage jobs that will be available through the Green New Deal, and they're not just jobs that are in the manufacture of clean energy," said security officer Judith Howell, a Service Employees 32BJ shop steward. For instance, she said, it will take work to clean up the environment where it's already been damaged.
Howell has been an environmental activist since hearing Ray Charles sing "America the Beautiful" on Earth Day. Last year she helped push through a carbon tax in her hometown of Washington, D.C.
Activists like her are responding to the acute necessity to deal with climate change before the earth is drastically damaged.
It's not too soon. Scientists now estimate that humanity has 12 years to cut carbon pollution by 45 percent to avert dramatic increases in droughts, flooding, heat, and poverty. Among the costs will be exposure to deadly heat illnesses for 350 million more people around the world by 2050 and $500 billion lost annually to the U.S. economy by 2100.
IT HASN'T BEEN EASY
Not everyone is on board, though. In fact, significant forces in the labor movement are actively opposed to a Green New Deal.
"It is difficult to take this unrealistic manifesto seriously, but the economic and social devastation it would cause if it moves forward is serious and real," said Terry O'Sullivan, president of the Laborers union, in a statement about the Green New Deal resolution.
The Laborers are worried that members will lose their jobs in fossil fuel industries, which they say are paid much more than current jobs in the renewable energy sector.
The American labor movement has a long history of mistrusting environmental groups as job-killers. Frequently the Building Trades are at odds with environmental groups over projects like the Keystone XL and Dakota Access oil pipelines.
Most often, the AFL-CIO backs the Building Trades, though some unions, like National Nurses United, Steelworkers, and Service Employees, have forged ties with environmental groups.
"A small group of unions with close ties to the fossil fuel industry appear to be setting the definition of what the millions and millions of union members in America want and need," said historian Jeremy Brecher, a staff member at the Labor Network for Sustainability.
It's not hard to see that a huge gap exists between current labor-environment collaboration and what it will take to win a massive, federally mandated good jobs program to combat climate change.
JOBS, JOBS, JOBS
One union that finds itself in a unique position is the Electrical Workers (IBEW), which benefits from solar energy construction but has traditionally allied with the other Building Trades and still supports coal and nuclear energy production, anathema to environmentalists.
The IBEW has offered career training for electricians in the solar energy industry in New York, Los Angeles, Alameda County in California, and Washington state.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.