SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Right now, the Internet is allows users to "surf" wherever they want, with all sites having equal access--accessibility is, by rule, neutral. Imagine, though, if only some sites were accessible with just a click, while others took forever to load?" (Photo: Free Press/Flickr/cc)
Killing Net Neutrality Is the Latest Example of Trump's Hollow Populism
What would happen to small, independent outlets, like the one you’re reading right now?
Dec 13, 2017
One of former U.S. Senator's Paul Wellstone's favorite slogans used to be, "I'm for the little fellers, not the Rockefellers."
When Donald Trump was running for President, his slogan could have been: "I'm the Rockefeller for the little feller." At every event, he extolled the virtues of being a fat cat who essentially switched sides to work for the mice.
"What self-funding means is that I'm not controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. I'm not controlled by lumber. I'm not controlled by electric. I'm not controlled by anybody--I'm controlled by you," Trump said during a 2016 rally in Racine, Wisconsin.
As for everybody else, Trump said, "They're politicians. They get their money from companies . . . . They're not going to do the right thing for you. They're going to do the right thing for the [foreign] country and the right thing for their lobbyist and the right thing for their special interest, but they're not going to do the right thing for you. Believe me. I know it."
At another rally in Council Bluffs, Iowa, Trump declared that, unlike Hillary Clinton, he was "taking on big business and big media and big donors. We're taking them on for you."
And remember how investment bank Goldman Sachs had, in Trump's estimation, "total control over Hillary Clinton" and none over Trump? "I don't want their money," he said. "I don't need their money."
Now, only ten months into Trump's presidency, it's obvious just how hollow Trump's economic populism was. His administration is chock-full of Goldman Sachs executives and corporate executives. And even though corporate profits are already at record highs, Trump is on the verge of signing a tax-cut package that will overwhelmingly benefit large corporations and the one percenters who control them.
Recently, the Trump Administration announced new rules to let restaurant owners intercept and keep a waiter's tips and allow airlines to not disclose baggage fees. Oh, and you know that long list of fine print in credit card agreements? Trump wants to allow companies to use this language to screw you over and then prevent you from suing in response.
But all that is small potatoes compared to what Team Trump is about to drop on us in a few days, when it deep-sixes "net neutrality" rules.
Right now, the Internet is allows users to "surf" wherever they want, with all sites having equal access--accessibility is, by rule, neutral. Imagine, though, if only some sites were accessible with just a click, while others took forever to load?
That's soon to be the new normal. Without net neutrality rules, which Trump's appointees to the Federal Communications Commission are poised to destroy, Internet providers will be able to sell accessibility in a way similar to how a supermarkets sell shelf space to big companies.
For example, let's say you like to buy things on Etsy, but your Internet provider doesn't get any "shelf space" money from Etsy, but it does from Amazon and e-Bay. Surfing on Amazon and e-Bay will be really quick, while Etsy would be really slow.
And it's not just buying stuff that will be affected. Most people now get the lion's share of their news from the Internet. Imagine a world where only the deep pockets can afford to pay for fast load times. What would happen to small, independent outlets, like the one you're reading right now?
Almost every facet of our lives is tied up in the Internet. More people now watch TV via the Internet than from cable providers. It's how most modern communication takes place.
And all that is about to fundamentally change.
It's hard to imagine a better example of a President siding with the Rockefellers over the little fellers, than with the gutting of net neutrality. It's the coup de grace of a President whose promise to fight for those little fellers has been exposed time and again as a lie.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Progressive
Jud Lounsbury
Jud Lounsbury lives on a small farm south of Madison, Wisconsin with his family and writes for The Progressive and the Uppity Wisconsin blog. Follow him on Twitter: @JudLounsbury
One of former U.S. Senator's Paul Wellstone's favorite slogans used to be, "I'm for the little fellers, not the Rockefellers."
When Donald Trump was running for President, his slogan could have been: "I'm the Rockefeller for the little feller." At every event, he extolled the virtues of being a fat cat who essentially switched sides to work for the mice.
"What self-funding means is that I'm not controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. I'm not controlled by lumber. I'm not controlled by electric. I'm not controlled by anybody--I'm controlled by you," Trump said during a 2016 rally in Racine, Wisconsin.
As for everybody else, Trump said, "They're politicians. They get their money from companies . . . . They're not going to do the right thing for you. They're going to do the right thing for the [foreign] country and the right thing for their lobbyist and the right thing for their special interest, but they're not going to do the right thing for you. Believe me. I know it."
At another rally in Council Bluffs, Iowa, Trump declared that, unlike Hillary Clinton, he was "taking on big business and big media and big donors. We're taking them on for you."
And remember how investment bank Goldman Sachs had, in Trump's estimation, "total control over Hillary Clinton" and none over Trump? "I don't want their money," he said. "I don't need their money."
Now, only ten months into Trump's presidency, it's obvious just how hollow Trump's economic populism was. His administration is chock-full of Goldman Sachs executives and corporate executives. And even though corporate profits are already at record highs, Trump is on the verge of signing a tax-cut package that will overwhelmingly benefit large corporations and the one percenters who control them.
Recently, the Trump Administration announced new rules to let restaurant owners intercept and keep a waiter's tips and allow airlines to not disclose baggage fees. Oh, and you know that long list of fine print in credit card agreements? Trump wants to allow companies to use this language to screw you over and then prevent you from suing in response.
But all that is small potatoes compared to what Team Trump is about to drop on us in a few days, when it deep-sixes "net neutrality" rules.
Right now, the Internet is allows users to "surf" wherever they want, with all sites having equal access--accessibility is, by rule, neutral. Imagine, though, if only some sites were accessible with just a click, while others took forever to load?
That's soon to be the new normal. Without net neutrality rules, which Trump's appointees to the Federal Communications Commission are poised to destroy, Internet providers will be able to sell accessibility in a way similar to how a supermarkets sell shelf space to big companies.
For example, let's say you like to buy things on Etsy, but your Internet provider doesn't get any "shelf space" money from Etsy, but it does from Amazon and e-Bay. Surfing on Amazon and e-Bay will be really quick, while Etsy would be really slow.
And it's not just buying stuff that will be affected. Most people now get the lion's share of their news from the Internet. Imagine a world where only the deep pockets can afford to pay for fast load times. What would happen to small, independent outlets, like the one you're reading right now?
Almost every facet of our lives is tied up in the Internet. More people now watch TV via the Internet than from cable providers. It's how most modern communication takes place.
And all that is about to fundamentally change.
It's hard to imagine a better example of a President siding with the Rockefellers over the little fellers, than with the gutting of net neutrality. It's the coup de grace of a President whose promise to fight for those little fellers has been exposed time and again as a lie.
Jud Lounsbury
Jud Lounsbury lives on a small farm south of Madison, Wisconsin with his family and writes for The Progressive and the Uppity Wisconsin blog. Follow him on Twitter: @JudLounsbury
One of former U.S. Senator's Paul Wellstone's favorite slogans used to be, "I'm for the little fellers, not the Rockefellers."
When Donald Trump was running for President, his slogan could have been: "I'm the Rockefeller for the little feller." At every event, he extolled the virtues of being a fat cat who essentially switched sides to work for the mice.
"What self-funding means is that I'm not controlled by the pharmaceutical industry. I'm not controlled by lumber. I'm not controlled by electric. I'm not controlled by anybody--I'm controlled by you," Trump said during a 2016 rally in Racine, Wisconsin.
As for everybody else, Trump said, "They're politicians. They get their money from companies . . . . They're not going to do the right thing for you. They're going to do the right thing for the [foreign] country and the right thing for their lobbyist and the right thing for their special interest, but they're not going to do the right thing for you. Believe me. I know it."
At another rally in Council Bluffs, Iowa, Trump declared that, unlike Hillary Clinton, he was "taking on big business and big media and big donors. We're taking them on for you."
And remember how investment bank Goldman Sachs had, in Trump's estimation, "total control over Hillary Clinton" and none over Trump? "I don't want their money," he said. "I don't need their money."
Now, only ten months into Trump's presidency, it's obvious just how hollow Trump's economic populism was. His administration is chock-full of Goldman Sachs executives and corporate executives. And even though corporate profits are already at record highs, Trump is on the verge of signing a tax-cut package that will overwhelmingly benefit large corporations and the one percenters who control them.
Recently, the Trump Administration announced new rules to let restaurant owners intercept and keep a waiter's tips and allow airlines to not disclose baggage fees. Oh, and you know that long list of fine print in credit card agreements? Trump wants to allow companies to use this language to screw you over and then prevent you from suing in response.
But all that is small potatoes compared to what Team Trump is about to drop on us in a few days, when it deep-sixes "net neutrality" rules.
Right now, the Internet is allows users to "surf" wherever they want, with all sites having equal access--accessibility is, by rule, neutral. Imagine, though, if only some sites were accessible with just a click, while others took forever to load?
That's soon to be the new normal. Without net neutrality rules, which Trump's appointees to the Federal Communications Commission are poised to destroy, Internet providers will be able to sell accessibility in a way similar to how a supermarkets sell shelf space to big companies.
For example, let's say you like to buy things on Etsy, but your Internet provider doesn't get any "shelf space" money from Etsy, but it does from Amazon and e-Bay. Surfing on Amazon and e-Bay will be really quick, while Etsy would be really slow.
And it's not just buying stuff that will be affected. Most people now get the lion's share of their news from the Internet. Imagine a world where only the deep pockets can afford to pay for fast load times. What would happen to small, independent outlets, like the one you're reading right now?
Almost every facet of our lives is tied up in the Internet. More people now watch TV via the Internet than from cable providers. It's how most modern communication takes place.
And all that is about to fundamentally change.
It's hard to imagine a better example of a President siding with the Rockefellers over the little fellers, than with the gutting of net neutrality. It's the coup de grace of a President whose promise to fight for those little fellers has been exposed time and again as a lie.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.