SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York responds to the Republican leadership's health care bill on Thursday. (Photo: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
And You Thought Republicans' Health Care Bill Couldn't Get Worse
At this point, it's only a matter of degrees how misguided and cruel the proposals are by Republicans in Congress to "fix" America's health care system.
Still, the bill unveiled by Senate GOP leaders Thursday is even worse in some ways than the horrible bill the House narrowly approved in May.
Jun 23, 2017
At this point, it's only a matter of degrees how misguided and cruel the proposals are by Republicans in Congress to "fix" America's health care system.
Still, the bill unveiled by Senate GOP leaders Thursday is even worse in some ways than the horrible bill the House narrowly approved in May.
The Senate's Better Care Reconciliation Act would eventually make deeper cuts to the Medicaid program for the poor. In California, Medi-Cal covers nearly 14 million, including half of the state's children and two-thirds of seniors in nursing homes.
By 2024, the bill would end Obamacare's federal money to expand Medicaid, which has allowed 4 million Californians to get insured. Unless the state steps in with substantially more funding - possibly $30 billion or more by 2027, compared to $24 billion under the House bill - many would lose coverage. And because California is a high-cost state, premiums and deductibles are likely to spike for some middle-class families.
So no matter the new name and a few tweaks, the bottom line of the Senate bill is the same: Millions of poorer people will lose their health insurance so that the richest Americans can get a huge tax cut they don't need. One-sixth of the U.S. economy will be upended, with unknown risks and consequences.
It's also outrageous that 13 senators - all white men - drafted this bill in secret for weeks. And now they're rushing to pass it next week before the July Fourth recess, before senators have to return home and face their constituents. And who knows what goodies for Big Pharma and other special interests may be hidden in the 142 pages.
Last week, President Donald Trump called the American Health Care Act approved by the House "mean" and urged the Senate to be more "generous." Thursday, he tweeted his support for the Senate bill.
The Senate bill does keep more of Obamacare's protections for people with pre-existing conditions. It would base tax credits to help people buy private insurance on income, as the Affordable Care Act does, rather than age, as the House bill does. But the subsidy would be smaller and fewer people would be eligible.
The Congressional Budget Office says that under the House bill, 23 million Americans would lose insurance by 2026 and Medicaid spending would be slashed by $834 billion over 10 years. Its analysis of the Senate bill is expected early next week, a day or two before the vote.
For all the objections and theatrics by Senate Democrats - Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts called the tax cuts for the wealthy "blood money" - the bill's fate is out of their hands. Only 50 votes are needed to pass this bill in the Senate, and Republicans hold 52 seats.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is trying to keep moderates and conservatives on board. Four conservative senators quickly announced their opposition to the current draft. If the bill fails on the Senate floor, it should not lead to an even more draconian version to win the votes of conservatives.
As we've said, Obamacare isn't perfect. But it has improved health care for many Americans. The right path is to fix its flaws and to focus on reducing health care costs, not to wipe it out.
If Republican leaders in Congress really meant what they said about unity and common purpose last week after the shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise, they'd slow down and craft a bipartisan plan with plenty of input from hospitals, doctors, patient groups and the general public.
That isn't likely to happen. Now it's about big money and partisan political power - and millions of poorer, sicker and older Americans are the collateral damage.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Sacramento Bee
At this point, it's only a matter of degrees how misguided and cruel the proposals are by Republicans in Congress to "fix" America's health care system.
Still, the bill unveiled by Senate GOP leaders Thursday is even worse in some ways than the horrible bill the House narrowly approved in May.
The Senate's Better Care Reconciliation Act would eventually make deeper cuts to the Medicaid program for the poor. In California, Medi-Cal covers nearly 14 million, including half of the state's children and two-thirds of seniors in nursing homes.
By 2024, the bill would end Obamacare's federal money to expand Medicaid, which has allowed 4 million Californians to get insured. Unless the state steps in with substantially more funding - possibly $30 billion or more by 2027, compared to $24 billion under the House bill - many would lose coverage. And because California is a high-cost state, premiums and deductibles are likely to spike for some middle-class families.
So no matter the new name and a few tweaks, the bottom line of the Senate bill is the same: Millions of poorer people will lose their health insurance so that the richest Americans can get a huge tax cut they don't need. One-sixth of the U.S. economy will be upended, with unknown risks and consequences.
It's also outrageous that 13 senators - all white men - drafted this bill in secret for weeks. And now they're rushing to pass it next week before the July Fourth recess, before senators have to return home and face their constituents. And who knows what goodies for Big Pharma and other special interests may be hidden in the 142 pages.
Last week, President Donald Trump called the American Health Care Act approved by the House "mean" and urged the Senate to be more "generous." Thursday, he tweeted his support for the Senate bill.
The Senate bill does keep more of Obamacare's protections for people with pre-existing conditions. It would base tax credits to help people buy private insurance on income, as the Affordable Care Act does, rather than age, as the House bill does. But the subsidy would be smaller and fewer people would be eligible.
The Congressional Budget Office says that under the House bill, 23 million Americans would lose insurance by 2026 and Medicaid spending would be slashed by $834 billion over 10 years. Its analysis of the Senate bill is expected early next week, a day or two before the vote.
For all the objections and theatrics by Senate Democrats - Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts called the tax cuts for the wealthy "blood money" - the bill's fate is out of their hands. Only 50 votes are needed to pass this bill in the Senate, and Republicans hold 52 seats.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is trying to keep moderates and conservatives on board. Four conservative senators quickly announced their opposition to the current draft. If the bill fails on the Senate floor, it should not lead to an even more draconian version to win the votes of conservatives.
As we've said, Obamacare isn't perfect. But it has improved health care for many Americans. The right path is to fix its flaws and to focus on reducing health care costs, not to wipe it out.
If Republican leaders in Congress really meant what they said about unity and common purpose last week after the shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise, they'd slow down and craft a bipartisan plan with plenty of input from hospitals, doctors, patient groups and the general public.
That isn't likely to happen. Now it's about big money and partisan political power - and millions of poorer, sicker and older Americans are the collateral damage.
At this point, it's only a matter of degrees how misguided and cruel the proposals are by Republicans in Congress to "fix" America's health care system.
Still, the bill unveiled by Senate GOP leaders Thursday is even worse in some ways than the horrible bill the House narrowly approved in May.
The Senate's Better Care Reconciliation Act would eventually make deeper cuts to the Medicaid program for the poor. In California, Medi-Cal covers nearly 14 million, including half of the state's children and two-thirds of seniors in nursing homes.
By 2024, the bill would end Obamacare's federal money to expand Medicaid, which has allowed 4 million Californians to get insured. Unless the state steps in with substantially more funding - possibly $30 billion or more by 2027, compared to $24 billion under the House bill - many would lose coverage. And because California is a high-cost state, premiums and deductibles are likely to spike for some middle-class families.
So no matter the new name and a few tweaks, the bottom line of the Senate bill is the same: Millions of poorer people will lose their health insurance so that the richest Americans can get a huge tax cut they don't need. One-sixth of the U.S. economy will be upended, with unknown risks and consequences.
It's also outrageous that 13 senators - all white men - drafted this bill in secret for weeks. And now they're rushing to pass it next week before the July Fourth recess, before senators have to return home and face their constituents. And who knows what goodies for Big Pharma and other special interests may be hidden in the 142 pages.
Last week, President Donald Trump called the American Health Care Act approved by the House "mean" and urged the Senate to be more "generous." Thursday, he tweeted his support for the Senate bill.
The Senate bill does keep more of Obamacare's protections for people with pre-existing conditions. It would base tax credits to help people buy private insurance on income, as the Affordable Care Act does, rather than age, as the House bill does. But the subsidy would be smaller and fewer people would be eligible.
The Congressional Budget Office says that under the House bill, 23 million Americans would lose insurance by 2026 and Medicaid spending would be slashed by $834 billion over 10 years. Its analysis of the Senate bill is expected early next week, a day or two before the vote.
For all the objections and theatrics by Senate Democrats - Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts called the tax cuts for the wealthy "blood money" - the bill's fate is out of their hands. Only 50 votes are needed to pass this bill in the Senate, and Republicans hold 52 seats.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is trying to keep moderates and conservatives on board. Four conservative senators quickly announced their opposition to the current draft. If the bill fails on the Senate floor, it should not lead to an even more draconian version to win the votes of conservatives.
As we've said, Obamacare isn't perfect. But it has improved health care for many Americans. The right path is to fix its flaws and to focus on reducing health care costs, not to wipe it out.
If Republican leaders in Congress really meant what they said about unity and common purpose last week after the shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise, they'd slow down and craft a bipartisan plan with plenty of input from hospitals, doctors, patient groups and the general public.
That isn't likely to happen. Now it's about big money and partisan political power - and millions of poorer, sicker and older Americans are the collateral damage.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.