Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Famed physicist Stephen Hawking has made headlines for telling humanity that colonizing faraway planets in the best hope for saving humanity. But if we can't save ourselves here, what's the point? (Photo: Lucas Jackson/Reuters)

No, Stephen Hawking. Let's Save This Planet Instead of Looking for Another

Giving up on planet Earth is a cruel and destructive form of defeatism

David Macaray

Back in the 1970s, a Nobel Prize-winning physicist named William Shockley created quite a stir when he suggested that certain races (i.e., black people) were “genetically inferior” to whites and Asians, and that in order for the human race to have any chance of “improving” itself, people with IQs lower than 100 should submit to voluntary sterilization.  Other than that, nothing he said was particularly controversial.

 What made Shockley’s pronouncements so outrageous, besides their obvious inflammatory nature, was their source.  After all, this wasn’t some hack, ex-Navy science fiction writer like L. Ron Hubbard introducing a new, screwball religion (“Scientology”) to the masses.  This was a brilliant scientist talking.  Shockley won the 1956 Nobel Prize in physics, and now he was going on record with a profoundly radical and transformative theory.

"Just because Hawking is a genius doesn’t mean everything he says is smart."

Of course, what followed was predictable.  His fellow scientists pointed out that, while Shockley may have been a “genius” when it came to semiconductors and transistors, he was woefully unprepared and unqualified to speak on the topic of genetics.  Indeed, he was so far out of his element, his so-called “findings” were embarrassing.  Which brings us to Stephen Hawking, the world’s favorite theoretical physicist.

Fearing that the Earth will one day be destroyed by a colliding asteroid, or by widespread epidemics, or by over-population, or the cumulative effects of climate change, Hawking was recently quoted as saying, “I think the human race has no future if it doesn’t go into space.”  Moreover, he insists that we must do it—must accomplish our evacuation—within the next 100 years.

There are at least two problems with this nutty advice.  (1)  Hawking is talking about stuff he’s not qualified to talk about—stuff that would cause a “lesser mortal” to be laughed off the podium, and (2) by trying to convince the people of Earth that future life on our planet is not worth investing in, he is guilty of the cruelest and most destructive form of defeatism.

When Hawking talks about black holes, or time-travel, or multiple universes, his remarks, while unproven and basically unprovable, are intriguing and fascinating.  For one thing, very few people are “smart” enough to dare refute what he says, and for another, all that far-out stuff about worm-holes and six dimensions that Hawking is spouting is very cool—way cooler than garden variety terrestrial science. 

"It goes without saying that the rich and well-connected will be the first to jump ship, and the poorest and most desolate among us will be condemned to stay."

But just because Hawking is a genius doesn’t mean everything he says is smart.  We don’t automatically listen to a gifted shoemaker talk about making gloves, do we?  Consider:  What if Hawking argued that the National League should copy the American League and go to the Designated Hitter (DH) rule?  Would baseball purists abandon their opposition to the DH simply because a “genius” told them they should do so?   

But what Hawking seems to be suggesting is no less bizarre.  Instead of focusing our resources on saving and protecting Earth, Hawking wants us to abandon it.  Really, Stephen?  You honestly think that pulling up stakes is going to improve morale?  Surely, he has to know that you can’t do both—that you can’t commit yourself totally to saving the planet while simultaneously putting your resources into finding a new one.

Also, who’s going to break the news to Sudan, Somalia, Bangladesh, Guatemala, et al?  Who’s going to tell them that, after giving the matter careful thought, we’ve decided to move to a better neighborhood, all because some weirdo physicist has convinced us it was time to leave. 

And of course, it goes without saying that the rich and well-connected will be the first to jump ship, and the poorest and most desolate among us will be condemned to stay.  Donald Trump has his own word for those unfortunate individuals who won’t be allowed to make the trip.  He calls them “losers.”


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

'On Her Way Home': WNBA Star Brittney Griner Freed in US-Russia Prisoner Swap

"Moments ago I spoke to Brittney Griner," said U.S. President Joe Biden. "She is safe. She is on a plane."

Jessica Corbett ·


Historic Offshore Wind Lease Sale in California Gets Over $750 Million in Winning Bids

"If we build on today's forward momentum, the United States can dramatically reduce its global warming emissions and become a global leader in renewable energy technologies like deep-water offshore wind."

Brett Wilkins ·


Solidarity Fund Up and Running for Designer Behind Iconic Bernie Sanders Posters

Tyler Evans "has dedicated his life to the progressive movement," says the GoFundMe created for the hospitalized designer. "Now it's our time to have Tyler's back when he and his family need it most."

Jessica Corbett ·


Journalism Defenders Push for Passage of 'Game-Changing' PRESS Act

"The PRESS Act is the most important free press legislation in modern times because it would finally stop the government from spying on journalists and threatening them with arrest for doing their jobs," explained one advocate.

Brett Wilkins ·


New York Times Union Workers Planning Dec. 8 Walkout, Rally Over Pay

"Our collective action is working: Management backed off its attempt to kill our pension and agreed to expand fertility benefits," the union said of ongoing talks. "But management still barely budged on some of our most important priorities."

Jessica Corbett ·

Common Dreams Logo