Why Oregon Standoff Verdicts Set Dangerous and Far-Reaching Precedent
Malheur acquittals raise stakes for next year’s trial in Nevada and beyond
I was nearly killed earlier this year while counter-protesting the paramilitary seizure of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon. After accusing me of being an FBI agent, the armed occupiers there worked themselves into a mob. Hog-faced militia thugs barked, "he's a fed." Some pawed their pistols. I was told snipers were trained on us. It was dangerously close to violence.
"The cradling of the Bundy's media circus at Malheur, and the government's over-confident bungling of the ensuing prosecution--sets a dangerous and far-reaching precedent for the kind of paramilitary intimidation and right-wing violence that underpins their movement."
For weeks last January a small rag-tag group of public lands supporters protested the Malheur occupiers. There was a handful of us, and dozens of them--all 30 miles from the nearest law enforcement. We crashed press conferences, staged counter protests, and marched into their occupied barracks with signs. We were threatened, harassed, blasted with bull horns and trailed by thugs with assault rifles.
We saw first-hand what was live-streamed to the world: An illegal paramilitary seizure of one of the crown jewels of our national wildlife refuge system, and the months-long social, cultural, economic, and environmental terrorization of an entire community. So, like many others, I was jarred by last Thursday's acquittal of seven defendants: How could such an obvious, video-taped crime could go unpunished? Here's how: Federal fumbling.
The Bundy clan and their followers peddle a dangerous brand of radicalism. Their core ideas--that the federal government lacks authority to own public land, and that county sheriffs are the highest form of law enforcement--are rooted in hard-right racist ideologies created to sidestep federal civil rights laws by elevating local authority. They're perfectly suited to ranchers, like Cliven Bundy, who refused to pay deeply subsidized federal grazing fees.
After Cliven Bundy's 2014 Nevada standoff--where militia thugs with assault rifles stood down federal officials corralling Cliven's illegally-grazing cows--the Obama administration did nothing. The standoff was a big win for anti-government militants, and in the two years following, facing no arrests or federal enforcement, the movement grew, spawning the Malheur seizure last winter.
"It's a stepping stone toward fascism, not nonviolent civil disobedience."
There, the kids-gloves stayed on. Militants were free to come and go from the refuge. They visited town, harassed locals, and crashed community meetings armed. They held press conferences, trenched Burns Paiute sacred sites, and shook hands with the FBI in front of news cameras. And because refuge employees were told to stay home, the jury could cynically find that the lynchpin charge in the government's boldly-narrow prosecution--that occupiers had conspired to impede federal employees from doing their jobs--wasn't supported by evidence.
All of this--the federal inaction following the Nevada standoff, the cradling of the Bundy's media circus at Malheur, and the government's over-confident bungling of the ensuing prosecution--sets a dangerous and far-reaching precedent for the kind of paramilitary intimidation and right-wing violence that underpins their movement. Social change in America depends on nonviolent civil disobedience, like the brutal struggles of indigenous activists in North Dakota and Black Lives Matter activists throughout the U.S. But right-wing paramilitary intimidation is different. It's a stepping stone toward fascism, not nonviolent civil disobedience. Its rise should concern anyone who cares about America's public lands, civil rights, and a political system that refuses to be bullied by violence and racism.
All of those principles were on trial in the Malheur case. They will be again in next year's trial for the 2014 Bundy standoff. There, the government has the ingredients for a strong case. And the imperative for getting it right couldn't be greater.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
I was nearly killed earlier this year while counter-protesting the paramilitary seizure of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon. After accusing me of being an FBI agent, the armed occupiers there worked themselves into a mob. Hog-faced militia thugs barked, "he's a fed." Some pawed their pistols. I was told snipers were trained on us. It was dangerously close to violence.
"The cradling of the Bundy's media circus at Malheur, and the government's over-confident bungling of the ensuing prosecution--sets a dangerous and far-reaching precedent for the kind of paramilitary intimidation and right-wing violence that underpins their movement."
For weeks last January a small rag-tag group of public lands supporters protested the Malheur occupiers. There was a handful of us, and dozens of them--all 30 miles from the nearest law enforcement. We crashed press conferences, staged counter protests, and marched into their occupied barracks with signs. We were threatened, harassed, blasted with bull horns and trailed by thugs with assault rifles.
We saw first-hand what was live-streamed to the world: An illegal paramilitary seizure of one of the crown jewels of our national wildlife refuge system, and the months-long social, cultural, economic, and environmental terrorization of an entire community. So, like many others, I was jarred by last Thursday's acquittal of seven defendants: How could such an obvious, video-taped crime could go unpunished? Here's how: Federal fumbling.
The Bundy clan and their followers peddle a dangerous brand of radicalism. Their core ideas--that the federal government lacks authority to own public land, and that county sheriffs are the highest form of law enforcement--are rooted in hard-right racist ideologies created to sidestep federal civil rights laws by elevating local authority. They're perfectly suited to ranchers, like Cliven Bundy, who refused to pay deeply subsidized federal grazing fees.
After Cliven Bundy's 2014 Nevada standoff--where militia thugs with assault rifles stood down federal officials corralling Cliven's illegally-grazing cows--the Obama administration did nothing. The standoff was a big win for anti-government militants, and in the two years following, facing no arrests or federal enforcement, the movement grew, spawning the Malheur seizure last winter.
"It's a stepping stone toward fascism, not nonviolent civil disobedience."
There, the kids-gloves stayed on. Militants were free to come and go from the refuge. They visited town, harassed locals, and crashed community meetings armed. They held press conferences, trenched Burns Paiute sacred sites, and shook hands with the FBI in front of news cameras. And because refuge employees were told to stay home, the jury could cynically find that the lynchpin charge in the government's boldly-narrow prosecution--that occupiers had conspired to impede federal employees from doing their jobs--wasn't supported by evidence.
All of this--the federal inaction following the Nevada standoff, the cradling of the Bundy's media circus at Malheur, and the government's over-confident bungling of the ensuing prosecution--sets a dangerous and far-reaching precedent for the kind of paramilitary intimidation and right-wing violence that underpins their movement. Social change in America depends on nonviolent civil disobedience, like the brutal struggles of indigenous activists in North Dakota and Black Lives Matter activists throughout the U.S. But right-wing paramilitary intimidation is different. It's a stepping stone toward fascism, not nonviolent civil disobedience. Its rise should concern anyone who cares about America's public lands, civil rights, and a political system that refuses to be bullied by violence and racism.
All of those principles were on trial in the Malheur case. They will be again in next year's trial for the 2014 Bundy standoff. There, the government has the ingredients for a strong case. And the imperative for getting it right couldn't be greater.
I was nearly killed earlier this year while counter-protesting the paramilitary seizure of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in Oregon. After accusing me of being an FBI agent, the armed occupiers there worked themselves into a mob. Hog-faced militia thugs barked, "he's a fed." Some pawed their pistols. I was told snipers were trained on us. It was dangerously close to violence.
"The cradling of the Bundy's media circus at Malheur, and the government's over-confident bungling of the ensuing prosecution--sets a dangerous and far-reaching precedent for the kind of paramilitary intimidation and right-wing violence that underpins their movement."
For weeks last January a small rag-tag group of public lands supporters protested the Malheur occupiers. There was a handful of us, and dozens of them--all 30 miles from the nearest law enforcement. We crashed press conferences, staged counter protests, and marched into their occupied barracks with signs. We were threatened, harassed, blasted with bull horns and trailed by thugs with assault rifles.
We saw first-hand what was live-streamed to the world: An illegal paramilitary seizure of one of the crown jewels of our national wildlife refuge system, and the months-long social, cultural, economic, and environmental terrorization of an entire community. So, like many others, I was jarred by last Thursday's acquittal of seven defendants: How could such an obvious, video-taped crime could go unpunished? Here's how: Federal fumbling.
The Bundy clan and their followers peddle a dangerous brand of radicalism. Their core ideas--that the federal government lacks authority to own public land, and that county sheriffs are the highest form of law enforcement--are rooted in hard-right racist ideologies created to sidestep federal civil rights laws by elevating local authority. They're perfectly suited to ranchers, like Cliven Bundy, who refused to pay deeply subsidized federal grazing fees.
After Cliven Bundy's 2014 Nevada standoff--where militia thugs with assault rifles stood down federal officials corralling Cliven's illegally-grazing cows--the Obama administration did nothing. The standoff was a big win for anti-government militants, and in the two years following, facing no arrests or federal enforcement, the movement grew, spawning the Malheur seizure last winter.
"It's a stepping stone toward fascism, not nonviolent civil disobedience."
There, the kids-gloves stayed on. Militants were free to come and go from the refuge. They visited town, harassed locals, and crashed community meetings armed. They held press conferences, trenched Burns Paiute sacred sites, and shook hands with the FBI in front of news cameras. And because refuge employees were told to stay home, the jury could cynically find that the lynchpin charge in the government's boldly-narrow prosecution--that occupiers had conspired to impede federal employees from doing their jobs--wasn't supported by evidence.
All of this--the federal inaction following the Nevada standoff, the cradling of the Bundy's media circus at Malheur, and the government's over-confident bungling of the ensuing prosecution--sets a dangerous and far-reaching precedent for the kind of paramilitary intimidation and right-wing violence that underpins their movement. Social change in America depends on nonviolent civil disobedience, like the brutal struggles of indigenous activists in North Dakota and Black Lives Matter activists throughout the U.S. But right-wing paramilitary intimidation is different. It's a stepping stone toward fascism, not nonviolent civil disobedience. Its rise should concern anyone who cares about America's public lands, civil rights, and a political system that refuses to be bullied by violence and racism.
All of those principles were on trial in the Malheur case. They will be again in next year's trial for the 2014 Bundy standoff. There, the government has the ingredients for a strong case. And the imperative for getting it right couldn't be greater.