

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Public outrage has been brewing about the fact that ExxonMobil--one of the the world's biggest oil companies--knew about climate change as early as 1977 and yet promoted climate denialism and actively deceived the public by turning "
Public outrage has been brewing about the fact that ExxonMobil--one of the the world's biggest oil companies--knew about climate change as early as 1977 and yet promoted climate denialism and actively deceived the public by turning "ordinary scientific uncertainties into weapons of mass confusion."
A little-known fact, however, is that while ExxonMobil was misleading the public about climate disruption, it was also using trade rules to increase its power, to bolster its profits, and to actively hamper climate action.
When you take a closer look, it's plain to see. Here are just three examples:
1. ExxonMobil uses private trade tribunals to challenge policies that cut into its profits. In November 2004, a Canadian government body enacted a policy requiring oil companies to allocate a portion of their revenues gained through offshore drilling in Newfoundland and Labrador -- Canada's poorest province -- toward financing local research and development. ExxonMobil didn't like this new policy because it would cut into its record profits, so in 2007 it used rules in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to sue Canada in a private trade tribunal. The lawyers, unaccountable to any domestic legal system, sided with ExxonMobil and ordered Canada to pay the oil giant $14 million in compensation for the policy.
2. ExxonMobil, through its trade associations, uses trade negotiations to strike down critical climate safeguards. ExxonMobil is a member of American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers. In 2013, that association lobbied the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) to use the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations to pressure the EU to weaken a policy designed to encourage European fuel suppliers to switch from high-carbon fuels, such as those derived from tar sands, to lower-carbon fuels. As I wrote about previously, USTR heeded this advice and used the TTIP negotiations to "press the [European] Commission to take the views of stakeholders including U.S. refiners, under consideration." The EU soon did just that by rolling back the proposed policy and agreeing to fuel quality rules that ignored the additional climate emissions from tar sands oil -- just as ExxonMobil's trade association had asked for.
3.ExxonMobil lobbies for trade deals to increase exports of fossil fuels. Declassified documents reveal that ExxonMobil has colluded with the European Commission on TTIP negotiating strategies. The documents show that one of ExxonMobil's biggest objectives for the deal is to require the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to automatically approve exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to the EU -- the world's third-largest LNG importer.
ExxonMobil has also openly advocated for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) for similar reasons. Under the TPP, DOE would be required to automatically approve LNG exports to Japan, the world's top LNG importer. These automatic exports of LNG would facilitate increase global dependency on a fossil fuel with high climate emissions while incentivizing increased fossil fuel infrastructure and fracking.
While we can't take back the previous decades of soaring climate emissions -- decades when ExxonMobil was deceiving the American people -- we can and must hold ExxonMobil accountable for their deception. We must also work together to stop these polluter-friendly trade deals, like the TPP and TTIP, that would allow corrupt companies like ExxonMobil to gain more profits via the destruction of communities and our environment.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Public outrage has been brewing about the fact that ExxonMobil--one of the the world's biggest oil companies--knew about climate change as early as 1977 and yet promoted climate denialism and actively deceived the public by turning "ordinary scientific uncertainties into weapons of mass confusion."
A little-known fact, however, is that while ExxonMobil was misleading the public about climate disruption, it was also using trade rules to increase its power, to bolster its profits, and to actively hamper climate action.
When you take a closer look, it's plain to see. Here are just three examples:
1. ExxonMobil uses private trade tribunals to challenge policies that cut into its profits. In November 2004, a Canadian government body enacted a policy requiring oil companies to allocate a portion of their revenues gained through offshore drilling in Newfoundland and Labrador -- Canada's poorest province -- toward financing local research and development. ExxonMobil didn't like this new policy because it would cut into its record profits, so in 2007 it used rules in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to sue Canada in a private trade tribunal. The lawyers, unaccountable to any domestic legal system, sided with ExxonMobil and ordered Canada to pay the oil giant $14 million in compensation for the policy.
2. ExxonMobil, through its trade associations, uses trade negotiations to strike down critical climate safeguards. ExxonMobil is a member of American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers. In 2013, that association lobbied the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) to use the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations to pressure the EU to weaken a policy designed to encourage European fuel suppliers to switch from high-carbon fuels, such as those derived from tar sands, to lower-carbon fuels. As I wrote about previously, USTR heeded this advice and used the TTIP negotiations to "press the [European] Commission to take the views of stakeholders including U.S. refiners, under consideration." The EU soon did just that by rolling back the proposed policy and agreeing to fuel quality rules that ignored the additional climate emissions from tar sands oil -- just as ExxonMobil's trade association had asked for.
3.ExxonMobil lobbies for trade deals to increase exports of fossil fuels. Declassified documents reveal that ExxonMobil has colluded with the European Commission on TTIP negotiating strategies. The documents show that one of ExxonMobil's biggest objectives for the deal is to require the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to automatically approve exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to the EU -- the world's third-largest LNG importer.
ExxonMobil has also openly advocated for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) for similar reasons. Under the TPP, DOE would be required to automatically approve LNG exports to Japan, the world's top LNG importer. These automatic exports of LNG would facilitate increase global dependency on a fossil fuel with high climate emissions while incentivizing increased fossil fuel infrastructure and fracking.
While we can't take back the previous decades of soaring climate emissions -- decades when ExxonMobil was deceiving the American people -- we can and must hold ExxonMobil accountable for their deception. We must also work together to stop these polluter-friendly trade deals, like the TPP and TTIP, that would allow corrupt companies like ExxonMobil to gain more profits via the destruction of communities and our environment.
Public outrage has been brewing about the fact that ExxonMobil--one of the the world's biggest oil companies--knew about climate change as early as 1977 and yet promoted climate denialism and actively deceived the public by turning "ordinary scientific uncertainties into weapons of mass confusion."
A little-known fact, however, is that while ExxonMobil was misleading the public about climate disruption, it was also using trade rules to increase its power, to bolster its profits, and to actively hamper climate action.
When you take a closer look, it's plain to see. Here are just three examples:
1. ExxonMobil uses private trade tribunals to challenge policies that cut into its profits. In November 2004, a Canadian government body enacted a policy requiring oil companies to allocate a portion of their revenues gained through offshore drilling in Newfoundland and Labrador -- Canada's poorest province -- toward financing local research and development. ExxonMobil didn't like this new policy because it would cut into its record profits, so in 2007 it used rules in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) to sue Canada in a private trade tribunal. The lawyers, unaccountable to any domestic legal system, sided with ExxonMobil and ordered Canada to pay the oil giant $14 million in compensation for the policy.
2. ExxonMobil, through its trade associations, uses trade negotiations to strike down critical climate safeguards. ExxonMobil is a member of American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers. In 2013, that association lobbied the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) to use the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations to pressure the EU to weaken a policy designed to encourage European fuel suppliers to switch from high-carbon fuels, such as those derived from tar sands, to lower-carbon fuels. As I wrote about previously, USTR heeded this advice and used the TTIP negotiations to "press the [European] Commission to take the views of stakeholders including U.S. refiners, under consideration." The EU soon did just that by rolling back the proposed policy and agreeing to fuel quality rules that ignored the additional climate emissions from tar sands oil -- just as ExxonMobil's trade association had asked for.
3.ExxonMobil lobbies for trade deals to increase exports of fossil fuels. Declassified documents reveal that ExxonMobil has colluded with the European Commission on TTIP negotiating strategies. The documents show that one of ExxonMobil's biggest objectives for the deal is to require the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to automatically approve exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) to the EU -- the world's third-largest LNG importer.
ExxonMobil has also openly advocated for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) for similar reasons. Under the TPP, DOE would be required to automatically approve LNG exports to Japan, the world's top LNG importer. These automatic exports of LNG would facilitate increase global dependency on a fossil fuel with high climate emissions while incentivizing increased fossil fuel infrastructure and fracking.
While we can't take back the previous decades of soaring climate emissions -- decades when ExxonMobil was deceiving the American people -- we can and must hold ExxonMobil accountable for their deception. We must also work together to stop these polluter-friendly trade deals, like the TPP and TTIP, that would allow corrupt companies like ExxonMobil to gain more profits via the destruction of communities and our environment.