General Mills to Label GMOs
Vermont’s GMO labeling law goes into effect in July, and some major companies are starting to give consumers more information about what’s in their food.
On Friday, General Mills announced it will label all of its products sold in the United States that contain genetically engineered ingredients (GMOs). This development comes just days after the Senate failed to pass the DARK Act, which would block state GMO labeling laws, including the one in Vermont that goes into effect on July 1 of this year.
Although the DARK Act is by no means dead, this announcement signals that with Vermont's law due to take effect in July, companies can and will comply with it.
General Mills owns dozens of brands in the United States including many products you might already have in your kitchen such as Yoplait, Betty Crocker, Haagen-Dazs, Pillsbury, Progresso, Cheerios and many more.
While Big Food and agribusiness companies claim that requiring GMO labels will raise food prices for consumers, Friday's announcement adds to the evidence that debunks that claim. Campbell Soup Company also recently announced it will label GMOs on products nationwide without raising consumer prices. According to research commissioned by Consumers Union, requiring labeling for foods with genetically engineered ingredients will cost consumers less than a penny per day, or $2.30 per person annually.
While mandatory GMO labeling has been met with resistance by food corporations here in the United States, it is not a novel concept. Australia, Brazil, China, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Russia and Saudi Arabia are among more than 60 countries that require some labeling on GMO foods. But Big Food has spent millions lobbying Congress, state legislatures and federal agencies to keep labels off of GMO foods. The Grocery Manufacturers Association, which represents the biggest food and chemical companies, has spent over $80 million to defeat labeling initiatives in multiple states.
Friday's announcement shows that food companies can figure out how to meet the reasonable requirements of Vermont's mandatory labeling law. But we can't rely on individual corporations to do what's right. Stay tuned for more news about any attempts by Big Food to use the DARK Act to block state labeling laws, or to come up with a false "compromises" like QR codes.
Nothing short of mandatory-on package labeling will do when it comes to providing consumers with information about GMOs in their food. Write your senators today, and ask them to oppose the DARK Act.
Then check out our vote center to find out how your senators voted last week.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On Friday, General Mills announced it will label all of its products sold in the United States that contain genetically engineered ingredients (GMOs). This development comes just days after the Senate failed to pass the DARK Act, which would block state GMO labeling laws, including the one in Vermont that goes into effect on July 1 of this year.
Although the DARK Act is by no means dead, this announcement signals that with Vermont's law due to take effect in July, companies can and will comply with it.
General Mills owns dozens of brands in the United States including many products you might already have in your kitchen such as Yoplait, Betty Crocker, Haagen-Dazs, Pillsbury, Progresso, Cheerios and many more.
While Big Food and agribusiness companies claim that requiring GMO labels will raise food prices for consumers, Friday's announcement adds to the evidence that debunks that claim. Campbell Soup Company also recently announced it will label GMOs on products nationwide without raising consumer prices. According to research commissioned by Consumers Union, requiring labeling for foods with genetically engineered ingredients will cost consumers less than a penny per day, or $2.30 per person annually.
While mandatory GMO labeling has been met with resistance by food corporations here in the United States, it is not a novel concept. Australia, Brazil, China, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Russia and Saudi Arabia are among more than 60 countries that require some labeling on GMO foods. But Big Food has spent millions lobbying Congress, state legislatures and federal agencies to keep labels off of GMO foods. The Grocery Manufacturers Association, which represents the biggest food and chemical companies, has spent over $80 million to defeat labeling initiatives in multiple states.
Friday's announcement shows that food companies can figure out how to meet the reasonable requirements of Vermont's mandatory labeling law. But we can't rely on individual corporations to do what's right. Stay tuned for more news about any attempts by Big Food to use the DARK Act to block state labeling laws, or to come up with a false "compromises" like QR codes.
Nothing short of mandatory-on package labeling will do when it comes to providing consumers with information about GMOs in their food. Write your senators today, and ask them to oppose the DARK Act.
Then check out our vote center to find out how your senators voted last week.
On Friday, General Mills announced it will label all of its products sold in the United States that contain genetically engineered ingredients (GMOs). This development comes just days after the Senate failed to pass the DARK Act, which would block state GMO labeling laws, including the one in Vermont that goes into effect on July 1 of this year.
Although the DARK Act is by no means dead, this announcement signals that with Vermont's law due to take effect in July, companies can and will comply with it.
General Mills owns dozens of brands in the United States including many products you might already have in your kitchen such as Yoplait, Betty Crocker, Haagen-Dazs, Pillsbury, Progresso, Cheerios and many more.
While Big Food and agribusiness companies claim that requiring GMO labels will raise food prices for consumers, Friday's announcement adds to the evidence that debunks that claim. Campbell Soup Company also recently announced it will label GMOs on products nationwide without raising consumer prices. According to research commissioned by Consumers Union, requiring labeling for foods with genetically engineered ingredients will cost consumers less than a penny per day, or $2.30 per person annually.
While mandatory GMO labeling has been met with resistance by food corporations here in the United States, it is not a novel concept. Australia, Brazil, China, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Russia and Saudi Arabia are among more than 60 countries that require some labeling on GMO foods. But Big Food has spent millions lobbying Congress, state legislatures and federal agencies to keep labels off of GMO foods. The Grocery Manufacturers Association, which represents the biggest food and chemical companies, has spent over $80 million to defeat labeling initiatives in multiple states.
Friday's announcement shows that food companies can figure out how to meet the reasonable requirements of Vermont's mandatory labeling law. But we can't rely on individual corporations to do what's right. Stay tuned for more news about any attempts by Big Food to use the DARK Act to block state labeling laws, or to come up with a false "compromises" like QR codes.
Nothing short of mandatory-on package labeling will do when it comes to providing consumers with information about GMOs in their food. Write your senators today, and ask them to oppose the DARK Act.
Then check out our vote center to find out how your senators voted last week.