SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Democrats gathered outside the U.S. Supreme Court last month. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
The Constitution of the United States is clear: Article II Section 2 says the President "shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... judges to the Supreme Court."
It doesn't say the President can't appoint in the final year of his term of office. In fact, a third of all U.S. presidents have appointed a Supreme Court justice in an election year. Yet many Republicans argue that no appointment can be made in the election year.
The Constitution of the United States is clear: Article II Section 2 says the President "shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... judges to the Supreme Court."
It doesn't say the President can't appoint in the final year of his term of office. In fact, a third of all U.S. presidents have appointed a Supreme Court justice in an election year. Yet many Republicans argue that no appointment can be made in the election year.
And the Constitution doesn't give the Senate leader the right to delay and obstruct the rest of the Senate from voting on a President's nominee. Yet this is what the current Republican leadership argues.
In refusing to vote or even hold a hearing on the President's nominee to the Supreme Court, the GOP is abdicating its constitutional responsibility. It's not doing its job.
Senate Republicans are trying to justify their refusal by referring to a comment Joe Biden made when he chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1992, urging then-President Bush to hold off on nominating a Supreme Court justice until after the election. But Biden was speaking hypothetically - there was no nominee before the Senate at that time - and he concluded by saying that if the President were to nominate someone he was sure the Senate and the President could come to an agreement.
This fight has huge implications. A new Supreme Court justice might be able to reverse "Citizens United" and remove the poison of big money from our democracy. It might reverse "Shelby v. Holder," and resurrect the Voting Rights Act.
And think of the cases coming up - on retaining a woman's right to choose, on the rights of teachers and other public employees to unionize, on the President's authority to fight climate change, and the rights of countless Americans with little or no power in a system where more and more power is going to the top. That's the traditional role of the Supreme Court - to protect the powerless from the powerful.
Which is exactly why the Republicans don't want to fulfill their constitutional responsibility and allow a vote on the President's nominee.
So what can you do? There's only one response - the same response you made when Republicans shut down the government because they didn't get their way over the debt ceiling: You let them know they'll be held accountable.
Public pressure is the only way to get GOP senators to release their choke hold on the Supreme Court. Public pressure is up to you. Call your senators now, and tell them you want them to do their job.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Constitution of the United States is clear: Article II Section 2 says the President "shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... judges to the Supreme Court."
It doesn't say the President can't appoint in the final year of his term of office. In fact, a third of all U.S. presidents have appointed a Supreme Court justice in an election year. Yet many Republicans argue that no appointment can be made in the election year.
And the Constitution doesn't give the Senate leader the right to delay and obstruct the rest of the Senate from voting on a President's nominee. Yet this is what the current Republican leadership argues.
In refusing to vote or even hold a hearing on the President's nominee to the Supreme Court, the GOP is abdicating its constitutional responsibility. It's not doing its job.
Senate Republicans are trying to justify their refusal by referring to a comment Joe Biden made when he chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1992, urging then-President Bush to hold off on nominating a Supreme Court justice until after the election. But Biden was speaking hypothetically - there was no nominee before the Senate at that time - and he concluded by saying that if the President were to nominate someone he was sure the Senate and the President could come to an agreement.
This fight has huge implications. A new Supreme Court justice might be able to reverse "Citizens United" and remove the poison of big money from our democracy. It might reverse "Shelby v. Holder," and resurrect the Voting Rights Act.
And think of the cases coming up - on retaining a woman's right to choose, on the rights of teachers and other public employees to unionize, on the President's authority to fight climate change, and the rights of countless Americans with little or no power in a system where more and more power is going to the top. That's the traditional role of the Supreme Court - to protect the powerless from the powerful.
Which is exactly why the Republicans don't want to fulfill their constitutional responsibility and allow a vote on the President's nominee.
So what can you do? There's only one response - the same response you made when Republicans shut down the government because they didn't get their way over the debt ceiling: You let them know they'll be held accountable.
Public pressure is the only way to get GOP senators to release their choke hold on the Supreme Court. Public pressure is up to you. Call your senators now, and tell them you want them to do their job.
The Constitution of the United States is clear: Article II Section 2 says the President "shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... judges to the Supreme Court."
It doesn't say the President can't appoint in the final year of his term of office. In fact, a third of all U.S. presidents have appointed a Supreme Court justice in an election year. Yet many Republicans argue that no appointment can be made in the election year.
And the Constitution doesn't give the Senate leader the right to delay and obstruct the rest of the Senate from voting on a President's nominee. Yet this is what the current Republican leadership argues.
In refusing to vote or even hold a hearing on the President's nominee to the Supreme Court, the GOP is abdicating its constitutional responsibility. It's not doing its job.
Senate Republicans are trying to justify their refusal by referring to a comment Joe Biden made when he chaired the Senate Judiciary Committee in 1992, urging then-President Bush to hold off on nominating a Supreme Court justice until after the election. But Biden was speaking hypothetically - there was no nominee before the Senate at that time - and he concluded by saying that if the President were to nominate someone he was sure the Senate and the President could come to an agreement.
This fight has huge implications. A new Supreme Court justice might be able to reverse "Citizens United" and remove the poison of big money from our democracy. It might reverse "Shelby v. Holder," and resurrect the Voting Rights Act.
And think of the cases coming up - on retaining a woman's right to choose, on the rights of teachers and other public employees to unionize, on the President's authority to fight climate change, and the rights of countless Americans with little or no power in a system where more and more power is going to the top. That's the traditional role of the Supreme Court - to protect the powerless from the powerful.
Which is exactly why the Republicans don't want to fulfill their constitutional responsibility and allow a vote on the President's nominee.
So what can you do? There's only one response - the same response you made when Republicans shut down the government because they didn't get their way over the debt ceiling: You let them know they'll be held accountable.
Public pressure is the only way to get GOP senators to release their choke hold on the Supreme Court. Public pressure is up to you. Call your senators now, and tell them you want them to do their job.