To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
In this world, where everything and everyone is for sale, we must sustain independent media we can trust. If you believe independent journalism is critical to protecting democracy and the common good, please support Common Dreams this Giving Tuesday! We wouldn't exist without you.
(Screenshot: Fox News)
Actually, many people are alarmed, but it is difficult to know that by observing media coverage, where little journalistic alarm over Trump is expressed. That's because the rules of large media outlets -- venerating faux objectivity over truth along with every other civic value -- prohibit the sounding of any alarms. Under this framework of corporate journalism, to denounce Trump, or even to sound alarms about the dark forces he's exploiting and unleashing, would not constitute journalism. To the contrary, such behavior is regarded as a violation of journalism. Such denunciations are scorned as opinion, activism, and bias: all the values that large media-owning corporations have posited as the antithesis of journalism in order to defang and neuter it as an adversarial force.
Just this morning, NPR media reporter David Folkenflik published a story describing the concern and even anger of some NPR executives and journalists over a column by longtime NPR commentator Cokie Roberts -- the Beacon of Washington Centrism -- that criticizes Trump. "NPR has a policy forbidding its journalists from taking public stances on political affairs," he wrote. For any NPR reporter, Roberts's statements -- warning of the dangers of a Trump presidency -- would be a clear violation of that policy.
An NPR vice president, Michael Oreskes, published an internal memo to NPR staff this morning highlighting Roberts's non-reporting and non-employee role as a reason she would not be punished, but he pointedly noted, "If Cokie were still a member of NPR's staff we would not have allowed that." And in an interview that Oreskes "directed" Roberts to do this morning with Morning Edition host David Greene about the matter, the NPR host chided Roberts for expressing negative views of Trump, telling her:
Objectivity is so fundamental to what we do. Can you blame people like me for being a little disappointed to hear you come out and take a personal position on something like this in a campaign?
Imagine calling yourself a journalist, and then -- as you watch an authoritarian politician get closer to power by threatening and unleashing violence and stoking the ugliest impulses -- denouncing not that politician, but, rather, other journalists who warn of the dangers.
Read the rest at The Intercept.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Actually, many people are alarmed, but it is difficult to know that by observing media coverage, where little journalistic alarm over Trump is expressed. That's because the rules of large media outlets -- venerating faux objectivity over truth along with every other civic value -- prohibit the sounding of any alarms. Under this framework of corporate journalism, to denounce Trump, or even to sound alarms about the dark forces he's exploiting and unleashing, would not constitute journalism. To the contrary, such behavior is regarded as a violation of journalism. Such denunciations are scorned as opinion, activism, and bias: all the values that large media-owning corporations have posited as the antithesis of journalism in order to defang and neuter it as an adversarial force.
Just this morning, NPR media reporter David Folkenflik published a story describing the concern and even anger of some NPR executives and journalists over a column by longtime NPR commentator Cokie Roberts -- the Beacon of Washington Centrism -- that criticizes Trump. "NPR has a policy forbidding its journalists from taking public stances on political affairs," he wrote. For any NPR reporter, Roberts's statements -- warning of the dangers of a Trump presidency -- would be a clear violation of that policy.
An NPR vice president, Michael Oreskes, published an internal memo to NPR staff this morning highlighting Roberts's non-reporting and non-employee role as a reason she would not be punished, but he pointedly noted, "If Cokie were still a member of NPR's staff we would not have allowed that." And in an interview that Oreskes "directed" Roberts to do this morning with Morning Edition host David Greene about the matter, the NPR host chided Roberts for expressing negative views of Trump, telling her:
Objectivity is so fundamental to what we do. Can you blame people like me for being a little disappointed to hear you come out and take a personal position on something like this in a campaign?
Imagine calling yourself a journalist, and then -- as you watch an authoritarian politician get closer to power by threatening and unleashing violence and stoking the ugliest impulses -- denouncing not that politician, but, rather, other journalists who warn of the dangers.
Read the rest at The Intercept.
Actually, many people are alarmed, but it is difficult to know that by observing media coverage, where little journalistic alarm over Trump is expressed. That's because the rules of large media outlets -- venerating faux objectivity over truth along with every other civic value -- prohibit the sounding of any alarms. Under this framework of corporate journalism, to denounce Trump, or even to sound alarms about the dark forces he's exploiting and unleashing, would not constitute journalism. To the contrary, such behavior is regarded as a violation of journalism. Such denunciations are scorned as opinion, activism, and bias: all the values that large media-owning corporations have posited as the antithesis of journalism in order to defang and neuter it as an adversarial force.
Just this morning, NPR media reporter David Folkenflik published a story describing the concern and even anger of some NPR executives and journalists over a column by longtime NPR commentator Cokie Roberts -- the Beacon of Washington Centrism -- that criticizes Trump. "NPR has a policy forbidding its journalists from taking public stances on political affairs," he wrote. For any NPR reporter, Roberts's statements -- warning of the dangers of a Trump presidency -- would be a clear violation of that policy.
An NPR vice president, Michael Oreskes, published an internal memo to NPR staff this morning highlighting Roberts's non-reporting and non-employee role as a reason she would not be punished, but he pointedly noted, "If Cokie were still a member of NPR's staff we would not have allowed that." And in an interview that Oreskes "directed" Roberts to do this morning with Morning Edition host David Greene about the matter, the NPR host chided Roberts for expressing negative views of Trump, telling her:
Objectivity is so fundamental to what we do. Can you blame people like me for being a little disappointed to hear you come out and take a personal position on something like this in a campaign?
Imagine calling yourself a journalist, and then -- as you watch an authoritarian politician get closer to power by threatening and unleashing violence and stoking the ugliest impulses -- denouncing not that politician, but, rather, other journalists who warn of the dangers.
Read the rest at The Intercept.