Why the Oil Export Ban Must Stay
Don’t double down on dirty fuels from the 19th century
It's easy to understand why the American oil industry would like to see the ban on crude oil exports lifted: Foreign markets would be a new source of profits while also helping to raise the price of oil domestically. The consequences for the environment and for America's growing clean-energy economy, however, would be disastrous.
The increased demand for more drilling that would result from exports means that oil companies would resort to ever riskier sources -- while demanding access to our nation's most beautiful and vulnerable environments, including our coastlines, our public lands and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. At the same time, we would face the risk of even more spills and deadly explosions from the transport of crude oil, whether by pipeline or by oil trains that run through our communities.
At the very moment when the world is reaching consensus that we must rein in climate-polluting fossil fuel emissions, lifting the ban on exports would send a signal that America is ready to double down on dirty, 19th century fuels -- when we should instead be investing more in the clean and renewable energy sources that are our future and leaving dirty sources in the ground as much as possible.
Lifting of the crude oil export ban would not only threaten our environment and climate, though; it would also hurt our workforce, and it's not just the job-creating renewable energy workforce that would be affected. American refinery workers are our first and last line of defense for community safety in the face of an industry that all too often prioritizes profits over people. Instead of exporting pollution and good jobs to other countries, the U.S should concentrate on leading the world in exporting clean-energy technologies.
Congress should listen to the American people rather than its friends in the oil industry and leave the crude oil export ban in place.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It's easy to understand why the American oil industry would like to see the ban on crude oil exports lifted: Foreign markets would be a new source of profits while also helping to raise the price of oil domestically. The consequences for the environment and for America's growing clean-energy economy, however, would be disastrous.
The increased demand for more drilling that would result from exports means that oil companies would resort to ever riskier sources -- while demanding access to our nation's most beautiful and vulnerable environments, including our coastlines, our public lands and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. At the same time, we would face the risk of even more spills and deadly explosions from the transport of crude oil, whether by pipeline or by oil trains that run through our communities.
At the very moment when the world is reaching consensus that we must rein in climate-polluting fossil fuel emissions, lifting the ban on exports would send a signal that America is ready to double down on dirty, 19th century fuels -- when we should instead be investing more in the clean and renewable energy sources that are our future and leaving dirty sources in the ground as much as possible.
Lifting of the crude oil export ban would not only threaten our environment and climate, though; it would also hurt our workforce, and it's not just the job-creating renewable energy workforce that would be affected. American refinery workers are our first and last line of defense for community safety in the face of an industry that all too often prioritizes profits over people. Instead of exporting pollution and good jobs to other countries, the U.S should concentrate on leading the world in exporting clean-energy technologies.
Congress should listen to the American people rather than its friends in the oil industry and leave the crude oil export ban in place.
It's easy to understand why the American oil industry would like to see the ban on crude oil exports lifted: Foreign markets would be a new source of profits while also helping to raise the price of oil domestically. The consequences for the environment and for America's growing clean-energy economy, however, would be disastrous.
The increased demand for more drilling that would result from exports means that oil companies would resort to ever riskier sources -- while demanding access to our nation's most beautiful and vulnerable environments, including our coastlines, our public lands and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. At the same time, we would face the risk of even more spills and deadly explosions from the transport of crude oil, whether by pipeline or by oil trains that run through our communities.
At the very moment when the world is reaching consensus that we must rein in climate-polluting fossil fuel emissions, lifting the ban on exports would send a signal that America is ready to double down on dirty, 19th century fuels -- when we should instead be investing more in the clean and renewable energy sources that are our future and leaving dirty sources in the ground as much as possible.
Lifting of the crude oil export ban would not only threaten our environment and climate, though; it would also hurt our workforce, and it's not just the job-creating renewable energy workforce that would be affected. American refinery workers are our first and last line of defense for community safety in the face of an industry that all too often prioritizes profits over people. Instead of exporting pollution and good jobs to other countries, the U.S should concentrate on leading the world in exporting clean-energy technologies.
Congress should listen to the American people rather than its friends in the oil industry and leave the crude oil export ban in place.