SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Next Steps for Test Reform Activists on ESEA Reauthorization
Aug 16, 2015
Testing resistance and reform activists can help determine the result of the House-Senate conference committee that will write a compromise bill to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA, now named No Child Left Behind).
Both houses of Congress took important steps to end federally mandated accountability but failed to reduce the amount of required testing. While they do little to advance high-quality education, the bills are a valuable step forward in overhauling the testing and accountability regime that has undermined public education. The new shared version written by the conference committee this fall will go back to each chamber for final votes and, if approved, to President Obama for his signature. If a bill does not become law in this Congress, NCLB, and the waivers will continue until at least 2017.
FairTest has analyzed the bills (see here) and will work toward these goals at the conference:
1) Block NCLB-style accountability provisions. This is the most contentious accountability issue. The Senate rejected a Democratic amendment that would have significantly restored NCLB-style accountability, including a variation of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and mandated school interventions. Democrats from both houses, backed by the Obama-Duncan administration, will try to use the conference process to insert what they could not win in either chamber. They have threatened to block final passage if they do not get their way. However, all but three Senate Democrats voted for the bill, signaling most members do not want to keep NCLB. Now, activists must win over Democrats to counter the threat to reestablish "test-and-punish." Fortunately, no one is pushing to restore the mandate for escalating sanctions. Both bills leave interventions up to the states and end the federal mandate to use student scores to judge teachers.
2) Retain state power to limit the weight given to test scores in accountability provisions. Both bills leave it up to the states to determine their accountability indices, provided that statewide assessment is part of the mix. Some Democrats will push to give test scores the majority of the weight.
3) Retain as strong an opt-out provision as possible. The House bill allows parents to opt their children out of federally mandated exams, while the Senate allows states or districts to decide. Where allowed, opt-outs would not count against schools. FairTest will press the conference committee to adopt the House version while recognizing that the Senate version would still be a step forward.
4) Retain the Senate section authorizing states to develop "innovative" assessment programs and the House section authorizing local assessments. The Senate bill allows up to seven states to develop innovative systems built on various local, performance, and other assessments. More states would be allowed to participate after three years. The conference bill should allow as many states to participate as they meet the criteria. The House bill allows districts to design assessment systems, continuing an NCLB provision. (State efforts to use it were blocked by the U.S. Department of Education until the recent approval of a New Hampshire pilot.) In both cases, scores have to be comparable on a statewide basis. FairTest recommends combining the two: the House for its greater flexibility and availability to all states, the Senate for its explicit support of spending federal funds to build new assessment systems, pushing the Department to allow innovation.
5) Retain limits to the power of the U.S. Department of Education to manipulate state policies on standards, assessments, and accountability, as well as bar the Department from granting waivers that require state actions not already mandated by federal law. Again, some Democrats aim to weaken the prohibitions to allow the Department to intervene in state tests and accountability.
What can people do?
- Contact all your Senators and Representatives to express your views and ask them to share them with the House and Senate education committee leadership. Here is a letter you can use: https://www.fairtest.org/tell-congress-keep-federal-accountability-mandates.
- Push organizations you work with to intervene.
- Congress is on recess until after Labor Day, so try to meet with members to educate them while they're in their home districts. You can find House contact information at https://www.house.gov/representatives/ and Senate contact information at https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/.
- As always, share the information and call on people you know to act now.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Living In Dialogue
Monty Neill
Monty Neill is the executive director of the National Center for Fair & Open Testing, known as FairTest, which works to eliminate the overuse of high-stakes standardized tests.
arne duncanbarack obamaeducationpeople powerpublic educationus congressus department of educationno child left behind
Testing resistance and reform activists can help determine the result of the House-Senate conference committee that will write a compromise bill to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA, now named No Child Left Behind).
Both houses of Congress took important steps to end federally mandated accountability but failed to reduce the amount of required testing. While they do little to advance high-quality education, the bills are a valuable step forward in overhauling the testing and accountability regime that has undermined public education. The new shared version written by the conference committee this fall will go back to each chamber for final votes and, if approved, to President Obama for his signature. If a bill does not become law in this Congress, NCLB, and the waivers will continue until at least 2017.
FairTest has analyzed the bills (see here) and will work toward these goals at the conference:
1) Block NCLB-style accountability provisions. This is the most contentious accountability issue. The Senate rejected a Democratic amendment that would have significantly restored NCLB-style accountability, including a variation of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and mandated school interventions. Democrats from both houses, backed by the Obama-Duncan administration, will try to use the conference process to insert what they could not win in either chamber. They have threatened to block final passage if they do not get their way. However, all but three Senate Democrats voted for the bill, signaling most members do not want to keep NCLB. Now, activists must win over Democrats to counter the threat to reestablish "test-and-punish." Fortunately, no one is pushing to restore the mandate for escalating sanctions. Both bills leave interventions up to the states and end the federal mandate to use student scores to judge teachers.
2) Retain state power to limit the weight given to test scores in accountability provisions. Both bills leave it up to the states to determine their accountability indices, provided that statewide assessment is part of the mix. Some Democrats will push to give test scores the majority of the weight.
3) Retain as strong an opt-out provision as possible. The House bill allows parents to opt their children out of federally mandated exams, while the Senate allows states or districts to decide. Where allowed, opt-outs would not count against schools. FairTest will press the conference committee to adopt the House version while recognizing that the Senate version would still be a step forward.
4) Retain the Senate section authorizing states to develop "innovative" assessment programs and the House section authorizing local assessments. The Senate bill allows up to seven states to develop innovative systems built on various local, performance, and other assessments. More states would be allowed to participate after three years. The conference bill should allow as many states to participate as they meet the criteria. The House bill allows districts to design assessment systems, continuing an NCLB provision. (State efforts to use it were blocked by the U.S. Department of Education until the recent approval of a New Hampshire pilot.) In both cases, scores have to be comparable on a statewide basis. FairTest recommends combining the two: the House for its greater flexibility and availability to all states, the Senate for its explicit support of spending federal funds to build new assessment systems, pushing the Department to allow innovation.
5) Retain limits to the power of the U.S. Department of Education to manipulate state policies on standards, assessments, and accountability, as well as bar the Department from granting waivers that require state actions not already mandated by federal law. Again, some Democrats aim to weaken the prohibitions to allow the Department to intervene in state tests and accountability.
What can people do?
- Contact all your Senators and Representatives to express your views and ask them to share them with the House and Senate education committee leadership. Here is a letter you can use: https://www.fairtest.org/tell-congress-keep-federal-accountability-mandates.
- Push organizations you work with to intervene.
- Congress is on recess until after Labor Day, so try to meet with members to educate them while they're in their home districts. You can find House contact information at https://www.house.gov/representatives/ and Senate contact information at https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/.
- As always, share the information and call on people you know to act now.
Monty Neill
Monty Neill is the executive director of the National Center for Fair & Open Testing, known as FairTest, which works to eliminate the overuse of high-stakes standardized tests.
Testing resistance and reform activists can help determine the result of the House-Senate conference committee that will write a compromise bill to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA, now named No Child Left Behind).
Both houses of Congress took important steps to end federally mandated accountability but failed to reduce the amount of required testing. While they do little to advance high-quality education, the bills are a valuable step forward in overhauling the testing and accountability regime that has undermined public education. The new shared version written by the conference committee this fall will go back to each chamber for final votes and, if approved, to President Obama for his signature. If a bill does not become law in this Congress, NCLB, and the waivers will continue until at least 2017.
FairTest has analyzed the bills (see here) and will work toward these goals at the conference:
1) Block NCLB-style accountability provisions. This is the most contentious accountability issue. The Senate rejected a Democratic amendment that would have significantly restored NCLB-style accountability, including a variation of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and mandated school interventions. Democrats from both houses, backed by the Obama-Duncan administration, will try to use the conference process to insert what they could not win in either chamber. They have threatened to block final passage if they do not get their way. However, all but three Senate Democrats voted for the bill, signaling most members do not want to keep NCLB. Now, activists must win over Democrats to counter the threat to reestablish "test-and-punish." Fortunately, no one is pushing to restore the mandate for escalating sanctions. Both bills leave interventions up to the states and end the federal mandate to use student scores to judge teachers.
2) Retain state power to limit the weight given to test scores in accountability provisions. Both bills leave it up to the states to determine their accountability indices, provided that statewide assessment is part of the mix. Some Democrats will push to give test scores the majority of the weight.
3) Retain as strong an opt-out provision as possible. The House bill allows parents to opt their children out of federally mandated exams, while the Senate allows states or districts to decide. Where allowed, opt-outs would not count against schools. FairTest will press the conference committee to adopt the House version while recognizing that the Senate version would still be a step forward.
4) Retain the Senate section authorizing states to develop "innovative" assessment programs and the House section authorizing local assessments. The Senate bill allows up to seven states to develop innovative systems built on various local, performance, and other assessments. More states would be allowed to participate after three years. The conference bill should allow as many states to participate as they meet the criteria. The House bill allows districts to design assessment systems, continuing an NCLB provision. (State efforts to use it were blocked by the U.S. Department of Education until the recent approval of a New Hampshire pilot.) In both cases, scores have to be comparable on a statewide basis. FairTest recommends combining the two: the House for its greater flexibility and availability to all states, the Senate for its explicit support of spending federal funds to build new assessment systems, pushing the Department to allow innovation.
5) Retain limits to the power of the U.S. Department of Education to manipulate state policies on standards, assessments, and accountability, as well as bar the Department from granting waivers that require state actions not already mandated by federal law. Again, some Democrats aim to weaken the prohibitions to allow the Department to intervene in state tests and accountability.
What can people do?
- Contact all your Senators and Representatives to express your views and ask them to share them with the House and Senate education committee leadership. Here is a letter you can use: https://www.fairtest.org/tell-congress-keep-federal-accountability-mandates.
- Push organizations you work with to intervene.
- Congress is on recess until after Labor Day, so try to meet with members to educate them while they're in their home districts. You can find House contact information at https://www.house.gov/representatives/ and Senate contact information at https://www.senate.gov/senators/contact/.
- As always, share the information and call on people you know to act now.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.