Will Republicans Block Action On Corporations Abandoning the US?
There is legislation before Congress to do something about corporations renouncing their US "citizenship." The odds are that Republicans will block it -- and not just because they have obstructed everything else.
There is legislation before Congress to do something about corporations renouncing their US "citizenship." The odds are that Republicans will block it -- and not just because they have obstructed everything else.
There is a wave of news about corporations using a technicality called an "inversion" to renounce their US "citizenship." An inversion is when a US company buys or merges with a non-US company, and then pretends it is no longer a US company. Today it's Burger King. Not long ago it was Walgreens.
Keep Same Executives, Employees, Facilities And Customers
Even though an inverted company has renounced its US citizenship, the company keeps the same executives, the same stores or facilities, the same employees, and the same customers -- right here in the US. The only things that changes is the company sheds certain tax obligations. The company still receives all the benefits of US roads and infrastructure, police and fire protection, courts, military protection, and the rest. The US still educates its workforce and subsidizes its ultra-low wages with food stamps, Medicaid, and other available government services.
There is legislation to fix this problem. In particular, the Stop Corporate Inversions Act of 2014 has been introduced in both the House and the Senate.
Will Republicans Block Action?
Will Republicans block this legislation? Aside from the fact that Republicans have obstructed nearly all legislation of substance for years, there is precedent for Republicans blocking bills to end corporate tax loopholes. Here are a few examples:
- In July, Senate Republicans filibustered the Bring Jobs Home Act. That bill would have ended tax breaks to help companies move jobs and facilities out of the country, and given companies a 20 percent tax credit for relocating business units back to the US.
- In 2012, Senate Republicans filibustered a similar Bring Jobs Home Act, and filibustered a similar bill in 2010.
- In June 2013, Republicans filibustered a bill to close "tax loopholes for oil companies, wealthy pensioners, and multinational corporations."
- In March 2012, Senate Republicans filibustered a bill "to repeal about $24 billion in U.S. tax breaks for the nation's biggest oil companies."
- In May 2011, Senate Republicans filibustered "a Democratic bill that would have repealed about $2 billion in annual tax breaks for the five biggest oil companies."
- In December 2009, Senate Republicans filibustered legislation to "monitor and treat first responders and emergency workers who suffered illnesses related to 9/11," because it was "paid for by a provision that would prevent foreign multinational corporations from using tax havens to avoid taxes on U.S. income."
These are just a few of dozens and dozens of examples of Republicans obstructing legislation to close tax loopholes that let the giant corporations dodge, evade, avoid, and otherwise not pay taxes for the roads, courts, military defense, and other government services they benefit from. In fact, they have obstructed pretty much every effort to close corporate tax loopholes.
So ... yes ... Republicans will probably certainly obstruct efforts to stop these corporate "inversions," in which companies renounce their US "citizenship" and pretend they are non-US companies. It's who they are. It's what they do.
Update - If true, this is another reason to suspect that Republicans might block doing anything about these companies renouncing their "citizenship:" Republican leadership personally profiting from tax inversion deals
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
There is legislation before Congress to do something about corporations renouncing their US "citizenship." The odds are that Republicans will block it -- and not just because they have obstructed everything else.
There is a wave of news about corporations using a technicality called an "inversion" to renounce their US "citizenship." An inversion is when a US company buys or merges with a non-US company, and then pretends it is no longer a US company. Today it's Burger King. Not long ago it was Walgreens.
Keep Same Executives, Employees, Facilities And Customers
Even though an inverted company has renounced its US citizenship, the company keeps the same executives, the same stores or facilities, the same employees, and the same customers -- right here in the US. The only things that changes is the company sheds certain tax obligations. The company still receives all the benefits of US roads and infrastructure, police and fire protection, courts, military protection, and the rest. The US still educates its workforce and subsidizes its ultra-low wages with food stamps, Medicaid, and other available government services.
There is legislation to fix this problem. In particular, the Stop Corporate Inversions Act of 2014 has been introduced in both the House and the Senate.
Will Republicans Block Action?
Will Republicans block this legislation? Aside from the fact that Republicans have obstructed nearly all legislation of substance for years, there is precedent for Republicans blocking bills to end corporate tax loopholes. Here are a few examples:
- In July, Senate Republicans filibustered the Bring Jobs Home Act. That bill would have ended tax breaks to help companies move jobs and facilities out of the country, and given companies a 20 percent tax credit for relocating business units back to the US.
- In 2012, Senate Republicans filibustered a similar Bring Jobs Home Act, and filibustered a similar bill in 2010.
- In June 2013, Republicans filibustered a bill to close "tax loopholes for oil companies, wealthy pensioners, and multinational corporations."
- In March 2012, Senate Republicans filibustered a bill "to repeal about $24 billion in U.S. tax breaks for the nation's biggest oil companies."
- In May 2011, Senate Republicans filibustered "a Democratic bill that would have repealed about $2 billion in annual tax breaks for the five biggest oil companies."
- In December 2009, Senate Republicans filibustered legislation to "monitor and treat first responders and emergency workers who suffered illnesses related to 9/11," because it was "paid for by a provision that would prevent foreign multinational corporations from using tax havens to avoid taxes on U.S. income."
These are just a few of dozens and dozens of examples of Republicans obstructing legislation to close tax loopholes that let the giant corporations dodge, evade, avoid, and otherwise not pay taxes for the roads, courts, military defense, and other government services they benefit from. In fact, they have obstructed pretty much every effort to close corporate tax loopholes.
So ... yes ... Republicans will probably certainly obstruct efforts to stop these corporate "inversions," in which companies renounce their US "citizenship" and pretend they are non-US companies. It's who they are. It's what they do.
Update - If true, this is another reason to suspect that Republicans might block doing anything about these companies renouncing their "citizenship:" Republican leadership personally profiting from tax inversion deals
There is legislation before Congress to do something about corporations renouncing their US "citizenship." The odds are that Republicans will block it -- and not just because they have obstructed everything else.
There is a wave of news about corporations using a technicality called an "inversion" to renounce their US "citizenship." An inversion is when a US company buys or merges with a non-US company, and then pretends it is no longer a US company. Today it's Burger King. Not long ago it was Walgreens.
Keep Same Executives, Employees, Facilities And Customers
Even though an inverted company has renounced its US citizenship, the company keeps the same executives, the same stores or facilities, the same employees, and the same customers -- right here in the US. The only things that changes is the company sheds certain tax obligations. The company still receives all the benefits of US roads and infrastructure, police and fire protection, courts, military protection, and the rest. The US still educates its workforce and subsidizes its ultra-low wages with food stamps, Medicaid, and other available government services.
There is legislation to fix this problem. In particular, the Stop Corporate Inversions Act of 2014 has been introduced in both the House and the Senate.
Will Republicans Block Action?
Will Republicans block this legislation? Aside from the fact that Republicans have obstructed nearly all legislation of substance for years, there is precedent for Republicans blocking bills to end corporate tax loopholes. Here are a few examples:
- In July, Senate Republicans filibustered the Bring Jobs Home Act. That bill would have ended tax breaks to help companies move jobs and facilities out of the country, and given companies a 20 percent tax credit for relocating business units back to the US.
- In 2012, Senate Republicans filibustered a similar Bring Jobs Home Act, and filibustered a similar bill in 2010.
- In June 2013, Republicans filibustered a bill to close "tax loopholes for oil companies, wealthy pensioners, and multinational corporations."
- In March 2012, Senate Republicans filibustered a bill "to repeal about $24 billion in U.S. tax breaks for the nation's biggest oil companies."
- In May 2011, Senate Republicans filibustered "a Democratic bill that would have repealed about $2 billion in annual tax breaks for the five biggest oil companies."
- In December 2009, Senate Republicans filibustered legislation to "monitor and treat first responders and emergency workers who suffered illnesses related to 9/11," because it was "paid for by a provision that would prevent foreign multinational corporations from using tax havens to avoid taxes on U.S. income."
These are just a few of dozens and dozens of examples of Republicans obstructing legislation to close tax loopholes that let the giant corporations dodge, evade, avoid, and otherwise not pay taxes for the roads, courts, military defense, and other government services they benefit from. In fact, they have obstructed pretty much every effort to close corporate tax loopholes.
So ... yes ... Republicans will probably certainly obstruct efforts to stop these corporate "inversions," in which companies renounce their US "citizenship" and pretend they are non-US companies. It's who they are. It's what they do.
Update - If true, this is another reason to suspect that Republicans might block doing anything about these companies renouncing their "citizenship:" Republican leadership personally profiting from tax inversion deals