SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Two Years Later: Showdown with Citizens United
On December 30, the Montana Supreme Court delivered a New Year's gift to the nation, upholding a century-old ban on corporate political expenditures in state elections. The decision has gone underreported amidst the hoopla of the Republican primaries--even as super PAC spending skyrockets and there is an emerging understanding
Jan 17, 2012
On December 30, the Montana Supreme Court delivered a New Year's gift to the nation, upholding a century-old ban on corporate political expenditures in state elections. The decision has gone underreported amidst the hoopla of the Republican primaries--even as super PAC spending skyrockets and there is an emerging understanding of its corrosive impact--but the Montana case sets up the first direct challenge to the disastrous Citizens United decision as we approach its second anniversary.
Free Speech For People--a national non-partisan campaign challenging the fabrication of corporate rights under the US Constitution--filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Montana case. It led a coalition that included the American Sustainable Business Council, a network of more than 70,000 businesses across the country; the American Independent Business Alliance; and a local supermarket business and non-profit corporation.
Jeff Clements is the author of the coalition's brief. Co-founder and general counsel of Free Speech, Clements did two stints as Assistant Attorney General in Massachusetts, litigating in the areas of civil rights, environmental protection, healthcare, insurance and financial services, antitrust and consumer protection, and taking on the tobacco industry. He's also the author of a new book, Corporations Are Not People: Why They Have More Rights Than You Do and What You Can Do About. This is a book that anyone who cares about taking back our democracy of, by and for the people must check out.
Clements tells a vivid story of how some of the largest corporations organized to take over our government and Constitution, culminating with the Citizens United decision. He also lays out a vision of how we can return democracy to the people.
As Bill Moyers notes in the book's Foreword, this isn't the first time a Supreme Court has served as a "procorporate conservative fortress": in 1905 it killed a New York state law limiting working hours, and a prohibition against child labor about a decade later; it ruled against a minimum wage law in 1923, and early New Deal recovery acts in 1935 and 1936.
"But in the face of such discouragement, embattled citizens refused to give up," writes Moyers. "Every day citizens researched the issues, organized public events to educate their neighbors, held rallies, made speeches, petitioned and canvassed, marched and exhorted. They would elect the twentieth century-governments that restored 'the general welfare' as a pillar of American democracy."
Clements book, writes Moyers, describes "how to fight back"--as our forebears have done so many times before--in this case, through a constitutional amendment declaring what Clements calls "the simplest of propositions: corporations are not people." (Clements also calls for corporate accountability, and corporate charter and election law reform, including increased public funding.)
"Citizens United is a corporate power case masquerading as a free speech case," writes Clements. "We do not have to live with this. We can put the American project back together."
Campaigns for constitutional amendments demand patience and a great deal of tenacity, since they must first secure supermajority support from both houses of Congress and then win ratification by three-quarters of the states. But as Maryland State Senator Jamin Raskin, professor of constitutional law and the First Amendment at American University's Washington College of Law, says, "American citizens have repeatedly amended the Constitution to defend democracy when the Supreme Court acts in collusion with democracy's enemies, whether they are slavemasters, imposing poll taxes on voters or the opponents of woman suffrage."
It's a long haul, and groups working towards that end--including Public Citizen, the Center for Media and Democracy, Move to Amend, Common Cause, People For the American Way, and others--would be smart to agree on exactly what the amendment's language is and make it simple, clear, and appealing. After all, it's tough to organize a united front around the country when there are multiple versions of the same amendment.
Raskin himself will be introducing a Joint Resolution in the Maryland General Assembly calling on Congress to swiftly pass a constitutional amendment reversing the Citizens United decision and send it out to the states for ratification. He hopes his effort will kick off a national movement at the state level to press the amendment case. Other local jurisdictions are also pursuing that strategy, including the city councils of Los Angeles, Oakland, New York, Albany, Duluth, and Boulder which have all passed resolutions opposing Citizens United. In Congress, a number of representatives have introduced resolutions seeking a constitutional remedy, including: Donna Edwards; Senator Tom Udall and Representative Betty Sutton; Representative Ted Deutsch and Senator Bernie Sanders; Representative Jim McGovern; Representative John Yarmuth and Republican Representative Walter Jones; Representative Keith Ellison, and others. Kudos to these Senators and Congressmen for their good proposals, and--as with the pro-democracy advocacy organizations--the more they are able to agree on the language of an amendment, the more easily citizens will be able to rally around it.
But as undisclosed corporate money continues to flood our elections and drown out the voices of ordinary Americans, it's important to remember that we need to walk and chew gum at the same time, and not solely focus on the amendment fight. That means building on successful public campaign financing systems already on the books in places like Arizona, Connecticut, Maine, and North Carolina, bringing those models to other states. In Congress, the Fair Elections Now Act would allow federal candidates to run for office without relying on Big Money as well--force Republicans and conservative Democrats to go on record opposing it, and if it eventually passes and the Supreme Court shoots it down that will only galvanize the public.
With the Montana Supreme Court decision and public anger toward a political and economic system devoted to serving the 1 percent, this is a moment to dig-in and organize for a cleaner, more democratic way. On January 20 and 21 activists across the country are organizing to protest Citizens United and urge a Constitutional amendment. Will you join in the effort?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Nation
Katrina Vanden Heuvel
Katrina vanden Heuvel is an American editor and publisher. She is the editor, publisher, and part-owner of the magazine The Nation. She has been the magazine's editor since 1995.
bernie sandersbill moyerscenters for disease control (cdc)citizens unitedcommon causedonna edwardsminimum wagemove to amendpeople for the american waypublic citizen
On December 30, the Montana Supreme Court delivered a New Year's gift to the nation, upholding a century-old ban on corporate political expenditures in state elections. The decision has gone underreported amidst the hoopla of the Republican primaries--even as super PAC spending skyrockets and there is an emerging understanding of its corrosive impact--but the Montana case sets up the first direct challenge to the disastrous Citizens United decision as we approach its second anniversary.
Free Speech For People--a national non-partisan campaign challenging the fabrication of corporate rights under the US Constitution--filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Montana case. It led a coalition that included the American Sustainable Business Council, a network of more than 70,000 businesses across the country; the American Independent Business Alliance; and a local supermarket business and non-profit corporation.
Jeff Clements is the author of the coalition's brief. Co-founder and general counsel of Free Speech, Clements did two stints as Assistant Attorney General in Massachusetts, litigating in the areas of civil rights, environmental protection, healthcare, insurance and financial services, antitrust and consumer protection, and taking on the tobacco industry. He's also the author of a new book, Corporations Are Not People: Why They Have More Rights Than You Do and What You Can Do About. This is a book that anyone who cares about taking back our democracy of, by and for the people must check out.
Clements tells a vivid story of how some of the largest corporations organized to take over our government and Constitution, culminating with the Citizens United decision. He also lays out a vision of how we can return democracy to the people.
As Bill Moyers notes in the book's Foreword, this isn't the first time a Supreme Court has served as a "procorporate conservative fortress": in 1905 it killed a New York state law limiting working hours, and a prohibition against child labor about a decade later; it ruled against a minimum wage law in 1923, and early New Deal recovery acts in 1935 and 1936.
"But in the face of such discouragement, embattled citizens refused to give up," writes Moyers. "Every day citizens researched the issues, organized public events to educate their neighbors, held rallies, made speeches, petitioned and canvassed, marched and exhorted. They would elect the twentieth century-governments that restored 'the general welfare' as a pillar of American democracy."
Clements book, writes Moyers, describes "how to fight back"--as our forebears have done so many times before--in this case, through a constitutional amendment declaring what Clements calls "the simplest of propositions: corporations are not people." (Clements also calls for corporate accountability, and corporate charter and election law reform, including increased public funding.)
"Citizens United is a corporate power case masquerading as a free speech case," writes Clements. "We do not have to live with this. We can put the American project back together."
Campaigns for constitutional amendments demand patience and a great deal of tenacity, since they must first secure supermajority support from both houses of Congress and then win ratification by three-quarters of the states. But as Maryland State Senator Jamin Raskin, professor of constitutional law and the First Amendment at American University's Washington College of Law, says, "American citizens have repeatedly amended the Constitution to defend democracy when the Supreme Court acts in collusion with democracy's enemies, whether they are slavemasters, imposing poll taxes on voters or the opponents of woman suffrage."
It's a long haul, and groups working towards that end--including Public Citizen, the Center for Media and Democracy, Move to Amend, Common Cause, People For the American Way, and others--would be smart to agree on exactly what the amendment's language is and make it simple, clear, and appealing. After all, it's tough to organize a united front around the country when there are multiple versions of the same amendment.
Raskin himself will be introducing a Joint Resolution in the Maryland General Assembly calling on Congress to swiftly pass a constitutional amendment reversing the Citizens United decision and send it out to the states for ratification. He hopes his effort will kick off a national movement at the state level to press the amendment case. Other local jurisdictions are also pursuing that strategy, including the city councils of Los Angeles, Oakland, New York, Albany, Duluth, and Boulder which have all passed resolutions opposing Citizens United. In Congress, a number of representatives have introduced resolutions seeking a constitutional remedy, including: Donna Edwards; Senator Tom Udall and Representative Betty Sutton; Representative Ted Deutsch and Senator Bernie Sanders; Representative Jim McGovern; Representative John Yarmuth and Republican Representative Walter Jones; Representative Keith Ellison, and others. Kudos to these Senators and Congressmen for their good proposals, and--as with the pro-democracy advocacy organizations--the more they are able to agree on the language of an amendment, the more easily citizens will be able to rally around it.
But as undisclosed corporate money continues to flood our elections and drown out the voices of ordinary Americans, it's important to remember that we need to walk and chew gum at the same time, and not solely focus on the amendment fight. That means building on successful public campaign financing systems already on the books in places like Arizona, Connecticut, Maine, and North Carolina, bringing those models to other states. In Congress, the Fair Elections Now Act would allow federal candidates to run for office without relying on Big Money as well--force Republicans and conservative Democrats to go on record opposing it, and if it eventually passes and the Supreme Court shoots it down that will only galvanize the public.
With the Montana Supreme Court decision and public anger toward a political and economic system devoted to serving the 1 percent, this is a moment to dig-in and organize for a cleaner, more democratic way. On January 20 and 21 activists across the country are organizing to protest Citizens United and urge a Constitutional amendment. Will you join in the effort?
Katrina Vanden Heuvel
Katrina vanden Heuvel is an American editor and publisher. She is the editor, publisher, and part-owner of the magazine The Nation. She has been the magazine's editor since 1995.
On December 30, the Montana Supreme Court delivered a New Year's gift to the nation, upholding a century-old ban on corporate political expenditures in state elections. The decision has gone underreported amidst the hoopla of the Republican primaries--even as super PAC spending skyrockets and there is an emerging understanding of its corrosive impact--but the Montana case sets up the first direct challenge to the disastrous Citizens United decision as we approach its second anniversary.
Free Speech For People--a national non-partisan campaign challenging the fabrication of corporate rights under the US Constitution--filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the Montana case. It led a coalition that included the American Sustainable Business Council, a network of more than 70,000 businesses across the country; the American Independent Business Alliance; and a local supermarket business and non-profit corporation.
Jeff Clements is the author of the coalition's brief. Co-founder and general counsel of Free Speech, Clements did two stints as Assistant Attorney General in Massachusetts, litigating in the areas of civil rights, environmental protection, healthcare, insurance and financial services, antitrust and consumer protection, and taking on the tobacco industry. He's also the author of a new book, Corporations Are Not People: Why They Have More Rights Than You Do and What You Can Do About. This is a book that anyone who cares about taking back our democracy of, by and for the people must check out.
Clements tells a vivid story of how some of the largest corporations organized to take over our government and Constitution, culminating with the Citizens United decision. He also lays out a vision of how we can return democracy to the people.
As Bill Moyers notes in the book's Foreword, this isn't the first time a Supreme Court has served as a "procorporate conservative fortress": in 1905 it killed a New York state law limiting working hours, and a prohibition against child labor about a decade later; it ruled against a minimum wage law in 1923, and early New Deal recovery acts in 1935 and 1936.
"But in the face of such discouragement, embattled citizens refused to give up," writes Moyers. "Every day citizens researched the issues, organized public events to educate their neighbors, held rallies, made speeches, petitioned and canvassed, marched and exhorted. They would elect the twentieth century-governments that restored 'the general welfare' as a pillar of American democracy."
Clements book, writes Moyers, describes "how to fight back"--as our forebears have done so many times before--in this case, through a constitutional amendment declaring what Clements calls "the simplest of propositions: corporations are not people." (Clements also calls for corporate accountability, and corporate charter and election law reform, including increased public funding.)
"Citizens United is a corporate power case masquerading as a free speech case," writes Clements. "We do not have to live with this. We can put the American project back together."
Campaigns for constitutional amendments demand patience and a great deal of tenacity, since they must first secure supermajority support from both houses of Congress and then win ratification by three-quarters of the states. But as Maryland State Senator Jamin Raskin, professor of constitutional law and the First Amendment at American University's Washington College of Law, says, "American citizens have repeatedly amended the Constitution to defend democracy when the Supreme Court acts in collusion with democracy's enemies, whether they are slavemasters, imposing poll taxes on voters or the opponents of woman suffrage."
It's a long haul, and groups working towards that end--including Public Citizen, the Center for Media and Democracy, Move to Amend, Common Cause, People For the American Way, and others--would be smart to agree on exactly what the amendment's language is and make it simple, clear, and appealing. After all, it's tough to organize a united front around the country when there are multiple versions of the same amendment.
Raskin himself will be introducing a Joint Resolution in the Maryland General Assembly calling on Congress to swiftly pass a constitutional amendment reversing the Citizens United decision and send it out to the states for ratification. He hopes his effort will kick off a national movement at the state level to press the amendment case. Other local jurisdictions are also pursuing that strategy, including the city councils of Los Angeles, Oakland, New York, Albany, Duluth, and Boulder which have all passed resolutions opposing Citizens United. In Congress, a number of representatives have introduced resolutions seeking a constitutional remedy, including: Donna Edwards; Senator Tom Udall and Representative Betty Sutton; Representative Ted Deutsch and Senator Bernie Sanders; Representative Jim McGovern; Representative John Yarmuth and Republican Representative Walter Jones; Representative Keith Ellison, and others. Kudos to these Senators and Congressmen for their good proposals, and--as with the pro-democracy advocacy organizations--the more they are able to agree on the language of an amendment, the more easily citizens will be able to rally around it.
But as undisclosed corporate money continues to flood our elections and drown out the voices of ordinary Americans, it's important to remember that we need to walk and chew gum at the same time, and not solely focus on the amendment fight. That means building on successful public campaign financing systems already on the books in places like Arizona, Connecticut, Maine, and North Carolina, bringing those models to other states. In Congress, the Fair Elections Now Act would allow federal candidates to run for office without relying on Big Money as well--force Republicans and conservative Democrats to go on record opposing it, and if it eventually passes and the Supreme Court shoots it down that will only galvanize the public.
With the Montana Supreme Court decision and public anger toward a political and economic system devoted to serving the 1 percent, this is a moment to dig-in and organize for a cleaner, more democratic way. On January 20 and 21 activists across the country are organizing to protest Citizens United and urge a Constitutional amendment. Will you join in the effort?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy