To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Good riddance, Larry Summers.
Obama's top economic adviser is going back to Harvard by the end of the year, and Harvard can have him.
Summers has a resume of disaster.
As chief economist at the World Bank, he proposed dumping the West's toxic waste on the Third World.
As Clinton's Treasury undersecretary, he forced privatization on the
Russian people, who experienced enormous poverty as a result. (See Naomi
Klein's "The Shock Doctrine.")
Good riddance, Larry Summers.
Obama's top economic adviser is going back to Harvard by the end of the year, and Harvard can have him.
Summers has a resume of disaster.
As chief economist at the World Bank, he proposed dumping the West's toxic waste on the Third World.
As Clinton's Treasury undersecretary, he forced privatization on the
Russian people, who experienced enormous poverty as a result. (See Naomi
Klein's "The Shock Doctrine.")
And when he was Clinton's Treasury secretary, he helped deregulate Wall Street, which led to the current crisis.
When he was President of Harvard, his sexism did him in.
Under Obama, Summers and Timothy Geithner were largely responsible for understimulating the economy.
And Summers and Timothy Geithner were largely responsible for not
extracting meaningful concessions from the banks when they were on their
deathbeds. "The first big economic debate of the new administration was
over whether the government should use the leverage of TARP to force
new behavior on lenders (credit was frozen) and on companies awarding
outlandish bonuses," writes Jonathan Alter in his book on Obama's first
year, The Promise. "In a meeting less than two weeks after Obama took
office, [Presidential adviser David] Axelrod argued yes, but Summers and
Geithner opposed attaching big strings to bailouts. They thought it
wrong to kick banks when they were down, not to mention violating their
contracts."
Wrong to kick banks that had destroyed the whole economy?
Alter quotes Summers as saying: "Just as war had unintended victims,
bailouts had unintended wealthy beneficiaries." Unintended my ass!
Summers helped land Obama in the fix he's in today: unemployment's
very high, resentment at the banks is even higher, and few people can
feel the economic benefits that Obama and Summers say they've brought
about.
So adios, Larry.
Now Obama has a chance to put a progressive economist in.
How about Paul Krugman of the New York Times?
Or Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia?
Both have Nobel Prizes in economics.
Obama sure could use their wisdom, their tenacity, and their humanity now.
And so could we.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Good riddance, Larry Summers.
Obama's top economic adviser is going back to Harvard by the end of the year, and Harvard can have him.
Summers has a resume of disaster.
As chief economist at the World Bank, he proposed dumping the West's toxic waste on the Third World.
As Clinton's Treasury undersecretary, he forced privatization on the
Russian people, who experienced enormous poverty as a result. (See Naomi
Klein's "The Shock Doctrine.")
And when he was Clinton's Treasury secretary, he helped deregulate Wall Street, which led to the current crisis.
When he was President of Harvard, his sexism did him in.
Under Obama, Summers and Timothy Geithner were largely responsible for understimulating the economy.
And Summers and Timothy Geithner were largely responsible for not
extracting meaningful concessions from the banks when they were on their
deathbeds. "The first big economic debate of the new administration was
over whether the government should use the leverage of TARP to force
new behavior on lenders (credit was frozen) and on companies awarding
outlandish bonuses," writes Jonathan Alter in his book on Obama's first
year, The Promise. "In a meeting less than two weeks after Obama took
office, [Presidential adviser David] Axelrod argued yes, but Summers and
Geithner opposed attaching big strings to bailouts. They thought it
wrong to kick banks when they were down, not to mention violating their
contracts."
Wrong to kick banks that had destroyed the whole economy?
Alter quotes Summers as saying: "Just as war had unintended victims,
bailouts had unintended wealthy beneficiaries." Unintended my ass!
Summers helped land Obama in the fix he's in today: unemployment's
very high, resentment at the banks is even higher, and few people can
feel the economic benefits that Obama and Summers say they've brought
about.
So adios, Larry.
Now Obama has a chance to put a progressive economist in.
How about Paul Krugman of the New York Times?
Or Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia?
Both have Nobel Prizes in economics.
Obama sure could use their wisdom, their tenacity, and their humanity now.
And so could we.
Good riddance, Larry Summers.
Obama's top economic adviser is going back to Harvard by the end of the year, and Harvard can have him.
Summers has a resume of disaster.
As chief economist at the World Bank, he proposed dumping the West's toxic waste on the Third World.
As Clinton's Treasury undersecretary, he forced privatization on the
Russian people, who experienced enormous poverty as a result. (See Naomi
Klein's "The Shock Doctrine.")
And when he was Clinton's Treasury secretary, he helped deregulate Wall Street, which led to the current crisis.
When he was President of Harvard, his sexism did him in.
Under Obama, Summers and Timothy Geithner were largely responsible for understimulating the economy.
And Summers and Timothy Geithner were largely responsible for not
extracting meaningful concessions from the banks when they were on their
deathbeds. "The first big economic debate of the new administration was
over whether the government should use the leverage of TARP to force
new behavior on lenders (credit was frozen) and on companies awarding
outlandish bonuses," writes Jonathan Alter in his book on Obama's first
year, The Promise. "In a meeting less than two weeks after Obama took
office, [Presidential adviser David] Axelrod argued yes, but Summers and
Geithner opposed attaching big strings to bailouts. They thought it
wrong to kick banks when they were down, not to mention violating their
contracts."
Wrong to kick banks that had destroyed the whole economy?
Alter quotes Summers as saying: "Just as war had unintended victims,
bailouts had unintended wealthy beneficiaries." Unintended my ass!
Summers helped land Obama in the fix he's in today: unemployment's
very high, resentment at the banks is even higher, and few people can
feel the economic benefits that Obama and Summers say they've brought
about.
So adios, Larry.
Now Obama has a chance to put a progressive economist in.
How about Paul Krugman of the New York Times?
Or Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia?
Both have Nobel Prizes in economics.
Obama sure could use their wisdom, their tenacity, and their humanity now.
And so could we.