Aug 26, 2010
To many people, the "war on drugs" sounds like a metaphor, like the "war on poverty". It is not. It is being fought with tanks and sub-machine guns and hand grenades, funded in part by your taxes, and it has killed 28,000 people under the current Mexican President alone. The death toll in Tijuana - one of the front lines of this war - is now higher than in Baghdad. Yesterday, another pile of 72 mutilated corpses was found near San Fernando - an event that no longer shocks the country.
Mexico today is a place where the severed heads of police officers are found
week after week, pinned to bloody notes that tell their colleagues: "This
is how you learn respect". It is a place where hand grenades are tossed
into crowds to intimidate the public into shutting up. It is the state the
US Joint Chiefs of Staff say is most likely, after Pakistan, to suffer "a
rapid and sudden collapse".
Why? When you criminalise a drug for which there is a large market, it doesn't
disappear. The trade is simply transferred from off-licences, pharmacists
and doctors to armed criminal gangs.
In order to protect their patch and their supply routes, these gangs tool up -
and kill anyone who gets in their way. You can see this any day on the
streets of a poor part of London or Los Angeles, where teenage gangs stab or
shoot each other for control of the 3,000 per cent profit margins on offer.
Now imagine this process taking over an entire nation, to turn it into a
massive production and supply route for the Western world's drug hunger.
Why Mexico? Why now? In the past decade, the US has spent a fortune spraying
carcinogenic chemicals over Colombia's coca-growing areas, so the drug trade
has simply shifted to Mexico. It's known as the "balloon effect":
press down in one place, and the air rushes to another.
When I was last there in 2006, I saw the drug violence taking off and warned
that the murder rate was going to skyrocket. Since then the victims have
ranged from a pregnant woman washing her car, to a four-year-old child, to a
family in the "wrong" house watching television, to a group of 14
teenagers having a party. Today, 70 per cent of Mexicans say they are
frightened to go out because of the cartels.
The gangs offer Mexican police and politicians a choice: "Plata o ploma".
Silver, or lead. Take a bribe, or take a bullet. President Felipe Calderon
has been leading a military crackdown on them since 2006 - yet every time he
surges the military forward, the gang violence in an area massively
increases.
This might seem like a paradox, but it isn't. If you knock out the leaders of
a drug gang, you don't eradicate demand, or supply. You simply trigger a
fresh war for control of the now-vacant patch. The violence creates more
violence.
This is precisely what happened - to the letter - when the United States
prohibited alcohol. A ban produced a vicious rash of criminal gangs to meet
the popular demand, and they terrorised the population and bribed the
police. Now 1,000 Mexican Al Capones are claiming their billions and waving
their guns.
Like Capone, the drug gangs love the policy of prohibition. Michael Levine,
who had a 30-year career as one of America's most distinguished federal
narcotics agents, penetrated to the very top of the Mafia Cruenza, one of
the biggest drug-dealing gangs in the world in the 1980s.
Its leaders told him "that not only did they not fear our war on drugs,
they actually counted on it... On one undercover tape-recorded conversation,
a top cartel chief, Jorge Roman, expressed his gratitude for the drug war,
calling it 'a sham put on the American tax-payer' that was 'actually good
for business'."
So there is a growing movement in Mexico to do the one thing these murderous
gangs really fear - take the source of their profits, drugs, back into the
legal economy. It would bankrupt them swiftly, and entirely. Nobody kills to
sell you a glass of Jack Daniels. Nobody beheads police officers or shoots
teenagers to sell you a glass of Budweiser. And, after legalisation, nobody
would do it to sell you a spliff or a gram of cocaine either. They would be
in the hands of unarmed, regulated, legal businesses, paying taxes to the
state, at a time when we all need large new sources of tax revenue.
The conservative former President, Vicente Fox, has publicly called for
legalisation, and he has been joined by a battery of former presidents
across Latin America - all sober, right-leaning statesmen who are trying
rationally to assess the facts.
Every beheading, grenade attack, and assassination underlines their point.
Calderon's claims in response that legalisation would lead to a sudden
explosion in drug use don't seem to match the facts: Portugal decriminalised
possession of all drugs in 2001, and drug use there has slightly fallen
since.
Yet Mexico is being pressured hard by countries like the US and Britain - both
led by former drug users - to keep on fighting this war, while any mention
of legalisation brings whispered threats of slashed aid and diplomatic
shunning.
Look carefully at that mound of butchered corpses found yesterday. They are
the inevitable and ineluctable product of drug prohibition. This will keep
happening for as long as we pursue this policy. If you believe the way to
deal with the human appetite for intoxication is to criminalise and
militarise, then blood is on your hands.
How many people have to die before we finally make a sober assessment of
reality, and take the drugs trade back from murderous criminal gangs?
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
© 2023 The Independent
Johann Hari
Johann Hari is a British-Swiss writer and journalist. He has written for publications including The Independent and The Huffington Post, and has written books on the topics of depression, the war on drugs, and the British monarchy. He reported from Iraq, Israel/Palestine, the Congo, the Central African Republic, Venezuela, Peru and the US, and his journalism has appeared in publications all over the world.
To many people, the "war on drugs" sounds like a metaphor, like the "war on poverty". It is not. It is being fought with tanks and sub-machine guns and hand grenades, funded in part by your taxes, and it has killed 28,000 people under the current Mexican President alone. The death toll in Tijuana - one of the front lines of this war - is now higher than in Baghdad. Yesterday, another pile of 72 mutilated corpses was found near San Fernando - an event that no longer shocks the country.
Mexico today is a place where the severed heads of police officers are found
week after week, pinned to bloody notes that tell their colleagues: "This
is how you learn respect". It is a place where hand grenades are tossed
into crowds to intimidate the public into shutting up. It is the state the
US Joint Chiefs of Staff say is most likely, after Pakistan, to suffer "a
rapid and sudden collapse".
Why? When you criminalise a drug for which there is a large market, it doesn't
disappear. The trade is simply transferred from off-licences, pharmacists
and doctors to armed criminal gangs.
In order to protect their patch and their supply routes, these gangs tool up -
and kill anyone who gets in their way. You can see this any day on the
streets of a poor part of London or Los Angeles, where teenage gangs stab or
shoot each other for control of the 3,000 per cent profit margins on offer.
Now imagine this process taking over an entire nation, to turn it into a
massive production and supply route for the Western world's drug hunger.
Why Mexico? Why now? In the past decade, the US has spent a fortune spraying
carcinogenic chemicals over Colombia's coca-growing areas, so the drug trade
has simply shifted to Mexico. It's known as the "balloon effect":
press down in one place, and the air rushes to another.
When I was last there in 2006, I saw the drug violence taking off and warned
that the murder rate was going to skyrocket. Since then the victims have
ranged from a pregnant woman washing her car, to a four-year-old child, to a
family in the "wrong" house watching television, to a group of 14
teenagers having a party. Today, 70 per cent of Mexicans say they are
frightened to go out because of the cartels.
The gangs offer Mexican police and politicians a choice: "Plata o ploma".
Silver, or lead. Take a bribe, or take a bullet. President Felipe Calderon
has been leading a military crackdown on them since 2006 - yet every time he
surges the military forward, the gang violence in an area massively
increases.
This might seem like a paradox, but it isn't. If you knock out the leaders of
a drug gang, you don't eradicate demand, or supply. You simply trigger a
fresh war for control of the now-vacant patch. The violence creates more
violence.
This is precisely what happened - to the letter - when the United States
prohibited alcohol. A ban produced a vicious rash of criminal gangs to meet
the popular demand, and they terrorised the population and bribed the
police. Now 1,000 Mexican Al Capones are claiming their billions and waving
their guns.
Like Capone, the drug gangs love the policy of prohibition. Michael Levine,
who had a 30-year career as one of America's most distinguished federal
narcotics agents, penetrated to the very top of the Mafia Cruenza, one of
the biggest drug-dealing gangs in the world in the 1980s.
Its leaders told him "that not only did they not fear our war on drugs,
they actually counted on it... On one undercover tape-recorded conversation,
a top cartel chief, Jorge Roman, expressed his gratitude for the drug war,
calling it 'a sham put on the American tax-payer' that was 'actually good
for business'."
So there is a growing movement in Mexico to do the one thing these murderous
gangs really fear - take the source of their profits, drugs, back into the
legal economy. It would bankrupt them swiftly, and entirely. Nobody kills to
sell you a glass of Jack Daniels. Nobody beheads police officers or shoots
teenagers to sell you a glass of Budweiser. And, after legalisation, nobody
would do it to sell you a spliff or a gram of cocaine either. They would be
in the hands of unarmed, regulated, legal businesses, paying taxes to the
state, at a time when we all need large new sources of tax revenue.
The conservative former President, Vicente Fox, has publicly called for
legalisation, and he has been joined by a battery of former presidents
across Latin America - all sober, right-leaning statesmen who are trying
rationally to assess the facts.
Every beheading, grenade attack, and assassination underlines their point.
Calderon's claims in response that legalisation would lead to a sudden
explosion in drug use don't seem to match the facts: Portugal decriminalised
possession of all drugs in 2001, and drug use there has slightly fallen
since.
Yet Mexico is being pressured hard by countries like the US and Britain - both
led by former drug users - to keep on fighting this war, while any mention
of legalisation brings whispered threats of slashed aid and diplomatic
shunning.
Look carefully at that mound of butchered corpses found yesterday. They are
the inevitable and ineluctable product of drug prohibition. This will keep
happening for as long as we pursue this policy. If you believe the way to
deal with the human appetite for intoxication is to criminalise and
militarise, then blood is on your hands.
How many people have to die before we finally make a sober assessment of
reality, and take the drugs trade back from murderous criminal gangs?
Johann Hari
Johann Hari is a British-Swiss writer and journalist. He has written for publications including The Independent and The Huffington Post, and has written books on the topics of depression, the war on drugs, and the British monarchy. He reported from Iraq, Israel/Palestine, the Congo, the Central African Republic, Venezuela, Peru and the US, and his journalism has appeared in publications all over the world.
To many people, the "war on drugs" sounds like a metaphor, like the "war on poverty". It is not. It is being fought with tanks and sub-machine guns and hand grenades, funded in part by your taxes, and it has killed 28,000 people under the current Mexican President alone. The death toll in Tijuana - one of the front lines of this war - is now higher than in Baghdad. Yesterday, another pile of 72 mutilated corpses was found near San Fernando - an event that no longer shocks the country.
Mexico today is a place where the severed heads of police officers are found
week after week, pinned to bloody notes that tell their colleagues: "This
is how you learn respect". It is a place where hand grenades are tossed
into crowds to intimidate the public into shutting up. It is the state the
US Joint Chiefs of Staff say is most likely, after Pakistan, to suffer "a
rapid and sudden collapse".
Why? When you criminalise a drug for which there is a large market, it doesn't
disappear. The trade is simply transferred from off-licences, pharmacists
and doctors to armed criminal gangs.
In order to protect their patch and their supply routes, these gangs tool up -
and kill anyone who gets in their way. You can see this any day on the
streets of a poor part of London or Los Angeles, where teenage gangs stab or
shoot each other for control of the 3,000 per cent profit margins on offer.
Now imagine this process taking over an entire nation, to turn it into a
massive production and supply route for the Western world's drug hunger.
Why Mexico? Why now? In the past decade, the US has spent a fortune spraying
carcinogenic chemicals over Colombia's coca-growing areas, so the drug trade
has simply shifted to Mexico. It's known as the "balloon effect":
press down in one place, and the air rushes to another.
When I was last there in 2006, I saw the drug violence taking off and warned
that the murder rate was going to skyrocket. Since then the victims have
ranged from a pregnant woman washing her car, to a four-year-old child, to a
family in the "wrong" house watching television, to a group of 14
teenagers having a party. Today, 70 per cent of Mexicans say they are
frightened to go out because of the cartels.
The gangs offer Mexican police and politicians a choice: "Plata o ploma".
Silver, or lead. Take a bribe, or take a bullet. President Felipe Calderon
has been leading a military crackdown on them since 2006 - yet every time he
surges the military forward, the gang violence in an area massively
increases.
This might seem like a paradox, but it isn't. If you knock out the leaders of
a drug gang, you don't eradicate demand, or supply. You simply trigger a
fresh war for control of the now-vacant patch. The violence creates more
violence.
This is precisely what happened - to the letter - when the United States
prohibited alcohol. A ban produced a vicious rash of criminal gangs to meet
the popular demand, and they terrorised the population and bribed the
police. Now 1,000 Mexican Al Capones are claiming their billions and waving
their guns.
Like Capone, the drug gangs love the policy of prohibition. Michael Levine,
who had a 30-year career as one of America's most distinguished federal
narcotics agents, penetrated to the very top of the Mafia Cruenza, one of
the biggest drug-dealing gangs in the world in the 1980s.
Its leaders told him "that not only did they not fear our war on drugs,
they actually counted on it... On one undercover tape-recorded conversation,
a top cartel chief, Jorge Roman, expressed his gratitude for the drug war,
calling it 'a sham put on the American tax-payer' that was 'actually good
for business'."
So there is a growing movement in Mexico to do the one thing these murderous
gangs really fear - take the source of their profits, drugs, back into the
legal economy. It would bankrupt them swiftly, and entirely. Nobody kills to
sell you a glass of Jack Daniels. Nobody beheads police officers or shoots
teenagers to sell you a glass of Budweiser. And, after legalisation, nobody
would do it to sell you a spliff or a gram of cocaine either. They would be
in the hands of unarmed, regulated, legal businesses, paying taxes to the
state, at a time when we all need large new sources of tax revenue.
The conservative former President, Vicente Fox, has publicly called for
legalisation, and he has been joined by a battery of former presidents
across Latin America - all sober, right-leaning statesmen who are trying
rationally to assess the facts.
Every beheading, grenade attack, and assassination underlines their point.
Calderon's claims in response that legalisation would lead to a sudden
explosion in drug use don't seem to match the facts: Portugal decriminalised
possession of all drugs in 2001, and drug use there has slightly fallen
since.
Yet Mexico is being pressured hard by countries like the US and Britain - both
led by former drug users - to keep on fighting this war, while any mention
of legalisation brings whispered threats of slashed aid and diplomatic
shunning.
Look carefully at that mound of butchered corpses found yesterday. They are
the inevitable and ineluctable product of drug prohibition. This will keep
happening for as long as we pursue this policy. If you believe the way to
deal with the human appetite for intoxication is to criminalise and
militarise, then blood is on your hands.
How many people have to die before we finally make a sober assessment of
reality, and take the drugs trade back from murderous criminal gangs?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.