SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Problems with Podesta's Take on Obama's Poll Numbers
Aug 20, 2010
The folks around Barack Obama are scratching their heads, wondering why his poll numbers are autumnal, hanging there in the low to mid-40s.
John Podesta, Clinton's old chief of staff who headed up Obama's transition team, recently offered his own view that the President got bogged down in the legislative details, for one, and as a result, he couldn't deliver on his pledge to transcend partisanship. And for two, the economy didn't recover quickly enough.
Well, let's look at these.
Obama's pledge bipartisanship always seemed either gimmicky or naive, since the Republicans have been set on sabotaging him every step of the way. And this could have been predicted. In fact, it was. By none other than Hillary Clinton.
So Obama should have given up on this sooner, rather than clinging to it for so long. Or he should never have made it a campaign pledge in the first place, since it boxed him in.
As for the economy, it hasn't recovered quickly enough because Obama didn't frontload enough stimulus. And the theory was wrong.
"The idea was that you didn't have to get the unemployment rate to a certain number, but you had to get unemployment going in the right direction," Podesta told the New York Times.
But even if unemployment were dropping slowly, that wouldn't put food on the table for 14 million people still officially out of a job-and the millions more who stopped looking long ago.
It was this miscalculation, more than anything, that has kept Obama's numbers in the dumpster.
Plus, having Robert Gibbs and Rahm Emanuel rip into Obama's progressive base hasn't helped matters much, either.
Single payer, forget it.
Public option, no need.
Afghanistan, more troops.
Obama's opposition will always hate him.
But he's not given his own base enough support to remain energized.
He's not delivered enough for Independents economically to win them over.
And he hasn't stressed a consistent theme of progressive governance, which would give much-needed coherence to the hodge-podge that is his Administration.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
The folks around Barack Obama are scratching their heads, wondering why his poll numbers are autumnal, hanging there in the low to mid-40s.
John Podesta, Clinton's old chief of staff who headed up Obama's transition team, recently offered his own view that the President got bogged down in the legislative details, for one, and as a result, he couldn't deliver on his pledge to transcend partisanship. And for two, the economy didn't recover quickly enough.
Well, let's look at these.
Obama's pledge bipartisanship always seemed either gimmicky or naive, since the Republicans have been set on sabotaging him every step of the way. And this could have been predicted. In fact, it was. By none other than Hillary Clinton.
So Obama should have given up on this sooner, rather than clinging to it for so long. Or he should never have made it a campaign pledge in the first place, since it boxed him in.
As for the economy, it hasn't recovered quickly enough because Obama didn't frontload enough stimulus. And the theory was wrong.
"The idea was that you didn't have to get the unemployment rate to a certain number, but you had to get unemployment going in the right direction," Podesta told the New York Times.
But even if unemployment were dropping slowly, that wouldn't put food on the table for 14 million people still officially out of a job-and the millions more who stopped looking long ago.
It was this miscalculation, more than anything, that has kept Obama's numbers in the dumpster.
Plus, having Robert Gibbs and Rahm Emanuel rip into Obama's progressive base hasn't helped matters much, either.
Single payer, forget it.
Public option, no need.
Afghanistan, more troops.
Obama's opposition will always hate him.
But he's not given his own base enough support to remain energized.
He's not delivered enough for Independents economically to win them over.
And he hasn't stressed a consistent theme of progressive governance, which would give much-needed coherence to the hodge-podge that is his Administration.
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
The folks around Barack Obama are scratching their heads, wondering why his poll numbers are autumnal, hanging there in the low to mid-40s.
John Podesta, Clinton's old chief of staff who headed up Obama's transition team, recently offered his own view that the President got bogged down in the legislative details, for one, and as a result, he couldn't deliver on his pledge to transcend partisanship. And for two, the economy didn't recover quickly enough.
Well, let's look at these.
Obama's pledge bipartisanship always seemed either gimmicky or naive, since the Republicans have been set on sabotaging him every step of the way. And this could have been predicted. In fact, it was. By none other than Hillary Clinton.
So Obama should have given up on this sooner, rather than clinging to it for so long. Or he should never have made it a campaign pledge in the first place, since it boxed him in.
As for the economy, it hasn't recovered quickly enough because Obama didn't frontload enough stimulus. And the theory was wrong.
"The idea was that you didn't have to get the unemployment rate to a certain number, but you had to get unemployment going in the right direction," Podesta told the New York Times.
But even if unemployment were dropping slowly, that wouldn't put food on the table for 14 million people still officially out of a job-and the millions more who stopped looking long ago.
It was this miscalculation, more than anything, that has kept Obama's numbers in the dumpster.
Plus, having Robert Gibbs and Rahm Emanuel rip into Obama's progressive base hasn't helped matters much, either.
Single payer, forget it.
Public option, no need.
Afghanistan, more troops.
Obama's opposition will always hate him.
But he's not given his own base enough support to remain energized.
He's not delivered enough for Independents economically to win them over.
And he hasn't stressed a consistent theme of progressive governance, which would give much-needed coherence to the hodge-podge that is his Administration.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.