SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Every August, as the anniversaries of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
approach, comments resume about American decisions at the end of World
War II. Despite the passage of 65 years, heated opinions are repeated
as fact and myths become immortalized as truths. Beyond distorting
the historical record, wishful thinking about it leads us to repeat
past mistakes in new ways against new enemies.
Among the inaccuracies are these:
1) Japan was ready to fight to the end.
Facts: In an intercepted cable of July 12, 1945, Emperor Hirohito
revealed his decision to intervene to end the war. In Truman's
journal he characterized the message as "telegram from Jap Emperor
asking for peace." Tokyo was prepared to surrender unconditionally if
the monarchy would be retained, the very position the Allies accepted
after Hiroshima.
Five days later Truman predicted that Stalin would "be in the Jap war
by August 15. Fini Japs when that comes about." Nevertheless, he
ordered the bombing of Hiroshima on Aug. 6. The U.S.S.R. entered the
war on Aug. 8. Truman ordered the bombing of Nagasaki anyway.
2) Dropping the bomb was necessary to prevent an American invasion.
Facts: In 1946, a U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey report based on
intelligence available to the White House concluded: "certainly prior
to Dec. 31, 1945 and in all probability prior to Nov. 1, 1945, Japan
would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped,
even if Russian had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had
been planned or contemplated."
3) Dropping the bomb saved lives.
Facts: Stanford historian Barton Bernstein's study of declassified
documents found that the worst-case scenario by military planners was
46,000 deaths if the U.S. invaded both Kyushu and Honshu islands.
Since Hiroshima, these estimates have grown exponentially as if to
justify using the bomb. In notes, Truman cites 250,000 casualties
(dead, wounded, missing). His published memoir raises the number to
500,000 dead. Still later, he referred to saving a million lives. In
1991, President H.W. Bush claimed that the bomb saved "millions."
Since both presidents, among countless others, ignored the U.S.
Strategic Bombing Survey conclusion that an invasion was unnecessary,
it is no wonder average Americans do the same. All of these morbid
calculations ignore the stark fact that more than 187,000 humans died
at Hiroshima.
4) At the time, military and civilian leaders agreed the bomb was necessary.
Fact: Supreme Allied Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower told Secretary of
War Stimson, "Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb
was completely unnecessary." Fleet Admiral William Leahy, Chief of
Staff to Presidents Roosevelt and Truman, wrote in his memoirs, "the
use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no
material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were
already defeated and ready to surrender." Among the few civilians who
knew about the bomb, 155 Manhattan Project scientists signed petitions
raising moral concerns about bombing Japanese cities. The report
issued by Nobel physicist James Franck in June 1945 recommended a
demonstration bombing on a deserted island and also anticipated
creating a dangerous arms race.
5) Japanese citizens were warned in advance.
Fact: They were not.
Americans properly disparage countries that manipulate their own
histories, whether it is Stalinist revisionism or Japanese amnesia
about the forced prostitution of "comfort women." Yet, powerful
belief in American ideals and in the nobility of our motives, leads us
to do the same. The result, as with Hiroshima, is a chasm between
public perception and historical truth, between ideals and reality.
If we had not used the bomb to end a war that was already won, we
might not have had to negotiate with one "evil empire" (N. Korea) to
stop developing nuclear weapons, or be anxious that another "evil
empire" (Iran) is secretly developing them, while all the while
supporting an unstable ally (Pakistan) that possesses them already.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Every August, as the anniversaries of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
approach, comments resume about American decisions at the end of World
War II. Despite the passage of 65 years, heated opinions are repeated
as fact and myths become immortalized as truths. Beyond distorting
the historical record, wishful thinking about it leads us to repeat
past mistakes in new ways against new enemies.
Among the inaccuracies are these:
1) Japan was ready to fight to the end.
Facts: In an intercepted cable of July 12, 1945, Emperor Hirohito
revealed his decision to intervene to end the war. In Truman's
journal he characterized the message as "telegram from Jap Emperor
asking for peace." Tokyo was prepared to surrender unconditionally if
the monarchy would be retained, the very position the Allies accepted
after Hiroshima.
Five days later Truman predicted that Stalin would "be in the Jap war
by August 15. Fini Japs when that comes about." Nevertheless, he
ordered the bombing of Hiroshima on Aug. 6. The U.S.S.R. entered the
war on Aug. 8. Truman ordered the bombing of Nagasaki anyway.
2) Dropping the bomb was necessary to prevent an American invasion.
Facts: In 1946, a U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey report based on
intelligence available to the White House concluded: "certainly prior
to Dec. 31, 1945 and in all probability prior to Nov. 1, 1945, Japan
would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped,
even if Russian had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had
been planned or contemplated."
3) Dropping the bomb saved lives.
Facts: Stanford historian Barton Bernstein's study of declassified
documents found that the worst-case scenario by military planners was
46,000 deaths if the U.S. invaded both Kyushu and Honshu islands.
Since Hiroshima, these estimates have grown exponentially as if to
justify using the bomb. In notes, Truman cites 250,000 casualties
(dead, wounded, missing). His published memoir raises the number to
500,000 dead. Still later, he referred to saving a million lives. In
1991, President H.W. Bush claimed that the bomb saved "millions."
Since both presidents, among countless others, ignored the U.S.
Strategic Bombing Survey conclusion that an invasion was unnecessary,
it is no wonder average Americans do the same. All of these morbid
calculations ignore the stark fact that more than 187,000 humans died
at Hiroshima.
4) At the time, military and civilian leaders agreed the bomb was necessary.
Fact: Supreme Allied Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower told Secretary of
War Stimson, "Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb
was completely unnecessary." Fleet Admiral William Leahy, Chief of
Staff to Presidents Roosevelt and Truman, wrote in his memoirs, "the
use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no
material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were
already defeated and ready to surrender." Among the few civilians who
knew about the bomb, 155 Manhattan Project scientists signed petitions
raising moral concerns about bombing Japanese cities. The report
issued by Nobel physicist James Franck in June 1945 recommended a
demonstration bombing on a deserted island and also anticipated
creating a dangerous arms race.
5) Japanese citizens were warned in advance.
Fact: They were not.
Americans properly disparage countries that manipulate their own
histories, whether it is Stalinist revisionism or Japanese amnesia
about the forced prostitution of "comfort women." Yet, powerful
belief in American ideals and in the nobility of our motives, leads us
to do the same. The result, as with Hiroshima, is a chasm between
public perception and historical truth, between ideals and reality.
If we had not used the bomb to end a war that was already won, we
might not have had to negotiate with one "evil empire" (N. Korea) to
stop developing nuclear weapons, or be anxious that another "evil
empire" (Iran) is secretly developing them, while all the while
supporting an unstable ally (Pakistan) that possesses them already.
Every August, as the anniversaries of Hiroshima and Nagasaki
approach, comments resume about American decisions at the end of World
War II. Despite the passage of 65 years, heated opinions are repeated
as fact and myths become immortalized as truths. Beyond distorting
the historical record, wishful thinking about it leads us to repeat
past mistakes in new ways against new enemies.
Among the inaccuracies are these:
1) Japan was ready to fight to the end.
Facts: In an intercepted cable of July 12, 1945, Emperor Hirohito
revealed his decision to intervene to end the war. In Truman's
journal he characterized the message as "telegram from Jap Emperor
asking for peace." Tokyo was prepared to surrender unconditionally if
the monarchy would be retained, the very position the Allies accepted
after Hiroshima.
Five days later Truman predicted that Stalin would "be in the Jap war
by August 15. Fini Japs when that comes about." Nevertheless, he
ordered the bombing of Hiroshima on Aug. 6. The U.S.S.R. entered the
war on Aug. 8. Truman ordered the bombing of Nagasaki anyway.
2) Dropping the bomb was necessary to prevent an American invasion.
Facts: In 1946, a U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey report based on
intelligence available to the White House concluded: "certainly prior
to Dec. 31, 1945 and in all probability prior to Nov. 1, 1945, Japan
would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped,
even if Russian had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had
been planned or contemplated."
3) Dropping the bomb saved lives.
Facts: Stanford historian Barton Bernstein's study of declassified
documents found that the worst-case scenario by military planners was
46,000 deaths if the U.S. invaded both Kyushu and Honshu islands.
Since Hiroshima, these estimates have grown exponentially as if to
justify using the bomb. In notes, Truman cites 250,000 casualties
(dead, wounded, missing). His published memoir raises the number to
500,000 dead. Still later, he referred to saving a million lives. In
1991, President H.W. Bush claimed that the bomb saved "millions."
Since both presidents, among countless others, ignored the U.S.
Strategic Bombing Survey conclusion that an invasion was unnecessary,
it is no wonder average Americans do the same. All of these morbid
calculations ignore the stark fact that more than 187,000 humans died
at Hiroshima.
4) At the time, military and civilian leaders agreed the bomb was necessary.
Fact: Supreme Allied Commander Dwight D. Eisenhower told Secretary of
War Stimson, "Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb
was completely unnecessary." Fleet Admiral William Leahy, Chief of
Staff to Presidents Roosevelt and Truman, wrote in his memoirs, "the
use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no
material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were
already defeated and ready to surrender." Among the few civilians who
knew about the bomb, 155 Manhattan Project scientists signed petitions
raising moral concerns about bombing Japanese cities. The report
issued by Nobel physicist James Franck in June 1945 recommended a
demonstration bombing on a deserted island and also anticipated
creating a dangerous arms race.
5) Japanese citizens were warned in advance.
Fact: They were not.
Americans properly disparage countries that manipulate their own
histories, whether it is Stalinist revisionism or Japanese amnesia
about the forced prostitution of "comfort women." Yet, powerful
belief in American ideals and in the nobility of our motives, leads us
to do the same. The result, as with Hiroshima, is a chasm between
public perception and historical truth, between ideals and reality.
If we had not used the bomb to end a war that was already won, we
might not have had to negotiate with one "evil empire" (N. Korea) to
stop developing nuclear weapons, or be anxious that another "evil
empire" (Iran) is secretly developing them, while all the while
supporting an unstable ally (Pakistan) that possesses them already.