SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
162 House Votes for an Exit Strategy From Afghanistan
An addition $33 billion in spending for President Obama's
occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq -- and they are now his occupations
as much as they once were George Bush's -- was approved by the House
Thursday night as part of a broad "emergency" supplmental spending bill.
But the money for the Afghanistan quagmire did not come without a fight.
Jul 02, 2010
An addition $33 billion in spending for President Obama's
occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq -- and they are now his occupations
as much as they once were George Bush's -- was approved by the House
Thursday night as part of a broad "emergency" supplmental spending bill.
But the money for the Afghanistan quagmire did not come without a fight.
Two-thirds of House Democrats and nine Republicans voted for an
amendment sponsored by Appropriations Committee chair David Obey,
D-Wisconsin, and Congressmen Jim McGovern, D-Massachusetts, and Walter
Jones, R-North Carolina, that would have required the president to
rapidly begin developing a plan for the safe, orderly and expeditious
redeployment of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. The Obey-McGovern-Jones
amendment also called for more detailed reporting to Congress on the
status of the occupation and for stricter congressional oversight of
private contractors working on the ground in Afghanistan in order to
address charges of corruption, waste, fraud and abuse.
The amendment received 162 votes, while 260 members opposed it.
What was significant was the partisan breakdown.
Among Democrats, 153 backed the amendment, while 98 opposed it.
Among Republicans, 9 backed the amendment while 162 opposed it.
So President Obama is now relying on Republicans to provide
unquestioning support for his war, while most Democrats want to see an
exit strategy developed.
Significantly, 100 members of the House
(93 Democrats, 7 Republicans) voted for an amendment offered
by California Congresswoman Barbara Lee, the chair of the
Congressional Black Caucus, which proposed to fully fund a withdrawal
plan.
Twenty-five members (22 Democrats and three Republicans) cast the
boldest anti-war votes, backing an amendment to strike Afghanistan
funding from the supplemental bill. Another 22 members (all Democrats)
voted "present," suggesting their sympathy with the proposal.
What does it all add up to? Congress has not checked or balanced the
president, and that is disappointing -- although opportunities still
exist to do so, as the supplemental spending bill now must go back to
the Senate for another vote.
What should be understood, however, is that the president's own party is losing patience with his misguided war strategies.
As Paul Kawika Martin, Peace Action's
policy and political director, said late Thursday: "A year ago,
American voters turned against the Afghanistan war. They understand
that the enormous costs of blood and treasure are not necessarily
making us safer. Congress is slowly catching up with their
constituents. The votes in the House showed increasing congressional
concern for a failed policy in the Afghanistan region at a time when
Representatives are thinking about elections four months from now."
They are, as well, thinking about how to balance a budget when so much
money is being diverted to expand missions that Obama should be
bringing to an end.
"We've been in Afghanistan for nine years, making it the longest war in
our nation's history, and it's come at a tremendous cost. We've
tragically lost more than 1,100 American lives and spent close to $300
billion. We've also been in Iraq for seven years, where we've lost more
than 4,400 American lives and spent more than $700 billion," explained
Congressman John Garamendi,
D-California, who added that, "Every dollar spent on war is a dollar
not available for job creation in America, our schools, paying down the
deficit, or helping those afflicted by natural and man-made disasters.
The more than $30 billion allotted for the Afghanistan war could employ
300,000 teachers in schools across America."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Nation
John Nichols
John Nichols is Washington correspondent for The Nation and associate editor of The Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin. His books co-authored with Robert W. McChesney are: "Dollarocracy: How the Money and Media Election Complex is Destroying America" (2014), "The Death and Life of American Journalism: The Media Revolution that Will Begin the World Again" (2011), and "Tragedy & Farce: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy" (2006). Nichols' other books include: "The "S" Word: A Short History of an American Tradition...Socialism" (2015), "Dick: The Man Who is President (2004) and "The Genius of Impeachment: The Founders' Cure for Royalism" (2006).
An addition $33 billion in spending for President Obama's
occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq -- and they are now his occupations
as much as they once were George Bush's -- was approved by the House
Thursday night as part of a broad "emergency" supplmental spending bill.
But the money for the Afghanistan quagmire did not come without a fight.
Two-thirds of House Democrats and nine Republicans voted for an
amendment sponsored by Appropriations Committee chair David Obey,
D-Wisconsin, and Congressmen Jim McGovern, D-Massachusetts, and Walter
Jones, R-North Carolina, that would have required the president to
rapidly begin developing a plan for the safe, orderly and expeditious
redeployment of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. The Obey-McGovern-Jones
amendment also called for more detailed reporting to Congress on the
status of the occupation and for stricter congressional oversight of
private contractors working on the ground in Afghanistan in order to
address charges of corruption, waste, fraud and abuse.
The amendment received 162 votes, while 260 members opposed it.
What was significant was the partisan breakdown.
Among Democrats, 153 backed the amendment, while 98 opposed it.
Among Republicans, 9 backed the amendment while 162 opposed it.
So President Obama is now relying on Republicans to provide
unquestioning support for his war, while most Democrats want to see an
exit strategy developed.
Significantly, 100 members of the House
(93 Democrats, 7 Republicans) voted for an amendment offered
by California Congresswoman Barbara Lee, the chair of the
Congressional Black Caucus, which proposed to fully fund a withdrawal
plan.
Twenty-five members (22 Democrats and three Republicans) cast the
boldest anti-war votes, backing an amendment to strike Afghanistan
funding from the supplemental bill. Another 22 members (all Democrats)
voted "present," suggesting their sympathy with the proposal.
What does it all add up to? Congress has not checked or balanced the
president, and that is disappointing -- although opportunities still
exist to do so, as the supplemental spending bill now must go back to
the Senate for another vote.
What should be understood, however, is that the president's own party is losing patience with his misguided war strategies.
As Paul Kawika Martin, Peace Action's
policy and political director, said late Thursday: "A year ago,
American voters turned against the Afghanistan war. They understand
that the enormous costs of blood and treasure are not necessarily
making us safer. Congress is slowly catching up with their
constituents. The votes in the House showed increasing congressional
concern for a failed policy in the Afghanistan region at a time when
Representatives are thinking about elections four months from now."
They are, as well, thinking about how to balance a budget when so much
money is being diverted to expand missions that Obama should be
bringing to an end.
"We've been in Afghanistan for nine years, making it the longest war in
our nation's history, and it's come at a tremendous cost. We've
tragically lost more than 1,100 American lives and spent close to $300
billion. We've also been in Iraq for seven years, where we've lost more
than 4,400 American lives and spent more than $700 billion," explained
Congressman John Garamendi,
D-California, who added that, "Every dollar spent on war is a dollar
not available for job creation in America, our schools, paying down the
deficit, or helping those afflicted by natural and man-made disasters.
The more than $30 billion allotted for the Afghanistan war could employ
300,000 teachers in schools across America."
John Nichols
John Nichols is Washington correspondent for The Nation and associate editor of The Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin. His books co-authored with Robert W. McChesney are: "Dollarocracy: How the Money and Media Election Complex is Destroying America" (2014), "The Death and Life of American Journalism: The Media Revolution that Will Begin the World Again" (2011), and "Tragedy & Farce: How the American Media Sell Wars, Spin Elections, and Destroy Democracy" (2006). Nichols' other books include: "The "S" Word: A Short History of an American Tradition...Socialism" (2015), "Dick: The Man Who is President (2004) and "The Genius of Impeachment: The Founders' Cure for Royalism" (2006).
An addition $33 billion in spending for President Obama's
occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq -- and they are now his occupations
as much as they once were George Bush's -- was approved by the House
Thursday night as part of a broad "emergency" supplmental spending bill.
But the money for the Afghanistan quagmire did not come without a fight.
Two-thirds of House Democrats and nine Republicans voted for an
amendment sponsored by Appropriations Committee chair David Obey,
D-Wisconsin, and Congressmen Jim McGovern, D-Massachusetts, and Walter
Jones, R-North Carolina, that would have required the president to
rapidly begin developing a plan for the safe, orderly and expeditious
redeployment of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. The Obey-McGovern-Jones
amendment also called for more detailed reporting to Congress on the
status of the occupation and for stricter congressional oversight of
private contractors working on the ground in Afghanistan in order to
address charges of corruption, waste, fraud and abuse.
The amendment received 162 votes, while 260 members opposed it.
What was significant was the partisan breakdown.
Among Democrats, 153 backed the amendment, while 98 opposed it.
Among Republicans, 9 backed the amendment while 162 opposed it.
So President Obama is now relying on Republicans to provide
unquestioning support for his war, while most Democrats want to see an
exit strategy developed.
Significantly, 100 members of the House
(93 Democrats, 7 Republicans) voted for an amendment offered
by California Congresswoman Barbara Lee, the chair of the
Congressional Black Caucus, which proposed to fully fund a withdrawal
plan.
Twenty-five members (22 Democrats and three Republicans) cast the
boldest anti-war votes, backing an amendment to strike Afghanistan
funding from the supplemental bill. Another 22 members (all Democrats)
voted "present," suggesting their sympathy with the proposal.
What does it all add up to? Congress has not checked or balanced the
president, and that is disappointing -- although opportunities still
exist to do so, as the supplemental spending bill now must go back to
the Senate for another vote.
What should be understood, however, is that the president's own party is losing patience with his misguided war strategies.
As Paul Kawika Martin, Peace Action's
policy and political director, said late Thursday: "A year ago,
American voters turned against the Afghanistan war. They understand
that the enormous costs of blood and treasure are not necessarily
making us safer. Congress is slowly catching up with their
constituents. The votes in the House showed increasing congressional
concern for a failed policy in the Afghanistan region at a time when
Representatives are thinking about elections four months from now."
They are, as well, thinking about how to balance a budget when so much
money is being diverted to expand missions that Obama should be
bringing to an end.
"We've been in Afghanistan for nine years, making it the longest war in
our nation's history, and it's come at a tremendous cost. We've
tragically lost more than 1,100 American lives and spent close to $300
billion. We've also been in Iraq for seven years, where we've lost more
than 4,400 American lives and spent more than $700 billion," explained
Congressman John Garamendi,
D-California, who added that, "Every dollar spent on war is a dollar
not available for job creation in America, our schools, paying down the
deficit, or helping those afflicted by natural and man-made disasters.
The more than $30 billion allotted for the Afghanistan war could employ
300,000 teachers in schools across America."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.