Tea Party Money-Bomb Elects Scott Brown, Blows-Up Obamacare
Six months ago the vocal factions of the Tea Party revolt organized among anti-Obama right wingers were mostly an annoyance to the Democratic Party. Today the Congressional Democrats are scared for their political lives after Scott Brown, with the help of a Tea Party organized online "money bomb" and get-out-the-vote campaign, won back for Republicans Ted Kennedy's former Massachusetts senate seat. The "money bomb" is a tactic borrowed from MoveOn and the liberal netroots
movement through which the Tea Party activists raised way over one
million dollars online in 24 hours for Scott Brown. Even though the Republicans
have only reduced the still large fifty-nine member Democratic senate
majority by one person, the fact that Brown ran an uphill campaign that
came from nowhere and steamrolled to victory means that all the
Congressional Democrats are now looking over their right shoulders,
fearing a similar populist attack as the 2010 electoral season heats
up.
The Tea Party money bomb has also blown up Obamacare, the
President's muddled health care reform plan. While many pundits point
to local issues that helped Brown win, the fact is that Brown ran
hardest against Obama's health care bill, and won despite personal
appearances in Massachusetts by Obama and Bill Clinton, and despite a desperate but failed Democratic effort to beat back the insurgency.
Freedomworks and other groups behind the Tea Party populists have long claimed that they would create the Right's equivalent of MoveOn, and they have. Indeed, the best efforts of MoveOn and Obama's much-touted but very ineffectual Organizing for America
to rescue the Massachusetts senate race failed miserably. The
grassroots political momentum in the country is now with the right wing
populists who have tapped into a great disillusionment with Obama and his Democratic Party. Indeed, given the inevitable political stalemate this stunning Republican
upset will cause in Washington, the most interesting political action
in 2010 is going to be found in examining what takes place at the
grassroots among populists of both the Left and the Right. Can the
progressive Left once again become a force for change in America, or
will it continue to take the role of cheerleader for Obama and cede the
grassroots to the Right?
How ironic that smug Democrats in the Administration refused to allow the single payer, medicare-for-all
option to even be considered as a possibility for America. They
declared it off the table, pushing a "public option" plan that was
quickly jettisoned by an Administration happy to cut deals with the
drug and insurance lobbies. The result is a massive mess difficult to
understand with shrinking public support. It was hung like an albatross
around the neck of Martha Coakley, the loser in the Scott Brown race.
If the Obama Administration had embraced the single payer option --
some type of which is in place in every country that does have
universal medical coverage -- it could have ignited the Democratic
grassroots and educated the public. Instead, the health care debacle
has become a massive political train wreck, and Barack Obama's
Democratic Party is pinned in the wreckage.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Six months ago the vocal factions of the Tea Party revolt organized among anti-Obama right wingers were mostly an annoyance to the Democratic Party. Today the Congressional Democrats are scared for their political lives after Scott Brown, with the help of a Tea Party organized online "money bomb" and get-out-the-vote campaign, won back for Republicans Ted Kennedy's former Massachusetts senate seat. The "money bomb" is a tactic borrowed from MoveOn and the liberal netroots
movement through which the Tea Party activists raised way over one
million dollars online in 24 hours for Scott Brown. Even though the Republicans
have only reduced the still large fifty-nine member Democratic senate
majority by one person, the fact that Brown ran an uphill campaign that
came from nowhere and steamrolled to victory means that all the
Congressional Democrats are now looking over their right shoulders,
fearing a similar populist attack as the 2010 electoral season heats
up.
The Tea Party money bomb has also blown up Obamacare, the
President's muddled health care reform plan. While many pundits point
to local issues that helped Brown win, the fact is that Brown ran
hardest against Obama's health care bill, and won despite personal
appearances in Massachusetts by Obama and Bill Clinton, and despite a desperate but failed Democratic effort to beat back the insurgency.
Freedomworks and other groups behind the Tea Party populists have long claimed that they would create the Right's equivalent of MoveOn, and they have. Indeed, the best efforts of MoveOn and Obama's much-touted but very ineffectual Organizing for America
to rescue the Massachusetts senate race failed miserably. The
grassroots political momentum in the country is now with the right wing
populists who have tapped into a great disillusionment with Obama and his Democratic Party. Indeed, given the inevitable political stalemate this stunning Republican
upset will cause in Washington, the most interesting political action
in 2010 is going to be found in examining what takes place at the
grassroots among populists of both the Left and the Right. Can the
progressive Left once again become a force for change in America, or
will it continue to take the role of cheerleader for Obama and cede the
grassroots to the Right?
How ironic that smug Democrats in the Administration refused to allow the single payer, medicare-for-all
option to even be considered as a possibility for America. They
declared it off the table, pushing a "public option" plan that was
quickly jettisoned by an Administration happy to cut deals with the
drug and insurance lobbies. The result is a massive mess difficult to
understand with shrinking public support. It was hung like an albatross
around the neck of Martha Coakley, the loser in the Scott Brown race.
If the Obama Administration had embraced the single payer option --
some type of which is in place in every country that does have
universal medical coverage -- it could have ignited the Democratic
grassroots and educated the public. Instead, the health care debacle
has become a massive political train wreck, and Barack Obama's
Democratic Party is pinned in the wreckage.
Six months ago the vocal factions of the Tea Party revolt organized among anti-Obama right wingers were mostly an annoyance to the Democratic Party. Today the Congressional Democrats are scared for their political lives after Scott Brown, with the help of a Tea Party organized online "money bomb" and get-out-the-vote campaign, won back for Republicans Ted Kennedy's former Massachusetts senate seat. The "money bomb" is a tactic borrowed from MoveOn and the liberal netroots
movement through which the Tea Party activists raised way over one
million dollars online in 24 hours for Scott Brown. Even though the Republicans
have only reduced the still large fifty-nine member Democratic senate
majority by one person, the fact that Brown ran an uphill campaign that
came from nowhere and steamrolled to victory means that all the
Congressional Democrats are now looking over their right shoulders,
fearing a similar populist attack as the 2010 electoral season heats
up.
The Tea Party money bomb has also blown up Obamacare, the
President's muddled health care reform plan. While many pundits point
to local issues that helped Brown win, the fact is that Brown ran
hardest against Obama's health care bill, and won despite personal
appearances in Massachusetts by Obama and Bill Clinton, and despite a desperate but failed Democratic effort to beat back the insurgency.
Freedomworks and other groups behind the Tea Party populists have long claimed that they would create the Right's equivalent of MoveOn, and they have. Indeed, the best efforts of MoveOn and Obama's much-touted but very ineffectual Organizing for America
to rescue the Massachusetts senate race failed miserably. The
grassroots political momentum in the country is now with the right wing
populists who have tapped into a great disillusionment with Obama and his Democratic Party. Indeed, given the inevitable political stalemate this stunning Republican
upset will cause in Washington, the most interesting political action
in 2010 is going to be found in examining what takes place at the
grassroots among populists of both the Left and the Right. Can the
progressive Left once again become a force for change in America, or
will it continue to take the role of cheerleader for Obama and cede the
grassroots to the Right?
How ironic that smug Democrats in the Administration refused to allow the single payer, medicare-for-all
option to even be considered as a possibility for America. They
declared it off the table, pushing a "public option" plan that was
quickly jettisoned by an Administration happy to cut deals with the
drug and insurance lobbies. The result is a massive mess difficult to
understand with shrinking public support. It was hung like an albatross
around the neck of Martha Coakley, the loser in the Scott Brown race.
If the Obama Administration had embraced the single payer option --
some type of which is in place in every country that does have
universal medical coverage -- it could have ignited the Democratic
grassroots and educated the public. Instead, the health care debacle
has become a massive political train wreck, and Barack Obama's
Democratic Party is pinned in the wreckage.