

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
No one in the Obama administration is going to acknowledge that our foreign policy in the Middle East has alienated many Arabs.
The U.S. pro-Israel policy and our shocking neglect of the beleaguered
Palestinians underlie almost every initiative or tactical tilt that
comes out of Washington.
President
Obama and his predecessors in the White House have scored domestic
political points by embracing this world view. This is one vantage
point that is truly bipartisan, to the point where no one discusses it.
Michael
Scheuer, a former CIA specialist on the al-Qaida terrorists, complained
on C-SPAN recently that any debate about American support for Israel is
"normally squelched."
"For anyone to say our support for Israel doesn't hurt us is to just defy reality," he added.
Another
former CIA analyst, Ray McGovern, says the 9/11 Commission report noted
that Khalid Sheikh -- the mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks --
cited his violent disagreement with U.S. support for Israel as the
motivating dynamic behind the attacks.
Obama knows enough about
the Middle East that tightening airport security is not the whole
answer to fighting terrorism. He should try a more even-handed policy
in the region.
Grievances of the Arab man on the street include
bitter criticism of the U.S. for supporting harsh authoritarian regimes
in the Arab world and the failure of those U.S.-backed regimes to help
the Palestinians in Gaza.
Surely after several years of war in
Iraq and Afghanistan, we can dispense with the obfuscation and evasion
that flood forth from official U.S. megaphones.
Terrorism spawned in the Middle East is not the only threat we face.
As
the American economy digs out from the debris of the Great Recession
triggered by the collapse of the housing bubble, we should think about
what could happen about another bubble that invisibly chugs through the
American economy.
I refer to our bloated defense spending.
The
United States spends more for its arsenal than any other 10 countries
combined. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research
Institute, the U.S. accounts for more than 40 percent of the world's
total military spending. China is in second place, at a relatively puny
5.8 percent.
If the U.S. defense spending bubble were ever to
deflate, domestic job losses would be catastrophic, a stunning fact
that raises the question of whether we can ever afford peace.
The
American people have long shown they can handle the truth. When it
comes to the Middle East and to threats to our economy, so should our
leaders.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
No one in the Obama administration is going to acknowledge that our foreign policy in the Middle East has alienated many Arabs.
The U.S. pro-Israel policy and our shocking neglect of the beleaguered
Palestinians underlie almost every initiative or tactical tilt that
comes out of Washington.
President
Obama and his predecessors in the White House have scored domestic
political points by embracing this world view. This is one vantage
point that is truly bipartisan, to the point where no one discusses it.
Michael
Scheuer, a former CIA specialist on the al-Qaida terrorists, complained
on C-SPAN recently that any debate about American support for Israel is
"normally squelched."
"For anyone to say our support for Israel doesn't hurt us is to just defy reality," he added.
Another
former CIA analyst, Ray McGovern, says the 9/11 Commission report noted
that Khalid Sheikh -- the mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks --
cited his violent disagreement with U.S. support for Israel as the
motivating dynamic behind the attacks.
Obama knows enough about
the Middle East that tightening airport security is not the whole
answer to fighting terrorism. He should try a more even-handed policy
in the region.
Grievances of the Arab man on the street include
bitter criticism of the U.S. for supporting harsh authoritarian regimes
in the Arab world and the failure of those U.S.-backed regimes to help
the Palestinians in Gaza.
Surely after several years of war in
Iraq and Afghanistan, we can dispense with the obfuscation and evasion
that flood forth from official U.S. megaphones.
Terrorism spawned in the Middle East is not the only threat we face.
As
the American economy digs out from the debris of the Great Recession
triggered by the collapse of the housing bubble, we should think about
what could happen about another bubble that invisibly chugs through the
American economy.
I refer to our bloated defense spending.
The
United States spends more for its arsenal than any other 10 countries
combined. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research
Institute, the U.S. accounts for more than 40 percent of the world's
total military spending. China is in second place, at a relatively puny
5.8 percent.
If the U.S. defense spending bubble were ever to
deflate, domestic job losses would be catastrophic, a stunning fact
that raises the question of whether we can ever afford peace.
The
American people have long shown they can handle the truth. When it
comes to the Middle East and to threats to our economy, so should our
leaders.
No one in the Obama administration is going to acknowledge that our foreign policy in the Middle East has alienated many Arabs.
The U.S. pro-Israel policy and our shocking neglect of the beleaguered
Palestinians underlie almost every initiative or tactical tilt that
comes out of Washington.
President
Obama and his predecessors in the White House have scored domestic
political points by embracing this world view. This is one vantage
point that is truly bipartisan, to the point where no one discusses it.
Michael
Scheuer, a former CIA specialist on the al-Qaida terrorists, complained
on C-SPAN recently that any debate about American support for Israel is
"normally squelched."
"For anyone to say our support for Israel doesn't hurt us is to just defy reality," he added.
Another
former CIA analyst, Ray McGovern, says the 9/11 Commission report noted
that Khalid Sheikh -- the mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks --
cited his violent disagreement with U.S. support for Israel as the
motivating dynamic behind the attacks.
Obama knows enough about
the Middle East that tightening airport security is not the whole
answer to fighting terrorism. He should try a more even-handed policy
in the region.
Grievances of the Arab man on the street include
bitter criticism of the U.S. for supporting harsh authoritarian regimes
in the Arab world and the failure of those U.S.-backed regimes to help
the Palestinians in Gaza.
Surely after several years of war in
Iraq and Afghanistan, we can dispense with the obfuscation and evasion
that flood forth from official U.S. megaphones.
Terrorism spawned in the Middle East is not the only threat we face.
As
the American economy digs out from the debris of the Great Recession
triggered by the collapse of the housing bubble, we should think about
what could happen about another bubble that invisibly chugs through the
American economy.
I refer to our bloated defense spending.
The
United States spends more for its arsenal than any other 10 countries
combined. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research
Institute, the U.S. accounts for more than 40 percent of the world's
total military spending. China is in second place, at a relatively puny
5.8 percent.
If the U.S. defense spending bubble were ever to
deflate, domestic job losses would be catastrophic, a stunning fact
that raises the question of whether we can ever afford peace.
The
American people have long shown they can handle the truth. When it
comes to the Middle East and to threats to our economy, so should our
leaders.