

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Are you feeling like a chump yet?
If you're a good progressive, and you wanted single-payer health care for all, or, second best, Medicare for All Who Want It, or third best, a robust public option, or fourth best, a paltry public option, now you've got nothing, nada, zippo.
Has it ever crossed your mind that this is the way President Obama wanted it to be?
That he tossed in the public option at the beginning only to get progressives on board, knowing full well that he was going to jettison the public option by the end?
Have you considered that maybe Max Baucus wasn't the problem?
And that maybe Olympia Snowe wasn't the problem?
And that maybe even hideous Joe Lieberman wasn't the problem?
But that Obama himself was the problem?
After all, Obama never once said he wouldn't sign a health care bill that didn't have a public option in it.
After all, Obama dumped on the public option at almost every opportunity, calling it just a "sliver" of the overall package, and not the most important sliver at that.
After all, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was huddling regularly with Max Baucus when the Montana Senator squashed the public option the first time.
And after all, Obama didn't even ask Lieberman to back the public option.
Seems to me that Obama played us all for fools.
His discussion of the public option was a cynical charade from the start, and now he expects all good progressives to rally around this "historic" health care bill?
Forget about it.
The most historic thing about Obama's health care bill is the double-cross he dealt progressives.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Are you feeling like a chump yet?
If you're a good progressive, and you wanted single-payer health care for all, or, second best, Medicare for All Who Want It, or third best, a robust public option, or fourth best, a paltry public option, now you've got nothing, nada, zippo.
Has it ever crossed your mind that this is the way President Obama wanted it to be?
That he tossed in the public option at the beginning only to get progressives on board, knowing full well that he was going to jettison the public option by the end?
Have you considered that maybe Max Baucus wasn't the problem?
And that maybe Olympia Snowe wasn't the problem?
And that maybe even hideous Joe Lieberman wasn't the problem?
But that Obama himself was the problem?
After all, Obama never once said he wouldn't sign a health care bill that didn't have a public option in it.
After all, Obama dumped on the public option at almost every opportunity, calling it just a "sliver" of the overall package, and not the most important sliver at that.
After all, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was huddling regularly with Max Baucus when the Montana Senator squashed the public option the first time.
And after all, Obama didn't even ask Lieberman to back the public option.
Seems to me that Obama played us all for fools.
His discussion of the public option was a cynical charade from the start, and now he expects all good progressives to rally around this "historic" health care bill?
Forget about it.
The most historic thing about Obama's health care bill is the double-cross he dealt progressives.
Are you feeling like a chump yet?
If you're a good progressive, and you wanted single-payer health care for all, or, second best, Medicare for All Who Want It, or third best, a robust public option, or fourth best, a paltry public option, now you've got nothing, nada, zippo.
Has it ever crossed your mind that this is the way President Obama wanted it to be?
That he tossed in the public option at the beginning only to get progressives on board, knowing full well that he was going to jettison the public option by the end?
Have you considered that maybe Max Baucus wasn't the problem?
And that maybe Olympia Snowe wasn't the problem?
And that maybe even hideous Joe Lieberman wasn't the problem?
But that Obama himself was the problem?
After all, Obama never once said he wouldn't sign a health care bill that didn't have a public option in it.
After all, Obama dumped on the public option at almost every opportunity, calling it just a "sliver" of the overall package, and not the most important sliver at that.
After all, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was huddling regularly with Max Baucus when the Montana Senator squashed the public option the first time.
And after all, Obama didn't even ask Lieberman to back the public option.
Seems to me that Obama played us all for fools.
His discussion of the public option was a cynical charade from the start, and now he expects all good progressives to rally around this "historic" health care bill?
Forget about it.
The most historic thing about Obama's health care bill is the double-cross he dealt progressives.