Dec 23, 2009
Are you feeling like a chump yet?
If you're a good progressive, and you wanted single-payer health care for all, or, second best, Medicare for All Who Want It, or third best, a robust public option, or fourth best, a paltry public option, now you've got nothing, nada, zippo.
Has it ever crossed your mind that this is the way President Obama wanted it to be?
That he tossed in the public option at the beginning only to get progressives on board, knowing full well that he was going to jettison the public option by the end?
Have you considered that maybe Max Baucus wasn't the problem?
And that maybe Olympia Snowe wasn't the problem?
And that maybe even hideous Joe Lieberman wasn't the problem?
But that Obama himself was the problem?
After all, Obama never once said he wouldn't sign a health care bill that didn't have a public option in it.
After all, Obama dumped on the public option at almost every opportunity, calling it just a "sliver" of the overall package, and not the most important sliver at that.
After all, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was huddling regularly with Max Baucus when the Montana Senator squashed the public option the first time.
And after all, Obama didn't even ask Lieberman to back the public option.
Seems to me that Obama played us all for fools.
His discussion of the public option was a cynical charade from the start, and now he expects all good progressives to rally around this "historic" health care bill?
Forget about it.
The most historic thing about Obama's health care bill is the double-cross he dealt progressives.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
Are you feeling like a chump yet?
If you're a good progressive, and you wanted single-payer health care for all, or, second best, Medicare for All Who Want It, or third best, a robust public option, or fourth best, a paltry public option, now you've got nothing, nada, zippo.
Has it ever crossed your mind that this is the way President Obama wanted it to be?
That he tossed in the public option at the beginning only to get progressives on board, knowing full well that he was going to jettison the public option by the end?
Have you considered that maybe Max Baucus wasn't the problem?
And that maybe Olympia Snowe wasn't the problem?
And that maybe even hideous Joe Lieberman wasn't the problem?
But that Obama himself was the problem?
After all, Obama never once said he wouldn't sign a health care bill that didn't have a public option in it.
After all, Obama dumped on the public option at almost every opportunity, calling it just a "sliver" of the overall package, and not the most important sliver at that.
After all, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was huddling regularly with Max Baucus when the Montana Senator squashed the public option the first time.
And after all, Obama didn't even ask Lieberman to back the public option.
Seems to me that Obama played us all for fools.
His discussion of the public option was a cynical charade from the start, and now he expects all good progressives to rally around this "historic" health care bill?
Forget about it.
The most historic thing about Obama's health care bill is the double-cross he dealt progressives.
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
Are you feeling like a chump yet?
If you're a good progressive, and you wanted single-payer health care for all, or, second best, Medicare for All Who Want It, or third best, a robust public option, or fourth best, a paltry public option, now you've got nothing, nada, zippo.
Has it ever crossed your mind that this is the way President Obama wanted it to be?
That he tossed in the public option at the beginning only to get progressives on board, knowing full well that he was going to jettison the public option by the end?
Have you considered that maybe Max Baucus wasn't the problem?
And that maybe Olympia Snowe wasn't the problem?
And that maybe even hideous Joe Lieberman wasn't the problem?
But that Obama himself was the problem?
After all, Obama never once said he wouldn't sign a health care bill that didn't have a public option in it.
After all, Obama dumped on the public option at almost every opportunity, calling it just a "sliver" of the overall package, and not the most important sliver at that.
After all, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was huddling regularly with Max Baucus when the Montana Senator squashed the public option the first time.
And after all, Obama didn't even ask Lieberman to back the public option.
Seems to me that Obama played us all for fools.
His discussion of the public option was a cynical charade from the start, and now he expects all good progressives to rally around this "historic" health care bill?
Forget about it.
The most historic thing about Obama's health care bill is the double-cross he dealt progressives.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.