SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Obama Double-Crossed Progressives on Health Care
Dec 23, 2009
Are you feeling like a chump yet?
If you're a good progressive, and you wanted single-payer health care for all, or, second best, Medicare for All Who Want It, or third best, a robust public option, or fourth best, a paltry public option, now you've got nothing, nada, zippo.
Has it ever crossed your mind that this is the way President Obama wanted it to be?
That he tossed in the public option at the beginning only to get progressives on board, knowing full well that he was going to jettison the public option by the end?
Have you considered that maybe Max Baucus wasn't the problem?
And that maybe Olympia Snowe wasn't the problem?
And that maybe even hideous Joe Lieberman wasn't the problem?
But that Obama himself was the problem?
After all, Obama never once said he wouldn't sign a health care bill that didn't have a public option in it.
After all, Obama dumped on the public option at almost every opportunity, calling it just a "sliver" of the overall package, and not the most important sliver at that.
After all, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was huddling regularly with Max Baucus when the Montana Senator squashed the public option the first time.
And after all, Obama didn't even ask Lieberman to back the public option.
Seems to me that Obama played us all for fools.
His discussion of the public option was a cynical charade from the start, and now he expects all good progressives to rally around this "historic" health care bill?
Forget about it.
The most historic thing about Obama's health care bill is the double-cross he dealt progressives.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 The Progressive
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
Are you feeling like a chump yet?
If you're a good progressive, and you wanted single-payer health care for all, or, second best, Medicare for All Who Want It, or third best, a robust public option, or fourth best, a paltry public option, now you've got nothing, nada, zippo.
Has it ever crossed your mind that this is the way President Obama wanted it to be?
That he tossed in the public option at the beginning only to get progressives on board, knowing full well that he was going to jettison the public option by the end?
Have you considered that maybe Max Baucus wasn't the problem?
And that maybe Olympia Snowe wasn't the problem?
And that maybe even hideous Joe Lieberman wasn't the problem?
But that Obama himself was the problem?
After all, Obama never once said he wouldn't sign a health care bill that didn't have a public option in it.
After all, Obama dumped on the public option at almost every opportunity, calling it just a "sliver" of the overall package, and not the most important sliver at that.
After all, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was huddling regularly with Max Baucus when the Montana Senator squashed the public option the first time.
And after all, Obama didn't even ask Lieberman to back the public option.
Seems to me that Obama played us all for fools.
His discussion of the public option was a cynical charade from the start, and now he expects all good progressives to rally around this "historic" health care bill?
Forget about it.
The most historic thing about Obama's health care bill is the double-cross he dealt progressives.
Matt Rothschild
Matt Rothschild is the executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. Prior to joining the Democracy Campaign at the start of 2015, Matt worked at The Progressive Magazine for 32 years. For most of those, he was the editor and publisher of The Progressive.
Are you feeling like a chump yet?
If you're a good progressive, and you wanted single-payer health care for all, or, second best, Medicare for All Who Want It, or third best, a robust public option, or fourth best, a paltry public option, now you've got nothing, nada, zippo.
Has it ever crossed your mind that this is the way President Obama wanted it to be?
That he tossed in the public option at the beginning only to get progressives on board, knowing full well that he was going to jettison the public option by the end?
Have you considered that maybe Max Baucus wasn't the problem?
And that maybe Olympia Snowe wasn't the problem?
And that maybe even hideous Joe Lieberman wasn't the problem?
But that Obama himself was the problem?
After all, Obama never once said he wouldn't sign a health care bill that didn't have a public option in it.
After all, Obama dumped on the public option at almost every opportunity, calling it just a "sliver" of the overall package, and not the most important sliver at that.
After all, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, was huddling regularly with Max Baucus when the Montana Senator squashed the public option the first time.
And after all, Obama didn't even ask Lieberman to back the public option.
Seems to me that Obama played us all for fools.
His discussion of the public option was a cynical charade from the start, and now he expects all good progressives to rally around this "historic" health care bill?
Forget about it.
The most historic thing about Obama's health care bill is the double-cross he dealt progressives.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.