Congress Needs to Hear From Us Today on Afghanistan
This week Congress is set to
authorize $550 billion in defense spending and, with it, an additional
$130 billion to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite a
Democratic President and a Democratic majority in Congress, the
military industrial complex is once again running up the score: the
House Armed Services Committee wants to shower the Pentagon with even
more federal dollars than George W. Bush ever requested. And the flood
gates of federal dollars are once again wide open for a war without end
in Afghanistan.
But there is some good news. Representative Jim McGovern (D-MA) is
trying to squeeze a bit of common sense into the bill with an amendment
that calls on the Administration to develop what President Obama told a
national television audience we need: an exit strategy from
Afghanistan. Unable to get this proposal included in the Supplemental
Defense Appropriation bill a few weeks ago, Rep. McGovern has since
introduced it as a bill that has already attracted 89 Congressional
co-sponsors. Now he intends to propose it as an amendment to the House
Armed Services Committee bill when it makes its way to the floor of the
House tomorrow.
But Rep. McGovern needs our help.
Call your Representative today at (202) 224-3121 and:
1. urge her/him to co-sponsor Rep. McGovern's Afghanistan Exit Strategy bill H.R. 2404, and
2. vote for Rep. McGovern's amendment to the Defense Authorization bill (H.R. 2647).
I realize how hard it may seem for Congressional Democrats to require
the Obama administration to develop an exit strategy as a condition for
continued funding. After all, this is our
guy, right? The last thing our guy needs is a Democratic Congress
second guessing, making demands, and putting conditions on the war.
But this is exactly what we and the administration need precisely because he is our guy.
Unlike Mr. Limbaugh, we want and need President Obama to succeed. The
very real prospect of the United States embedded in an endless war in
Afghanistan would undermine everything this administration is trying to
do while imperiling the very Congressional Democrats President Obama
needs to move his agenda.
Continuing our military presence in Afghanistan without an exit strategy is a bad idea for many reasons. As I've noted before, the presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan unites our opponents within the country and region and makes cooperation by key regional players like Iran, Russia and China
far less likely with the prospect of tens of thousands of US troops on
their border. As for those with the most at stake - Afghan people - over 80% oppose an escalation of American troops in their country.
Despite the heated rhetoric you're hearing from the right-wing echo
chamber, exit strategies are an important and useful part of military
planning. President Obama knows this, and that's why he has gone on the
record to say that we need one for the US military in Afghanistan.
The Win Without War coalition has been working closely with Congressman
McGovern and other Congressional allies on this important amendment.
Coalition member organizations have stepped up: MoveOn.org,
USAction/TrueMajority.org and Peace Action all sent alerts last week to
their membership asking them to call Members of Congress in support of
this bill. With your help today, we can easily push the number of
co-sponsors from 89 to over 100. Call your Member of Congress, ask if
she/he is a co-sponsor and if she/he intends to vote for the McGovern
amendment to the Defense Authorization bill on Wednesday. If not, why
not? And, if so, can she/he take an active role to encourage their
colleagues to support it as well.
There is not a lot of good news in the Defense Authorization bill.
Let's do something about that today before the votes are cast in
Congress tomorrow.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This week Congress is set to
authorize $550 billion in defense spending and, with it, an additional
$130 billion to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite a
Democratic President and a Democratic majority in Congress, the
military industrial complex is once again running up the score: the
House Armed Services Committee wants to shower the Pentagon with even
more federal dollars than George W. Bush ever requested. And the flood
gates of federal dollars are once again wide open for a war without end
in Afghanistan.
But there is some good news. Representative Jim McGovern (D-MA) is
trying to squeeze a bit of common sense into the bill with an amendment
that calls on the Administration to develop what President Obama told a
national television audience we need: an exit strategy from
Afghanistan. Unable to get this proposal included in the Supplemental
Defense Appropriation bill a few weeks ago, Rep. McGovern has since
introduced it as a bill that has already attracted 89 Congressional
co-sponsors. Now he intends to propose it as an amendment to the House
Armed Services Committee bill when it makes its way to the floor of the
House tomorrow.
But Rep. McGovern needs our help.
Call your Representative today at (202) 224-3121 and:
1. urge her/him to co-sponsor Rep. McGovern's Afghanistan Exit Strategy bill H.R. 2404, and
2. vote for Rep. McGovern's amendment to the Defense Authorization bill (H.R. 2647).
I realize how hard it may seem for Congressional Democrats to require
the Obama administration to develop an exit strategy as a condition for
continued funding. After all, this is our
guy, right? The last thing our guy needs is a Democratic Congress
second guessing, making demands, and putting conditions on the war.
But this is exactly what we and the administration need precisely because he is our guy.
Unlike Mr. Limbaugh, we want and need President Obama to succeed. The
very real prospect of the United States embedded in an endless war in
Afghanistan would undermine everything this administration is trying to
do while imperiling the very Congressional Democrats President Obama
needs to move his agenda.
Continuing our military presence in Afghanistan without an exit strategy is a bad idea for many reasons. As I've noted before, the presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan unites our opponents within the country and region and makes cooperation by key regional players like Iran, Russia and China
far less likely with the prospect of tens of thousands of US troops on
their border. As for those with the most at stake - Afghan people - over 80% oppose an escalation of American troops in their country.
Despite the heated rhetoric you're hearing from the right-wing echo
chamber, exit strategies are an important and useful part of military
planning. President Obama knows this, and that's why he has gone on the
record to say that we need one for the US military in Afghanistan.
The Win Without War coalition has been working closely with Congressman
McGovern and other Congressional allies on this important amendment.
Coalition member organizations have stepped up: MoveOn.org,
USAction/TrueMajority.org and Peace Action all sent alerts last week to
their membership asking them to call Members of Congress in support of
this bill. With your help today, we can easily push the number of
co-sponsors from 89 to over 100. Call your Member of Congress, ask if
she/he is a co-sponsor and if she/he intends to vote for the McGovern
amendment to the Defense Authorization bill on Wednesday. If not, why
not? And, if so, can she/he take an active role to encourage their
colleagues to support it as well.
There is not a lot of good news in the Defense Authorization bill.
Let's do something about that today before the votes are cast in
Congress tomorrow.
This week Congress is set to
authorize $550 billion in defense spending and, with it, an additional
$130 billion to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Despite a
Democratic President and a Democratic majority in Congress, the
military industrial complex is once again running up the score: the
House Armed Services Committee wants to shower the Pentagon with even
more federal dollars than George W. Bush ever requested. And the flood
gates of federal dollars are once again wide open for a war without end
in Afghanistan.
But there is some good news. Representative Jim McGovern (D-MA) is
trying to squeeze a bit of common sense into the bill with an amendment
that calls on the Administration to develop what President Obama told a
national television audience we need: an exit strategy from
Afghanistan. Unable to get this proposal included in the Supplemental
Defense Appropriation bill a few weeks ago, Rep. McGovern has since
introduced it as a bill that has already attracted 89 Congressional
co-sponsors. Now he intends to propose it as an amendment to the House
Armed Services Committee bill when it makes its way to the floor of the
House tomorrow.
But Rep. McGovern needs our help.
Call your Representative today at (202) 224-3121 and:
1. urge her/him to co-sponsor Rep. McGovern's Afghanistan Exit Strategy bill H.R. 2404, and
2. vote for Rep. McGovern's amendment to the Defense Authorization bill (H.R. 2647).
I realize how hard it may seem for Congressional Democrats to require
the Obama administration to develop an exit strategy as a condition for
continued funding. After all, this is our
guy, right? The last thing our guy needs is a Democratic Congress
second guessing, making demands, and putting conditions on the war.
But this is exactly what we and the administration need precisely because he is our guy.
Unlike Mr. Limbaugh, we want and need President Obama to succeed. The
very real prospect of the United States embedded in an endless war in
Afghanistan would undermine everything this administration is trying to
do while imperiling the very Congressional Democrats President Obama
needs to move his agenda.
Continuing our military presence in Afghanistan without an exit strategy is a bad idea for many reasons. As I've noted before, the presence of foreign troops in Afghanistan unites our opponents within the country and region and makes cooperation by key regional players like Iran, Russia and China
far less likely with the prospect of tens of thousands of US troops on
their border. As for those with the most at stake - Afghan people - over 80% oppose an escalation of American troops in their country.
Despite the heated rhetoric you're hearing from the right-wing echo
chamber, exit strategies are an important and useful part of military
planning. President Obama knows this, and that's why he has gone on the
record to say that we need one for the US military in Afghanistan.
The Win Without War coalition has been working closely with Congressman
McGovern and other Congressional allies on this important amendment.
Coalition member organizations have stepped up: MoveOn.org,
USAction/TrueMajority.org and Peace Action all sent alerts last week to
their membership asking them to call Members of Congress in support of
this bill. With your help today, we can easily push the number of
co-sponsors from 89 to over 100. Call your Member of Congress, ask if
she/he is a co-sponsor and if she/he intends to vote for the McGovern
amendment to the Defense Authorization bill on Wednesday. If not, why
not? And, if so, can she/he take an active role to encourage their
colleagues to support it as well.
There is not a lot of good news in the Defense Authorization bill.
Let's do something about that today before the votes are cast in
Congress tomorrow.