The "Suicide" Of Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi: Why The Media Silence?

The Brad Blog, which picked up on the story of the strange death of
Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi shortly after I published the first account in
the Western media on Sunday evening, asked a question yesterday evening
that I had been asking myself throughout the day:

So, it's been about 16 hours since we covered indie journalist / historian / blogger Andy Worthington's detailed report
on the reported suicide of the man who falsely "confessed," during
torture, to a false tie between Iraq and al-Qaeda ... As of this moment,
not a single mainstream US newspaper or broadcast outlet has reported
on the story. Is it not notable? Or are our newspapers just dead set on
ensuring their irrelevance by continuing to not report on news that actually matters, no matter how widely it's being reported in other parts of the world?

See the rest of the story here.

Reuters finally picked up on the story
late yesterday afternoon, and secured a quote from Human Rights Watch
researcher Heba Morayef, who said that she had seen al-Libi just two
weeks ago, on April 27, during a visit to Abu Salim jail in Tripoli.
She explained that he "appeared for just two minutes in a prison
courtyard," and that he "looked well, but was unwilling to speak" to
the Human Rights Watch team, saying instead, "Where were you when I was
being tortured in American prisons?"

This account corresponded with some news I received from a Libyan
friend, who told me that "a reliable source" had told him that
al-Libi's body "was handed to his brother in the city of Ajdabiya." The
friend's source corroborated Heba Morayef's account of the prison
visit, explaining that al-Libi "refused to meet them in anger because
he thought, 'Where were these organizations when I was badly tortured
in US custody?'" In addition, the source, who had had access to al-Libi
when he was in prison, said that he was held "in reasonable cell

This doesn't provide absolute confirmation of what happened to
al-Libi, but it does seem to indicate fairly convincingly that he was
in reasonable health just two weeks ago, which will only add to
suspicions that, instead of committing suicide, as the Libyan
authorities claimed, he was actually killed.

Late yesterday, Human Rights Watch issued a press release,
calling on the Libyan authorities to conduct "a full and transparent
investigation of the reported suicide," in which they "should reveal
what they know about al-Libi's treatment in US and Egyptian custody."
Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights Watch, said,
"The death of Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi means that the world will never
hear his account of the brutal torture he experienced. So now it is up
to Libya and the United States to reveal the full story of what they
know, including its impact on his mental health."

Other Libyans subjected to "extraordinary rendition" by the CIA

Human Rights Watch also revealed that, although its researchers had
been unable to talk to al-Libi, they did interview four other Libyan
prisoners, sent to Libya by the CIA between 2004 to 2006, who stated
that they had been tortured by US forces in detention centers in
Afghanistan, and that US forces had also supervised their torture in
Pakistan and Thailand.

One of the men, Mohamed Ahmad Mohamed al-Shoroeiya, also known as
Hassan Rabi'i, told Human Rights Watch that "in mid-2003, in a place he
believed was Bagram prison in Afghanistan," he had been subjected to
the following abuse: "The interpreters who directed the questions to us
did it with beatings and insults. They used cold water, ice water. They
put us in a tub with cold water. We were forced [to go] for months
without clothes. They brought a doctor at the beginning. He put my leg
in a plaster. One of the methods of interrogation was to take the
plaster off and stand on my leg."

The Washington Post
published the story of al-Libi's death in this morning's edition, with
a fine quote from Tom Malinowski, the head of the Washington office of
Human Rights Watch, who said, "I would speculate that he was missing
because he was such an embarrassment to the Bush administration. He was
Exhibit A in the narrative that tortured confessions contributed to the
massive intelligence failure that preceded the Iraq war." However, the Post
failed to follow up on the stories of the other prisoners mentioned in
the Human Rights Watch press release, even though, in October 2007,
Craig Whitlock had written a front-page article for the Post, "From CIA Jails, Inmates Fade Into Obscurity," which included details of the four prisoners.

Whitlock wrote that, when al-Libi was rendered to Libya by the CIA
"in early 2006," he "joined several other Libyans" - members of the
Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, an exiled group dedicated to the
overthrow of Colonel Gaddafi - "who had spent time in the CIA's penal
system." Whitlock noted that, after the US-led invasion of Afghanistan,
the CIA "helped Libya's spy agencies track down some of the leaders" of
the LIFG, after they fled the country.

He reported that, according to Noman Benotman, an exiled former LIFG
member, who had met the prisoners during a visit to Tripoli that was
"arranged by the Libyan government as part of an effort to persuade the
Libyan prisoners to reconcile with the Gaddafi regime," the prisoners
included Abdallah al-Sadeq, who "was apprehended in a covert CIA
operation in Thailand in the spring of 2004," and Abu Munder al-Saadi,
described as "the group's spiritual leader," who was seized at an
airport in Hong Kong. According to Benotman, these two men were only
"held briefly" by the CIA before being rendered to Tripoli. "They
realized very quickly that these guys had nothing to do with al-Qaeda,"
Benotman explained. "They kept them for a few weeks, and that's it."

Benotman also explained that two other prisoners, Khaled al-Sharif
"and another Libyan known only as Rabai" - the prisoner mentioned in
the Human Rights Watch press release - "were captured in Peshawar,
Pakistan, in 2003 and spent time in a CIA prison in Afghanistan."

I await the Human Rights Watch report on the Libyan visit with
interest, as it will undoubtedly shed more light on the stories of
these four men, who appear to be among the 94 prisoners
who, in May 2005, in one of the notorious Office of Legal Counsel memos
issued by the US Justice Department last month, Principal Deputy
Assistant Attorney General Steven G. Bradbury acknowledged had been
held in US custody.

Just as the story of Ibn al-Shaykh al-Libi should shine the most uncomfortable light
on former Vice President Dick Cheney's claims that the CIA's web of
secret prisons and proxy prisons protected America from further deadly
attacks (and not, as it transpired, provided false information obtained
through torture to justify an illegal war), so the stories of these
four men deserve to be heard, to focus much-needed attention on a
policy which, with no oversight from either Congress or the judiciary,
allowed the Executive branch to indulge its dictatorial fantasies by
"disappearing" prisoners anywhere around the world, and, in some cases,
returning them to countries like Libya, with its notoriously poor human
rights record, even when, as Craig Whitlock noted, at least two of
these men "had nothing to do with al-Qaeda."

And an even bigger story, to which I hope to return in future,
involves asking searching questions of both the US and UK governments
regarding their role in forcibly returning - or attempting to return - Libyan prisoners from Guantanamo, and Libyan residents in the UK,
whose only crime, it appears, is to have been in the wrong place at the
wrong time when Colonel Gaddafi, once regarded as a pariah and an
international terrorist, became an ally in the "War on Terror," and
those who opposed him were transformed, overnight, from freedom
fighters to terrorists.

Note: See here for some excellent political cartoons by Detainee DD, one of the Libyans held in the UK, see here for a report on the UK government's failed attempts to forcibly repatriate Libyans in the UK, and see here, here, here and here for more stories of Libyans in Guantanamo.

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world

Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.