In the Sunday New York Times, the paper's editors call for the impeachment of Judge Jay Bybee, author of one of the now infamous torture memos released last week. Bybee is now a federal judge. In its editorial, "The Torturers' Manifesto," the Timesargued:
[The] investigation should start with the lawyers who wrote these
sickening memos, including John Yoo, who now teaches law in California;
Steven Bradbury, who was job-hunting when we last heard; and Mr. Bybee,
who holds the lifetime seat on the federal appeals court that Mr. Bush
rewarded him with.
These memos make it clear that Mr. Bybee is unfit for a job that
requires legal judgment and a respect for the Constitution. Congress
should impeach him. And if the administration will not conduct a
thorough investigation of these issues, then Congress has a
constitutional duty to hold the executive branch accountable. If that
means putting Donald Rumsfeld and Alberto Gonzales on the stand, even
Dick Cheney, we are sure Americans can handle it.
Of course, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, Cheney, Bush and a slew of others
belong on trial with Bybee, not just as witnesses in his case and the Times
should be calling for that as well. But let's remember, this is the
paper that the Bush administration used as a conveyor belt for its
deadly lies so expectations of it should be low.
In a recent piece for Slate,
"Impeach Jay Bybee: Why should a suspected war criminal serve as a
federal judge?," Yale law professor Bruce Ackerman lays out some of
"Jay Bybee is currently sitting on the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals in San Francisco. As assistant attorney general in President
George W. Bush's Justice Department, he was responsible for the
notorious torture memos that enabled the excesses at Abu Ghraib,
Guantanamo, and other places. While John Yoo did most of the staff work
for Bybee, Yoo was barely 35 years old - and his memos showed it. They
not only took extreme positions; they were legally incompetent, failing
to consider many of the most obvious counterarguments. Bybee was 49. He
was the grown-up, the seasoned jurist. He had been a law professor and
had served as associate counsel to President Bush. When he was promoted
to head the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel, he became the
final judge of legal matters within the executive branch. Yet his
opinion on torture was so poorly reasoned that it was repudiated by his
very conservative successor, Jack Goldsmith."
David Swanson, the ever vigilant crusader for holding Bush era criminals accountable for their crimes, has started a website ImpeachBybee.org which contains resources on Bybee and how people can sign a petition calling for his impeachment.
While Obama has made clear that he does not intend to prosecute CIA
torturers and their bosses and lawyers, saying it is "time for
reflection, not retribution," not everyone in his party is in
agreement. As previously reported, Representative Jan Schakowsky, has been outspoken on this issue, as have Senator Russ Feingold
and Representative Jerrold Nadler. But the leadership of the Democratic
Party has, predictably, been silent. Indeed, Nadler was the first
Democrat to call for the appointment of a Special Prosecutor. On Friday, Nadler released a statement, saying:
"These memos make it abundantly clear that the Bush administration
engaged in torture. Because torture is illegal under American law - as
the U.S. is a signatory to the Convention Against Torture - we are
legally required to investigate and, when appropriate, to prosecute
those responsible for these crimes.
"I commend President Obama for his unequivocal rejection of torture
and for his resolve to move forward. The President's intentions are
honorable, but don't go far enough. All history teaches us that simply
shining a light on criminal acts without holding the responsible people
accountable will not prevent repetition of those acts.
"I have previously urged Attorneys General Gonzalez and Mukasey to
appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the torture abuses of the
Bush administration, and now I will convey that same necessity to
President Obama and Attorney General Holder. We sorely need an
independent investigation that will provide accountability for these
Meanwhile, Bob Fertik at Democrats.com is circulating a petition to Congress with five primary demands:
1. Demand the appointment of a Special Prosecutor by Attorney General Eric Holder for torture, warrantless wiretapping, and other heinous crimes of the Bush Administration.
2. Prohibit the use of any taxpayer dollars to defend
government officials who committed such crimes against lawsuits, or to
pay for judgments against them.
3. Impeach Judge Jay Bybee, the torture memo author who serves on the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in California.
4. Protect human rights by restoring Habeas Corpus and the Fourth
Amendment (search and seizure), including repeal of the Orwellian-named
Protect America Act, U.S.A. Patriot Act, the FISA Amendments, and
Military Commissions Act.
5. End secret government by prohibiting use of "State Secrets," "Sovereign Immunity" and "Signing Statements."
The Obama administration has a moral and legal responsibility to prosecute Bush era criminals. The UN has indicated
that Obama's refusal to prosecute torturers may be a violation of
International law. As for US law, Michael Ratner, president of the
Center for Constitutional Rights said, "Whether or not to prosecute law
breakers is not a political decision. Laws were broken and crimes were
committed. If we are truly a nation of laws ... a prosecutor needs to be
appointed and the decisions regarding the guilt of those involved in
the torture program should be decided in a court of law."
Comments like "reflection not retribution" and "look forward, not
backwards," are insulting to the rule of law and the cause of justice.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.