Obama Administration Affirms U.S. Neutrality in Salvadoran Election
Thank you, President Obama. At long last - better late than never - a
high-level official of the Obama Administration has clearly affirmed
U.S. neutrality ahead of Sunday's Presidential election in El
Salvador.
Voice of America reports:
Friday in Washington, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State
Tom Shannon said the United States supports the democratic process in
El Salvador and will work with whomever is elected.
Also on Friday, Rep. Howard Berman, (D-CA), chair of the House Foreign
Affairs Committee, affirmed that neither Temporary Protected Status
for Salvadorans in the U.S. nor remittance flows from the U.S. to El
Salvador would be affected by the outcome of the election. From the
Committee website:
Congressman Howard L. Berman (D-CA), chairman of the House
Foreign Affairs Committee, issued the following statement in response
to comments made by members of Congress, widely reported in the El
Salvador media on the eve of elections there, that both Temporary
Protected Status (TPS) for Salvadorans in the U.S. and remittance
flows from the U.S. to El Salvador may be in jeopardy depending on the
outcome of the El Salvador elections to be held this Sunday:"Sunday's election belongs to the people of El Salvador. As Chairman
of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, I am confident that neither
TPS nor the right to receive remittances from family in the United
States will be affected by the outcome of the election, despite what
some of my colleagues in Congress have said."
Last week, Rep. Raul Grijalva and more than 30 Members of Congress asked
the Obama Administration for a high-level affirmation of US
neutrality. Until today, there had been no high-level response.
The need for such affirmation - which should have come earlier - was
made painfully obvious by the dirty
tricks of Congressional Republicans this week.
Tuesday March 10:
El Salvador's largest circulating daily, the Diario de
Hoy, published news of a letter signed by over 40 Republicans in
Congress, denouncing the FMLN and warning of their links to Venezuela
and Cuba. The letter expresses "grave concern that a victory by the
FMLN could make links between El Salvador and the regimes of
Venezuela, Iran and Cuba, and other states that promote terrorism, and
also with other non-democratic regimes and terrorist
organizations."
Wednesday March 11:
Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ):
"Should the pro-terrorist FMLN party replace the current
government in El Salvador, the United States, in the interests of
national security, would be required to reevaluate our policy toward
El Salvador, including cash remittance and immigration policies to
compensate for the fact there will no longer be a reliable counterpart
in the Salvadoran government."
Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN):
"Those monies that are coming from here to there I am
confident will be cut, and I hope the people of El Salvador are aware
of that because it will have a tremendous impact on individuals and
their economy." Indeed, these threats carry considerable weight for
Salvadoran voters, as 25% of the Salvadoran population lives in the
U.S., and 20% of the nation's economy consists of remittances from
those family members."
Rep.
Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA):
El Salvador's election is on Sunday. If an ally of
Al-Qaeda and Iran comes to power in El Salvador, the national security
interests of the United States will require certain immigration
restrictions and controls over the flow of the $4 billion in annual
remittances sent from the U.S. back home to El Salvador.
These threats were trumpeted in Salvadoran media. Here's
the front page of Diario de Hoy.
What remains to be seen is how widely Friday's affirmations of U.S.
neutrality will be reported in El Salvador, where the private media
are overwhelmingly and openly biased in their reporting in support of
the right-wing government.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Thank you, President Obama. At long last - better late than never - a
high-level official of the Obama Administration has clearly affirmed
U.S. neutrality ahead of Sunday's Presidential election in El
Salvador.
Voice of America reports:
Friday in Washington, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State
Tom Shannon said the United States supports the democratic process in
El Salvador and will work with whomever is elected.
Also on Friday, Rep. Howard Berman, (D-CA), chair of the House Foreign
Affairs Committee, affirmed that neither Temporary Protected Status
for Salvadorans in the U.S. nor remittance flows from the U.S. to El
Salvador would be affected by the outcome of the election. From the
Committee website:
Congressman Howard L. Berman (D-CA), chairman of the House
Foreign Affairs Committee, issued the following statement in response
to comments made by members of Congress, widely reported in the El
Salvador media on the eve of elections there, that both Temporary
Protected Status (TPS) for Salvadorans in the U.S. and remittance
flows from the U.S. to El Salvador may be in jeopardy depending on the
outcome of the El Salvador elections to be held this Sunday:"Sunday's election belongs to the people of El Salvador. As Chairman
of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, I am confident that neither
TPS nor the right to receive remittances from family in the United
States will be affected by the outcome of the election, despite what
some of my colleagues in Congress have said."
Last week, Rep. Raul Grijalva and more than 30 Members of Congress asked
the Obama Administration for a high-level affirmation of US
neutrality. Until today, there had been no high-level response.
The need for such affirmation - which should have come earlier - was
made painfully obvious by the dirty
tricks of Congressional Republicans this week.
Tuesday March 10:
El Salvador's largest circulating daily, the Diario de
Hoy, published news of a letter signed by over 40 Republicans in
Congress, denouncing the FMLN and warning of their links to Venezuela
and Cuba. The letter expresses "grave concern that a victory by the
FMLN could make links between El Salvador and the regimes of
Venezuela, Iran and Cuba, and other states that promote terrorism, and
also with other non-democratic regimes and terrorist
organizations."
Wednesday March 11:
Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ):
"Should the pro-terrorist FMLN party replace the current
government in El Salvador, the United States, in the interests of
national security, would be required to reevaluate our policy toward
El Salvador, including cash remittance and immigration policies to
compensate for the fact there will no longer be a reliable counterpart
in the Salvadoran government."
Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN):
"Those monies that are coming from here to there I am
confident will be cut, and I hope the people of El Salvador are aware
of that because it will have a tremendous impact on individuals and
their economy." Indeed, these threats carry considerable weight for
Salvadoran voters, as 25% of the Salvadoran population lives in the
U.S., and 20% of the nation's economy consists of remittances from
those family members."
Rep.
Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA):
El Salvador's election is on Sunday. If an ally of
Al-Qaeda and Iran comes to power in El Salvador, the national security
interests of the United States will require certain immigration
restrictions and controls over the flow of the $4 billion in annual
remittances sent from the U.S. back home to El Salvador.
These threats were trumpeted in Salvadoran media. Here's
the front page of Diario de Hoy.
What remains to be seen is how widely Friday's affirmations of U.S.
neutrality will be reported in El Salvador, where the private media
are overwhelmingly and openly biased in their reporting in support of
the right-wing government.
Thank you, President Obama. At long last - better late than never - a
high-level official of the Obama Administration has clearly affirmed
U.S. neutrality ahead of Sunday's Presidential election in El
Salvador.
Voice of America reports:
Friday in Washington, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State
Tom Shannon said the United States supports the democratic process in
El Salvador and will work with whomever is elected.
Also on Friday, Rep. Howard Berman, (D-CA), chair of the House Foreign
Affairs Committee, affirmed that neither Temporary Protected Status
for Salvadorans in the U.S. nor remittance flows from the U.S. to El
Salvador would be affected by the outcome of the election. From the
Committee website:
Congressman Howard L. Berman (D-CA), chairman of the House
Foreign Affairs Committee, issued the following statement in response
to comments made by members of Congress, widely reported in the El
Salvador media on the eve of elections there, that both Temporary
Protected Status (TPS) for Salvadorans in the U.S. and remittance
flows from the U.S. to El Salvador may be in jeopardy depending on the
outcome of the El Salvador elections to be held this Sunday:"Sunday's election belongs to the people of El Salvador. As Chairman
of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, I am confident that neither
TPS nor the right to receive remittances from family in the United
States will be affected by the outcome of the election, despite what
some of my colleagues in Congress have said."
Last week, Rep. Raul Grijalva and more than 30 Members of Congress asked
the Obama Administration for a high-level affirmation of US
neutrality. Until today, there had been no high-level response.
The need for such affirmation - which should have come earlier - was
made painfully obvious by the dirty
tricks of Congressional Republicans this week.
Tuesday March 10:
El Salvador's largest circulating daily, the Diario de
Hoy, published news of a letter signed by over 40 Republicans in
Congress, denouncing the FMLN and warning of their links to Venezuela
and Cuba. The letter expresses "grave concern that a victory by the
FMLN could make links between El Salvador and the regimes of
Venezuela, Iran and Cuba, and other states that promote terrorism, and
also with other non-democratic regimes and terrorist
organizations."
Wednesday March 11:
Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ):
"Should the pro-terrorist FMLN party replace the current
government in El Salvador, the United States, in the interests of
national security, would be required to reevaluate our policy toward
El Salvador, including cash remittance and immigration policies to
compensate for the fact there will no longer be a reliable counterpart
in the Salvadoran government."
Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN):
"Those monies that are coming from here to there I am
confident will be cut, and I hope the people of El Salvador are aware
of that because it will have a tremendous impact on individuals and
their economy." Indeed, these threats carry considerable weight for
Salvadoran voters, as 25% of the Salvadoran population lives in the
U.S., and 20% of the nation's economy consists of remittances from
those family members."
Rep.
Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA):
El Salvador's election is on Sunday. If an ally of
Al-Qaeda and Iran comes to power in El Salvador, the national security
interests of the United States will require certain immigration
restrictions and controls over the flow of the $4 billion in annual
remittances sent from the U.S. back home to El Salvador.
These threats were trumpeted in Salvadoran media. Here's
the front page of Diario de Hoy.
What remains to be seen is how widely Friday's affirmations of U.S.
neutrality will be reported in El Salvador, where the private media
are overwhelmingly and openly biased in their reporting in support of
the right-wing government.