I Hope Obama Jumps the Right Way on Canada's Tar Sands
One story, two contradictory reports.
The first, on Bloomberg news,
suggests that ahead of a meeting with Canada's prime minister, Barack
Obama believes the US's northern neighbour can green its tar sands,
becoming compatible with his clean energy revolution.
The second, in Nature,
suggests that his environmental measures will destroy tar sands
production - which mostly supplies the US - by making it prohibitively
expensive to sell south of the border.
I think you can probably
guess which outcome I'm hoping for. For the sake of argument, let's
accept the following improbable propositions:
1
That the Albertan tar sands operation can adopt universal carbon
capture and storage, cutting the emissions from processing the fuel by
80-90%.
2 That this can be done so cheaply that tar production remains economically viable.
3 That it can happen quickly enough to help prevent global climate breakdown.
This
still leaves us with two intractable problems. The first is that even
if the extraction and processing of tar sands produces scarcely more
carbon than the production of ordinary petroleum, the stuff will still
be burnt in cars, and there's no foreseeable carbon capture and storage
technology which can deal with that. We will have a chance of
preventing full-scale climate breakdown only if we reduce the amount of
fossil fuel we take out of the ground.
The second is that carbon pollution is just one of the impacts of tar sands production. The strip-mining
destroys vast tracts of forest and wetland. The processing poisons
great volumes of water, which sit in ever-growing toxic lagoons, or are
flushed down the rivers, at potential hazard to both wildlife and human
health. You have only to see some pictures of these operations to
recognise that there can be no such thing as clean tar sands, just as -
when all the impacts are taken into account - there is no such thing as
clean coal.
Alberta's
oil production ensures that Canada is trashing its own environment, and
is further from meeting its Kyoto commitments than any other country
that has ratified the treaty. Its government has no intention of
closing the Alberta tar patch. Let's hope Obama jumps the right way
when he meets Canadian PM Stephen Harper today, and ensures that this
industry becomes impossible to sustain.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
One story, two contradictory reports.
The first, on Bloomberg news,
suggests that ahead of a meeting with Canada's prime minister, Barack
Obama believes the US's northern neighbour can green its tar sands,
becoming compatible with his clean energy revolution.
The second, in Nature,
suggests that his environmental measures will destroy tar sands
production - which mostly supplies the US - by making it prohibitively
expensive to sell south of the border.
I think you can probably
guess which outcome I'm hoping for. For the sake of argument, let's
accept the following improbable propositions:
1
That the Albertan tar sands operation can adopt universal carbon
capture and storage, cutting the emissions from processing the fuel by
80-90%.
2 That this can be done so cheaply that tar production remains economically viable.
3 That it can happen quickly enough to help prevent global climate breakdown.
This
still leaves us with two intractable problems. The first is that even
if the extraction and processing of tar sands produces scarcely more
carbon than the production of ordinary petroleum, the stuff will still
be burnt in cars, and there's no foreseeable carbon capture and storage
technology which can deal with that. We will have a chance of
preventing full-scale climate breakdown only if we reduce the amount of
fossil fuel we take out of the ground.
The second is that carbon pollution is just one of the impacts of tar sands production. The strip-mining
destroys vast tracts of forest and wetland. The processing poisons
great volumes of water, which sit in ever-growing toxic lagoons, or are
flushed down the rivers, at potential hazard to both wildlife and human
health. You have only to see some pictures of these operations to
recognise that there can be no such thing as clean tar sands, just as -
when all the impacts are taken into account - there is no such thing as
clean coal.
Alberta's
oil production ensures that Canada is trashing its own environment, and
is further from meeting its Kyoto commitments than any other country
that has ratified the treaty. Its government has no intention of
closing the Alberta tar patch. Let's hope Obama jumps the right way
when he meets Canadian PM Stephen Harper today, and ensures that this
industry becomes impossible to sustain.
One story, two contradictory reports.
The first, on Bloomberg news,
suggests that ahead of a meeting with Canada's prime minister, Barack
Obama believes the US's northern neighbour can green its tar sands,
becoming compatible with his clean energy revolution.
The second, in Nature,
suggests that his environmental measures will destroy tar sands
production - which mostly supplies the US - by making it prohibitively
expensive to sell south of the border.
I think you can probably
guess which outcome I'm hoping for. For the sake of argument, let's
accept the following improbable propositions:
1
That the Albertan tar sands operation can adopt universal carbon
capture and storage, cutting the emissions from processing the fuel by
80-90%.
2 That this can be done so cheaply that tar production remains economically viable.
3 That it can happen quickly enough to help prevent global climate breakdown.
This
still leaves us with two intractable problems. The first is that even
if the extraction and processing of tar sands produces scarcely more
carbon than the production of ordinary petroleum, the stuff will still
be burnt in cars, and there's no foreseeable carbon capture and storage
technology which can deal with that. We will have a chance of
preventing full-scale climate breakdown only if we reduce the amount of
fossil fuel we take out of the ground.
The second is that carbon pollution is just one of the impacts of tar sands production. The strip-mining
destroys vast tracts of forest and wetland. The processing poisons
great volumes of water, which sit in ever-growing toxic lagoons, or are
flushed down the rivers, at potential hazard to both wildlife and human
health. You have only to see some pictures of these operations to
recognise that there can be no such thing as clean tar sands, just as -
when all the impacts are taken into account - there is no such thing as
clean coal.
Alberta's
oil production ensures that Canada is trashing its own environment, and
is further from meeting its Kyoto commitments than any other country
that has ratified the treaty. Its government has no intention of
closing the Alberta tar patch. Let's hope Obama jumps the right way
when he meets Canadian PM Stephen Harper today, and ensures that this
industry becomes impossible to sustain.