Jan 15, 2009
Somehow, a man with three names has been reduced to four words. Say Martin Luther King Jr and the phrase "I have a dream" comes to mind as if that sums up his life or his relevance to the events swirling around his memory next week in Washington with the inauguration of Barack Obama who many mistake as his spiritual son.
As the nation marks King's birthday, and as he is elevated to the pantheon of officially sanctioned heroes, many forget that he was a man who led a movement, who never sought office, and whose contribution was as a teacher of moral laws and an activist in righteous struggles. We mark his birthday only because so many fought for it. We mark it in recognition of the spirit of Stevie Wonder's birthday song and Nina Simone's sad lament.
The movement that King led is, in fact, still alive and meeting as a shell of its former self in New York this week at a Summit organized in New York by Jesse Jackson, one of his disciples. There is a discussion on the economy and how its collapse is impacting on the people King gave his life for, like the striking garbagemen of Memphis.
It is also battling to redefine its program at a time when activists have moved from the streets to digital platforms, from face to face to Facebook, from tumult to Twitter, from agitation in the streets to deal making in the suites.
Jackson, of course knows about this divide and tried to cross it boldly in 1984 and 1988 in two historic Presidential campaigns that shook up the Democratic Party, won primaries, and party rule changes that permitted the proportional allocation of primary votes that enabled Obama's victories.
Just as Barack reached into fellow organizer's Cesar Chavez's tool kit for the phrase "Si Se Puede!" (Yes We Can!), Jesse's living legacy is a largely unacknowledged building block in the chain of history that has taken us to this point. His tears at the victory rally in Chicago were connected to a history that our media often buries.
I spoke to Jesse for a film I am making with Videovision's Anant Singh about the Obama campaign. I asked him about what was going through his mind on that joyous night in Grant Park where many heads were broken by the police back in 1968.
"Really, it was two things," he told me. "It was the draw of the moment. In my mind's eye, I saw martyrs, whose caskets I walked behind, and friends with whom I worked who are somewhere in poverty or dead. Children in villages of Kenya, Haiti, who could not afford a television,or somewhere around some radio, hoping that there'd be this great redemptive, transformative breakthrough.
So it was the draw of that moment, and most of the people I knew who live down in the Alabama or Mississippi who made this moment happen couldn't afford to be there. And I felt them. And it was also a journey, the journey to get us there."
Memories flooded in, and he spoke with an almost stream of consciousness:
"I was jailed trying to use a public library along with seven of my classmates. We couldn't take a picture in the state capitol, but dogs could. Many of us kill about the right to vote. James Meredith shot ... Two Jews were killed because they were seen as meddling in Mississippi politics. Reverend James Reeve, Jimmy Lee Jackson, these people, these mostly nameless, faceless maters, they made the big part of it possible. And often those who make the big part possible, are not invited to the party. They can't afford to come to the party.
"And I wept again for them, because I wanted them to be there and I thought that if Doctor came, Chavez maybe just be there for a moment in time, and I just kept thinking about Martin Luther King, just like. . . if they were just there for a moment in time, my whole life would have been fulfilled. So I was thinking about the joy and the journey. That kind of took me to a level of ecstasy and joy."
This was not a history referenced by most commentators in covering the Obama campaign.
There is a complicated tension between civil rights leaders and President-elect Obama. Their difference is more about how change can made - will it all come from the inside through an inherently conservative, compromised and bureaucratic political process or does their need to be pressure from the outside at the grass roots or "street heat" as one of the Reverend's supporters put it?
Is the Movement model fashioned by King and civil rights organization calling for activism still needed or is it passe? Is there still a need and role for the Reverend Jackson?
With Obama mounting a charm offensive to neutralize enemies and seduce opponents on the right, it seems as if he is running away from progressive supporters. After he met with hard right commentators, Katrina vanden Heuvel, editor of the Nation, the first publication to endorse Jackson years back, asked why progressive supporters are being ignored.
Obama came out of the Saul Alinsky tradition of community organizing. While Alinsky's most famous book was called Reveille For Radicals, by the time I met and worked with him in a real organizing school in 1965, he had become a reformer and pragmatist, quiet on the Vietnam war, solicitous of liberal Democrats and hostile to student movements.
Jesse Jackson remains an organizer in the more big tent Movement tradition. He was preaching rainbow for decades before Obama made the idea jell politically.
PUSH is an acronym for People United to Save Humanity, and is firmly pro-peace and pro-economic justice. Obama has so far been eloquent at tapping movement rhetoric, but he seems distant, even dismissive, of movement culture. Many of his most devoted backers, want to know if he is married to promoting change or just shucking and jiving. Will he remain an advocate for transforming the system or a prisoner of power? Will he turn his back on King's commitment to non-violence, or has he already?
Can the Obama generation and the King-Jackson culture, one with an outside-in strategy the other inside-out merge or are they inherently in conflict? Will Barack give his predecessors the props they deserve? Can the fight for change that both Jackson and Obama embrace work on many levels? If Barack can reconcile with Republicans, why not with the long marchers of the Rainbow?
These are questions that will soon be be tested in a new Administration that gets underway in less than a week.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Danny Schechter
Danny Schechter, 'The News Dissector', was an American television producer, independent filmmaker, blogger, and media critic. He wrote and spoke about many issues including apartheid, civil rights, economics, foreign policy, journalistic control and ethics, and medicine. He was the author of many books including "Media Wars: News at a Time of Terror," "Madiba A to Z: The Many Faces of Nelson Mandela," and "When News Lies: Media Complicity and the Iraq War." Schechter died of pancreatic cancer on March 19, 2015 in New York City.
Somehow, a man with three names has been reduced to four words. Say Martin Luther King Jr and the phrase "I have a dream" comes to mind as if that sums up his life or his relevance to the events swirling around his memory next week in Washington with the inauguration of Barack Obama who many mistake as his spiritual son.
As the nation marks King's birthday, and as he is elevated to the pantheon of officially sanctioned heroes, many forget that he was a man who led a movement, who never sought office, and whose contribution was as a teacher of moral laws and an activist in righteous struggles. We mark his birthday only because so many fought for it. We mark it in recognition of the spirit of Stevie Wonder's birthday song and Nina Simone's sad lament.
The movement that King led is, in fact, still alive and meeting as a shell of its former self in New York this week at a Summit organized in New York by Jesse Jackson, one of his disciples. There is a discussion on the economy and how its collapse is impacting on the people King gave his life for, like the striking garbagemen of Memphis.
It is also battling to redefine its program at a time when activists have moved from the streets to digital platforms, from face to face to Facebook, from tumult to Twitter, from agitation in the streets to deal making in the suites.
Jackson, of course knows about this divide and tried to cross it boldly in 1984 and 1988 in two historic Presidential campaigns that shook up the Democratic Party, won primaries, and party rule changes that permitted the proportional allocation of primary votes that enabled Obama's victories.
Just as Barack reached into fellow organizer's Cesar Chavez's tool kit for the phrase "Si Se Puede!" (Yes We Can!), Jesse's living legacy is a largely unacknowledged building block in the chain of history that has taken us to this point. His tears at the victory rally in Chicago were connected to a history that our media often buries.
I spoke to Jesse for a film I am making with Videovision's Anant Singh about the Obama campaign. I asked him about what was going through his mind on that joyous night in Grant Park where many heads were broken by the police back in 1968.
"Really, it was two things," he told me. "It was the draw of the moment. In my mind's eye, I saw martyrs, whose caskets I walked behind, and friends with whom I worked who are somewhere in poverty or dead. Children in villages of Kenya, Haiti, who could not afford a television,or somewhere around some radio, hoping that there'd be this great redemptive, transformative breakthrough.
So it was the draw of that moment, and most of the people I knew who live down in the Alabama or Mississippi who made this moment happen couldn't afford to be there. And I felt them. And it was also a journey, the journey to get us there."
Memories flooded in, and he spoke with an almost stream of consciousness:
"I was jailed trying to use a public library along with seven of my classmates. We couldn't take a picture in the state capitol, but dogs could. Many of us kill about the right to vote. James Meredith shot ... Two Jews were killed because they were seen as meddling in Mississippi politics. Reverend James Reeve, Jimmy Lee Jackson, these people, these mostly nameless, faceless maters, they made the big part of it possible. And often those who make the big part possible, are not invited to the party. They can't afford to come to the party.
"And I wept again for them, because I wanted them to be there and I thought that if Doctor came, Chavez maybe just be there for a moment in time, and I just kept thinking about Martin Luther King, just like. . . if they were just there for a moment in time, my whole life would have been fulfilled. So I was thinking about the joy and the journey. That kind of took me to a level of ecstasy and joy."
This was not a history referenced by most commentators in covering the Obama campaign.
There is a complicated tension between civil rights leaders and President-elect Obama. Their difference is more about how change can made - will it all come from the inside through an inherently conservative, compromised and bureaucratic political process or does their need to be pressure from the outside at the grass roots or "street heat" as one of the Reverend's supporters put it?
Is the Movement model fashioned by King and civil rights organization calling for activism still needed or is it passe? Is there still a need and role for the Reverend Jackson?
With Obama mounting a charm offensive to neutralize enemies and seduce opponents on the right, it seems as if he is running away from progressive supporters. After he met with hard right commentators, Katrina vanden Heuvel, editor of the Nation, the first publication to endorse Jackson years back, asked why progressive supporters are being ignored.
Obama came out of the Saul Alinsky tradition of community organizing. While Alinsky's most famous book was called Reveille For Radicals, by the time I met and worked with him in a real organizing school in 1965, he had become a reformer and pragmatist, quiet on the Vietnam war, solicitous of liberal Democrats and hostile to student movements.
Jesse Jackson remains an organizer in the more big tent Movement tradition. He was preaching rainbow for decades before Obama made the idea jell politically.
PUSH is an acronym for People United to Save Humanity, and is firmly pro-peace and pro-economic justice. Obama has so far been eloquent at tapping movement rhetoric, but he seems distant, even dismissive, of movement culture. Many of his most devoted backers, want to know if he is married to promoting change or just shucking and jiving. Will he remain an advocate for transforming the system or a prisoner of power? Will he turn his back on King's commitment to non-violence, or has he already?
Can the Obama generation and the King-Jackson culture, one with an outside-in strategy the other inside-out merge or are they inherently in conflict? Will Barack give his predecessors the props they deserve? Can the fight for change that both Jackson and Obama embrace work on many levels? If Barack can reconcile with Republicans, why not with the long marchers of the Rainbow?
These are questions that will soon be be tested in a new Administration that gets underway in less than a week.
Danny Schechter
Danny Schechter, 'The News Dissector', was an American television producer, independent filmmaker, blogger, and media critic. He wrote and spoke about many issues including apartheid, civil rights, economics, foreign policy, journalistic control and ethics, and medicine. He was the author of many books including "Media Wars: News at a Time of Terror," "Madiba A to Z: The Many Faces of Nelson Mandela," and "When News Lies: Media Complicity and the Iraq War." Schechter died of pancreatic cancer on March 19, 2015 in New York City.
Somehow, a man with three names has been reduced to four words. Say Martin Luther King Jr and the phrase "I have a dream" comes to mind as if that sums up his life or his relevance to the events swirling around his memory next week in Washington with the inauguration of Barack Obama who many mistake as his spiritual son.
As the nation marks King's birthday, and as he is elevated to the pantheon of officially sanctioned heroes, many forget that he was a man who led a movement, who never sought office, and whose contribution was as a teacher of moral laws and an activist in righteous struggles. We mark his birthday only because so many fought for it. We mark it in recognition of the spirit of Stevie Wonder's birthday song and Nina Simone's sad lament.
The movement that King led is, in fact, still alive and meeting as a shell of its former self in New York this week at a Summit organized in New York by Jesse Jackson, one of his disciples. There is a discussion on the economy and how its collapse is impacting on the people King gave his life for, like the striking garbagemen of Memphis.
It is also battling to redefine its program at a time when activists have moved from the streets to digital platforms, from face to face to Facebook, from tumult to Twitter, from agitation in the streets to deal making in the suites.
Jackson, of course knows about this divide and tried to cross it boldly in 1984 and 1988 in two historic Presidential campaigns that shook up the Democratic Party, won primaries, and party rule changes that permitted the proportional allocation of primary votes that enabled Obama's victories.
Just as Barack reached into fellow organizer's Cesar Chavez's tool kit for the phrase "Si Se Puede!" (Yes We Can!), Jesse's living legacy is a largely unacknowledged building block in the chain of history that has taken us to this point. His tears at the victory rally in Chicago were connected to a history that our media often buries.
I spoke to Jesse for a film I am making with Videovision's Anant Singh about the Obama campaign. I asked him about what was going through his mind on that joyous night in Grant Park where many heads were broken by the police back in 1968.
"Really, it was two things," he told me. "It was the draw of the moment. In my mind's eye, I saw martyrs, whose caskets I walked behind, and friends with whom I worked who are somewhere in poverty or dead. Children in villages of Kenya, Haiti, who could not afford a television,or somewhere around some radio, hoping that there'd be this great redemptive, transformative breakthrough.
So it was the draw of that moment, and most of the people I knew who live down in the Alabama or Mississippi who made this moment happen couldn't afford to be there. And I felt them. And it was also a journey, the journey to get us there."
Memories flooded in, and he spoke with an almost stream of consciousness:
"I was jailed trying to use a public library along with seven of my classmates. We couldn't take a picture in the state capitol, but dogs could. Many of us kill about the right to vote. James Meredith shot ... Two Jews were killed because they were seen as meddling in Mississippi politics. Reverend James Reeve, Jimmy Lee Jackson, these people, these mostly nameless, faceless maters, they made the big part of it possible. And often those who make the big part possible, are not invited to the party. They can't afford to come to the party.
"And I wept again for them, because I wanted them to be there and I thought that if Doctor came, Chavez maybe just be there for a moment in time, and I just kept thinking about Martin Luther King, just like. . . if they were just there for a moment in time, my whole life would have been fulfilled. So I was thinking about the joy and the journey. That kind of took me to a level of ecstasy and joy."
This was not a history referenced by most commentators in covering the Obama campaign.
There is a complicated tension between civil rights leaders and President-elect Obama. Their difference is more about how change can made - will it all come from the inside through an inherently conservative, compromised and bureaucratic political process or does their need to be pressure from the outside at the grass roots or "street heat" as one of the Reverend's supporters put it?
Is the Movement model fashioned by King and civil rights organization calling for activism still needed or is it passe? Is there still a need and role for the Reverend Jackson?
With Obama mounting a charm offensive to neutralize enemies and seduce opponents on the right, it seems as if he is running away from progressive supporters. After he met with hard right commentators, Katrina vanden Heuvel, editor of the Nation, the first publication to endorse Jackson years back, asked why progressive supporters are being ignored.
Obama came out of the Saul Alinsky tradition of community organizing. While Alinsky's most famous book was called Reveille For Radicals, by the time I met and worked with him in a real organizing school in 1965, he had become a reformer and pragmatist, quiet on the Vietnam war, solicitous of liberal Democrats and hostile to student movements.
Jesse Jackson remains an organizer in the more big tent Movement tradition. He was preaching rainbow for decades before Obama made the idea jell politically.
PUSH is an acronym for People United to Save Humanity, and is firmly pro-peace and pro-economic justice. Obama has so far been eloquent at tapping movement rhetoric, but he seems distant, even dismissive, of movement culture. Many of his most devoted backers, want to know if he is married to promoting change or just shucking and jiving. Will he remain an advocate for transforming the system or a prisoner of power? Will he turn his back on King's commitment to non-violence, or has he already?
Can the Obama generation and the King-Jackson culture, one with an outside-in strategy the other inside-out merge or are they inherently in conflict? Will Barack give his predecessors the props they deserve? Can the fight for change that both Jackson and Obama embrace work on many levels? If Barack can reconcile with Republicans, why not with the long marchers of the Rainbow?
These are questions that will soon be be tested in a new Administration that gets underway in less than a week.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.