SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As the big-time political pundits pick over the point spread and exit polls of the Iowa caucuses, they eventually will stumble upon what I consider the most interesting story there: The re-emergence of engaged young adults.
The statistics on the Democratic side are nothing less than startling. According to CNN's exit (and entrance) polls, Barack Obama took 57 percent of the 18- to 29-year-old vote compared to 11 percent for his chief rival, Hillary Clinton. He took 41 percent of the votes of first time caucus goers, a dozen points more than any of his rivals. On the Republican side, Mike Huckabee outpolled Mitt Romney nearly 2-1 among the youngest group of voters.
Even considering all the caveats -- a caucus draws far fewer voters overall than a primary and Iowa is a small place to begin with -- these figures suggest something is stirring out there.
"The huge difference was that we had the greatest organization ever built in this state," Obama's chief strategist, David Axelrod, told The New York Times. "And it was built on the backs of idealistic kids who came in here not just because they believed in Obama, but they wanted to change the course of history and the world."
Passionate youth are nothing new to politics. Just four years ago, the tech savvy Deaniacs ushered in the era of big-time online fund-raising and this election cycle Ron Paul's kiddie corps has harvested millions. But translating the passion to votes is another matter. Just ask Howard Dean. In Round 1, anyway, Obama converted the passion to action.
If he continues to succeed at this, his story may yet be the biggest since two brothers named Kennedy crashed the political scene in the 1960s. That's because, at least on the surface, it is irony, not hope, that has characterized my children's and students' generation.
Forgive my narrow-mindedness, but it seems their biggest contribution to American culture to date has been one word -- "whatever." My two daughters wielded it with such wicked delight in their teens that it made me secretly want to throttle them. Now my peers and I now use it regularly as well.
Barack Obama's message is the antithesis of "whatever." He is a man who prides himself in his capacity to engage anyone, friend or foe. He is, he tells followers at every opportunity, "fired up, ready to go." With his big ears and slightly goofy smile, he is the antithesis of cool, the geeky guy who in the end turns out to be cool because he so isn't.
But perhaps, as with all political movements, in the end it's not merely about the man, not about his call for change, not about the ascendancy of a new, race-neutral political America. Perhaps this time, "it's the voters, stupid." Young voters.
Certainly the sweep of Obama's support in Iowa, driven by young, single, first-time caucus goers, at least suggests that in this deconstructionist, create-your-own reality, there-is-no-truth era of deeply cynical politics and personal life, idealism is showing signs of a comeback.
Whatever.
No. Make that, I hope so.
Jerry Lanson is an associate professor of journalism at Emerson College in Boston. His blog can be found at https://makingsenseofnews.blogspot.com
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As the big-time political pundits pick over the point spread and exit polls of the Iowa caucuses, they eventually will stumble upon what I consider the most interesting story there: The re-emergence of engaged young adults.
The statistics on the Democratic side are nothing less than startling. According to CNN's exit (and entrance) polls, Barack Obama took 57 percent of the 18- to 29-year-old vote compared to 11 percent for his chief rival, Hillary Clinton. He took 41 percent of the votes of first time caucus goers, a dozen points more than any of his rivals. On the Republican side, Mike Huckabee outpolled Mitt Romney nearly 2-1 among the youngest group of voters.
Even considering all the caveats -- a caucus draws far fewer voters overall than a primary and Iowa is a small place to begin with -- these figures suggest something is stirring out there.
"The huge difference was that we had the greatest organization ever built in this state," Obama's chief strategist, David Axelrod, told The New York Times. "And it was built on the backs of idealistic kids who came in here not just because they believed in Obama, but they wanted to change the course of history and the world."
Passionate youth are nothing new to politics. Just four years ago, the tech savvy Deaniacs ushered in the era of big-time online fund-raising and this election cycle Ron Paul's kiddie corps has harvested millions. But translating the passion to votes is another matter. Just ask Howard Dean. In Round 1, anyway, Obama converted the passion to action.
If he continues to succeed at this, his story may yet be the biggest since two brothers named Kennedy crashed the political scene in the 1960s. That's because, at least on the surface, it is irony, not hope, that has characterized my children's and students' generation.
Forgive my narrow-mindedness, but it seems their biggest contribution to American culture to date has been one word -- "whatever." My two daughters wielded it with such wicked delight in their teens that it made me secretly want to throttle them. Now my peers and I now use it regularly as well.
Barack Obama's message is the antithesis of "whatever." He is a man who prides himself in his capacity to engage anyone, friend or foe. He is, he tells followers at every opportunity, "fired up, ready to go." With his big ears and slightly goofy smile, he is the antithesis of cool, the geeky guy who in the end turns out to be cool because he so isn't.
But perhaps, as with all political movements, in the end it's not merely about the man, not about his call for change, not about the ascendancy of a new, race-neutral political America. Perhaps this time, "it's the voters, stupid." Young voters.
Certainly the sweep of Obama's support in Iowa, driven by young, single, first-time caucus goers, at least suggests that in this deconstructionist, create-your-own reality, there-is-no-truth era of deeply cynical politics and personal life, idealism is showing signs of a comeback.
Whatever.
No. Make that, I hope so.
Jerry Lanson is an associate professor of journalism at Emerson College in Boston. His blog can be found at https://makingsenseofnews.blogspot.com
As the big-time political pundits pick over the point spread and exit polls of the Iowa caucuses, they eventually will stumble upon what I consider the most interesting story there: The re-emergence of engaged young adults.
The statistics on the Democratic side are nothing less than startling. According to CNN's exit (and entrance) polls, Barack Obama took 57 percent of the 18- to 29-year-old vote compared to 11 percent for his chief rival, Hillary Clinton. He took 41 percent of the votes of first time caucus goers, a dozen points more than any of his rivals. On the Republican side, Mike Huckabee outpolled Mitt Romney nearly 2-1 among the youngest group of voters.
Even considering all the caveats -- a caucus draws far fewer voters overall than a primary and Iowa is a small place to begin with -- these figures suggest something is stirring out there.
"The huge difference was that we had the greatest organization ever built in this state," Obama's chief strategist, David Axelrod, told The New York Times. "And it was built on the backs of idealistic kids who came in here not just because they believed in Obama, but they wanted to change the course of history and the world."
Passionate youth are nothing new to politics. Just four years ago, the tech savvy Deaniacs ushered in the era of big-time online fund-raising and this election cycle Ron Paul's kiddie corps has harvested millions. But translating the passion to votes is another matter. Just ask Howard Dean. In Round 1, anyway, Obama converted the passion to action.
If he continues to succeed at this, his story may yet be the biggest since two brothers named Kennedy crashed the political scene in the 1960s. That's because, at least on the surface, it is irony, not hope, that has characterized my children's and students' generation.
Forgive my narrow-mindedness, but it seems their biggest contribution to American culture to date has been one word -- "whatever." My two daughters wielded it with such wicked delight in their teens that it made me secretly want to throttle them. Now my peers and I now use it regularly as well.
Barack Obama's message is the antithesis of "whatever." He is a man who prides himself in his capacity to engage anyone, friend or foe. He is, he tells followers at every opportunity, "fired up, ready to go." With his big ears and slightly goofy smile, he is the antithesis of cool, the geeky guy who in the end turns out to be cool because he so isn't.
But perhaps, as with all political movements, in the end it's not merely about the man, not about his call for change, not about the ascendancy of a new, race-neutral political America. Perhaps this time, "it's the voters, stupid." Young voters.
Certainly the sweep of Obama's support in Iowa, driven by young, single, first-time caucus goers, at least suggests that in this deconstructionist, create-your-own reality, there-is-no-truth era of deeply cynical politics and personal life, idealism is showing signs of a comeback.
Whatever.
No. Make that, I hope so.
Jerry Lanson is an associate professor of journalism at Emerson College in Boston. His blog can be found at https://makingsenseofnews.blogspot.com