SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A Pro-Impeachment Republican's Defense of Nancy Pelosi
Jul 12, 2007
Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan recently announced that she will run as an independent against Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, unless Pelosi moves to impeach President Bush within two weeks.Pelosi is going to do no such thing, and she probably has little to fear from Sheehan. Sheehan is superb at grand gestures, but Pelosi has a much better idea of what is necessary to get elected and to get things done in Washington, D.C.
Sheehan is mad because she thinks that the American involvement in Iraq will not end before January 20, 2009 unless the current administration is removed before then, and that impeachment is the only legitimate way this can be done. And she is mad at Pelosi because the Speaker has refused to lead an impeachment movement in the House of Representatives.
From my perspective as a life-long Republican who supports impeachment, Pelosi has done the right thing. Conviction on an impeachment takes two thirds of the Senate and will require support from both parties. Of course, to produce the desired results, any impeachment would have to include both the President and Vice President Cheney. Since Bush and Cheney are Republicans, a bipartisan impeachment process must be started by Republicans in the House of Representatives, not by Democrats, and least of all by Pelosi, whose legitimacy as President after Bush and Cheney are removed must be protected at all costs.
Sheehan's fundamental mistake is to target her complaints at congressional Democrats. This mistake is natural enough, since the Democrats are closer to her own position on the war. And it is a widely shared mistake, since virtually all calls for impeachment have been addressed to Democrats and to Democratic politicians. This is such a common mistake in politics that there is a special term we use to refer to it: "preaching to the choir."
The actual targets of any successful impeachment movement will have to be Republicans and Republican politicians. When seeking political allies, one does not worry too much about what motivates people to cooperate, and there are various motives---noble and otherwise---that might attract Republican leaders to an impeachment movement. Some might join up for policy reasons, having concluded that the Iraq war is lost and it is crazy to continue it until January 2009. Some might support impeachment in order to save the Republican Party from probable disaster, given the Iraq war's great unpopularity. Some might even support impeachment in order to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming the first woman President!
More and more prominent Republicans have been pulling back from their support for the Bush-Cheney war policies. Senators Smith and Hagel have now been joined by Senators Lugar, ranking Republican member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Voinovich, and Domenici. It would probably take about twenty Republican Senators, added to most Democratic ones, to get a two-thirds vote for conviction in the Senate.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Paul F. Delespinasse
Paul F. deLespinasse, who now lives in Oregon, is professor emeritus of political science at Adrian College in Michigan. He can be reached via his website, www.deLespinasse.org.
Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan recently announced that she will run as an independent against Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, unless Pelosi moves to impeach President Bush within two weeks.Pelosi is going to do no such thing, and she probably has little to fear from Sheehan. Sheehan is superb at grand gestures, but Pelosi has a much better idea of what is necessary to get elected and to get things done in Washington, D.C.
Sheehan is mad because she thinks that the American involvement in Iraq will not end before January 20, 2009 unless the current administration is removed before then, and that impeachment is the only legitimate way this can be done. And she is mad at Pelosi because the Speaker has refused to lead an impeachment movement in the House of Representatives.
From my perspective as a life-long Republican who supports impeachment, Pelosi has done the right thing. Conviction on an impeachment takes two thirds of the Senate and will require support from both parties. Of course, to produce the desired results, any impeachment would have to include both the President and Vice President Cheney. Since Bush and Cheney are Republicans, a bipartisan impeachment process must be started by Republicans in the House of Representatives, not by Democrats, and least of all by Pelosi, whose legitimacy as President after Bush and Cheney are removed must be protected at all costs.
Sheehan's fundamental mistake is to target her complaints at congressional Democrats. This mistake is natural enough, since the Democrats are closer to her own position on the war. And it is a widely shared mistake, since virtually all calls for impeachment have been addressed to Democrats and to Democratic politicians. This is such a common mistake in politics that there is a special term we use to refer to it: "preaching to the choir."
The actual targets of any successful impeachment movement will have to be Republicans and Republican politicians. When seeking political allies, one does not worry too much about what motivates people to cooperate, and there are various motives---noble and otherwise---that might attract Republican leaders to an impeachment movement. Some might join up for policy reasons, having concluded that the Iraq war is lost and it is crazy to continue it until January 2009. Some might support impeachment in order to save the Republican Party from probable disaster, given the Iraq war's great unpopularity. Some might even support impeachment in order to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming the first woman President!
More and more prominent Republicans have been pulling back from their support for the Bush-Cheney war policies. Senators Smith and Hagel have now been joined by Senators Lugar, ranking Republican member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Voinovich, and Domenici. It would probably take about twenty Republican Senators, added to most Democratic ones, to get a two-thirds vote for conviction in the Senate.
Paul F. Delespinasse
Paul F. deLespinasse, who now lives in Oregon, is professor emeritus of political science at Adrian College in Michigan. He can be reached via his website, www.deLespinasse.org.
Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan recently announced that she will run as an independent against Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House, unless Pelosi moves to impeach President Bush within two weeks.Pelosi is going to do no such thing, and she probably has little to fear from Sheehan. Sheehan is superb at grand gestures, but Pelosi has a much better idea of what is necessary to get elected and to get things done in Washington, D.C.
Sheehan is mad because she thinks that the American involvement in Iraq will not end before January 20, 2009 unless the current administration is removed before then, and that impeachment is the only legitimate way this can be done. And she is mad at Pelosi because the Speaker has refused to lead an impeachment movement in the House of Representatives.
From my perspective as a life-long Republican who supports impeachment, Pelosi has done the right thing. Conviction on an impeachment takes two thirds of the Senate and will require support from both parties. Of course, to produce the desired results, any impeachment would have to include both the President and Vice President Cheney. Since Bush and Cheney are Republicans, a bipartisan impeachment process must be started by Republicans in the House of Representatives, not by Democrats, and least of all by Pelosi, whose legitimacy as President after Bush and Cheney are removed must be protected at all costs.
Sheehan's fundamental mistake is to target her complaints at congressional Democrats. This mistake is natural enough, since the Democrats are closer to her own position on the war. And it is a widely shared mistake, since virtually all calls for impeachment have been addressed to Democrats and to Democratic politicians. This is such a common mistake in politics that there is a special term we use to refer to it: "preaching to the choir."
The actual targets of any successful impeachment movement will have to be Republicans and Republican politicians. When seeking political allies, one does not worry too much about what motivates people to cooperate, and there are various motives---noble and otherwise---that might attract Republican leaders to an impeachment movement. Some might join up for policy reasons, having concluded that the Iraq war is lost and it is crazy to continue it until January 2009. Some might support impeachment in order to save the Republican Party from probable disaster, given the Iraq war's great unpopularity. Some might even support impeachment in order to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming the first woman President!
More and more prominent Republicans have been pulling back from their support for the Bush-Cheney war policies. Senators Smith and Hagel have now been joined by Senators Lugar, ranking Republican member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Voinovich, and Domenici. It would probably take about twenty Republican Senators, added to most Democratic ones, to get a two-thirds vote for conviction in the Senate.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy