

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
It may surprise many readers to know that producing enough food is not responsible for world hunger -- we already produce enough food to feed 10 billion people. Hunger is caused by economic inequality. Despite this fact, the farming industry often cites the need to feed a growing population to justify the use of toxic, synthetic chemicals used in conventional farming.
Rodale Institute's Farming System Trial has compared organic to conventional farming, side by side, for over 33 years. What we've found is that, in the long term, the yields are the same with organic performing 33 percent higher in years of drought. Looking only at yields, this means that organic can feed the world just as effectively as conventional. Looking beyond the singular issue of yields, it becomes clear that regenerative organic farming is indeed the only way to feed the world in a way that encourages global health, and especially economic equality - the true root of hunger.
"Rather than using synthetic fertilizers, organic farmers build the health of the soil using compost, crop rotations, cover crops and reduced tillage. Using biology rather than chemistry, organic farmers mimic natural systems to promote healthy soil as the foundation for healthy food and, ultimately, healthy people."
While organic farmers depend upon the resources found on their own farms, conventional farming depends heavily on 'external inputs,' which are items that need to be purchased from somewhere off of the farm such as fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and more. These products are manufactured and then transported to the farmer - creating pollution and increasing the costs of doing business for the farmer. Increasingly dependent on a system of external inputs, farmers find themselves paying more and more for their inputs, eating away at their profits.
Rather than using synthetic fertilizers, organic farmers build the health of the soil using compost, crop rotations, cover crops and reduced tillage. Using biology rather than chemistry, organic farmers mimic natural systems to promote healthy soil as the foundation for healthy food and, ultimately, healthy people.
The Farming Systems Trial also measured the economics and found organic farming more profitable than conventional. Of course, there are still price premiums for organic products, as the demand is currently higher than the supply - an added bonus for today's organic farmers. To see how the economics would compare even without that price premium, we removed it from the data and found that the numbers still favored the profitability of organic farms over conventional.
Beyond economics, there are clear environmental and health advantages of farming organically. However, as we focus our attention on hunger, we must remember that buying organic is about more than protecting our own bodies from harmful poisons. Working toward an organic planet helps to move those in poverty away from the very economic inequalities causing world hunger.
It is easy to forget that once upon a time all agriculture was organic, grassfed, and regenerative.
Seed saving, composting, fertilizing with manure, polycultures, no-till and raising livestock entirely on grass--all of which we associate today with sustainable food production--was the norm in the "old days" of merely a century ago. And somehow we managed to feed ourselves and do so in a manner that followed nature's model of regeneration.
It is easy to forget that once upon a time all agriculture was organic, grassfed, and regenerative.
Seed saving, composting, fertilizing with manure, polycultures, no-till and raising livestock entirely on grass--all of which we associate today with sustainable food production--was the norm in the "old days" of merely a century ago. And somehow we managed to feed ourselves and do so in a manner that followed nature's model of regeneration.
"Farming like water and soil and land matter. Farming like clean air matters. Farming like human health, animal health and ecosystem health matters."
We all know what happened next: the plow, the tractor, fossil fuels, monocrops, nitrogen fertilizer, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, feedlots, animal byproducts, e. coli, CAFOs, GMOs, erosion, despair--practices and conditions that most Americans today think of as "normal," when they think about agriculture at all.
Fortunately, a movement to rediscover and implement "old" practices of bygone days has risen rapidly, abetted by innovations in technology, breakthroughs in scientific knowledge, and tons of old-fashioned, on-the-ground problem-solving.
Take Dorn Cox, a young farmer in New Hampshire. He tossed away the plow, preferring to use no-till practices on his parent's organic farm, then he developed a biodiesel alternative to fossil fuels (his sister and her husband use draft animals). He also measures the carbon content of the soil through sophisticated technology, aiming to raise the content as high as possible. And he co-founded Farm Hack, an open-source, virtual cafe for young and beginning farmers. "Farming isn't rocket science," he often says, "It's more complicated than that."
Like Dorn, many young people in agriculture today are looking to the past and what they are discovering is this: nature's model works best. After all, nature has been using evolution and the laws of physics to beta-test what works for merely millions of years--billions in the case of photosynthesis. Humans are pipsqueaks and upstarts in this process by comparison and the idea that we know what's best is looking like a dangerous form of hubris. That's why a new generation of agrarians is returning to the roots of agriculture--combined with advances in science and social justice-- for a different approach.
Soil carbon is a good example. As gardeners know, building carbon stocks underground--the dark, rich soil called humus--via soil biology is critical to plant vigor, mineral uptake, and water availability. At the farm and ranch scale it helps prevent soil erosion. A short list of practices that build soil carbon include: cover crops, mulching, composting, low or no-till, and planned grazing of livestock.
Building humus is also a great way to sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in the soil for potentially long periods of time, which means "old" practices can address "new" challenges like climate change. Recently, the level of CO2 in the atmosphere rose past 400ppm for the first time in millions of years. However, it is possible to bring this level back down an old-fashioned way: with plant photosynthesis. Last spring, the Rodale Institute, a research and education nonprofit, released a white paper--entitled Regenerative Organic Agriculture and Climate Change: A Down-to-Earth Solution to Global Warming--which states boldly that we could sequester more than 100% of current annual CO2 emissions with a switch to soil-creating, inexpensive and effective organic agricultural methods.
Just a few years ago, the climate potential of soil carbon wasn't on anyone's radar screens, other than a few laboratories, soil scientists, and a handful of progressive farmers and ranchers. Now talk of soil carbon is everywhere. At a recent major grazing conference I attended, soil carbon was the most popular topic discussed (after cattle), with speaker after speaker extolling its virtues. And people are even talking now about slowing climate change with the stuff.
However, there are many obstacles to implementing these types of back-to-the-future solutions to food and climate challenges. Some are economic, but many are policy-based, which is why it is important to support groups like the Organic Consumers Association or the National Young Farmers Coalition in their efforts to create a policy environment that favors back-to-the-future farmers, ranchers, and eaters - which is all of us!
It all comes back to nature. I like the way the Rodale Institute put it recently: farming like the Earth matters. Farming like water and soil and land matter. Farming like clean air matters. Farming like human health, animal health and ecosystem health matters.
It all matters and regenerative practices are the way we'll get there.
This October, I took a walk. A walk that, I hoped, would change the way that we look a climate change and think about how we can reverse this disastrous phenomenon.
I walked to bring awareness to research proving that a global transition to regenerative organic agriculture can reverse climate change and to hand deliver this data to the United States Department of Agriculture.
This journey took me from the Rodale Institute in Kutztown, PA to USDA headquarters in Washington, DC. Along the way, I had the honor of meeting with farmers, local public officials, community members, students and activists. Every person I met was impacted by the effects of climate change. From the disastrous hail storm that occurred in Reading, PA earlier this year to the local fisherman and their concern that Atrazine was found in spawning beds of smallmouth bass in the Susquehanna River. Climate change affects us all and the impact and destruction caused by catastrophic weather events is more noticeable with each passing year.
"Ultimately, it is possible for the health of the entire planet to constantly improve, if the global community adopts the Regenerative approach."
On the sixteenth and final day of my walk, staff from the Institute joined me on the final leg into D.C. where we presented our white paper on reversing climate change to USDA experts on climate change, organic transition, and conservation. The meeting illuminated specific areas where Rodale Institute's research and perspective could be important contributions to the work of the USDA. For example, Rodale Institute will begin utilizing GRACEnet (Greenhouse gas Reduction through Agricultural Carbon Enhancement network) practices, a system of metrics for measuring carbon emissions and sequestration on agricultural lands. By adopting GRACEnet, Rodale Institute's research data will be 'in the same language' as USDA data.
This meeting also helped us to realize that we must strengthen the voice to bring global attention to this word in particular: 'reverse.' There has been plenty of talk from policy makers about reducing carbon emissions, but even if we reduce emissions, we will still face climate change due to immense excesses of carbon and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Only healthy soil has the capability to sequester these levels of carbon and actually begin to draw down those excesses to reverse the greenhouse gas effect. It's an elegantly simple solution based on photosynthesis and healthy.
We've added the word 'Regenerative' to the term 'Organic Agriculture' to drive home the idea of constant improvement. Regenerative not only describes methods of soil management which would result in constantly improving soil health, but the word also describes practices that communities could adopt which would result in constant improvement. Ultimately, it is possible for the health of the entire planet to constantly improve, if the global community adopts the Regenerative approach.
It is in this spirit of constant improvement that we focus on the next Walk for an Organic Planet. In 2015, we are excited to open up the Walk for an Organic Planet to farmers, local public officials, community members, students and activists in the United States. We want you to share in our journey and walk with us.
We will plan individual 'Organic Walks' in every state. Every group of Walkers will deliver the most up-to-date research from Rodale Institute to their policy makers. They will all help to raise funds for continued research and outreach that will benefit organic farmers. This self-improving cycle of funding more research and outreach will continue to strengthen the collective voice with which we call for this global transition to an Organic Planet.
There is one single goal, and every Walk, in every state, has the same destination: an Organic Planet. We will keep walking until we have an Organic Planet. Just as a garden maintained with regenerative organic practices will improve in soil health every year, the Walk for an Organic Planet is sure to constantly improve every year, bringing us that much closer to the reality of an Organic Planet.