Though history never repeats itself even as farce, it often seems to, as is currently the case in
France.
Riots have spread since the police killing of a French teenager of North African descent in the banlieue of Nanterre, after he allegedly refused to comply with an order to stop his car. According to video evidence and witness testimony, an officer threatened to shoot the youth "in the head" before firing his gun when the car took off.
This feels like a replay of the
2005 deaths of two young teens chased by police in another Parisian banlieue, which led to weeks of nationwide riots and a state of emergency imposed by the government.
The Nanterre incident, in which one officer has been
charged with voluntary homicide, also recalls the 2016 death in police custody of 24-year-old French African Adama Traore, who subsequently became a symbol of the brutality and racism of the French police—and more broadly of the French state—against ethnic minorities. His death launched a wave of protests and activism for racial justice.
Who could possibly claim with a straight face that the French state treats Islam and its practitioners the same as Christians or Jews?
In recent days, French citizens have again been subjected to a problem whose roots can be found in its colonial history: an obsessive fixation on the visibility not of "religion in the public space," as it is sometimes described, but of one religion only: Islam, whose practitioners are subjected to an ever-worsening
differential and unequal treatment, securitization policies, and state persecution, in full violation of France's professed values and constitutional guarantees.
These guarantees include equality before the law, freedom of religion, and the principle of
laïcité, which obligates the state to treat all religions on a strictly equal footing. But who could possibly claim with a straight face that the French state treats Islam and its practitioners the same as Christians or Jews?
Having previously banned "religious symbols" (read: Islamic ones) from public schools and burqas from public places, France is now in the midst of a new witch hunt against students wearing abayas in schools, on the grounds that they are "religious symbols" and thus fall under the 2004 law.
This has led to the usual hysterical accusations from the far right that these young girls are, if not "Islamist agents" seeking to topple the republic, at least "manipulated" by such groups, and that the Macron government is too soft on "Islamism."
Targeting Muslims
Competing for attention and headlines in the French news media, a new national debate around (and against) women's
Islamic dress is again targeting "visible Muslims," vilified as threats, "Islamists," or "radicals." The media narrative is using the same old rhetoric (such as the need to "protect French laïcité" and to fight against "political Islam"), and it continues to have deleterious effects on Muslims.
Is the French Republic truly so weak that a few hundred school teens wearing long dresses, amid millions of other French students, somehow represent an existential threat to the nation—and if we don't tackle this issue, "the Islamists will win" and we will soon be living in an
Islamic-State-style caliphate?
This new campaign is even more outrageous, given that the abaya has no specific religious meaning and is often a simple fashion choice allowing girls to distinguish themselves from their peers, perhaps out of rebellion against mainstream Western culture. Prominent French imams, highly respected theologians and the French Council of the Muslim Faith (the semi-official representative institution of Muslims in France) have made it clear that the abaya is
not a religious sign but a cultural choice.
Instead of developing inclusive policies and encouraging an open culture more congruent with the dramatic societal transformations of France in the postwar era, the country is doing the opposite: excluding, stigmatising, vilifying, repressing, and discriminating against people and groups who only want to be treated equally.
At the same time, another recent "controversy" has focused on female football players, who have been protesting against the French Football Federation's
ban on headscarves. They, too, have regularly been accused by the dominant media of being dangerous, subversive "Islamists" at war with the republic.
All these interrelated events—the Nanterre killing, the banlieue riots, and the ongoing quest to demonize Islam—are symptoms of the deep structural problems that the French government, mainstream media, and dominant culture have developed with "post-colonial" minorities in general, and in particular the largely disenfranchised and segregated populations in France's banlieues.
Instead of developing inclusive policies and encouraging an open culture more congruent with the dramatic
societal transformations of France in the postwar era, the country is doing the opposite: excluding, stigmatising, vilifying, repressing, and discriminating against people and groups who only want to be treated equally. This includes the right not to get unjustifiably killed by police, and not to be summoned to choose between sport and education, or freedom of religion and conscience.
In particular, the government's response to the Nanterre killing and ensuing riots—zealously echoed by the mainstream media in their "analysis" of these events—has been at its essence repressive, aiming solely to "restore order." None of the root causes of the protests is being addressed.
Police Brutality
Most shockingly, the Macron government continues to refuse to recognize France's deep police brutality problem, the systemic racism that plagues its "security" forces, and
institutional Islamophobia, however well documented these phenomena have been by scholars, activists, local associations, human rights groups, and inhabitants of marginalized neighbourhoods.
Last week, France was officially condemned twice in one day over police racism, brutality, and excessive force. The United Nations human rights office
urged France to address "deep issues of racism and discrimination in law enforcement." The same day, the International Trade Union Confederation severely condemned France for "police brutality," "blind arrests," and repeated violations of workers' rights.
Yet against all evidence—which includes the
shocking declarations of France's own police forces, whose fascistic elements have openly threatened to violently turn against the government itself—Macron and his government are continuing to ignore and deny.
This suggests the Macron government is now so weak and powerless that its own police forces can openly and publicly threaten it with insurrection and violence, and get away with it.
On the U.N. condemnation, it merely
declared that "any accusation of racism or systemic discrimination in the police force in France is totally unfounded," as it always does in such cases, which have become routine. This suggests the Macron government is now so weak and powerless that its own police forces can openly and publicly threaten it with insurrection and violence, and get away with it.
What we have here, in such systematic blindness, denial, and powerlessness, is not a repetition of history, but a country both unwilling and unable to even recognize, much less address, the root causes of recent events so that one day it may live up to its high ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity.
In the meantime, these have become increasingly vacuous words for Muslims and other minorities—and this is why the French streets are once again on fire.
