

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Eric Wingerter, Center for Economic & Policy Research eric@greenwingstrategies.com
“Full Employment for All” initiative timed to coincide with the 60th anniversary of MLK’s iconic Dream speech
Ten leading economic organizations today launched a national campaign to “create an economy of full employment for all regardless of race, gender or region.” The campaign, Full Employment for All, calls for a federal program for subsidized employment targeted toward communities that face high rates of joblessness even during periods when the national unemployment rate is low.
Launched on Martin Luther King Day, Full Employment for All is timed to coincide with the sixtieth anniversary year of Dr. King’s Iconic “I Have a Dream” speech from the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom.
“Like in 1963, national employment numbers are relatively high, but those aggregate numbers can be deceiving,” said Algernon Austin, Director of Race and Economic Justice at the Center for Economic and Policy Research. “Black unemployment remains roughly double that of white workers nationwide, and regional unemployment rates for white workers in Appalachia, Latinos in the southwest, and among Native Americans remain persistently high.”
Subsidized employment programs, in which governments cover the costs of hiring new employees, have been successful in combating joblessness from the Great Depression through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, but the instability of the funding has limited their long-term benefits, and local discrimination meant that the outcomes were not equally distributed to everyone. A recent analysis of worker-centered employment strategies by Harvard University’s Center for International Development found that subsidized employment programs are the most effective policy solution to the problem of persistent joblessness.
"Decades of evidence show us that subsidized jobs work: they help pull people back into the labor market and increase economic security, especially for people facing systemic barriers to employment, such as Black and Brown workers,” said Kali Grant and Natalia Cooper of the Georgetown Center on Poverty & Inequality. “A federal program of subsidized employment would empower workers, strengthen communities, and move us toward a more equitable economy for everyone."
“Only a federally funded and long-lasting subsidized employment program can adequately solve these disparities,” said Austin. “We have an historic opportunity to reach Dr. King’s goal of full employment, and on this anniversary year we expect this dream to become a reality.”
The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) was established in 1999 to promote democratic debate on the most important economic and social issues that affect people's lives. In order for citizens to effectively exercise their voices in a democracy, they should be informed about the problems and choices that they face. CEPR is committed to presenting issues in an accurate and understandable manner, so that the public is better prepared to choose among the various policy options.
(202) 293-5380"If any Iranians are killed pursuant to this threat," said one expert, "President Trump will be guilty of genocide, as will those assisting him."
Just hours ahead of his self-imposed deadline for a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, US President Donald Trump threatened on Tuesday to permanently wipe out the "whole civilization" of Iran—remarks seen as a straightforward expression of genocidal intent.
"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again," Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. "I don’t want that to happen, but it probably will. However, now that we have Complete and Total Regime Change, where different, smarter, and less radicalized minds prevail, maybe something revolutionarily wonderful can happen, WHO KNOWS? We will find out tonight, one of the most important moments in the long and complex history of the World."
Brian Finucane, senior adviser to the US Program at the International Crisis Group, responded to Trump's threat by pointing to 18 US Code § 1091, which prohibits American nationals from committing genocide within the United States and abroad.
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the US-based Center for International Policy, wrote that "this meets the threshold for intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national group as set forth in 18 US Code § 1091 prohibiting the crime of genocide."
"If any Iranians are killed pursuant to this threat," Williams added, "President Trump will be guilty of genocide, as will those assisting him."
One expert, former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth, noted that Trump's genocidal threat is itself unlawful.
"Trump is openly threatening collective punishment, targeting not the Iranian military but the Iranian people," Roth told NBC News, pointing to the Fourth Geneva Convention. "Attacking civilians is a war crime. So is making threats with the aim of terrorizing the civilian population."
"Soldiers must refuse unlawful orders. Members of Congress must call for impeachment and removal."
Trump published his comments as the US unleashed a wave of attacks on Kharg Island, Iran's key oil export hub. The US and Israel also reportedly targeted bridges across Iran overnight as part of a broader assault that has killed thousands of people since late February.
The US president set a deadline of 8 pm ET for Iran to reach a deal that fully reopens the Strait of Hormuz. Trump has threatened to order the obliteration of Iranian bridges and energy infrastructure if there's no agreement by his arbitrary deadline.
Adil Haque, a professor of law at Rutgers University, wrote Tuesday that the international community must intervene immediately to prevent Trump from launching a catastrophic and criminal assault on a country of more than 90 million people.
"Soldiers must refuse unlawful orders," Haque added. "Members of Congress must call for impeachment and removal. Every American who loves their country must speak out. Enough is enough."
"If your political views are practically anything other than MAGA, you’re on notice, courtesy of the FBI," said journalist Ken Klippenstein.
Along with cutting environmental, housing, and health programs and proposing an increase of nearly $500 billion in military spending, President Donald Trump's new budget proposal shows how the White House "wants to use taxpayer dollars to spy on those who oppose its extremist agenda," one Democratic congresswoman said Monday evening.
Rep. Mary Gay Scanlon (D-Penn.) was referring to the budget's description of a new FBI center that is already working to root out what the White House broadly defined as "domestic terrorism" in a federal memo last year.
As independent journalist Ken Klippenstein wrote this week, buried in Trump's budget request—which includes $12.5 billion for the FBI to invest in counterterrorism efforts and other spending—is the White House's latest assertion that "domestic terrorists... pose an elevated threat to the Homeland."
"In recent years, heinous assassinations and other acts of political violence in the United States have dramatically increased," reads the budget's section on domestic terrorism. "Commonly, this violent conduct relates to views associated with anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the US government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility to those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and mortality."
The views described echo National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7), the memo signed last September that directed federal agencies to develop a national strategy to "investigate and disrupt networks, entities, and organizations that foment political violence" in order to stop violent attacks before they happen.
But despite the administration's singular focus on groups and individuals who hold left-wing, anti-capitalism views and subscribe to belief systems other than Christianity, the National Institute of Justice found that since 1990, 227 attacks motivated by right-wing views killed 520 people, while far-left groups carried out 42 attacks that killed 78 people. The NIJ study was removed from the US Department of Justice website shortly after the assassination of right-wing activist Charlie Kirk—an event that Trump explicitly blamed on left-wing groups without evidence, and which came weeks before the signing of NSPM-7.
The budget proposal explains that as a result of NSPM-7, the FBI recently created the NSPM-7 Joint Mission Center (JMC), which is run by personnel from 10 federal agencies.
"The JMC is working to counter domestic terrorism and organized political violence by integrating intelligence operational support, and financial analysis to proactively identify networks and prosecute domestic terrorist and related criminal actors," reads the proposal.
Scanlon is one of a small number of elected Democrats who have spoken out about NSPM-7 in congressional hearings and media interviews.
"If anyone can be labeled a domestic terrorist for speech opposing this administration, our First Amendment rights are under grave threat," said Scanlon recently.
Klippenstein noted that the budget document describes social media platforms and encrypted communications apps as being used by "domestic terrorists" to "recruit new adherents, plan and rally support for in-person actions, and disseminate materials encouraging radicalization and mobilization to violence.”
FBI Director Kash Patel told Congress that anyone who used the Discord channels used by Tyler Robinson, who was accused of killing Kirk, would be investigated by the agency.
Klippenstein noted that the FBI's domestic terrorism watchlist, which as of last September listed about 5,000 US citizens, reportedly "is growing."
"If your political views are practically anything other than MAGA, you’re on notice, courtesy of the FBI," Klippenstein wrote.
Democratic Rep. Yassamin Ansari called the Pentagon secretary "a chief enabler of this illegal war" and accused him of repeatedly violating his oath of office.
US Rep. Yassamin Ansari, the lone Iranian American Democrat in Congress, said on Monday that she will soon introduce articles of impeachment against Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth, the most prominent cheerleader of President Donald Trump's illegal war on Iran.
In a statement, Ansari (Ariz.) said that Hegseth has "repeatedly" violated his oath of office and his duty to the Constitution. The Democratic lawmaker, who said she would formally introduce the impeachment articles next week, pointed to Hegseth's "reckless endangerment of US servicemembers and repeated war crimes, including bombing a girls’ school in Minab, Iran."
Ansari, who was born in Seattle to parents who fled Iran following the 1979 revolution, warned that Trump's "deranged statements" and "apocalyptic" threats to obliterate Iranian bridges and power plants as soon as Tuesday night "are further entrenching our country and our world in another devastating, never-ending war."
"He’s threatening war crimes that violate US law and the Geneva Convention, on top of illegal actions and atrocities already committed at his direction–including violence that has destroyed schools, hospitals, and critical civilian infrastructure," said Ansari. "Republicans must join us in calling on the president to end this suicidal war before it is too late. So much is at stake, and those who continue to follow him blindly will have blood on their hands as well."
"As the daughter of Iranian immigrants who fled this regime, and as an American congresswoman who swore an oath to the United States Constitution, I know that this cannot go on," Ansari continued. "The 25th Amendment exists for a reason; his Cabinet should use it. The fate of US troops, the Iranian people, and the very foundation of our global system are at stake."
In a video posted to social media, Ansari said that "as a chief enabler of this illegal war, Pete Hegseth is responsible for directing this insane military action against Iran."
I’m introducing Articles of Impeachment against Pete Hegseth. Here’s why. pic.twitter.com/mMblG7tA7s
— Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari (@RepYassAnsari) April 7, 2026
Hegseth has been the foremost public advocate of Trump's war, praising the "lethality" of the American military and the "death and destruction" it is raining down on Iran, where US-Israeli attacks have killed around 2,000 people—including hundreds of children—and destroyed tens of thousands of civilian structures, from residential buildings to universities to medical facilities.
The Pentagon secretary has also derided what he's called "stupid rules of engagement" that constrain US servicemembers, gutted offices tasked with working to limit civilian casualties in war, and fired uniformed lawyers he's dismissed as "roadblocks" in the way of "maximum lethality."
Experts say those moves have made atrocities such as the one the US military committed on the first day of the war—the bombing of an elementary school in southern Iran—more likely. Human rights organizations and international legal scholars have said the attack should be investigated as a war crime.
Hegseth also said last month that "no quarter" would be given to "our enemies" in Iran, a statement indicating that surrendering combatants would be executed rather than taken prisoner. The declaration itself was seen as a clear violation of international law.
"Hegseth is making people less safe—and it’s time for him to go," the advocacy group Win Without War said last month in its own call for the Pentagon secretary's impeachment and removal.