For Immediate Release

Contact: 

Seth D. Michaels, 202-331-5662, smichaels@ucsusa.org

Trump Administration Puts Public Health, Community Participation at Risk

Statement by Dr. Kathleen Rest, Union of Concerned Scientists

WASHINGTON - The Trump administration is proposing major changes to the way the National Environmental Policy Act is implemented—changes that would dramatically reduce the environmental review of major projects. Under the new rule, the federal government would limit opportunities for public comment and no longer consider a project’s long-term impacts, including on heat-trapping emissions causing climate change.

Below is a statement by Dr. Kathleen Rest, executive director of UCS.

“When the federal government takes an action, it’s obvious that we should consider the consequences to the people it could affect and the environment they live in. The government should be presenting its case to the public, making clear what the pluses and minuses are, offering alternatives, and giving communities a chance to offer their input. That’s what the NEPA process is for—and the Trump administration is abandoning those basic principles of public participation and evidence-based decisionmaking.

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

At Stake?

An existential threat to our democracy. A global pandemic. An unprecedented economic crisis. Our journalism has never been more needed.

Can you pitch in today and help us make our Fall Campaign goal of $80,000 by November 2nd?

Please select a donation method:



“Despite the administration’s deceptive rhetoric, these short-sighted and callous changes will not improve public well-being. Rather than pitting economic and public interests against each other, we know that a prosperous economy and a healthy environment can and must go hand-in-hand. 

The Trump administration would allow powerful industries, like oil and gas extractors, to run roughshod over community interests. If this rule is implemented, hastily-considered, poorly-designed, damaging, and fossil fuel-intensive projects could proceed over public objections. The federal government would no longer have to consider the long-term cumulative impacts of projects, including the impact on the climate. It would deprive people of the information they need and their right to have a say in what happens in their own community.

“We’re going to scrutinize this proposal closely, but it’s clear the Trump administration intends to push public health, climate, and the public’s interest aside in the interest of helping politically powerful industries. That’s unacceptable.”

###

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Please select a donation method:



The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.

Share This Article