

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Alex Cornell du Houx, Elected Officials to Protect America, staff@uselectedofficials.org, +1 207 319 4511
Reiterating the concerns of constituents across the United States whose health and safety is threatened by fossil fuel production and worsening impacts from climate change, more than 300 mayors, state representatives, and elected officials from 40 states released a letter today calling for a nationwide plan to phase out the production and use of fossil fuels and to ramp up renewable energy as part of a green new deal approach to energy and efficiency.
"As the world gathers in Poland for the climate talks, it's imperative that we take the action here at home that really leads the nation and the world," said Maryland State Delegate Joseline Pena-Melnyk. "It's time to end the era of fossil fuel production and build our clean energy future together."
Elected Officials to Protect America (EOPA) released the letter as is a growing initiative of state representatives, mayors, country supervisors, and city council members from across the nation that are demanding an end to the use of dirty fossil fuels that harm their communities.
"Climate change is the most serious threat to the future of humanity, and we have failed to respond with the urgency needed," said John Marty, State Senator in Minnesota. "It's time for a strong, consistent, and aggressive response in order to become a 100% fossil fuel-free society."
In light of unprecedented devastation from wildfires in California, destructive hurricanes in North Carolina to Puerto Rico to Hawaii, droughts, and extreme weather throughout the US, the elected officials are urging their peer elected officials across the nation to end permitting for new fossil fuel projects and phase out oil and gas production within a 2,500-foot buffer zone of vulnerable communities, halt public investments and subsidies of fossil fuels, and move swiftly to 100% clean energy.
"The existence of climate change and its potential disastrous impacts have been known for decades. The solutions, primary among which is elimination of the use of fossil fuels, have also been known," said L.W. Allstadt, Trustee of Cooperstown, New York and former executive vice president of Mobil Oil. "We need to take action now, or we will be condemning our children and grandchildren to the severe physical and societal impacts of climate change and the exorbitant costs of trying to deal with them."
Drafted by state and local elected officials from across the country at the Global Action Climate Summit in San Francisco in September and launched at the United Nations climate talks in Poland on Thursday, the letter cites the increasingly serious local impacts of climate change and harm to public health throughout America from the production and burning of fossil fuels, including pollution, water contamination, leaks, explosions and other dangers.
"The most important job of local leaders is to keep their communities safe," said Meghan Sahli-Wells, Vice Mayor of Culver City, California. "The only way we can ensure the health and safety of our constituents is to end fossil fuel production in our communities, and transition to a just, clean, sustainable future."
The Universal Ecological Fund report have found that climate change is already costing the U.S. economy $240 billion annually from storms, droughts, fires, and sea level rise cost their communities.
" North Dakota is the breadbasket of the world," said Tim Mathern, State Senator in North Dakota. "I don't want climate change to make it the great American dessert."
The impacts of climate change threaten public safety in communities across the nation, particularly in low-income communities. Vulnerable communities will see an increase in poor air quality, infectious disease, and a decrease in food safety which will exacerbate social inequalities.
"There is no single more important issue that addressing climate change for our municipality, nation, and planet, period," said Peter Swiderski, Mayor of Hastings-on-Hudson, New York. "This is a global emergency."
By 2090, a scenario of uncontrolled emissions will cause temperature related health impacts of $140 billion annually and $160 billion in lost wages. Outbreaks of infectious diseases like West Nile could even result in a $3.3 billion increase in annual hospitalization costs by 2100.
" Maine has some of the highest rates of asthma in the country because we at the end of the 'tailpipe' of the nation," said Samantha Paradis, Mayor of Belfast, Maine. "We need bold climate leadership to protect the health of the public, the economy, and our beautiful landscape."
The officials are calling for supporting and retraining fossil fuel energy workers in the clean energy economy and ensuring investment in good, family-supporting jobs in renewable energy like solar, wind, and geothermal. These will lead to more sustainable, long-term employment and create hundreds of thousands of new jobs.
"We must protect our planet through actions big and small to wean ourselves from fossil fuels. There is no greater imperative," said Catherine Blakespear, Mayor of Encinitas, California. "We have the technology to thrive and prosper without oil and gas drilling but we need the will to make it happen."
The letter builds on a letter from more than 250 elected officials from a majority of counties in California urging Governor Jerry Brown to phase out fossil fuel production in the state. The letter contributed to Governor Brown signing bill SB 100 into law, requiring California's electricity to come from 100% renewable sources by 2045.
"We should all be alarmed at the increase in carbon emissions and rapid rate of climate change posing an imminent existential threat to all living things on our planet. We must act quickly, boldly, and decisively to address this critical threat," said Marina Khubesrian, Mayor of South Pasadena, California. "This includes how we power our cars, homes, and factories for starters."
The Global Climate Action Summit that Governor Brown and former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg convened was blockaded by protesters, chanting "climate leaders don't frack or drill oil." Following on dozens of events across the country, the network of officials is pointing to community concerns.
"By committing to this effort jurisdiction by jurisdiction, starting today, we will make a real difference," said Michael Dembrow, Oregon State Senator.
BACKGROUND
The full letter and list of signatories are available at www.uselectedofficials.org.
The National Climate Assessment released November 2018 projects that economic damages from climate change could lead to annual losses of $100 billion in various economic sectors. By the end of the century, current rates of warming will cost the US economy $500 billion a year in crop damage, labor losses, and damage from increasingly extreme weather -- double the economic consequence of the Great Recession. The Assessment predicts economic losses will exceed the GDP of many states.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report released on October 8th warns that to maintain global temperature rise below 1.5, far-reaching and unprecedented changes must be made in all aspects of society, including halting the production and burning of fossil fuels. Human CO2 emissions need to fall 45% by 2030.
ADDITIONAL QUOTES:
New York State Senator Krueger: "As elected officials, our first responsibility is to look after the safety, security, and health of the people we represent. There is no question that climate change is the greatest threat to our constituents' well-being, not to mention our economy and the very stability of our civilization. When it comes to tackling climate change, the question is not how much we've done compared to others, but whether what we have done matches what science tells us is necessary. The time has come to make commitments that are bold yet entirely realistic, to safeguard a livable climate for ourselves, our children, and our grandchildren."
"Scientific studies overwhelmingly agree on the terrible consequences that climate change will produce if we don't drastically reduce our dependence on fossil fuels," said Michael Yantachka, Vermont State Representative. "We can't wait any longer to take action that should have been taken a decade ago. The time is now."
"With the most intense wildfires in history preceded by a long drought, climate change cannot be denied in California," said Eduardo Martinez, Councilmember in Richmond, California, home of the large Chevron oil refinery. "These extreme weather events will continue to increase if we do not act now to lower carbon emissions."
"Climate change is the top threat to our safety, our infrastructure, our way of life," said Patrick Wojahn, Mayor of College Park, Maryland. "It's time to stop talking about it and start taking bold actions to do something about it."
Tim Goodrich, Councilmember in Torrance, California said, "As a military veteran of the conflicts in the Middle East, the threat of climate change is about more than the air we breathe, it's also a threat to our national security."
Paul Feiner, Town Supervisor, Greenburgh, New York, "I am pleased that officials at every level of government are joining forces and fighting to take action to preserve our planet. IF we don't act now the quality of life for our children, grandchildren and their children will be greatly reduced. We must act now. This is not a Democratic or Republican issue. It's a planet issue."
"Wisconsin is feeling the effects of climate change in force when in August we saw historic, catastrophic flooding across the state, costing at least $44 million -- a financial burden that Wisconsinites will bear for decades to come," said Kate Beaton, Councilmember in Eau Claire, Wisconsin. "Wisconsin families are still mourning this tragedy and we owe it to them to take this as a wakeup call and act on climate change right now."
"With the undeniable and devastating effects of fire, flood and record breaking heat, we can do longer be idle while the federal government closes its eyes to real science on climate change," said J.R. Roberts, Mayor Pro Tem of Palm Springs, California. "If we don't act locally and soon, there may not be a world for our children to fight for."
"We are at a climate crossroads. Failure to act now will have disastrous consequences for our planet and society," said Jesse Arreguin, Mayor of Berkeley, California. "I am proud to stand with countless other elected officials in promoting strong environmental policy while urging others to follow our lead. We cannot settle for anything less."
Josh Mandelbaum, Councilmember, Des Moines Iowa, "Our communities are increasingly impacted by severe weather events from floods to droughts. We must act. We can be part of the solution by leading the transition to a clean energy economy and creating local jobs."
Nicola Armacost, Trustee, Hastings-on-Hudson, New York, "Federal, state and local elected officials have a moral obligation to support efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change. We owe it to our children, our grandchildren and the generations to come."
William Reinhardt, County Legislator, Bethlehem Albany County, New York, "This is the underlying challenge of our time. Can humanity come together and cooperate at all levels of government to avert climate disaster?"
"If we are serious about addressing climate change then we need to be serious about drafting policies that mandate the phase-out of fossil fuels," said Daniel Lee, Councilmember in Culver City, California. "Anything less is window dressing on the porthole of a sinking ship."
Gary Koutnik, County Representative, Otsego County, New York, "It's time to stop playing nice. This is an emergency of historic proportions."
J.R. Roberts, Mayor Pro Tem, Palm Springs, California, "With the undeniable and devastating effects of fire, flood and record breaking heat, we can do longer be idle while the federal government closes it's eyes to real science on climate change. If we don't act locally and soon, there may not be a world for our children to fight for."
John Rizzo, Trustee of Community College Board, San Francisco, California, "Climate change will affect everyone on earth, and is already affecting millions right now. We must get serious about ending the burning of fossil fuels."
Share Horne, Councilmember, Laguna Woods, CA "This is the most critical issue for humans and animals living on this planet."
Carmen Ramirez, Mayor Pro Tem, Oxnard, California, "Future generations will praise or condemn us. Our legacy will be the health of the planet and all of its residents...or the dire consequences we clearly see coming if we have failed to do everything in our power to keep the world safe.""
Manna Jo Greene, Ulster County Legislator, New York, "The global climate crisis is the most pressing issue we face. By working together, we can reduce greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuel and other sources and rapidly transition to a renewable energy economy, with storage and efficiency. We must also protect our farms, forests, wetlands and oceans, that can draw down carbon and other greenhouse gasses and safely store them out of harm's way. By urgently preventing emissions and protecting ecosystems that sequester carbon, we can actually return the Earth back into balance. Climate solutions are here -- we just need the personal and political will to implement them. Given the recent IPCC report, we have 11 years to do so. This is therefore the most urgent and important work we can be doing for our constituents and for future generations."
Eduardo Martinez, Councilmember, Richmond, California,"With the most intense wild fires ever preceded by a long drought, climate change cannot be denied in California. These extreme weather events will increase if we do not act now to lower carbon emissions."
Frank Crawford, Vice President School Board, Marysvilla Joint Unified School District, California, "After working with various groups for the Camp Fire that destroyed the city of Paradise Calif. I am convinced that climate change, combined with other factors, contributed in the total devastation of a city I once lived and interned in while attending CSUChico. This is now the time for change. Thank You."
Meghan Kallman, Councilmember, Pawtucket, Rhode Island, ""Climate change is among the gravest threats facing not just our nation, but the entire globe. As a municipal official, I am deeply concerned about the ways that negative consequences will be experienced first in cities, including in mine. In Rhode Island, we are susceptible to flooding and hurricane damage, heat waves, and are running a grave risk of overtaxing our already-taxed infrastructure (including water and sewers). Our generation needs to step up to the plate and tackle this aggressively; we owe it to future generations to do so"."
Brandi Merolla, Councilmember, Tusten, New York, "The time to eliminate fossil fuel use is now and the time to embrace renewable energy is now. There is no Planet B!"
Roseann Torres, Director, Oakland Board of Education, California, "We must do all we can now to protect our environment for the future generations. Kids are most affected who are poor and begin school behind their peers as a result which has lifelong negative effects."
Barry Beck, Assessor, Mono, California, "It was recently announced that we had another record-breaking year for the release of carbon into the atmosphere, at over 37 billion tons. We have a lot less time than most people think to solve this problem that is currently on pace to lead to the 6th great extinction."
Debora Fudge, Councilmember in Windsor California, "Climate change is the most difficult challenge facing us. Our future is in peril."
Marina Khubesrian, Mayor of South Pasadena, California, "We should all be alarmed at the increase in carbon emissions and rapid rate of climate change posing an imminent existential threat to all living things on our planet. We must act quickly, boldly, and decisively to address this critical threat. If the planet were a patient exhibiting such dangerous vital signs, we would have her in the Critical Care Unit with a team of specialists working around the clock to save her life. We need to tap experts in Motivational Behavior Change to help our institutions overcome denial, resistance, ambivalence and inertia to move us into action on all fronts of sustainability. This includes how we power our cars, homes, and factories for starters.
Jan Pepper, Vice Mayor, Los Altos, California,"Combating climate change is essential for the survival of our planet. We all need to come together to make this happen."
Phillip Stoddard, Mayor of South Miami, Florida, "Coastal areas are going underwater, agriculture is failing, fires are raging, the oceans are dying, insects are disappearing. Think maybe we should do something different?"
Christy Holstege, Councilmember in Palm Springs, California, "As California, our nation, and the world face the devastating damage ravaged by extreme weather events caused by climate change, like the forest fires that destroyed parts of California last month, we need to call for bold leadership to achieve 100% clean energy to protect our environment. As a millennial city councilmember for the City of Palm Springs, I know we need to take urgent action now to protect our planet for generations so that we can all enjoy safe, healthy, and equitable futures.""
Nicholas Josefowitz, BART Director, San Francisco, California, "Climate change has already started to wreck havoc on our communities. We all need to step up, take responsibility for our future, and act decisively to eliminate the carbon pollution we are responsible for. That's why I led BART to become the first transit agency in the country to be powered by 100% renewables - creating good green jobs and saving money in the process. And that's why I'm urging all other governments - big or small - to do the same.""
Stephen Houlahan, Councilmember in Santee, California, "The time has come for the leaders of the Earth to create a sustainable economic model that accounts for the financial impacts of climate change."
Rebecca Kaplan, Councilmember at large, Oakland, California, ""As the city-wide elected representative of the people of Oakland, I know that some of our most struggling communities have the most to lose from the impacts of climate change and pollution. Oakland suffers a huge disproportionate share of asthma and other negative environmental impacts, and, as climate change worsens, it threatens to worsen injustice also. We must all take stronger action to protect our communities, including the most vulnerable!""
Kelly Kent, School board vice president, Culver City, California, "In Culver City, CA, our most sensitive receptors are subject to the harmful impacts of both conventional and unconventional oil drilling as we are smack in the middle of our nation's largest urban oil field. I emphatically call on this planet's political leaders to act like every child is their own, and to move with urgency toward phasing out the use of fossil fuels on behalf of all of our babies' health, learning and futures.""
Danielle Adams, Soil and Water Conservation District Supervisor, Durham, North Carolina "Younger generations are looking to us for answers on why we aren't doing more to preserve their future. The most vulnerable among us are looking to us for answers on why we aren't fighting for the lives that are being lost today because of the impacts of climate change. When future generations look back on us how will we be judged? How can we continue knowing the real costs ahead of us and do nothing. Their are people in my community who are dying because of our inaction. The time to act isn't now -- the time to act was decades ago and we missed the mark. Now we have to do ALL that we can to save lives, adapt to the changing world around us and preserve whatever we can of the future. We have no choice but to act."
Jeannine Pearce, City Councilmember, Long Beach (District 2), California "This is an issue that affects our communities not only physically , but it creates a financial burden to local municipalities. Without taking strategic steps to have clean energy, the increase of impacts will continue. I am proud to be part of a city that is currently working towards making Long Beach be a 100 % clean energy and environmentally sustainable city through policies such as our Clean Air Action Plan, Pier B On-Dock Rail Support Facility among others. Without a strong leadership in climate change, many green projects will not be implemented. I urge your support in taking care of our environment and most importantly our constituents. "
350 is building a future that's just, prosperous, equitable and safe from the effects of the climate crisis. We're an international movement of ordinary people working to end the age of fossil fuels and build a world of community-led renewable energy for all.
The report shows how a landmark civil rights law "is being cynically misused to squash political dissent and speech that advocates for the human rights of Palestinians," said one AAUP leader.
Under both the Biden and Trump administrations, pro-Israel and far-right advocacy groups have driven a surge of federal civil rights investigations conflating true antisemitism with university professors and students' criticism of the US-backed Israeli government and its genocidal assault on the Gaza Strip.
That's according to Discriminating Against Dissent: The Weaponization of Civil Rights Law to Repress Campus Speech on Palestine, a report published this week by the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) and the Middle East Studies Association (MESA).
"Our members, because of their expertise on the region, have long borne the brunt of allegations that falsely equate criticism of Israel with antisemitism," MESA president Aslı Bâli said in a statement. "Complaints like these penalize scholars for teaching basic facts about the region."
The report begins: "Over the past two years, the United States government has taken unprecedented steps to suppress campus speech—including scholarship, advocacy, and protest—opposing the state of Israel's genocidal war against the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip. This crackdown has paved the way for profound transformations in US colleges and universities."
"A long-standing 'Palestine exception' to the First Amendment now threatens to give way to a new reality: Palestine is less an exception to academic freedom than it is a pretext for erasing the norm altogether, as part of an authoritarian assault on the autonomy of higher education and on the very idea of racial and gender equity," the document warns.
The analysis comes as President Donald Trump continues his sweeping attack, aiming to shut down the Department of Education, deport foreign students critical of Israel, and bully campus leaders into signing an "extortion agreement" for federal funding.
"In effect, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is no longer being used to address racial discrimination in higher education," Bâli told the Guardian, which first reported on the findings. "Instead, Title VI has been repurposed as part of the administration's broader effort to remake higher education in line with its right-wing political and cultural agenda."
AAUP and MESA found that "more investigations were opened in the last two months of 2023 (25) than in all previous years combined (24). Investigations broke record numbers in 2024 (39) and are on track to do so again in 2025 (38, as of September 30)."
"All but one of the 102 antisemitism complaint letters we have analyzed focus on speech critical of Israel; of these, 79% contain allegations of antisemitism that simply describe criticisms of Israel or Zionism with no reference to Jews or Judaism; at least 50% of complaints consist solely of such criticism," the document states.
The report highlights that "the Biden administration opened more antisemitism probes against colleges and universities (65) than for all other types of racial harassment combined (38)," and "the Trump administration appears to have halted racial harassment investigations altogether."
The federal probes "are producing a new system of government surveillance and monitoring of campus speech," the report notes, with over 20 schools agreeing to share internal data on discrimination complaints with the government.
Examining Trump's Task Force to Combat Antisemitism, the researchers found that the Department of Education "has continued to open very high numbers of antisemitism probes even as its staff has been slashed by the Trump administration," and "in its high-profile campaigns against prestigious universities, the task force has systematically ignored the procedural requirements of Title VI, unlawfully cutting off vast sums of funding before any meaningful investigation, let alone findings."
For at least 78% of the complaints examined by AAUP and MESA, pro-Israel and right-wing advocacy organizations—including those without any campus presence—served as complainants or represented them. Such groups have also been involved with private lawsuits intended to redefine antisemitism as including criticism of Israel and restrict such criticism at universities.
"Antisemitism lawsuits surged after October 7, 2023 (two filed before that date, 26 since)," according to the analysis. "No court has yet made a final judgment in favor of plaintiffs. In nine cases, Title VI claims have been dismissed, including on free speech grounds; nine lawsuits have settled, some of which resulted in even more draconian policy changes on campuses than government investigations."
AAUP general counsel Veena Dubal said that "the findings in this report underscore how the Civil Rights Act of 1964—which passed in response to years of nonviolent civil disobedience against racial injustice—is being cynically misused to squash political dissent and speech that advocates for the human rights of Palestinians."
"This is a perverse outcome," Dubal declared, as AAUP prepares for Friday protests pressuring leaders at over 100 institutions to reject the president's "Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education" and make schooling more affordable.
As AAUP president Todd Wolfson said in a statement about the day of action earlier this week, "From attacks on academic freedom in the classroom to the defunding of lifesaving scientific research to surveilling and arresting peaceful student protesters, Trump's higher education policies have been catastrophic for our communities and our democracy."
"We're excited to help build a coalition of students and workers united in fighting back for a higher education system that is accessible and affordable for all and serves the common good," he added. Other supporting groups include Campus Climate Network, College Democrats of America, Gen-Z for Change, Indivisible, Jewish Voice for Peace, March for Our Lives, and Sunrise Movement.
"Big Tech is building a mountain of speculative infrastructure," warned one critic. "Now it wants the US government to prop up the bubble before it bursts."
Tech giant OpenAI generated significant backlash this week after one of its top executives floated potential loan guarantees from the US government to help fund its massive infrastructure buildout.
In a Wednesday interview with The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI chief financial officer Sarah Friar suggested that the federal government could get involved in infrastructure development for artificial intelligence by offering a "guarantee," which she said could "drop the cost of the financing" and increase the amount of debt her firm could take on.
When asked if she was specifically talking about a "federal backstop for chip investment," she replied, "Exactly."
Hours after the interview, Friar walked back her remarks and insisted that "OpenAI is not seeking a government backstop for our infrastructure commitments," while adding that she was "making the point that American strength in technology will come from building real industrial capacity, which requires the private sector and government playing their part."
Despite Friar's walk-back, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said during a podcast interview with economist Tyler Cowen that released on Thursday that he believed the government ultimately could be a backstop to the artificial intelligence industry.
"When something gets sufficiently huge... the federal government is kind of the insurer of last resort, as we've seen in various financial crises," he said. "Given the magnitude of what I expect AI's economic impact to look like, I do think the government ends up as the insurer of last resort."
Friar and Altman's remarks about government backstops for OpenAI loans drew the immediate ire of Robert Weissman, co-president of consumer advocacy organization Public Citizen, who expressed concerns that the tech industry may have already opened up talks about loan guarantees with President Donald Trump's administration.
"Given the Trump regime’s eagerness to shower taxpayer subsidies and benefits on favored corporations, it is entirely possible that OpenAI and the White House are concocting a scheme to siphon taxpayer money into OpenAI’s coffers, perhaps with some tribute paid to Trump and his family." Weissman said. "Perhaps not so coincidentally, OpenAI President Greg Brockman was among the attendees at a dinner for donors to Trump’s White House ballroom, though neither he nor OpenAI have been reported to be actual donors."
JB Branch, Public Citizen’s Big Tech accountability advocate, said even suggesting government backstops for OpenAI showed that the company and its executives were "completely out of touch with reality," and he argued it was no coincidence that Friar floated the possibility of federal loan guarantees at a time when many analysts have been questioning whether the AI industry is an unsustainable financial bubble.
"The truth is simple: the AI bubble is swelling, and OpenAI knows it," he said. "Big Tech is building a mountain of speculative infrastructure without real-world demands or proven productivity-enhancing use cases to justify it. Now it wants the US government to prop up the bubble before it bursts. This is an escape plan for an industry that has overpromised and underdelivered."
An MIT Media Lab report found in September that while AI use has doubled in workplaces since 2023, 95% of organizations that have invested in the technology have seen "no measurable return on their investment."
Concerns about an AI bubble intensified earlier this week when investor Michael Burry, who famously made a fortune by short-selling the US housing market ahead of the 2008 financial crisis, revealed that his firm was making bets against Nvidia and Palantir, two of the biggest players in the AI industry.
This has led to some AI industry players to complain that markets and governments are undervaluing their products.
During her Wednesday WSJ interview, for instance, Friar complained that "I don’t think there’s enough exuberance about AI, when I think about the actual practical implications and what it can do for individual."
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, meanwhile, told the Financial Times that China was going to beat the US in the race to develop high-powered artificial intelligence because the Chinese government offers more energy subsidies to AI and doesn't put as much regulation on AI development.
Huang also complained that "we need more optimism" about the AI industry in the US.
Investment researcher Ross Hendricks, however, dismissed Huang's warning about China winning the AI battle, and he accused the Nvidia CEO of seeking special government favors.
"This is nothing more than Jensen Huang foaming the runway for a federal AI bailout in coordination with OpenAI's latest plea in the WSJ," he commented in a post on X. "These grifters simply can't be happy making billions from one of the greatest investment manias of all time. They'll do everything possible to loot taxpayers to prevent it from popping."
"Congress needs to assert its constitutional power to prohibit use of military force," stressed one of the war powers resolution's co-sponsors.
As the Trump administration argues that it can continue its extrajudicial assassination spree of alleged drug runners on the high seas without congressional approval, the US Senate is set to vote Thursday afternoon on a bipartisan war powers resolution that would block military action against Venezuela absent lawmakers' assent—as required by law.
Last month, Sens. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) introduced a resolution to block US military "hostilities within or against Venezuela that have not been authorized by Congress," citing the War Powers Resolution of 1973 and Congress' sole ability to declare war under the Constitution.
Posting on X ahead of Thursday's vote, Schiff said that the measure's co-sponsors "are forcing a bipartisan vote to block the administration from dragging this country into war in South America."
"Congress needs to assert its constitutional power to prohibit use of military force," he added.
Trump has PUBLICLY threatened land strikes in Venezuela—after already killing at least 66 unknown people on boats in the Caribbean—unnecessarily putting the U.S. at risk of war. Here’s what @schiff.senate.gov, Senator Paul, and I are doing about it:youtube.com/shorts/TQKsF...
[image or embed]
— Senator Tim Kaine (@kaine.senate.gov) November 6, 2025 at 8:29 AM
Matt Duss, executive vice president of the Center for International Policy, a Washington, DC-based think tank, said Thursday that President Donald Trump "talks about himself as a historic peacemaker while continuing to order reckless military strikes and threatening to invade countries around the world."
"His actions violate both the Constitution and his own promises to be an anti-war president," he added.
This is the second time Kaine and Schiff have tried to introduce a Venezuela war powers resolution. Last month, Democratic Sen. John Fetterman joined his GOP colleagues in voting down a similar measure. Paul joined Democrats and Independent Sens. Bernie Sanders (Vt.) and Angus King (Maine) in voting for the legislation.
Since September 2, Trump has overseen 16 reported attacks on vessels allegedly transporting drugs in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean off the coast of South America, killing at least 67 people. Venezuelan and Colombian officials, as well as relatives of some of the slain men, assert that some victims were fishers and condemned the attacks as war crimes.
Trump—who deployed an armada of warships and thousands of troops off the coast of Venezuela—has also approved covert CIA action and, along with senior administration officials, threatened to attack targets on land inside the oil-rich country, which has long been subjected to US meddling, regime change, and deadly sanctions. Late last month, the government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro said that his country’s security forces captured a group of CIA-aligned mercenaries engaged in a "false-flag attack" against the nation.
The War Powers Resolution of 1973—also known as the War Powers Act—was enacted during the Nixon administration at the tail end of the US war on Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos to empower Congress to check the president’s war-making authority. The law requires the president to report any military action to Congress within 48 hours and mandates that lawmakers must approve troop deployments after 60 days.
That 60-day door closed on Monday. However, according to The Washington Post, Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel T. Elliott Gaiser told lawmakers this week that Trump is not bound by the War Powers Resolution, as the administration does not believe that the boat strikes legally meet the definition of "hostilities" because the victims of the attacks aren't fighting back.
The dubious argument that acts of US military aggression aren't hostilities isn't new—the Obama administration asserted similar immunity from the War Powers Resolution when it decided to attack Libya in 2011, leading to the ouster of longtime leader Muammar Gaddafi and over a decade of enduring conflict and division.
As Brian Finucane, a former State Department legal adviser who is now a senior official at the International Crisis Group, wrote for Just Security this week:
There are many flaws with the Trump administration’s reported interpretation of hostilities. As indicated in the legislative history, Congress understood the term “hostilities” to apply broadly, more broadly than “armed conflict.” The Obama administration’s prior attempt to restrictively interpret the term garnered strong bipartisan congressional opposition...
That the Trump administration would resort to creative lawyering to circumvent the limits of the War Powers Resolution is hardly a surprise... It nonetheless is yet another legal abuse and arrogation of power by the executive. And it is a power grab in the service of killing people outside the law based solely on the president’s own say-so.
"Congress needs to push back against this attempt by the White House to further encroach upon its constitutional prerogatives on the use of military force," Finucane added. "The legislative branch should reject the executive’s strained legal interpretation of the War Powers Resolution, including possibly in legislation. Congress should also continue efforts to halt these killings at sea and block an unlawful attack on Venezuela."