

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Eight environmental organizations launched a series of petition deliveries to the California offices of Attorney General Xavier Becerra asking him to investigate what Exxon knew about climate change, when it knew it, and what it did with that knowledge.
Greenpeace, CREDO Action, 350.org, ClimateTruth.org, Friends of the Earth, Corporate Accountability International, Climate Hawks Vote, and Fossil Free California started petition deliveries to the six attorney general offices and will deliver to the main Sacramento office tomorrow. Collectively, the organizations have gathered more than 70,000 petitions from people in California. The groups will continue deliveries in the lead up to the People's Climate March in Washington, DC on April 29th with sister events all over the country.
In September 2015, InsideClimate News, the Los Angeles Times, and the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism revealed that Exxon was researching the causes of climate change and the dangers of climate disruption since at least the 1970s. Since then, the New York and Massachusetts attorneys general have launched investigations into the oil company. At the request of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman last month, a New York judge ruled that Exxon turn over emails on climate change written by then-Exxon CEO and current Secretary of State Rex Tillerson under an alias, "Wayne Tracker."
In February, 18 of California's delegates to the U.S. House of Representatives wrote to Attorney General Becerra asking him to investigate Exxon. Last week, more than 30 environmental organizations called on Attorney General Becerra to do the same.
###
Quotes From Participating Organizations:
"Attorney General Becerra has a chance to launch a historic investigation on behalf of Californians who are on the frontlines of climate change. California can stand up to Trump whose administration is bending over backwards for the fossil fuel industry at the expense of everyday people in this country. Exxon has spent decades profiting off of carbon emissions and misleading the public about the devastation those emissions would cause. Just like the tobacco industry, the most important law enforcers in our country must judge Exxon and its fossil fuel allies for the pain they have caused the people of this country," said Greenpeace USA Climate Liability Campaigner Naomi Ages.
"Exxon has spent millions of dollars funding a systematic disinformation campaign disputing the science of climate change in order to keep profits high by delaying climate action. California has paid the consequences with unprecedented drought, historic wildfires and deadly heat waves. If Exxon executives lied to their shareholders and the public about the risks of their products, Californians deserve to know. Attorney General Becerra has the authority and resources to help us find out and that's exactly what we're calling on him to do," said CREDO Campaign Manager Brandy Doyle.
"California prides itself as a global climate leader. By opening an aggressive investigation into decades of Exxon climate malfeasance Attorney General Becerra has a world class opportunity to assert California's leadership on the international climate stage. Failure by AG Becerra to hold Exxon accountable for their willful misrepresentation of what the company knew about the environmental dangers of fossil fuels would be nothing more than offering protection to a powerful polluter at the expense of people and the planet," said Friends of the Earth Senior California Advocacy Campaigner Gary Hughes.
"With the Trump administration's deplorable and dangerous abdication on climate, California's leadership on many fronts of this battle is essential--and all eyes are on our state's policies and actions in response to Washington," said Janet Cox of Fossil Free California. "Fortunately, our elected leaders are stepping up to oppose Trump's retrograde policies. Attorney General Becerra needs to take a stand on climate, join New York and Massachusetts, and use his office's considerable resources to aid and support ongoing litigation. His failure to do so will send the wrong message to California, the nation, and the world," said Janet Cox of Fossil Free California.
"Climate Hawks Vote was the first group to create a petition and the first group to involve a Los Angeles-area member of Congress, following stories in the Los Angeles Times. Xavier Becerra represented part of of Los Angeles in Congress for 24 years, and now acts on behalf of California. AG Becerra needs to step up to protect all Californians from both the ravages of climate change, and from apparent consumer/securities fraud," said RL Miller of Climate Hawks Vote.
"California's elected officials must do everything in their power to stop Trump's dishonest and dangerous fossil fuel agenda. That's why Attorney General Becerra must do the right thing and investigate all that #ExxonKnew. From years-long drought to recent extreme flooding, Californians are bearing the impacts of Exxon's lies. Yet Big Oil continues to deny its responsibility in causing climate change, exploiting our communities in the name of profit. New York and Massachusetts investigations uncovered disturbing revelations, like Rex Tillerson's 'Wayne Tracker' alias, and helped push Exxon's deep history of climate deception into the spotlight. AG Becerra joining in would add much-needed power to hold Exxon accountable for potentially the biggest case of corporate fraud in history," said 350.org Executive Director May Boeve.
"With Exxon Mobil's Rex Tillerson and other oil darlings in the upper echelons of the federal government, it is crucial that a state with California's political and economic might take a stand. By launching an investigation, Attorney General Becerra could tip the scales and finally expose the true extent of Exxon Mobil's lies and abuses. In the 90's, similar investigations into Big Tobacco ushered in a series of lawsuits that held it liable for its impacts and forever changed how it operated. Big Oil is long overdue for the same fate. It's time for Attorney General Becerra to take a stand and investigate Exxon. The lives of millions of people and the future of our planet depend on it," said Tamar Lawrence-Samuel, International Policy Director at Corporate Accountability International.
Greenpeace is a global, independent campaigning organization that uses peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future.
+31 20 718 2000Iran's chief negotiator accused the Trump administration of giving the Israeli government a "green light" to continue attacking Lebanon and undermining diplomatic talks.
Update:
US President Donald Trump, Pakistan's prime minister, and the Iranian Foreign Ministry said Sunday that the US and Iran have reached an agreement on a framework to end the war that Trump launched in late February.
Iran's deputy foreign minister, Kazem Gharibabadi, said the terms of the deal will be made public after the memorandum of understanding is signed on Friday in Switzerland. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif wrote on social media that "both sides have declared the immediate and permanent termination of military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon."
The memorandum of understanding is expected to extend the current ceasefire agreement by 60 days while detailed negotiations take place.
Gharibabadi said the start of the 60-day negotiations will be contingent on the US lifting its naval blockade of Iranian ports, "ending the state of war and military operations," and "releasing Iran's frozen funds."
Earlier:
The Israeli military bombed the southern suburbs of Beirut on Sunday just as Iranian and US officials voiced optimism that a diplomatic agreement is in reach, prompting accusations that the government of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to derail the negotiations.
Israel's strikes reportedly targeted a five-story apartment building, killing at least three people, according to Lebanese authorities. Netanyahu said the bombing was a response to Hezbollah rocket fire into northern Israel.
The latest bombing of Beirut came hours after US President Donald Trump said he expected a memorandum of understanding (MOU) to be signed as early as Sunday, potentially setting the stage for negotiations to end the illegal war Trump started in late February. Iranian officials have pushed back on the US president's claim that the MOU will be signed Sunday, but Iran's foreign minister said Friday that an agreement had "never been closer."
The Associated Press reported Sunday that Israel's new strikes on Beirut "threatened to hamper negotiations over a deal, which in its current form is a deep disappointment to Israel’s government."
"The last time Israel struck the Beirut suburbs a week ago, it set off the most serious escalation of fighting between Iran and Israel since the tenuous ceasefire took hold April 7," AP added.
Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, wrote on social media that "as a US-Iranian deal seems like it might be closer, Israel predictably bombs the Beirut suburbs, evidently hoping to sabotage the deal."
"Why does Trump put up with this and continue to arm and fund such obstructionism?" Roth asked.
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran's chief negotiator and speaker of parliament, said Israel's strikes indicate that the US "either does not have the will or the ability to fulfill its obligations."
"You cannot gain concessions by giving [Israel] a green light," he added. "The good cop, bad cop routine has become old. If you do not have the will or the ability to fulfill your commitments, then there is no basis for talking about continuing down this path."
As the US & Iran reportedly near a deal that includes ending the war in Lebanon, Israel is attacking Beirut again.
Either Trump can't restrain Netanyahu, or the deal is already being violated before it's signed.
Either way, it undermines the deal's value for Iran. pic.twitter.com/v08c21i7wa
— Sina Toossi (@SinaToossi) June 14, 2026
While the MOU that's reportedly under consideration has not been released in full, its broad outlines have been reported in media outlets and divulged by Iranian and US officials in recent days. Reuters reported Sunday that "a final draft of the memorandum of understanding with the US covered a range of issues, from Tehran’s nuclear work to reopening the Strait of Hormuz and US waivers on oil sanctions, with a final deal to be discussed in the 60 days following agreement by the two sides."
Under the MOU, Iran would immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz and the US would end its illegal blockade of Iranian ports, according to Reuters. The US would also agree to waive oil sanctions on Iran and release $25 billion in frozen Iranian assets, while Iran would agree to "maintain the current status of its nuclear program, refraining from further uranium enrichment and expansion of nuclear facilities."
Abbas Araghchi, Iran's foreign minister, said in a television interview on Friday that the MOU's proposed 60-day ceasefire extension would include Lebanon.
Axios reported that Netanyahu has "found himself in the dark" as US-Iran negotiations have progressed in recent days, "calling allies close to the Trump administration to try and gather information."
Following Sunday's strike on Beirut, Trump told Axios' Barak Ravid that Netanyahu "has no fucking judgment."
"I passed this message on to him—that I am very unhappy with the attack in Beirut," said Trump, whose administration has approved billions of dollars worth of weapons sales to the Israeli government.
Trita Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, warned that "Israel will do more sabotage unless Trump imposes a cost on Israel."
"Netanyahu knows exactly what he is doing and is judging that an attack on Beirut—rather than southern Lebanon—is exactly what's needed to derail the pending US-Iran deal," Parsi argued.
"Now in its third consecutive year of famine, Sudan received nothing."
Elon Musk's vault to trillionaire status following the public debut of his rocket company SpaceX came on the heels of an analysis showing the devastating impact of his destruction of the US Agency for International Development on millions of people in countries facing or on the brink of famine.
The analysis, authored by Council on Foreign Relations expert and longtime aid worker Sam Vigersky, noted that Musk's targeting of USAID during his tenure as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) resulted in the transfer of the Food for Peace program to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA), an agency "without international humanitarian or disaster-response expertise."
Vigersky found that the USDA this year chose just seven countries to receive American grain under the Food for Peace program: the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Guatemala, Haiti, Kenya, El Salvador, and Rwanda. The latter two countries, Vigersky noted, "do not meet an emergency threshold" for assistance.
"Meanwhile, the country facing the largest hunger crisis in the world—Sudan—did not make the list. Now in its third consecutive year of famine, Sudan received nothing. In fact, more than 40% of Sudan’s community kitchens, a lifeline for the displaced, have closed in the past six months as funding dried up, according to Islamic Relief," Vigersky reported. "Afghanistan, Lebanon, and Yemen were also passed over. Millions of people in those countries live one step from famine, according to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), the UN-backed monitoring system that uses a standardized five-point scale (five being famine) to measure the severity of food insecurity."
Experts assessing the global impact of USAID's decimation at the hands of billionaire US President Donald Trump and the world's first trillionaire, who bragged publicly about "feeding USAID into the wood chipper," estimate that hundreds of thousands of people have already died as a result of the large-scale loss of humanitarian assistance—and millions more will die in the coming years if swift action is not taken to restore aid.
"The impacts of the cuts were immediate and tragic," Nicholas Enrich, a former USAID employee who became a whistleblower, wrote in The Boston Globe on Friday. "Health clinics and emergency ambulance services shuttered overnight. Clinical trials were deserted. Thousands of healthcare workers lost their jobs. Lifesaving food and medicine was left to expire in warehouses. According to conservative estimates, in the year since USAID was dismantled, 750,000 people have died as a result of the cuts. For the first time in a generation, more children died in one year — 2025—than in the previous year."
Oxfam has estimated that a 10% tax on Musk's $1 trillion fortune would generate enough revenue to end extreme poverty worldwide for a year.
Trump claimed on social media that a diplomatic agreement would be signed on Sunday, but Iran's Foreign Ministry pushed back on that timeline.
President Donald Trump claimed Saturday that the US and Iran are on track to sign a diplomatic agreement this weekend, but added that "we have the ultimate alternative" if the process doesn't "work out."
"The 'ultimate alternative' sounds a lot like a nuclear threat," Sina Toossi, a senior fellow at the Center for International Policy, wrote in response to the president's Truth Social post. "Not the first time Trump has hinted at it."
The agreement Trump referenced is believed to be "memorandum of understanding" that's expected be fleshed out in "technical talks" that could begin next week, according to Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, who is mediating the negotiations.
"We are closer to a peace deal than ever before," Sharif wrote on social media, echoing Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who said on Friday that "the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding has never been closer."
"Pending its finalization, the media should refrain from entering speculation about its content," Araghchi added. "In line with our responsible and transparent approach, all details will be shared with the public in due course."
On Saturday, a spokesperson for the Iranian Foreign Ministry cast doubt on the timeline put forth by Trump and Sharif.
"We will have to wait and see about the exact date of the signing of the memorandum of understanding, although it will not be tomorrow,” said Esmaeil Baqaei, as reported by Iranian state media. “The possibility of this happening in the coming days cannot be ruled out. However, due to the hesitation of the other side, we must be cautious in making any comments about this process.”
In his Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump declared that the Strait of Hormuz will be "OPEN TO ALL" immediately after the deal is signed—a condition that Iran has not confirmed.
"We look forward to working with Iran, and the entire Middle East, long into the future," Trump added. "Hopefully, this process will all work out quickly, easily, and smoothly. If it doesn’t, we have the ultimate alternative, hopefully never to be used again!"
Trump has repeatedly issued genocidal threats against Iran since launching the illegal war in late February, openly declaring his intention to target Iran's civilian infrastructure and wipe out its "whole civilization." Experts say such threats, even if they aren't acted on, constitute war crimes under international law.