April, 13 2011, 11:20am EDT
Watchdog: Organic Valley, Herbruck's Violating Federal Organic Standards with Factory Farm Egg Production
Factory Farm Egg Production, without Mandated Outdoor Access, Challenged
WASHINGTON
The Cornucopia Institute announced it has filed a formal legal complaint with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), alleging that one of the nation's largest industrial egg producers, Michigan-based Herbruck's Poultry Ranch, is violating the federal organic standards by confining their laying hens in buildings on "factory farms" instead of providing legitimate outdoor access as required by law.
[View the full news release at: https://www.cornucopia.org/2011/04/watchdog-claims-organic-valley-herbruck%E2%80%99s-violating-federal-organic-standards/
The Wisconsin-based farm policy research group also filed a similar complaint related to one of the suppliers of Organic Valley, a cooperative that secures most of its eggs from its family-scale farmer members.
"The federal organic standards clearly state that 'year-round access for all animals to the outdoors' is a requirement," states Mark Kastel, Senior Farm Policy Analyst with The Cornucopia Institute. "The tiny porches attached to the henhouses on Herbruck's Poultry Ranch, Petaluma Egg Farm, a major Organic Valley supplier, and a handful of other industrial egg producers, fail to meet either the intent or the letter of the law governing organic production and food labeling."
Herbruck's Poultry Ranch, based in Saranac, Michigan, is principally involved in conventional egg production, raising millions of conventional laying hens that are mostly confined in cages. They also raise, according to the Associated Press, at least 900,000 organic laying hens, principally at their corporate-owned Michigan facility, and in other locations under contract. According to public statements by company representatives, hens raised by Herbruck's do not have access to the outdoors beyond concrete enclosed porches and patios.
"Nobody forced Herbruck's to become certified organic. It's a voluntary program. When this corporation decided to enter the organic market, they assumed a responsibility to their customers and to the organic community as a whole to understand the organic standards, including their intent," states Kastel. "If they chose to look for loopholes in the rules, it is a gamble they willingly took and must be prepared for the consequences."
In September 2010, The Cornucopia Institute released a report that contrasted the exemplary management practices employed by the vast majority of family-scale organic farmers engaged in organic egg production, while spotlighting abuses at "factory farms" -- including Hillandale Farms, a major nationwide industrial egg producer that was implicated in the widespread 2010 salmonella outbreak centered in Iowa.
According to Cornucopia's report, when producers adopt industrial-scale practices that fail to fully comply with the organic standards for livestock production, it places ethical family farmers at a competitive disadvantage in the marketplace.
"The people that purchase organic eggs are under the understanding that these eggs are produced in a way to their liking. They are told the hens are able to go out and pick green grass," said Loren Dale Yoder, a certified organic egg producer from Riverside, Iowa. "These are farmers that are cheating."
In addition to the new complaint against Herbruck's, The Cornucopia Institute also filed a separate legal complaint against the country's largest name-brand organic egg marketer, CROPP, the farmer-owned cooperative that markets eggs under the Organic Valley brand. Organic Valley's local eggs on the West Coast are produced by Petaluma Egg Farm, the industrial-scale egg producer that, like Herbruck's, fails to give outdoor access to its laying hens.
Petaluma Egg Farm produces conventional and organic eggs under numerous brand names, including Rock Island, Uncle Eddie's, Judy's Family Farm and Gold Circle, as well as for Organic Valley. It also owns a major refrigerated food distribution company operating in California. According to Petaluma Egg Farm, their outdoor access consists solely of a "sun porch"--which is entirely enclosed and screened to prevent the birds from going outside.
On January 31, the USDA's National Organic Program issued a policy memo clearly indicating their concurrence with the illegitimacy of using enclosed porches as a substitute for true outdoor access for organic poultry.
Organic Valley requires its family farmer-members around the country to provide a minimum of 5 square feet per bird outdoors. The co-op's management says an exception has been made for Petaluma Egg Farm because "state veterinarians and the California Department of Agriculture strongly advocate that birds do not have free-range outdoor access because of the risk of Avian Influenza transmission."
Yet numerous other certified organic egg producers throughout the state of California are legally complying with federal law by providing legitimate outdoor access to their laying hens, including a number of exemplary pasture-based producers (there have been no published reports of avian influenza outbreaks). California organic farmers are bound by the same organic standards as farmers in the rest of the country.
"Sadly, it appears that upper management at CROPP, in their zeal to capitalize on the marketplace cachet of the 'local' food movement, has compromised the values that Organic Valley was founded upon," lamented Kastel. "They used to ship eggs from the Midwest out to California--eggs that were produced by their family-scale members who, based on our research, are overwhelmingly meeting the organic standards."
In response to Cornucopia's initial complaint against Petaluma Egg Farm, CROPP/Organic Valley officials argued that a local Sonoma County, California, ordinance prohibited the birds from going outdoors. However, no such local ordinance was found to exist.
Andrew Smith, an agricultural biologist at the Sonoma County Agricultural Commissioner's office, states, "There are no ordinances that prohibit a commercial egg or other poultry producer from letting birds have access to the outdoors."
In an effort to resolve these issues prior to filing a legal complaint, Cornucopia requested, on a number of occasions, a meeting with the Board of Directors of the CROPP Cooperative, which repeatedly refused to meet.
"We had hoped, by reaching out and supplying our research to the Organic Valley leadership, prior to its public release, that they would have been motivated to institute corrective modifications in their practices," stated Will Fantle, Cornucopia Research Director. "We were operating under the assumption that their farmer-board had not been made aware of some of these problems by their management. We are disappointed they did not take us up on the opportunity."
The organic poultry industry finds itself at a crossroads as the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), the expert citizen advisory panel to the USDA Secretary, has been debating a set of proposed new regulations for poultry and other livestock that would establish housing-density standards and a clearer understanding of what the requirement for outdoor access entails.
The industry's largest operators, such as Herbruck's, as well as the industry lobby/trade group, the United Egg Producers (UEP), have been loudly voicing their opposition to requirements for outdoor space.
At its upcoming meeting, April 26-29 in Seattle, Washington, the NOSB will debate a proposed outdoor stocking rate for organically raised laying hens, currently proposed at 2 square feet per bird--viewed by many industry observers as woefully inadequate and a capitulation to pressure from industrial egg producers.
Cornucopia has been leading an effort to challenge corporate agribusinesses that would like to weaken the organic standards in their effort to legitimize "factory farm" egg production.
Meanwhile, Cornucopia argues that the current standards are "abundantly clear" in requiring outdoor access for all animals, not just a tiny percentage of the birds, and is requesting the USDA to enforce these standards.
"We urge the USDA to take quick enforcement action against these industrial-scale scofflaws that are gaming the system. By doing so, we hope to protect the livelihoods of ethical family-scale organic farmers who are being placed at a distinct competitive disadvantage by corporations that are more than willing to cut corners in the pursuit of profit," concluded Cornucopia's Kastel.
-30-
MORE:
"Ironically, it might be a better environmental choice for Organic Valley to ship eggs from the Midwest, where there is an abundance of family-scale farmers with the right climate, and plenty of land, to produce the required feed, rather than shipping truckloads of corn and soybeans, raised in the Midwest, out to confinement operations like Petaluma Egg Farm in California," added Kastel.
Some industry experts have estimated that it would take multiple loads of chicken feed, shipped from the Midwest, to equal one load of eggs.
"Although local food is almost always fresher, more nutritious and environmentally advantageous, with eggs, which naturally have a long shelf life, this might not be the case," said Kastel.
Petaluma Farms was profiled in the wildly successful bestseller, The Omnivore's Dilemma, by the New York Times contributor and University of California professor, Michael Pollan. In the book, he described Petaluma Egg Farm as an overt example of what he calls "supermarket pastoral," industrial-scale agribusiness masquerading as part of the good food movement by cloaking its products in beautiful photos and prose on their website and packaging.
In addition, Petaluma Egg Farm's owner, Steve Mahrt, outraged family farmers, consumers and animal welfare activists in California by acting as a prominent spokesperson lobbying against the passage of proposition two, a state ballot initiative that successfully banned battery cages for laying hens, a practice that is widely viewed as inhumane.
"Possibly the most egregious misstep by Organic Valley management is to describe an industrial-scale egg producer, Petaluma Egg Farm, as being a "family farmer" and member of their cooperative," said Kastel. "No wonder they referred to Mr. Mahrt and his wife as "Steve and Judy" in their public relations work, using only their first names and referring to their operation not as "Petaluma Egg Farm" but "Judy's Egg Farm."
"Any farmer that can't provide outdoor access, so their chickens can scratch and forage and pick on green grass, don't need to label their eggs as organic," added Iowa certified organic farmer Loren Yoder. "Some producers are attempting to make these porches work but they don't provide chickens the ability to be outside under the blue sky."
Kastel concluded, "What leaves me optimistic, in the case of Organic Valley, is that every time there has been a misstep by their management of this magnitude the farmers that own the cooperative have stepped in to clean up the problem. We fully expect that will occur in this case as well."
In 2008 Cornucopia discovered that Organic Valley was marketing milk from a then 7200-cow mega-dairy in desert-like conditions in Texas. As was the case with their approach in the scandal involving Petaluma Egg Farm, the cooperative's Board of Directors refused to meet with representatives of The Cornucopia Institute.
It took Organic Valley farmer-members stepping in to correct the improprieties. A co-op member, California dairyman Tony Azevedo, said at the time, "This incident should be very reassuring to our many loyal Organic Valley customers. Unlike most business we are not strictly governed by the bottom line."
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based nonprofit farm policy research group, is dedicated to the fight for economic justice for the family-scale farming community. Their Organic Integrity Project acts as a corporate and governmental watchdog assuring that no compromises to the credibility of organic farming methods and the food it produces are made in the pursuit of profit.
LATEST NEWS
Sanders, Booker, and Welch Unveil Ban on Junk Food Ads Targeting Kids
"We cannot continue to allow large corporations in the food and beverage industry to put their profits over the health and wellbeing of our children," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Apr 19, 2024
A trio of U.S. senators on Friday introduced what's being billed as first-of-its-kind legislation sponsors say will "take on the greed of the food and beverage industry and address the growing diabetes and obesity epidemics" with a federal ban on junk food ads targeting children.
The Childhood Diabetes Reduction Act—introduced by Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), and Peter Welch (D-Vt.)—would also require warning labels "on sugar-sweetened foods and beverages; foods and beverages containing non-sugar sweeteners; ultra-processed foods; and foods high in nutrients of concern, such as added sugar, saturated fat, or sodium."
"Let's be clear: The twin crises of type 2 diabetes and obesity in America are being fueled by the food and beverage industry that, for decades, has been making massive profits by enticing children to consume unhealthy products purposely designed to be overeaten," Sanders—who chairs the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee—said in a statement. "We cannot continue to allow large corporations in the food and beverage industry to put their profits over the health and wellbeing of our children."
"Nearly 30 years ago, Congress had the courage to take on the tobacco industry, whose products killed more than 400,000 Americans every year," Sanders added. "Now is the time for Congress to act with the same sense of urgency to combat these diabetes and obesity epidemics. That means banning junk food ads targeted to kids and putting strong warning labels on food and beverages with unacceptably high levels of sugar, salt, and saturated fat."
Booker said that "the future of our nation depends on a continued investment in the health and wellbeing of our children," adding that "more and more of our children are developing diabetes and obesity primarily because a handful of corporate food giants push addictive, ultra-processed foods to drive up their profits."
"By banning junk food advertising to children, implementing front-of-package warning labels, and funding research on the dangers of ultra-processed foods, we can rein in the predatory behavior of big food companies and ensure a healthier future for generations to come," he added.
As the senators noted:
Today, more than 35 million Americans are struggling with type 2 diabetes—90% of whom are overweight or obese. These crises go hand-in-hand and children are severely impacted. Today, 1 out of 5 five kids are living with obesity. A serious illness unto itself, diabetes is also a contributing factor to heart disease, stroke, amputations, blindness, and kidney failure. Unless the U.S. dramatically changes course, these numbers will continue to grow exponentially.
The impact on the economy is enormous: Last year, the total cost of diabetes exceeded $400 billion, approximately 10% of overall U.S. healthcare expenditures.
Meanwhile, the U.S. food and beverage industry spends about $14 billion annually on marketing unhealthy products, with $2 billion of that spent on advertising these products to children.
"Our food environment has become dominated by ultra-processed foods that have more in common with a cigarette than a fruit or vegetable," said Ashley Gearhardt, director of the Food and Addiction Science & Treatment Lab at the University of Michigan. "Many ultra-processed foods are hyperpalatable and trigger the core signs of addiction, like intense cravings and a loss of control over intake."
"The American public is not adequately warned about the risks associated with these products and children are a key marketing demographic for ultra-processed foods with unhealthy nutrient profiles," Gearhardt added. "The Childhood Diabetes Reduction Act is a courageous step towards promoting the physical and mental health of American children."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Complaints of Pregnant Patients Denied Emergency Care Surged After Dobbs
"MAGA abortion bans deny women lifesaving care," one critic said in response to reporting on patient stories.
Apr 19, 2024
New reporting from The Associated Press that complaints of pregnant patients turned away from emergency departments "spiked" after the reversal of Roe v. Wade sparked fresh condemnation of efforts to restrict abortion rights on Friday.
Since the right-wing U.S. Supreme Court ended nearly half a century of nationwide abortion rights with Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization in June 2022, over 20 states have enacted new restrictions on reproductive healthcare, creating a culture of confusion and fear at many medical facilities.
Early last year, the AP submitted a public records request for 2022 complaints filed under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), a federal law that requires hospitals and emergency departments that accept Medicare to provide screenings to patients who request them and prohibits refusing to treat individuals with an emergency medical condition.
"This is the reality that extreme Republicans call 'pro-life.'"
"One year after submitting the request, the federal government agreed to release only some complaints and investigative documents filed across just 19 states," the AP's Amanda Seitz reported. "The names of patients, doctors, and medical staff were redacted from the documents."
"One woman miscarried in the lobby restroom of a Texas emergency room as front desk staff refused to admit her," the journalist detailed. "Another woman learned that her fetus had no heartbeat at a Florida hospital, the day after a security guard turned her away from the facility. And in North Carolina, a woman gave birth in a car after an emergency room couldn't offer an ultrasound. The baby later died."
According to Seitz:
Emergency rooms are subject to hefty fines when they turn away patients, fail to stabilize them, or transfer them to another hospital for treatment. Violations can also put hospitals' Medicare funding at risk.
But it's unclear what fines might be imposed on more than a dozen hospitals that the Biden administration says failed to properly treat pregnant patients in 2022.
It can take years for fines to be levied in these cases. The Health and Human Services agency, which enforces the law, declined to share if the hospitals have been referred to the agency's Office of Inspector General for penalties.
Responding to the reporting on social media, journalist Jane Mayer declared, "This is barbaric."
Texas Poor People's Campaign said that women in the state "are being left to die in ER waiting rooms. We cannot let this policy violence against women continue. Please join us as we mobilize voters for the '24 election."
Going into November, abortion has been a key issue at the state and federal level. Supporters of reproductive freedom are working to advance various ballot measures while Democratic President Joe Biden's campaign has highlighted his support for abortion rights and the presumptive Republican nominee, former President Donald Trump, has bragged about his role in reversing Roe—he appointed three of the six justices behind the majority opinion.
"MAGA abortion bans deny women lifesaving care," stressed Alex Wall, senior vice president for digital advocacy at the Center for American Progress. Citing examples from Texas and Florida in the AP report, he reiterated, "MAGA Republicans did this."
Congresswoman Becca Balint (D-Vt.) said that "this is the reality that extreme Republicans call 'pro-life'—pregnant women being turned away at hospitals and emergency centers. Absolutely disgraceful. No woman should ever be denied emergency care."
Slate's Mark Joseph Stern, who covers U.S. legal battles, noted that this "devastating and timely story" from Seitz comes "just days before the Supreme Court considers whether emergency rooms can legally force patients to the brink of death before terminating a failing pregnancy."
The high court is set to hear arguments in that case Wednesday. The Biden administration is challenging Idaho's near-total ban on abortion, which "would make it a criminal offense for doctors to comply with EMTALA's requirement to provide stabilizing treatment, even where a doctor determines that abortion is the medical treatment necessary to prevent a patient from suffering severe health risks or even death," as the U.S. Department of Justice's lawsuit explains.
The Justice Department is seeking a judgment that Idaho's law is invalid under the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution and "is preempted by federal law to the extent that it conflicts with EMTALA."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Progressives Oppose Israel Funding Advanced by US House
"Congress is shamefully choosing a failed approach of fueling genocide rather than saving Palestinian and Israeli lives," said Rep. Cori Bush.
Apr 19, 2024
Progressive lawmakers on Friday dissented as the Republican-controlled U.S. House advanced legislation to provide more military funding to Israel as well as Ukraine and Taiwan, with Rep. Cori Bush condemning a committee's refusal to consider an amendment aimed at securing a permanent cease-fire in Gaza.
The legislation passed a procedural hurdle in a vote of 316-94, placing votes for the separate aid packages and a bill calling for more humanitarian assistance to Gaza on the legislative agenda for Saturday.
Bush (D-Mo.) joined progressives including Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) in opposing the legislation, with centrist Democratic Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina also voting with the left-wing faction.
The Missouri Democrat condemned the House Rules Committee's refusal to consider an amendment she submitted along with Tlaib, which called for a lasting cease-fire, a release of all hostages in Israel and Palestine, and "diplomacy to secure self-determination for both Palestinians and Israelis."
"Congress is shamefully choosing a failed approach of fueling genocide rather than saving Palestinian and Israeli lives, releasing the hostages and others arbitrarily detained, and prioritizing peace in the region," said Bush.
The funding package includes $26.4 billion for Israel, purportedly to support "its effort to defend itself against Iran and its proxies" following Iran's retaliatory drone attack on Israel this week—to which Israeli forces responded with a limited attack on Friday.
The new military aid was passed on top of more than 100 weapons transfers the Biden administration has made to Israel since October 7. According to the Council on Foreign Relations, two of the transfers were reviewed by Congress and totaled about $250 million.
"Our country spends billions of tax dollars to maintain this apartheid state and support the continued ethnic cleansing of Palestinians," said Tlaib, the only Palestinian American member of Congress, in a statement on Thursday.
Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.) said she was "encouraged" that Democrats in Congress were able to secure more humanitarian aid for Gaza, where dozens of people have starved to death as Israel has blocked nearly the vast majority of aid shipments since October, but said the provisions do not "come close to meeting the desperate needs of the people in Gaza," particularly considering the United States' suspension of funds to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).
"Americans will remember this moment," said Balint. "The United States must be firm in demanding a course correction from the Netanyahu government. Without a strong message against more offensive aid, the United States risks signaling support for an expanded offensive in Rafah, for an escalation with Iran, and for continued disregard for Palestinian life."
Omar called the funding package part of the U.S. government's "thinly veiled attempts to escalate an already very dangerous situation."
"What is needed most of all is a sober approach to de-escalation and conflict prevention," said the congresswoman. "Congress should be focused on efforts to de-escalate tensions—not inflame them."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular